![]() |
Legendary Auctions - Photos
Did everyone believe that the majority of photos in the last auction were actually type 1 - vintage?
Just Curious, Mark mrios@hotmail.com |
I can't say for everyone, but, yes, I did.
|
yes
dsvid is certainly one of the foremost experts in this field and I wholeheartedly agree with him.
best, barry |
I don't want to dig myself into a hole, especially if the initial question is leading, as my impression was just my impression and it was based just on browsing the catalog. For example, I have no knowledge of was exactly in those bulk lots of 5,000, and I'm sure the auction contained wirephotos and later generation images. But a perfunctory survey of some single photo lots showed period stamps and/or tags, and I believe all the Thompson and Conlon photos were specifically labeled as original in the titles.
|
I think that's correct - all Conlons and Thompsons were in fact reviewed and labeled as Type 1s by the PSA team.
Outside of those lots, there were a few that you could tell from date stampings that were also Type 1s, which Legendary had not asked PSA to review. The majority of the rest I was told were in fact not Type 1s - printed at a later date. But I really don't know specifics. |
Without going back to the catalog to confirm, I recall there was a large category of UPI photos with pre-war baseball images. As UPI was formed in the 1950s, those would be later generation.
//// Added to say I just checked a lot description in the UPI category and it clearly indicated the photo was from years after the image was shot. There's nothing errant with auctioning a later generation photo if you say it's later generation. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 PM. |