Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   What NY Yankee should be in the HOF? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=165697)

quinnsryche 03-20-2013 08:06 PM

What NY Yankee should be in the HOF?
 
I know there are alot already, but what Yankee should be in the Hall of Fame that isn't? Leave out Jeter, Mariano, Randy Johnson and Joe Torre as they will all be in for sure. Provide whatever stats or history to plead your case if you like. I would like to see Bob Meusel and Urban Shocker in.

jthorst75 03-20-2013 08:17 PM

Easy, Thurman Munson. No stats/history needed.

chris6net 03-20-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jthorst75 (Post 1105977)
Easy, Thurman Munson. No stats/history needed.

As someone who saw Munson play during his whole career I don,t know how you can say Easy for him to be a HOFer. He only had about 5 really good years and falls short of being a Hofer

Peter_Spaeth 03-20-2013 08:21 PM

Bob Meusel played 11 years batted .309 with 1600 plus hits. Statistically on baseball reference he is rated the 82nd best rightfielder of all time. Why would you like to see him in.

Kenny Cole 03-20-2013 08:25 PM

I would be more inclined to say Urban Shocker than Munson or Meusel, but I think that the Yankees are already vastly overrepresented.

Al C.risafulli 03-20-2013 08:36 PM

Last I checked, there were 13 third basemen in the Hall of Fame, and Graig Nettles was a better player than several of them. Nettles played in an era when offensive stats were depressed in general, and he was one of the game's better offensive players. His defense was magnificent, and if his career hadn't overlapped Brooks Robinson's, he would have won far more than one Gold Glove.

Ultimately he gets a raw deal because his career doesn't include the kind of cheap stats that most HOF voters look for (high batting average, number of awards, etc), but statistically, he's one of the best players to ever play his position.

-Al

Peter_Spaeth 03-20-2013 08:37 PM

I would not vote for Shocker, but (for once) I agree with Kenny that he is the most qualified of the three. Munson was already in decline in terms of power when he died and I don't think his career numbers, even if he hung on for a few more years, would have been worthy of the HOF. Plus, you just can't credit him for what he might have done. Accordingly, he never received more than 15 percent of the vote.

PS I think we romanticize him because he was a Yankee, had a tough personality, and died prematurely. But he ended up with just over 100 HR and 1500 hits. That just doesn't get you into the Hall.

Jlighter 03-20-2013 08:40 PM

Urban Shocker should get in for his name alone.:)

I think Mattingly could be considered, not winning a championship really hurts him.

Batter67up 03-20-2013 08:42 PM

Meusel, Maris, and Munson are all good choices.

Jlighter 03-20-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1105990)
I would not vote for Shocker, but (for once) I agree with Kenny that he is the most qualified of the three. Munson was already in decline in terms of power when he died and I don't think his career numbers, even if he hung on for a few more years, would have been worthy of the HOF. Plus, you just can't credit him for what he might have done. Accordingly, he never received more than 15 percent of the vote.

PS I think we romanticize him because he was a Yankee, had a tough personality, and died prematurely. But he ended up with just over 100 HR and 1500 hits. That just doesn't get you into the Hall.

Valid points. His Postseason numbers are outstanding though.

Peter_Spaeth 03-20-2013 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al C.risafulli (Post 1105988)
Last I checked, there were 13 third basemen in the Hall of Fame, and Graig Nettles was a better player than several of them. Nettles played in an era when offensive stats were depressed in general, and he was one of the game's better offensive players. His defense was magnificent, and if his career hadn't overlapped Brooks Robinson's, he would have won far more than one Gold Glove.

Ultimately he gets a raw deal because his career doesn't include the kind of cheap stats that most HOF voters look for (high batting average, number of awards, etc), but statistically, he's one of the best players to ever play his position.

-Al

Nettles should get in on the basis of fighting Reggie Jackson at the team's victory party.

triwak 03-20-2013 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jlighter (Post 1105992)
I think Mattingly could be considered, not winning a championship really hurts him.

