Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   A-Rod Suspended For Entire 2014 Season (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=181578)

Big Dave 01-13-2014 06:04 AM

A-Rod Suspended For Entire 2014 Season
 
Good.....should be banned.

GrayGhost 01-13-2014 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Dave (Post 1227169)
Good.....should be banned.

+1

Mr. Zipper 01-13-2014 07:15 AM

While it appears that the autographs of indivudual PED users/suspects typically go in the tank, I've wondered if a PED multi-signed might actually go for big bucks.

What do you think a Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, Clemens, A-Rod, Manny, Canseco, et. al. ball would go for?

Would anyone refuse to sign it?

mschwade 01-13-2014 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Zipper (Post 1227183)
While it appears that the autographs of indivudual PED users/suspects typically go in the tank, I've wondered if a PED multi-signed might actually go for big bucks.

What do you think a Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, Clemens, A-Rod, Manny, Canseco, et. al. ball would go for?

Would anyone refuse to sign it?

So what you're saying is start a PED-HOF collection? :D :D :D

parker1b2 01-13-2014 09:23 AM

As a Yankee fan all I can say is Good. You cheat you get what you deserve.

brooklynbaseball 01-13-2014 01:17 PM

The Yanks signed him TWICE knowing he was a user of PED'S. They deserve each other.

toyman55 01-13-2014 06:59 PM

It is sad that if it is all true he destroyed what could have been a hall of fame vote. But, after watching 60 minutes last night it appeared that they were not quite convinced that he was totally guitly

Big Dave 01-14-2014 08:43 AM

A news article on the doper with more details.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/01/14..._r=0&referrer=

johnmh71 01-14-2014 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Dave (Post 1227169)
Good.....should be banned.

+1

bat_master 01-14-2014 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Dave (Post 1227713)
A news article on the doper with more details.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/01/14..._r=0&referrer=

Reading this article sort of makes the whole Black Sox scandal of 1919/1920 seem tame in comparison. I guess the money at stake in this case is much, much different than it was 90+ years ago.

mr2686 01-17-2014 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bat_master (Post 1227744)
Reading this article sort of makes the whole Black Sox scandal of 1919/1920 seem tame in comparison. I guess the money at stake in this case is much, much different than it was 90+ years ago.

...and who knows, maybe in 90 years from now this may seem tame too?

Runscott 01-17-2014 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bat_master (Post 1227744)
Reading this article sort of makes the whole Black Sox scandal of 1919/1920 seem tame in comparison. I guess the money at stake in this case is much, much different than it was 90+ years ago.

That's the crux of the problem - taking the livelihood away from the 'Black Sox' was a detriment to others of that era doing the same. Even though pay was much lower, it was still a relatively high-paying job.

The suspensions that are given to pro baseball players for PED use are NOT an incentive not to do it. For minor leaguers, it's often the difference between making the majors or not - it's worth the risk. For Major Leaguers, the increased income until they are caught, also makes it worth it.

Not sure what it will take to stop it, but the Arod penalty is a start.

bat_master 01-17-2014 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr2686 (Post 1228883)
...and who knows, maybe in 90 years from now this may seem tame too?

I REALLY hope not. Who knows though. I guess 20 years ago I never imagined that I'd be checking email and sending text messages from the same device I also was having a phone conversation on just before playing Candy Crush. Anything is possible.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.