Thoughts on these Ruth signatures?
 

I'm increasingly interested in purchasing a Ruth auto, and for my own educational purposes would greatly appreciate any insight into the authenticity of these three examples. Many thanks in advance.

I'll play. Imo, the first one is good...#2 and #3 are not.

Oh what the heck, I will play along too. From a quick glance I like one and three.

I am by no means an expert, but I agree with Jeff...I like #1 and #3

Babe in #2 looks all wrong. B is funny and the e looks labored and inconsistent.
Definitely not an expert but I wouldn't take a chance on it.

Ruth
 

Not a fan of numbers 2 and 3

Are these from the current Phillip Weiss auction?

.

. . . appears at least two of them are, per this current thread:

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=181677

I don't like the "e" in 3. At all.

Yes, I didn't want to mention it for risk of outing an auction someone here may be planning to bid on. I appreciate the feedback from everyone.