Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1928 Ruth Candy Co. in Old SGC Slab - Real or Fake? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=347956)

gunboat82 04-01-2024 06:01 PM

1928 Ruth Candy Co. in Old SGC Slab - Real or Fake?
 
I've checked some of the old threads on this frequently counterfeited card, but I'm still incapable of identifying a fake. Any thoughts on this one?

https://veriswap.com/card/d2933ddc-0...b-280a520bcb31

Leon 04-01-2024 07:18 PM

Can you post a picture? That link seems to make you sign up for something...unless I'm doing it wrong.
.

gunboat82 04-01-2024 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 2423896)
Can you post a picture? That link seems to make you sign up for something...unless I'm doing it wrong.
.

I can't save clean versions from the site, but I grabbed a couple screenshots.

http://i.imgur.com/5Ht6gizl.png

http://i.imgur.com/e2e0dDwl.png

Casey2296 04-01-2024 08:42 PM

I'm no expert but I lean authentic based on condition, old label, and it appears the flip has not been messed with.

ullmandds 04-01-2024 09:23 PM

Yeah, why wouldn't you trust an SGC holder.

ValKehl 04-01-2024 11:15 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Mike, here's my example in an SGC 1 slab for comparison.

EddieP 04-02-2024 04:38 AM

It looks good to me. The white areas are pixelated which the copies can’t replicated.

gunboat82 04-02-2024 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 2423930)
Yeah, why wouldn't you trust an SGC holder.

This one that recently sold at Huggins threw me off, with the font and no period after 1927.

http://i.imgur.com/PfbYzWdl.jpg

I've also seen a couple in SGC slabs with different centering on the Cleveland, OH backs.

Leon 04-02-2024 05:44 AM

Personally I am not 100% ok on either one. Probably ok but definitely not for sure.
I have seen reprints on that kind of stock. I would have to feel the paper. It looks like it could feel rough...which isn't good.
.

Leon 04-04-2024 07:56 AM

2 Attachment(s)
This is why I have my doubts. Several years ago I sat down with Andy Broome (Hi Andy) when he was at Beckett, with these cards and some real ones. The 2 of these that are on brown type paper are reprints. He was 85% sure the whiter one is ok. Therefore, it's not ok LOL.....

calvindog 04-04-2024 07:59 AM

Didn't the grading companies stop grading these cards at one point due to the proliferation of frauds?

Leon 04-04-2024 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 2424409)
Didn't the grading companies stop grading these cards at one point due to the proliferation of frauds?

Fro Joys

But honestly, they should be able to tell the difference.

https://luckeycards.com/pf52frojoyruth.jpg

EddieP 04-04-2024 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 2424407)
This is why I have my doubts. Several years ago I sat down with Andy Broome (Hi Andy) when he was at Beckett, with these cards and some real ones. The 2 of these that are on brown type paper are reprints. He was 85% sure the whiter one is ok. Therefore, it's not ok LOL.....

I’d like to change opinion from “looks ok” to “probably not”.BTW I have a ton of respect to Andy Broome.

Exhibitman 04-04-2024 12:19 PM

It should be easy to ferret out the repros with a black light and a microscope. I'm gonna guess that the repros will have a brightener added to the paper and that the printing will vary.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.