Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   New Old Judge Poses (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=117308)

oldjudge 10-31-2009 12:41 PM

New Old Judge Poses
 
"New Old Judge poses" always sounds like an oxymoron to me but, regardless, here is the list:

Barnie (21-2): As 21-1, head turned slightly L
Burns (56-10): As 56-3 with ball visible
Burns (58-6): Bat at ready, looking L (58-2 with no ball)
Crossley (101-6): Strike, 101-5 with ball present
Hart (215-5): Ready to pitch, R/hand above head,L/arm at side, looking front
Kilroy (262-7): Pitch, L/arm extended forward shoulder high
Manning (292-7): Throw, R/hand cap high
McPhee (317-6): As 317-4, no ball visible
Miller (324-7): Bat at ready, L/arm touching belt
Reilly (381-4): Strike, ball thigh high
Tomney (459-6): Catch, hands above head, ball between hands
Tyng (469-5): Bat on R/shoulder, facing front

Interestingly, I have seen multiple copies of some of these so, as I have said before, new does not necessarily mean rare.

Joe_G. 10-31-2009 01:03 PM

I'd say the lack of a photographic reference helped many poses remain uncatalogued since they were so similar to existing pose descriptions. The book has helped flush out some of the new poses, both rare and not so rare.

Pose Count at time of book being published = 2,491

Pose Count with 11 additions = 2,502

Subject count remains 521 split between players, managers, umpires, mascots, and even a team owner, Von der Ahe.

oldjudge 10-31-2009 02:07 PM

Joe--I left one out--there are 12 new poses and therefore 2503 poses now known

barrysloate 10-31-2009 02:27 PM

Don't forget to add my 1890 Cy Young (ready to pitch) to the checklist.:rolleyes:

oldjudge 10-31-2009 02:40 PM

Barry--that wasn't Cy, that was Cy's brother Sidney

barrysloate 10-31-2009 02:42 PM

I think it is Cy...I would post a scan but I seem to have misplaced it.:confused:

paul 10-31-2009 05:08 PM

And don't forget about my 1890 Jesse Burkett. His only card with New York, and a beautiful portrait as well.

bigfish 10-31-2009 07:19 PM

Tomney
 
Jay,

Is that Tomney a Louisville card?

Joe_G. 10-31-2009 09:27 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Yes, Tomney is with Louisville. The new pose is similar to 459-4.

egbeachley 10-31-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 759177)
Interestingly, I have seen multiple copies of some of these so, as I have said before, new does not necessarily mean rare.

No, but the opposite may be true. What was considered as "common" pose is now split in pieces.

Exhibitman 11-01-2009 06:46 AM

More refinements on a 120+ year old set; is this a great hobby or what?

edhans 11-01-2009 08:22 AM

Re: New Old Judge Pose
 
Do you guys have any plans to publish a supplement or update to your superb book?

oldjudge 11-01-2009 08:53 AM

Ed--Probably at some point when we get more to write about. Exactly when, I'm not sure.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.