Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T206 Near Complete Set for Sale (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=121626)

M's_Fan 03-11-2010 11:55 AM

T206 Near Complete Set for Sale
 
The Robert Edwards Catalog isn't out yet, but it looks like Robert Edwards Auctions has registered a complete set for sale in its Spring 2010 auction:

http://www.sgccardregistry.com/set.a...9&userset=4284

Looks like it has a wide range in quality, from SGC 5 to 70. Any guesses as to what it will take to walk away with this set?

T206Collector 03-11-2010 12:00 PM

I think it's interesting that they pulled/didn't include the Demmitt and O'Hara from this.

Jim VB 03-11-2010 12:09 PM

Here's a question from a lazy man.

SGC lists the complete set as 525 cards. Most sources list it as 524. What do they include that others don't?

barrysloate 03-11-2010 12:21 PM

Probably high five figures.

spacktrack 03-11-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim VB (Post 789443)
Here's a question from a lazy man.

SGC lists the complete set as 525 cards. Most sources list it as 524. What do they include that others don't?

The SGC T206 set used to include the Ty Cobb with Cobb back. It was removed from the set, but the numbering was never changed. This was actually brought to my attention this week, so we will begin to renumber the set to accurately reflect the 524 cards included. Unfortunately, this needs to be done card by card, so it will require some time.

Brian

Jim VB 03-11-2010 12:43 PM

Thank God! I thought you'd discovered something new and my 518/524 was now 518/525!

Thanks Brian.


Edited to add: Why renumber? Just note "Card #97 is no longer considered part of the T206 set."

autograf 03-11-2010 12:45 PM

I say between 52,500 and 71,500. Might be high with that. Overall SGC40ish.

Jim VB 03-11-2010 12:51 PM

They also have a George C. Miller (R300) set.


http://www.sgccardregistry.com/set.a...0&userset=4719

T206Collector 03-11-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacktrack (Post 789459)
This was actually brought to my attention this week, so we will begin to renumber the set to accurately reflect the 524 cards included.

You're welcome..... ;)

M's_Fan 03-11-2010 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector (Post 789437)
I think it's interesting that they pulled/didn't include the Demmitt and O'Hara from this.

Seems like the "big four" has become the "big six"

T206Collector 03-11-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M's_Fan (Post 789485)
Seems like the "big four" has become the "big six"

I wouldn't go that far. But it seems to me REA (or the consignor) has decided that the complete set minus the big six, with Demmitt and O'Hara sold on the side, would sell more than the compete set minus the big 4, including Demmitt and O'Hara.

E93 03-11-2010 02:48 PM

I agree with Barry. I would guess 60-90k.
JimB

Scott L. 03-11-2010 02:53 PM

What's an SGC grade of 5? Authentic?

M's_Fan 03-11-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott L. (Post 789495)
What's an SGC grade of 5? Authentic?

Yes, if you enter in a card that is SGC "A" it scores it as a 5.

where the gold at? 03-11-2010 02:59 PM

value
 
it depends if any of those cards have rare backs.
which is very possible.

Bridwell 03-11-2010 04:37 PM

T206 SGC Set
 
Not including the Demmitt and O-Hara, it might not break 50k. There are less than 10 cards graded better than an SGC 60. Quite a few 30s and 40s in there. A set in this condition is a lot easier to put together.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.