|  | 
| 
 Legendary Auctions - Photos Did everyone believe that the majority of photos in the last auction were actually type 1 - vintage? Just Curious, Mark mrios@hotmail.com | 
| 
 I can't say for everyone, but, yes, I did. | 
| 
 yes dsvid is certainly one of the foremost experts in this field and I wholeheartedly agree with him. best, barry | 
| 
 I don't want to dig myself into a hole, especially if the initial question is leading, as my impression was just my impression and it was based just on browsing the catalog.  For example, I have no knowledge of was exactly in those bulk lots of 5,000, and I'm sure the auction contained wirephotos and later generation images.  But a perfunctory survey of some single photo lots showed period stamps and/or tags, and I believe all the Thompson and Conlon photos were specifically labeled as original in the titles. | 
| 
 I think that's correct - all Conlons and Thompsons were in fact reviewed and labeled as Type 1s by the PSA team. Outside of those lots, there were a few that you could tell from date stampings that were also Type 1s, which Legendary had not asked PSA to review. The majority of the rest I was told were in fact not Type 1s - printed at a later date. But I really don't know specifics. | 
| 
 Without going back to the catalog to confirm, I recall there was a large category of UPI photos with pre-war baseball images.  As UPI was formed in the 1950s, those would be later generation. //// Added to say I just checked a lot description in the UPI category and it clearly indicated the photo was from years after the image was shot. There's nothing errant with auctioning a later generation photo if you say it's later generation. | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM. |