![]() |
Buy the card, not the grade
1 Attachment(s)
OK, a before and after shot. 1914 CJ Oldring #8 in that PSA 2.5 holder (that doesn't "hold" the card, hate those cheap oversized that allows the card to swim around) Anyway, I always thought it looked better than that - cracked out, resubmitted and this is what came back at the National. Obviously pleased, but goes back to the question of TPG consistency. Mistakes, opinions, time, etc - all factor in and I get that. 1/2 grade, 1 grade - sure, all the time - even 1 & 1/2 .. but this..?
|
Looks MUCH better in the black frame!
|
Was there warping or staining on the card? I know that in the past, PSA was much tougher on stains than SGC.
|
nice eye
winner winner!
great job on judging that card. it does look better now. don't know why PSA uses those "baggies", I know they have plastic that fits the cj's better than that!:mad: |
Nice upgrade Ed. I agree the sgc case should be its home.
|
upgrade
Looks much better and congrats! Those loose PSA holders are horrible...they remind me of one of those cheap knock-off TPG holders.
|
Staining
Staining may have played into it somewhat, although I thought that was taken into consideration and accepted as these came raw in CJ boxes (did they not?) and are pretty common. Who knows - while glad of the bump, I posted more along the lines of surprise at the amount it bumped and in question of the consistency in grading.
|
Great upgrade, congrats!
|
it's not an upgrade, it's the same card.
|
Actually...
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good on ya judging the card and not being dissuaded by the low number in the first place.. and I'm sure for getting a pretty good deal in doing so. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 PM. |