I kind of agree about Mattingly. Borderline. Appears the writers won't do it, but someday the Vet's committee might.

Iron Horse 03-20-2013 09:00 PM

I think
 
Donnie baseball, Mr. Mattingly belongs in the Hall. He could do it all and for a span of 5-6 years he was amongst the best hitters in either league. A class act, great hitter, and lets not forget his glove work at first. If it wasn't for his back who knows...
I will put a vote in for Nettles as well.

Al C.risafulli 03-20-2013 09:01 PM

Quote:

Nettles should get in on the basis of fighting Reggie Jackson at the team's victory party.
That was THE BEST.

BTW, compare Mattingly's career numbers with Kirby Puckett's.

-Al

T206Fan 03-20-2013 09:02 PM

Can Elston Howard get a little love for the hall?

12 time allstar
2 gold gloves
1 mvp
4 World series titles

Peter_Spaeth 03-20-2013 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al C.risafulli (Post 1106005)
That was THE BEST.

BTW, compare Mattingly's career numbers with Kirby Puckett's.

-Al

Mattingly started younger and had a second half of his career where he was a shadow of his former self, Puckett was cut down in his prime, I think that's the difference even though the stats are pretty similar.

packs 03-20-2013 09:14 PM

I think Mattingly is a HOFer too. I feel like a real HOFer was the best player in the game at some point in their career. There are plenty of HOFers who never were. But Mattingly was that player. That makes him a HOFer in my opinion even if he didn't hit the milestone numbers. For example, Puckett and Sandberg were never the best player in the league but they both got in.

I don't think saying Mattingly was a shadow of his former self is true. His 1992 and 1993 seasons were decent years and he was playing really well in 1994 before the strike. The guy was still the best first baseman in the league and he hit 417 his only time around October.

I also think Carl Mays is a HOFer but I'm not sure if he's really considered a Yankee. Although he did have his best seasons with the Yankees.

Of the recently retired Yankees I think Bernie Williams and Jorge Posada are HOFers too. Ichiro wears 51 because of Bernie. That tells you something.

Jlighter 03-20-2013 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Fan (Post 1106006)
Can Elston Howard get a little love for the hall?

12 time allstar
2 gold gloves
1 mvp
4 World series titles

Pretty sure it's 6 World Series.

His stats really don't help, but the historical context of being the first black Yankee gives him a big bump.

Nashvol 03-20-2013 09:25 PM

George Steinbrenner

chris6net 03-20-2013 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nashvol (Post 1106022)
George Steinbrenner

Is a criminal!

Kenny Cole 03-20-2013 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris6net (Post 1106024)
Is a criminal!

Yes he was. :)

MVSNYC 03-20-2013 09:39 PM

Sorry, but Randy Johnson and "Yankee" in the same sentence just never sounded right to me.

kmac32 03-20-2013 09:44 PM

Carl Mays

t206blogcom 03-20-2013 09:46 PM

My vote is for Roger Maris.

E93 03-20-2013 09:49 PM

Let's have a Yankee moratorium for 25 years.
JimB

CW 03-20-2013 09:56 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al C.risafulli (Post 1105988)
Last I checked, there were 13 third basemen in the Hall of Fame, and Graig Nettles was a better player than several of them. Nettles played in an era when offensive stats were depressed in general, and he was one of the game's better offensive players. His defense was magnificent, and if his career hadn't overlapped Brooks Robinson's, he would have won far more than one Gold Glove.

Ultimately he gets a raw deal because his career doesn't include the kind of cheap stats that most HOF voters look for (high batting average, number of awards, etc), but statistically, he's one of the best players to ever play his position.

-Al

He was the man when it came to robbing hitters of shots like this one....

oldjudge 03-20-2013 10:04 PM

Steinbrenner, whether you like him or not, deserves to be in the HOF. As a Yankee fan I appreciate what he did for the team. His sons, on the other hand, are a joke.

mets41 03-20-2013 10:38 PM

if steinbrenner ever makes it to the hof, I'll quit baseball. and who'd ever want to root for the yankees (only the fillies are lower than the yankees on my rooting list).

