![]() |
T206 F Stamp
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/08/10/anuhydyv.jpg
Question for the experts out there. Is this the supposed F Scott Fitzgerald back stamp? It looks slightly different than examples I have seen on this forum. Thanks in advance for your input. |
I am not an expert but this does look a little off. It wouldn't surprise me if it is a modern stamp by someone looking for a little premium.
|
Thanks for your input. I ran across the listing yesterday. To be fair, the seller lists the item as graded and having a mark with no F Scott Fitzgerald reference mentioned in the description.
|
The stamp looks consistent with others I have seen. It's actually more complete than the one I have as an example on my website (link below). If the seller didn't mention F. Scott in the description then I doubt he added the stamp to mislead buyers. I would like to have that example for my own collection to be honest.
Thanks, AndyH . |
looks legit....
you might have stumbled on a gem;)....if it wasn't listed as such...:confused:.the most seen has been on epdg.....these, I predict will be forged soon, so get them when you can and get them slabbed so they are "time" stamped......
the hobby is split wether these are f. Scotty's or not....I truly believe they are....we are still waiting on the verdict.... |
Quote:
:) |
F Scott Fitzgerald had and stamped his own T206 cards?
|
Thats why i come to this site . Never know what will show up that is truly amazing .
|
ben....
you did great.....I do fear in the future these will be forged tho:(
get em now, and get em slabbed:) |
No insight on the Fitzgerald connection, but, with a microscope, you can identify stamps made from the same rubber stamp. And ones made later from a different rubber stamp. All printing plates, including rubber stamps, have identifying microscopic 'fingerprints'-- unique microscopic imperfections, marks, shapes, etc. It's a standard forensic technique to match prints from the same printing plates. It's how they proved a letter came from a specific typewriter in the old day mysteries.
Chances are you don't even need a microscope to identify a new F stamp. Just a close look. But I agree that demonstrating that an 'F' stamp has been around for a while is the simplest way to establish the 'F' stamp is one of the originals. Being able to establish that something has been around for a while (a form of provenance) is usually a good thing these days. One use I see for getting a card graded. And, as mrvister accurately says, you want to document the existence of your F stamps before a flood of forged stamps come out, not after. It can be as simple as posting a photo to photobucket this afternoon. |
can someone explain the story behind the fitzgerald stamp? ive seen it referenced on here several times, but dont know much background info on it. Thanks
|
Quote:
Quote:
A few past threads discussing the stamp, including the last link in which a collector found the stamp on an Obak: http://www.network54.com/Forum/15365...ott+Fitzgerald http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=146726 http://ww.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=169794 |
thanks much appreciated!
|
F-stamp--Real or forgery?--
I didn't win this card, didn't bid higher because of the apparently trimmed bottom:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/231511394240...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT It looks to be a perfect stamp, maybe too perfect/fresh black ink? If it's real, I suspect it was a real bargain. Did FScott have trimmed cards in his collection? I know little more about it than what I've read on this and another thread. What does one of these go for, say in untrimmed, Good condition? I'd like to get one someday. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM. |