Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1916 Zeenut Horstman (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=161778)

RCMcKenzie 01-19-2013 12:57 AM

1916 Zeenut Horstman
 
What is the deal with this Horstman card. It looks like a 1916 with the blue background , but it states 1915 on the front. I was the underbidder because I'm trying to collect the 1916's, but they never come up for sale. Do all 1916 format Horstman's state 1915 on the front? Any help is appreciated...


www.ebay.com/itm/221175126571

Jacklitsch 01-19-2013 08:43 AM

I was an underbidder as well. Can't explain the discrepancy but it is a 1916. Never noticed it before. Maybe Andrew can chime in.

rhettyeakley 01-19-2013 10:02 AM

The card is a 1916. All Horstman's have the date incorrect on front as "1915"...
http://www.starsofthediamond.com/16zeehorstman.JPG

In addition, the Larsen and Ryan are also mistakes as they have "191" and "1915" as the dates, respectively.

-Rhett

Jaybird 01-19-2013 11:33 AM

Here's mine as well...

http://i1023.photobucket.com/albums/...ps80a4d85f.png

AndrewJerome 01-19-2013 12:50 PM

As Rhett indicated, all 1916 Horstman cards were printed with "1915" on the front. Anyone have ideas why this mistake was made on every known card? As far as mistakes go, it is a strange mistake to end up in the final print run. Mark might have some insight on this. Much (most?) of the Zeenut printing process remains a mystery.

Andrew

RCMcKenzie 01-20-2013 11:21 AM

Thanks for the information on the 1916 series.

oaks1912 01-20-2013 12:34 PM

Simply a typesetting error
 
Zeenuts are a fascinating and fun series to collect, but you learn along the way to expect numerous anomalies. There are several typesetting errors, players names are misspelled or completely misidentified, and team attribution errors. Very few of the errors were corrected, at least in the same year (Eddie Matteson / Matterson in 1920 is an example of a correction). This is a series that you can spend a long time, in my case going on 42 years, and still not fully understand the complexities of the set. Is it possible that the Horstman error was corrected...Absolutely. It just has not been discovered by modern collectors...yet:)

RCMcKenzie 01-20-2013 12:48 PM

Thanks. So, now I know that if I see a 1916 Horstman with 1916 on the front, I should be prepared to bid accordingly. BTW I just realized that I was the 3rd underbidder, not the underbidder, on the ebay lot.

Jacklitsch 01-20-2013 02:42 PM

1911 Driscoll originally issed as Discoll and subsequently corrected.


http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g5...l-Driscoll.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.