|
Grade this T206 please; Here is the actual grade
1 Attachment(s)
If some of you guys have a little time to kill while waiting for Adrian's next post, could you please take a look at this card and tell me what grade you think it should get? I will post its actual grade tomorrow. Thanks.
Attachment 96396 |
3-3.5
Great looking card Sean! |
Without the deep crease I'd say a 3 outside a 3.5, with that deep crease I say 2.0
|
2
|
definitely nice eye appeal for a low grade card, but i'd guess technically a 1.5 - that crease on the left makes it look like the card has separated most of the way thru
(send it in another day and you may get a different grade, but thats beside the point) |
2
Creases (I see one on the right side as well) and corners keep it from being a 3. Should be a 2 all day long...
|
Solid 2.
|
2.....
|
Btw....
BTW, Adrian has posted 6 times since you started this thread and my post here...
|
It's going to depend on the grader, but I'd give it a 2.5. If the crease wasn't as strong, you'd get a 3.
|
2
|
1
|
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.5-2 depending on how the back looks.
|
1.5
|
I'm going to guess 1.48740913201530, but I guess you can round it up to a 1.5 if you want to be like that
|
Quote:
Brent's right, PSA should be able to do better than measely half-point increments. I'm in the 1.5 camp. |
2 WITHOUT PAPER LOSS ON BACK:confused:
|
Dang iPhone screen. Creases hmmm 2-2.5
|
Probably a 2. Not sure how it could be any higher with that deep crease. Could be as low as 1.5. :confused:
|
1.5 -- looks like heavy chipping on the left border, and perhaps even glue residue above the heavy crease. That level of chipping and glue could make it lower, but I think the eye appeal keeps it in 1.5 territory. Certainly no higher than a 2.0.
I also don't like the top border, but that's another story. I'm guessing you didn't get an AUT holdered. |
Would say 1.5 - 2 depending on the Back............
|
I'm sorry, but I didn't scan the back. There is no paper loss, it just has the usual staining that one expects to find on a Polar Bear.
|
2?
|
4
|
1 - 1.5
|
I would say 2
|
Bases on PSA's grading standards write up, which I had never read until now, it should be 1.5.
|
Bvg
Bvg 4.5
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My next card will come back graded 3.1415926535897932384626433832795... :eek: |
Since I did just get my Matty back from SGC in mail today I would say it is a 2 considering I got a 3. Hope you got a 2.5 though...
|
Only a matter of time...
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wrong, that grade is seen only on "Pie" Traynor cards.:D Then again your next card may be a Traynor.:eek: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
stretching a bit....
Since PSA graded it, I'll go with a 6 ;)
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
I bought this one raw and only sent it for grading years later. I expected a 1 or at best a 2. I can't believe this grade, and it seems like all of you agree. Mind you, I'm not complaining. :p
But this is why we say "buy the card, not the holder." Thank you to everyone who took the time to express an opinion. :) |
wow
Lucky you Sean! all of my graded cards seem to go the other way for me!
|
Wow, 3.5 is surprising. Good for you Sean!
|
Big surprise....
|
Quote:
I'm really starting to get annoyed at this whole 3rd party grading nonsense. I think TPG companies should just drop their grading service and just stick to card authentication. That's it for my Friday rant. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 PM. |