![]() |
E92 question
Hi. This is probably a stupid ? but when you are collection an E92 set how do you do it. There's Nadja, Dockman, Crofts candy and cocoa. Do you mix them all together or do the backs need to stay seperate. Is it one set or 4 different ones? These colors are freaking awesome. Also the prices seem to be all over the place. What are the prices for common raw good, vg. Thanks for any answers and I apologize for my ignorance.:)
|
Monster guys mix backs, generally
|
I don't think i asked the ? right. Does each back have it's own set or where the companies in it together like t206.
|
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Each company had it's own set but, as Steve said, most old time collectors collect E92 by fronts only. Most newer collectors, myself included, collect the backs as (different) subsets of E92. Last time I went over to see my friend John Esch's collection he had all of his E92 in a binder together, with no recollection of the back types. He's more of an old school collector (and one of my favorite guys in the hobby). Good question.... |
Thanks Leon. Is one back more valuable than another
|
Also I believe that the "set" size varies by back type. Going from memory here I believe that the Croft's & Allen/Croft's Candy have 40 players, Dockman maybe 50 and Nadja more than that.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hey Doug,
Personally, I would consider each a separate set but would not discount anyone from saying they have a complete set with a mixture of backs. Recently I've been looking into the practicality of doing a Nadja set. What I've found is that there are a few cards that are extremely difficult with likely only a handful of examples. In addition, there are a few cards that have not even been confirmed. Therefore, the Nadja set may not be 62 cards, but does have the St. Louis players not found with the other backs. I can't speak for the others backs. Dj |
Again from memory, pretty sure Cobb is in all of the sets but Dockman. Are there other HOFers that are in some but not all f the E92 designated sets?
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s...r/E92Cobby.jpg |
No Evers in Dockman either, but is in the others. The Nadja is extremely difficult.
|
Lajoie is found with all of the brands.
http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...roft-candy.jpg http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...roft-cocoa.jpg http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...ie-dockman.jpg http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...joie-nadja.jpg http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...blank-back.jpg |
Very nice Rob.
|
Thanks. Sure wish he had a better pose.
|
Nice Lajoie run..
I just realized that the artwork for this Lajoie appears to be by the same artist that created the t206 Del Howard and similar cards with the orange sky and blue grandstands in the background.
Also, I did not know that collectors collected these fronts without regard to the back. If they mixed the backs, wouldn't they have e101 e102 and e105's mixed in with their collection? |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
John Esch collection
My memory is not the greatest, and sometimes I get names and people mixed up, but I'm almost sure I sold a card to John Esch on ebay 12-13 years ago.
I was just back to the hobby because of ebay and I was buying and selling cards on there. I didn't really have many cards at the time. At the time, they didn't have paypal and you had to contact the buyer and ask them to send you a check. He quickly sent a check along with a 4-5 page typed wantlist of cards not only did I not have, but had never heard of. I remember thinking at the time..."This must be 'America's toughest wantlist...'" |
Quote:
|
I remember thinking at the time..."This must be 'America's toughest wantlist...'"
You mean, there's two of those? :D |
Quote:
As mentioned by others the Dockman set has no Cobb or Evers. It also has no Eddie Collins, no Bender striped hat, no Bresnahan and no Bobby Wallace (these are just the HOF players). There is a very good comparison of the E92 sets on Peter Calderon's website, here: http://www.caramel-cards.com/e92.html Cheers, Blair |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 PM. |