Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Topps Willie Mays Cards Poll (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=154313)

timelord 07-23-2012 06:03 PM

Topps Willie Mays Cards Poll
 
Greetings everyone. I was wondering what the consesus is for Willie Mays's scarcest Topps card? My vote is for his 1952 Topps. This is just for regular Topps issue and not regional issues. Look forward to some replies.
Thanks,
Richard

HRBAKER 07-23-2012 06:04 PM

regular issue - 1953

Bosox Blair 07-23-2012 06:48 PM

timelord, you are in the wrong timezone...this forum is for Pre-WWII...try the '50s to 1979 area...

Cheers,
Blair

HRBAKER 07-23-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bosox Blair (Post 1017529)
timelord, you are in the wrong timezone...this forum is for Pre-WWII...try the '50s to 1979 area...

Cheers,
Blair

Unlikely, he is the timelord!

Leon 07-23-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HRBAKER (Post 1017506)
regular issue - 1953

Since he said "scarcest" I will have to agree with the 1952. There are more collectors that want that card than his 1953, and by enough to make it scarcer, imo. Now, had he said..."what is the rarest" then I might go with the 1953.

Volod 07-24-2012 04:43 AM

Hobby Semantics
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1017564)
Since he said "scarcest" I will have to agree with the 1952. There are more collectors that want that card than his 1953, and by enough to make it scarcer, imo. Now, had he said..."what is the rarest" then I might go with the 1953.

Is there an official hobby definition of the descriptors, "scarce" versus "rare?" Don't know that I've ever actually seen one. The concept of a card viewed as "scarce" when it is more desireable than another, even though there are more examples in existence, while a card is considered "rare" simply because fewer collectors want it, despite it being more plentiful than another, seems like an arbitrary distinction when the two adjectives actually have the same meaning.;)

Sorry, please ignore, didn't mean to hijack the thread.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:02 AM.