Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Printing irregularity found on a Piedmont 350 back (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=257615)

vintagebb2014 07-17-2018 06:17 PM

Printing irregularity found on a Piedmont 350 back
 
To all the T206 collector. I recently discovered a printing irregularity on the T206 Harry Krause, pitching version with a Piedmont 350 back. I purchased 2 different Harry Krause (pitching) cards from two different Sellers within the past month. I noticed that each had a unique printing irregularity on the "T" in Piedmont. I have viewed 30 or so Harry Krause (pitching version) cards with the Piedmont 350 back which are for sale and those recently purchased and I have not be able to find another card with the same printing irregularity. If anyone has the card with the same marking it would be interesting to know. Thanks.



https://i.imgur.com/XmtfM0G.jpg?2

https://i.imgur.com/mOiWWHo.jpg?2

https://i.imgur.com/66x2FB3.jpg[/QUOTE]

Leon 07-18-2018 06:56 AM

A new T206 error? Several years ago this would have been holy grail news. :) Something was on the printing plate that smeared the ink and/or it looks like the letter formation was changed....

Michael Peich 07-18-2018 07:06 AM

I could not agree more with Leon’s assessment. The “irregularity” is a plate imperfection causing the ink to smear. While interesting, it’s nothing more than an example of the pitfalls of early 20c printing.

Cheers,
Mike

vintagebb2014 07-18-2018 09:30 AM

Thank you Leon and Mike for your responses and expertise. It was just strange to me that this marking was on the back of two cards that I purchased last month and I haven't been able to find any others with similar markings. Thanks again.

Pat R 07-18-2018 10:33 AM

6 Attachment(s)
Hi Scott,

I did a quick check and found several other Krause (pitching) PD350's
with the same flaw, here are a few of them.

Attachment 323233Attachment 323234
Attachment 323235Attachment 323236

In my experience from researching print group 2 back flaws like
this you will generally find these flaws in about a 1 in 20-25 sales range.

It's also likely that this exact flaw can be found on one or
two other print group 2 subjects.

Here's a similar flaw that is found on three different print group 2
subjects.
Attachment 323238
Attachment 323237

Thanks for posting about this it is helpful in the research of
the printing process.

Luke 07-18-2018 10:53 AM

Thanks for pointing this print flaw out Scott! Like Pat said, every new print flaw we find gets us a little closer to understanding the way these cards were printed.

mybuddyinc 07-18-2018 11:57 AM

Yes, it would be interesting if someone found a different subject with the Krause flaw.

vintagebb2014 07-18-2018 03:23 PM

Thanks so much Pat for the great research. I know this has been said countless times before but Net54 is the premier site for vintage and the wealth of knowledge its members have never ceases to amaze me. As Luke mentioned, this find may bring us another step closer to solving the printing process of The Monster.

Leon 07-19-2018 10:40 AM

+1
Pat (hey Pat) is one of the best at this stuff!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagebb2014 (Post 1796018)
Thanks so much Pat for the great research. I know this has been said countless times before but Net54 is the premier site for vintage and the wealth of knowledge its members have never ceases to amaze me. As Luke mentioned, this find may bring us another step closer to solving the printing process of The Monster.


t206blogcom 07-19-2018 01:20 PM

Reminds me a little of this Piedmont 350 irregularity:

http://www.t206blog.com/wp-content/u...edmont-350.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.