![]() |
E104-II Nadja Wagner
Pretty good gig if he gets it. He shows that PSA said it was questionable authenticity (fake) then puts it at $300 with a reserve. I hope no one falls for it. And I am one who thinks PSA does a good job overall but I wish they would put "Counterfeit" and this kind of stuff wouldn't happen (or it would happen less). I guess it's a liability issue or something. Bottom line, this is a fake card.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1910-E104-II...item3a823b2951 . |
Gotta appreciate the picture outside on some sidewalk. That's where he found it I bet.
|
Wagner
I always liked this card, but I figured I would hold out for a "Nadja" backed example. Does anyone know how many Wagner's have a Nadja back? I'm assuming less than 5?
Tony |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nadja
Quote:
I'm pretty sure they are rarer than the blank back, and are also more desirable. I know a SGC 60 Wagner with Nadja back sold a few years ago in a Mastro auction. It hasn't resurfaced since. Tony |
Quote:
http://luckeycards.com/pe1042clarkenadjaback.jpg |
Quote:
Thanks for info, I've only looked at PSA pop reports on the E104's.. And there's only 1 Wagner blank listed and no Nadja's... I know there're more in SGC since I've seen a handful listed (via AH past listings), including that SGC60 Nadja back. ADDING- that's an amazing looking Clarke btw! I always loved he spelled it with an "e" |
I saw that Wagner... yeah a bad one at that... a real E104 Nadja backs are such a pain to find... :(
Ricky Y |
3 Attachment(s)
Nadjas backed e104-1,2, and 3s are incredibly hard to find. I never had a problem paying extra if it had a nadja back because they rarely ever come up! I think these sets would be more widely traded if they were sold more often; the fact that they don't come around much makes them less popular.
Leon is pretty spot on with the 20-1 blank backed to nadja back ratio, maybe even a tad higher. Here is an example I have from each subset - Attachment 103805 Attachment 103806 Attachment 103807 |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM. |