Fake?
 

Saw this on ebay. The Billy Herman and Hack Wilson aren't awful but the rest do not look right. Even before disecting the autographs something seems odd about the ball besides the price.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1931-Chicago...item1e67c9264f

I was going to say the pen pressure was the same for all when I read the description and it said they were "enhanced (traced)" so that explains that.

he has a good rep, but the Hornsby looks bad. Ive never seen one like that. Cuyler not bad. Rest Im not too familiar with.

The ball is authentic and is simply traced over (as stated).

But Scott (Gray Ghost) is correct... SC Gaynor probably should have mentioned that the Hornsby is secretarial. It is one of the key signatures on the Ball, so it definitely should be disclosed.

NM - double post

.