![]() |
SGC and Back Damage?
Greetings all. I have a card from the E135 Collins-McCarthy set with some slight back damage. It has just a few spots but does affect some of the text on back. What grade do you think it would get from SGC? Just curious as this is a key card from the set. Look forward to some comments.
|
Will grade either 10 or 20 at the most would be my guess without seeing a scan of the card.
|
I agree with Phil, 20 max, probably a 10.
|
SGC and Back Damage?
Thanks guys. That is what I thought. Real shame because this is a key to the set. The front is very nice but I know they reduce the grade significantly for BD.
:( |
I've seen some SGC-30 (2)'s with modest back damage recently -- before this, I would have agreed 100% with the commentary above. This one is on eBAY now.
http://joesvintagesportscards.com/Me...279570-255.jpg http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-1911-T206-E...item1c1d251da4 |
Agree with others here... if the back has extremely minor paper loss, it has an outside chance at a 30. Otherwise 10 or 20 depending on severity.
|
My latest submission came back with a blank backed card which looked like a 60 from the front but minor back damage and it received a 10 so I am guessing a 10 for your card. At least SGC is consistent and you know going in that your card will get thrashed for minor back damage, no surprises.
|
Depends on the size and placement. Also I think they take in the reason for the damage and how the rest of the card looks.
Grades can be anywhere between a 10-40. That being said an SGC 10 with damage like that will sell for a huge price premium over what a "normal" 10 will. I would call the Hornsby the 3rd key with the Ruth and Jackson being bigger even though it is the Hornsby RC :-D James G |
SGC and Back Damage?
Maybe I will scan the back and post it here. You guys can take a look and grade it yourselves. Then you can mail me a net54baseball numerical certification. Sound good?
|
I guess it all depends on the severity. Here is a 1.5 I just sold...
http://img2.sellersourcebook.com/use...1308792346.jpg Front looked fabulous! They really hammer the back. |
SGC and Back Damage? E135 Hornsby
I am wondering if anyone on the board here has an E135 Rogers Hornsby with back damage and had it graded? Would like to see what grade it received.
I will post my back this evening. |
Back of card added
Greetings, I added the photo of the back of the card.
|
After looking at the back scan, it is definitely not a 10. It could come back either with a 20 or a 30. If you can find some similar cards in a 30 holder, you can submit those as exemplars. That's what I'd do - in order to try to support the case for a 30. It may end up being a 20 though.
|
I agree with James G. 100% that an example with back damage but excellent eye appeal will absolutely crush a well-worn, creased version of the same card in the same technical grade. We've run a variation of that thread before.
Best of luck in getting it graded! Larry |
PSA is less harsh on back damage if you are purely looking to maximize the grade....
|
I always thought it would be helpful if slabbed cards had 2 grades, one for the front and one for the back. Some collectors (including me) don't care about the back as long as the front is nice. As someone said, I'd take a "P" or "10" graded card with decent corners and no creases, but with paper loss or marks on the back rather than a mangled card with little eye appeal. Doesn't seem fair that both are equally considered Poor.
|
Quote:
I'll agree. As for myself the backs just don't concern me unless everythinbg has been removed, marked over, etc.. I don't display the card backs :D |
Back damage
Quote:
|
Quote:
The more I look at it, the more I think it'll get a 20. Still a great card! I love cards with great eye appeal and a small flaw that knocks the technical grade down... especially if the flaw is on the back. If sold, I'd bet this one would bring a nice premium over a standard 20. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM. |