Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T206: Would you rather? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=152278)

sycks22 06-09-2012 07:03 PM

T206: Would you rather?
 
Would you rather have a high grade T206 HOFer (Matty / Johnson / Cobb) Not a Wagner / Plank, etc. or would you rather have a low grade common with a tough back (uzit / drum / broadleaf) etc.

SetBuilder 06-09-2012 07:10 PM

Backs are overrated.

ullmandds 06-09-2012 07:17 PM

Fight!

Abravefan11 06-09-2012 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SetBuilder (Post 1002139)
Backs are overrated.

:eek:

GregMitch34 06-09-2012 07:31 PM

I go for neither -- beauty of the card (including image, color and centering) most important. Could be, say, Lajoie with bat--or Bob Bescher portrait.

BCauley 06-09-2012 07:32 PM

While I appreciate the high grade stuff, I like my vintage to look vintage (prefer good to very good) so I'll take the rare back for the variety of it.

g_vezina_c55 06-09-2012 07:54 PM

Hof

I am not a é back collector but more information read on this board and more information am interested into back.

Mdoe 06-09-2012 08:31 PM

To each his own, but I vote for rare back just because they are much more difficult to obtain. It's all about the chase...

FrankWakefield 06-09-2012 09:30 PM

Kinda depends on the collector... more jazzed about high grade, or more jazzed about tough backs. And a factor would be whether the collector already has the tough backs or good HOFer cards.

steve B 06-09-2012 09:40 PM

Either would be fine. I have some tough backs, but I'd probably go for a drum or Uzit before a high grade HOFer. Bl 460 too, but not 350.

Steve B

vintagetoppsguy 06-09-2012 10:21 PM

Higher grade HOFer. I collect pictures of baseball men, not tobacco advertisement.

WillowGrove 06-09-2012 10:26 PM

Less filling!!

3-2-count 06-09-2012 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1002201)
Higher grade HOFer. I collect pictures of baseball men, not tobacco advertisement.

I couldn't have said it any better. Hall of Famer for me.

freakhappy 06-10-2012 01:12 AM

opinion
 
Although I love me some rare backs, the proof is in the pudding and numbers don't lie...A beautiful HOF over an obscure back any day of the week. I agree with David's comment.

mrvster 06-10-2012 04:17 AM

Backs
 
:DHands down..........tuf back no question

wonkaticket 06-10-2012 06:15 AM

High grade player.

Leon 06-10-2012 07:08 AM

back
 
I am a back collector. Fronts are cool too and when you have a top tier HOF'er with a tough back it's all the better. But I would pick a tough back first.

Pat R 06-10-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SetBuilder (Post 1002139)
Backs are overrated.

SGC and PSA pop reports Matty,Wajo,Young,Cobb Total cards graded 12,651
BL, Drum and uzit backs Total 20!!!!!

AgonyandIvy 06-10-2012 02:58 PM

Would rather have high grade HOFers
 
I would much rather have the high grade card. But I collect Baseball PLAYER cards, not cigarette BRAND advertisements.

But that's just me and my preference.

camlov2 06-10-2012 04:58 PM

I selected High grade star with a common back. In truth I would rather have a mid/lower grade star card and be able to pick up a few additional commons in the same condition.

Northviewcats 06-10-2012 06:40 PM

Another vote for the higher grade HOFers
 
High grade superstar over a rare back. Adding just about anything from the June Goodwin auction would make my year. Won't happen but I can dream :(

Best regards,

Joe

teetwoohsix 06-10-2012 10:36 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I'd be happy with either, but I chose low grade common with tough back. Low grade meaning VG'ish.......not tore up "poor".....

I can only speak for myself but it's not just "the back", it's the combination of the player on the front along with the tobacco add on the back together- some combinations are scarce, even if the tobacco add on the back isn't one of the toughest backs (like this Bresnahan portrait with EPDG back):

Vegas-guy 06-10-2012 10:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I voted for high grade HOFs as well but I'm happy to have one mid grade with a "rare" back..:D

David R 06-11-2012 01:03 AM

Why choose?
 
2 Attachment(s)
Do both.

martyogelvie 06-11-2012 07:14 AM

I am in the 'backs are over rated' camp.
give me a high grade HOFer anyday...

esd10 06-11-2012 01:05 PM

rare backs are great and all but for me a nice t206 matty trumps a tougher back any day of the week.

phikappapsi 06-11-2012 01:11 PM

I won't say backs are overrated, anyone can collect whatever they chose... For myself however; I am a fan of the sport first and foremost... Cycle, drum, and Carolina brights had very little affect on the game of baseball, Cobb, Young, Johnson and the likes are known even today 100 years later by every little leaguer in the country.

For me, I'll take the guys that sculpted the actual game, not the tobacco companies. That said, I love the extra depth of knowledge and sophistication the rare backs add to the set, and it's ambiance.

SushiX37 06-11-2012 02:23 PM

I see the appeal in collecting rare backs. However for my collection, I'll take an affordable mid grade over either.

Rich

eb548 06-11-2012 02:54 PM

Agree with David R and Leon..

Why not have both? Best of both words in my opinion! Nothing better than a rare back hall of famer

SetBuilder 06-11-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pat R (Post 1002250)
SGC and PSA pop reports Matty,Wajo,Young,Cobb Total cards graded 12,651
BL, Drum and uzit backs Total 20!!!!!

The way I see it, the more money I spend on an Uzit of a common player, the less I have to spend on a Cobb or a Wagner. Those are the cards I really want to own.

When you show off your collection, it's more impressive to have a HOF card everyone recognizes, than to show the reverse of a card with an Uzit advertisement no one recognizes but the most hardcore of collectors.

yanksfan09 06-11-2012 08:12 PM

Give me a low-mid grade HOFer any day of the week.....you weird back collectors!;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.