![]() |
What would you do? Grading question
2 Attachment(s)
First, I'll say these cards aren't for sale and hopefully won't be for a long time, so factor that into your thinking. I was thinking of getting some cards graded, just some of the better ones and thought about these four cards. They are all upside down Piedmonts, with four backs showing(scan is flipped for better viewing). Three of them should get decent grades(no creases or flaws besides corners), the Davis is a little beat up.
The thing in my mind, is that I like the display factor, putting the backs together so it looks like a partial sheet. With that being said though, I don't just sit there and put them together like that every once in awhile. I usually look at the scan if I want to do that. So unless SGC/PSA comes out with a holder big enough for four cards, and they won't move around, getting them graded ruins that display aspect. If these cards were yours and you planned out keeping them, what would you do? Grade them and look at the scan if you want to see them together? Don't grade them because it would ruin the display? Or just hold off on grading until it's time to sell? I've thought about all three choices for awhile |
Have you tried contacting SGC to see if they would be willing to make a custom sleeve that would hold all 4? They may be able to use a bigger holder like used for T3s with a custom insert. Then on the slip they can grade each card with the grade next to the name. It would be a very neat display.
|
Get 'em graded and make the connection with a scan like you have already done.
|
Quote:
|
It's a cool effect that would be impossible to replicate once graded. When displaying or sharing your cards with others, do you show them this in person or do you just show them a picture? If it's just a picture then I'd grade, but if you like to play the whole,"Bet you've never seen this before", parlor trick game, I'd just keep them raw.
|
Neat cards!
Personally, I wouldn't grade them. Also, when it does come time to sell these, the customer likely won't be someone putting together a mid-grade set that needs the cards individually, want them holdered, put them in set-order, never to put the backs together again. The customer instead will buy them due to the backs fitting together and they will want to put the backs together raw to see how well they match, etc. I don't think the grade will matter to them as much. just my preference and 0.02, good luck w/your decision! Rob :) |
Quote:
|
I have often wondered if I could get my Tinker, Evers and Chance T206's in a single graded slab. Right now they're bunched together pretty closely in a screw-down. Still looks pretty cool. Harry Steinfeldt didn't fit.
|
Quote:
That is what I was thinking Rob, if I did sell the cards, they might be worth more as a group, but also it might be better to keep them as a group. I meant to mention this above, I have seen only three others like this and there might be one more. Someone told me they knew of another back when I only knew of two, but didn't know who the player was, so the third one I know now might be that one. Anyway, it just means this is something that may never be replicated, so it is best to keep them together. |
Quote:
|
Bvg
If interested, I believe we at BVG could do this (put them all in a single slab with seals in between the cards to prevent movement).
|
I wouldn't grade them. I might make high res copies and make a framed display.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That might be something more people are interested in as well. I bet someone with all four of the Cobbs would like something like that, or as someone else said, the Cubs infield |
Quote:
|
If you've got a screwdown big enough for all four cutting a gasket like they use in the slabs is pretty easy. And most art stores sell acid free matboard in a few colors. Something close to Piedmont blue might be nice for these.
I think I have some light green and black and maybe one other color around and could put something together after the weekend. Steve B |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM. |