1928 Ruth Candy Co. in Old SGC Slab - Real or Fake?
I've checked some of the old threads on this frequently counterfeited card, but I'm still incapable of identifying a fake. Any thoughts on this one?
https://veriswap.com/card/d2933ddc-0...b-280a520bcb31 |
Can you post a picture? That link seems to make you sign up for something...unless I'm doing it wrong.
. |
Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/5Ht6gizl.png http://i.imgur.com/e2e0dDwl.png |
I'm no expert but I lean authentic based on condition, old label, and it appears the flip has not been messed with.
|
Yeah, why wouldn't you trust an SGC holder.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Mike, here's my example in an SGC 1 slab for comparison.
|
It looks good to me. The white areas are pixelated which the copies can’t replicated.
|
Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/PfbYzWdl.jpg I've also seen a couple in SGC slabs with different centering on the Cleveland, OH backs. |
Personally I am not 100% ok on either one. Probably ok but definitely not for sure.
I have seen reprints on that kind of stock. I would have to feel the paper. It looks like it could feel rough...which isn't good. . |
2 Attachment(s)
This is why I have my doubts. Several years ago I sat down with Andy Broome (Hi Andy) when he was at Beckett, with these cards and some real ones. The 2 of these that are on brown type paper are reprints. He was 85% sure the whiter one is ok. Therefore, it's not ok LOL.....
|
Didn't the grading companies stop grading these cards at one point due to the proliferation of frauds?
|
Quote:
But honestly, they should be able to tell the difference. https://luckeycards.com/pf52frojoyruth.jpg |
Quote:
|
It should be easy to ferret out the repros with a black light and a microscope. I'm gonna guess that the repros will have a brightener added to the paper and that the printing will vary.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM. |