Odd MLB rule and article
Similar to the strange articles I griped about in a different thread.... I saw a strange one today.
Some headline like "MLB to enforce odd rule next season" And what it was about is apparently the outfield grass is supposed to be a certain distance from the center of the pitchers mound +- a foot. Which is a really wide margin. That's important in a way that's somehow related to the silly anti- shift rules. Then the strangeness shoe drops. They already checked all the fields, and only one was not within the spec. And it will be fixed by spring. So basically a whole lot of micromanagement of nothing... And some reporter got paid for a nothing article about that nothing. I think it's going to be a LONG offseason and it hasn't even really started. |
Quote:
I'm actually a bit surprised there wasn't already a firm MLB rule in place as to what a ML playing field's infield dimensions have to be. And if not, it's actually a very good idea to finally do so. Have to ask, did the story say which team's field didn't comply? And please tell me it wasn't the Astros. :rolleyes: |
Odd but interesting stuff.
When will they do dimensions of ball parks to be consistent, walls for home runs etc. Wonder what other odd rules they have or do not have I never really looked at the details beyond the basics |
Quote:
They didn't say which team wasn't in compliance. I suspect it would be a very old field like Fenway, or an oldish field with artificial grass that has the line showing where the outfield begins drawn on. |
Quote:
Will be curious to learn which field is currently breaking the rule then. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM. |