![]() |
What is your favorite set of the 1960s?
Mine is obviously the 1963 Topps set. It is my birth year set. 576 very colorful cards. The backs are easy to read and offer complete stats. All the stars are here and we have Musial one last time. Koufax in his break out year, and Maris looking down in the dumps after breaking a hallowed record. The Rose rookie is the most powerful of the decade. I just don't like the four circle rookie cards. But I can live with that! Overall and incredible set and simply stunning! I love it!
|
1965. Pictures are clean and love the banner on the front. Set includes some good RCs (Morgan, Carlton, Niekro) as well as great subsets (leaders, World Series cards). I also really like the Aaron, Mantle, and Clemente cards.
|
The 1969 Topps set is my least favorite of the decade. All of the team names are the same color - yellow and there is really no thought to the design of the cards. I really don't like there are no team cards and too many hatless player photos. On the plus side, it is an easy to set to put together. No high number problems and if you have Mantle / Jackson / Ryan, there is the core value of the set.
|
Quote:
|
1969. Love the clean design and large photos. Plus lots of stars of the seventies in early cards. My favorite Clemente and killebrew cards.
|
I love the 60's sets. If I had to pick a favorite I would say 1963, very colorful and almost HD quality photos for the time. But...
1961 is beautiful with it's unique painting/photo cards and a simple clean design 1962 is a gorgeous set in mint condition 1964 isn't as popular but it's the year I really started collecting as a kid 1965 didn't used to love it but it's really a classic design 1966 same as 1965 1967 drop dead beautiful, very little to distract from the picture 1968 hmmm, not my favorite but definitely different 1969 reminds me of 1967 set but not as cutting edge |
The 1963 Mets cards. Complete set: 1965 easily.
|
The 1960 Topps set is also beautiful. Multicolored names, duel photos.. Coaches cards and first time World Series cards.. Plus Yaz's rookie...
|
Man, when you put all of those beautiful 1967's together, it is eye popping!!! Yowza!!!!
|
1967
It always pains me to agree with Bob
|
|
1967 as well, although the 60s as a whole has to be the best decade of Topps sets.
|
Quote:
|
1960s
The 60s were also the golden years for Topps insert and test sets, extending through the early 70s
|
1965 Topps is the best. 1967 is a close second. The 60's were a good decade for Topps but I can't stand 1960, 1964 or 1968 designs.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would have to say the first of the decade, the 1960 set. For such a colorful decade, the cards of the 60s are pretty bland, overall. But I like the 1960 set quite a lot.
|
I guess I was less sophisticated than you Adam, as I always found Raquel more to my liking:
http://bertc.com/subsix/stars/images/welch3g.jpg |
Quote:
|
1. 1960 - Has the look of a 50's set. Love it !
2. 1963 - this set would be #1 if the gave Rose and Stargell solo rookie cards. 3. 1964 4. 1961 The only sets of that decade I'm not a fan of are 1962 (wood grain) and 1968 (funky boders with bad paper stock). |
Quote:
To me there is too little variation between the 1965 - 69 sets but they are all pretty nice. |
1967 for sure, not even close and one of their best designs ever. 2nd place would be the 1963 set.
|
Quote:
|
Rita Hayworth
In the book, short story by King, it was the the even better Rita Haworth originally. Rachel later.
|
Quote:
|
1. 1967
2. 1960 3. 1962 4. 1965 5. 1964 I also think the 1960s Topps sets were pretty amazing. The only one I am not a huge fan of is 1968. Still not a bad set though. Scott |
My favorite set is 1960 Topps. It was the 1st I collected as a kid.
|
69, only because they were the first cards I purchased as a wee lad. Take away the sentimental attachment to the 69's, I'd go with 67.
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Quote:
|
65. Like Sean, first cards I collected. I believe it has the most hall of famers as well, due to the unusually large number of rookie cards (Morgan Carlton Perez Hunter) and last cards (Stengel Berra Spahn Fox).
|
Quote:
|
I am shocked no one likes the 68 set. I love the crazy 60's feel. Likewise, the 75 would be my fave of the 70's.
But second place would be either 65 or 67. I agree with the poster who found the 69 set dull. Just not much going on there. |
Quote:
|
I actually love the 1968 Topps set. It was one of the earliest sets I finished. I don't care to much for the 1969 Topps set. No team cards, all the team names in one color (yellow) and too many capless players.
|
1961 Topps baseball, but I can't stop at one. Must add 1962 Salada baseball coins, 1962 Post Cereal baseball, and 1960 Topps baseball.
|
60's set - 1967
Personally I like the '67 set the best and second to this set would be the '60 set. I may be different than most, but I do like all of the designs of this era (likely to the fact that Brooks Robinson is in all of them...:D).
|
Does it help or hurt you that Brooks Robinson is a very tough and pricy high number in the 1967 Topps set? Have you completed this set? I also agree that the 1960 Topps set is very awesome. Very colorful set!
|
Brooksie
Quote:
Since the advent of eBay there are plenty of the '67 Brooks cards that pop up now and then. I do have the '67 card, but will ultimately upgrade (one day...). I'm really not a set collector, so I haven't finished a set since I was a kid. Mainly collect Brooks and some O's memorabilia. Yeah...gotta love the '60 Topps as well! |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM. |