Ronnie73 03-20-2013 10:42 PM

My votes are for Don Mattingly and Paul O'Neill. I enjoyed watching them both at bat and on the field.

cardaholic 03-20-2013 10:57 PM

I'd vote for
 
Tommy John.

Runscott 03-20-2013 11:31 PM

I like Mattingly.

I also like Maris, realizing that he doesn't fit the HOF's 'career' requirements for number of HOF-caliber years, but I don't think Koufax did either, at least not any more than Mattingly did.

Mark 03-21-2013 12:15 AM

Billy Martin had a pretty impressive career, winning in Minnesota, Detroit, New York, and Oakland. The hall is OK without any of the other names I've read about here.

drc 03-21-2013 12:50 AM

If Mattingly coaches well.

For the record, I am the opposite of a Yankees fan. Though agree they've had a multitude of fine and admirable players.

deadballfreaK 03-21-2013 03:29 AM

I used to live half a mile from Don Mattingly's walled in mansion. Great player, nice guy, local star, but HOF? I don't think so, but a good managerial career and he will be there. I don't see any slighted Yankees. They already have enough advantages getting in.

deadballfreaK 03-21-2013 03:44 AM

BTW, I can't quote this as gospel, but I know a guy who was in Donny Ballgame's class in HS and he says Don was plagued by a couple of stupid bullies, but to his credit he didn't let it stop him.

deadballfreaK 03-21-2013 03:55 AM

Upon further review Nettles has a case, but he should have retired about three years earlier. Seems to be a bias against 3B. Santo finally made it after they waited for him to die. Ken Boyer should be in. Nettles was a defensive whiz and had some pop at the plate.

Buythatcard 03-21-2013 04:13 AM

Roger Maris 61 Home Runs - No steroids!

AMBST95 03-21-2013 04:55 AM

I don't think there is a Yankee not in the HOF that should be. The players mentioned above all had a few good years but over their careers struggled. In addition, if you put those same players on the Royals, they never garner the attention that you're giving to them now.

HexsHeroes 03-21-2013 05:52 AM

Too many already . . .
 
.

Not intended as a slam against the Yankees, as it actually is intended for all teams with an above average percentage of the HOF population.

One of my pet peeves is that that some player performances (stats) have been influenced by playing with teams stocked with good/great players. While true the individual ballplayer had to perform, or be gone, having talented ballplayers hitting before and after you does influence the opportunities an opposing pitcher presents to you as a hitter. The opportunities presented defensively are possibly influenced by having quality pitching, and quality pitching likely influenced by having qualify defenders. The 1927 NY Yankees were an outstanding team. But I have to believe that if you had removed the two best hitters and one best pitcher from that team, while they would still have been a very good team, fewer of the remaining very good players would have made it into the HOF. Just my opinion. That is why I have a softspot for outstanding ballplayers who played for less than brilliant teams over a period of years. I feel they may have had less opportunities or ideal situations inwhich to shine, but they shone never the less with what was given them.

Personally, I feel that it is not enough to say that a player was among the best in the league, year in and year out. If that were the case, Jack Morris (among others), would have been in the HOF years ago. For me, if the player evaluated cannot be considered among the top 50% already in the HOF, then it is a no for HOF induction. I realize this completely dismisses the characteristics of the game during the particular era a ballplayer played in, and therefore is a particularly harsh measure, but I believe the HOF is for the greats of the game; not for the above average but not necessarily great. If a ballplayer cannot be considered among the best ever, then HOF is not for him.

kcohen 03-21-2013 06:42 AM

Allie Reynolds
 
The top of the list IMO should be Allie Reynolds with an 8 year run of brilliance in a Yankee uniform. .630 career winning percentage, pitched in 6 WS with 7-2 record and 4 saves.

Can't understand why he isn't in.

npa589 03-21-2013 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hexsheroes (Post 1106098)
.

