![]() |
Values on the rise for pre-war?
What specific vintage cards are increasing in value?
For post-war, I feel like I've seen the 1951 bowman Mantle and 1955 topps Clemente pop within a year. The Mantle more recently, the Clemente for awhile now. For pre-war, I'm having a harder time identifying what is trending due to lower volume of sales. Certainly 1914 CJs are going up, up, up, but what else? Or is the market flat? |
Referring to the set that I collect (T206) the high end stuff always seems to go up. The popular players (Cobb, etc.), rare backs, and other set rarities remain in demand. The market for lesser players and common backs seems rather flat to me.
|
I feel the 14 CJ's have quieted down since they spiked about 6 months ago. Still have some strong prices on the less common n bigger name cards. But overall they have def cooled off from what they were doing. I know mantle and ruth stuff continues to be hot. When are they not haha. Besides that I feel stuff is at a lull right now. Nothing really going from what I can see.
|
In a lull it is. Even the 1933 Goudey Ruths seem to be somewhat flat. Some hit the market in the PWCC auction and went a little above, a little below and right on value.
Good point on the CJs flattening out about 6 months ago. Guess it was all the documentation on the 100th anniversary that riled folks up. I know it had me looking at my 1915s and wondering if I should trade some out for a cool factor 1914 (but didn't want to buy high). As tough as pre-war can be to track, the 19th century stuff is just about impossible (for me). There are so few that they constantly look up and down at the same time due to a couple sales here n there. Looking forward to seeing more action in the market once baseball season gears up. I know the pre-war stuff is year-round market for the die hards, but general baseball hype does seem to have an effect anyhow. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Let's be honest here, this is a time to be buying while things are quiet and slow. Maybe make a few decent pick ups to move later on. Only wish I knew what this years 14 CJ's going to be haha.
|
All it will take is a couple hundred million more to hit the trash can lol
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not sure about 1987 Topps, but a 1986 Topps Jerry Rice recently sold for $12K: Link
|
Quote:
(incidentally I checked the Rice link... Four bid retractions? when the card was in the 10k range? fishy?) was asking about 1987 topps baseball actually though... |
Quote:
As for T206 commons, it seems like there are cards considered commons that keep going up, first Titus, then Pelty/Horiz. and Doyle, no Nat'l sells for a lot more than commons. The Magee portrait prices are high and I've seen some odd prices recently for some cards considered easy to find like the Elberfeld NY card that someone posted here recently. I've heard for awhile that Puttman cards are tough to find and the prices seem to reflect that, but I could see that being the next card that takes off. You look on Ebay and there has only been two listed in the last six weeks(one is active and high-priced). If I had an extra, I'd probably list it on Ebay with a high price and see if anyone bites. Eventually, that high price, might not seem high. I also think people are looking for specific front/back combos that don't have many graded and paying more. Not sure how many people are going after a master set, but it sure seems like some people pay like they are. |
Maybe high-graded CJ 15s will bd this year's CJ 14s--the prices on some PSA 8s have really soared lately.
Disappointed that prices on M116s and Ramlys continue to collapse, despite being "cool" cards... Old Judges seem to keep falling.... |
The Pelty horizontal has always sold at a premium. Besides general attractiveness of the format and image it is a Jewish player and I think it is a 150-only card.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i59.tinypic.com/14scef7.jpg |
Pelted
Wow...certainly shows you how 'common' even tougher T206 cards are.
Brian |
as people have been focused on t206 oddities, the oddities in other sets have been on the rise as well.
|
Quote:
I know some people hate hoarding, but that is still pretty cool looking laid out like that. I only have two Pelty cards, one in my set and one has a split back and is missing red on front, but I was checking Ebay often once the prices started to jump, looking for someone to post with a low BIN. |
Quote:
Joe |
Yeah, well, Jerry Rice is the greatest receiver in NFL history, and that's a rookie card. Clearly it's overpriced by any of our standards, but it does make more sense than this:
http://smalltraditions.com/1986-topp...r-lot2473.aspx |
Quote:
|
That 1986 Sandberg brings up this old question...
Could certain card pops be low simply b/c no one thinks they are worth submitting? Won't the market get flooded after a sale like this w/ folks submitting theirs to try and cash in on the trend and cause the values to come crashing back down to reality? I probably donated cards like this because they were not worth the cardboard they were printed on. Could someone interested in playing the odds simply submit a couple hundred top condition value-less star cards for a few thousand and then sell 2 or 3 of those hundreds of cards for $1,000s and toss the rest in the garbage? Could it be that simple? |
Quote:
|
T206 Plank on the rise
Eddie Plank T206 prices are on the rise from recent sales in all grades. The T206 Plank has a population almost as low as the T206 Wagner. People are realizing the plank is an undervalued card as plank is an all time great hall of fame pitcher.
|
i say
no way is 118 copies even remotely close to 10% of the population. i don't even think its close to 5%.
|
Quote:
|
I see stuff like $2,400+ for a 1986 Topps Ryne Sandberg ... and it makes me wonder what is wrong with this hobby.
You're telling me that a card that can be bought in NM (or better) condition every single day on Ebay for $1 (plus what whatever for shipping) is worth and additional $2,400 because it is entombed in a plastic case saying it is a 10? Seriously? I get the four corners look better under a microscope, but you think you should pay a premium for that? You can't think of anything better to spend $2,400 on? Everyday I wonder how I can be involved in a hobby where people are willing to spend their money like that. Patrick |
Quote:
Then I can spend it on a T206 with a printing flaw instead. :rolleyes: |
Regarding 86 Topps Football - I have been watching the prices on unopened boxes, and they are up 200-300% in the last few months.
|
Quote:
Keep this shit where it belongs dammit!!!!!:D |
Quote:
:D Best regards, Eric |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
people with money buying cards is never a bad thing.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess it depends on which war we're discussing. Obviously, Pokémon is modern. Still, boxes of '86 Topps Football are nearly 30 years old. For some collectors, that goes way back to the olden days. :D I am obviously messing with you at this point. Please take my posts for what they are. A bit of levity directed towards someone who will (hopefully) get the joke. Best regards, Eric |
pre war
1 Attachment(s)
This one goes way back
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
...
|
T210s seem to be getting more and more popular
|
Quote:
|
Could I just grab 1,000 valueless star cards in perfect shape and send em off for a few grand and come out ahead on the flip?
Could the system be gamed this way? |
Quote:
Better yet: don't destroy em. Hold em. When the price goes up, flood the market and run! |
But there are many cards from the 80s where not a single specimen in a grade "1" exist. Is this not a great investment opportunity?
|
...
|
...
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM. |