![]() |
Stars in Your Sets...
Are the Stars HOFers Key Cards RCs, etc in better, equal, or worse condition than the rest of the commons. Thanks for sharing.
|
A number of years ago I put together a 1955 Topps set. For the most part the stars were in better condition because I knew I would focus on these more in the future as well as the fact that I purchased many lots of commons and was just trying to complete the set.
The key stars (to me at least) were the ones I focused on condition. Clemente and Koufax rookies, Jackie Robinson and Ted Williams to be precise. This was my first venture into vintage cards and had never owned any cards of these (my favorites) players before this so I didn't just want any old worn out used card. I wanted the cards I dreamed of owning in my youth to look like the ones in my dreams. Drew |
I agree.I try to get the key cards in the best condition possible.It may take awhile, but to me it is worth the wait.
|
key cards
I also think ...try to get the key cards/ high value cards..as nice as possible.
Ive learned 1st hand how bad it hurts when trying to sell a vintage set and the Mays and Mantle are F-P. |
I try to pick a condition, say PSA 7, complete the set then upgrade key cards when possible
|
Working on a few sets...
for my Diamond Stars, I've been focused on PSA 5s and 6s...and that includes the stars. For the 54 Topps, I'm aiming for minimum of PSA 7s...in short, it's just going to take time to build a consistent set...
|
I'd like to say I keep a set as consistent as possible, But in looking through a few sets I tend to go higher for the rookies especially, and most of the key cards as well. So for a 1968 topps set that is NM or better, The bench rc, Ryan Rc, Mantle and Rose were all PSA 8. For a 1957 Topps set Exmt or better, the Robinson Rc's were PSA 7s, and most of the stars were Psa 6, with a few 7s thrown in. I try and get the rookies and key cards as high as possible, so I don't have to upgrade down the road.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM. |