Not intended as a slam against the yankees, as it actually is intended for all teams with an above average percentage of the hof population.

One of my pet peeves is that that some player performances (stats) have been influenced by playing with teams stocked with good/great players. While true the individual ballplayer had to perform, or be gone, having talented ballplayers hitting before and after you does influence the opportunities an opposing pitcher presents to you as a hitter. The opportunities presented defensively are possibly influenced by having quality pitching, and quality pitching likely influenced by having qualify defenders. The 1927 ny yankees were an outstanding team. But i have to believe that if you had removed the two best hitters and one best pitcher from that team, while they would still have been a very good team, fewer of the remaining very good players would have made it into the hof. Just my opinion. That is why i have a softspot for outstanding ballplayers who played for less than brilliant teams over a period of years. I feel they may have had less opportunities or ideal situations inwhich to shine, but they shone never the less with what was given them.


+1

I thought about offering an optional way of looking at this, and I guess I am now... saying I think a better question to ask is which Yankee HOF'ers should NOT be in the hall of fame? Let's say if the same players played with the Cubs for example, or the Expos...

For example...had Joe Gordon played for someone else, I doubt he ever gets in. He got a maximum of 28.5% from the BBWAA during his eligibility pre- veterans committee.

.

bigtrain 03-21-2013 07:36 AM

I was a big fan of Mattingly and Munson. Both played like HoFers in their prime years but didn't have enough of them or the longevity to get my vote. It kind of irks me because I don't think that Fisk was a pimple on Munson's rear but that's an argument for another day. If Nettles hit .268 instead of .248 he's a slam dunk. Terrific fielder, 390 homers. I would vote for Allie Reynolds, 2 no-hitters in one season plus .630 winning percentage but he played for the great Yankee teams of the fifties so his wins are somewhat inflated. His pre-Yankee record with the Indians was not much.

dabigyankeeman 03-21-2013 08:12 AM

Nettles. His glove was almost the equal to Brooks. He could hit home runs. The guy was great.

jhs5120 03-21-2013 08:37 AM

In order of merit

1. George Steinbrenner - Like him or hate him, he changed the game and created a dynasty.
2. Craig Nettles
3. Thurman Munson
4. Roger Maris
5. Elston Howard
6. Don Mattingly
7. Tommy John
8. Billy Martin

JimStinson 03-21-2013 01:19 PM

JimStinson
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark (Post 1106075)
Billy Martin had a pretty impressive career, winning in Minnesota, Detroit, New York, and Oakland. The hall is OK without any of the other names I've read about here.

+1 , BILLY MARTIN ...best manager day in day out I ever saw. Made winning teams out of losing teams everywhere he went ! Not just NYC, Also should be in the Boxing Hall of Fame :)
____________________
jim@stinsonsports.com

packs 03-21-2013 01:23 PM

Good players are good players. I don't buy the thinking that some players are only in the HOF because they played for the Yankees. You'd have to hold being on a good team against every HOFer if you're going to hold it against a Yankee.

Peter_Spaeth 03-21-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1106276)
Good players are good players. I don't buy the thinking that some players are only in the HOF because they played for the Yankees. You'd have to hold being on a good team against every HOFer if you're going to hold it against a Yankee.

I think the Yankee factor got Joe Gordon in. Does he really get in with the same puny stats playing for the Browns?

packs 03-21-2013 01:53 PM

Yes. He missed prime years due to the war and according to Baseball Reference he is the 16th best second baseman to ever play the game. He got elected over 30 years after his death. It's not like it was a Frankie Frisch situation.

tcdyess 03-21-2013 01:54 PM

All of them :D

glchen 03-21-2013 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1106280)
I think the Yankee factor got Joe Gordon in. Does he really get in with the same puny stats playing for the Browns?

I still don't know how Joe Gordon won the AL MVP in 1942 over Ted Williams even though Williams won the Triple Crown, and basically led the league in practically all offensive categories that year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:56 AM.