Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1933 Babe Ruth (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=321041)

RhodeyRhode 06-14-2022 08:56 AM
1933 Babe Ruth
 
1 Attachment(s)
Was Just looking for people's thoughts on a 1933 Babe Ruth, GAI graded. Was wondering different grades over various companies and wanted peoples opinions on this, as if it looks overly graded, was thinking it was lower than a 3.5. Also was wondering why no barcode if this is normal on GAI grades?

ullmandds 06-14-2022 09:00 AM
looks ok to me...older GAI are hit or miss.

ezez420 06-14-2022 09:20 AM
This one was just in or in auction. I forget. It's good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Joe Hunter 06-14-2022 09:26 AM
GAI Goudey
 
Yes, it is good. Probably a little over-graded(.5-1) by today's standards. The barcode should be on the back of the flip.

RhodeyRhode 06-14-2022 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezez420 (Post 2234141)
This one was just in or in auction. I forget. It's good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was I was looking thru images of them and how I came across it. For some reason no barcode on back

5-Tool Player 06-16-2022 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Hunter (Post 2234142)
Yes, it is good. Probably a little over-graded(.5-1) by today's standards. The barcode should be on the back of the flip.
+1

nolemmings 06-16-2022 10:44 PM
Agree with others that it is overgraded by a half to a whole point but good--looks rather nice.

Not all GAI cards had barcodes on front or back.
https://photos.imageevent.com/imover...28_%202010.jpg

mrreality68 06-17-2022 05:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5-Tool Player (Post 2234911)
+1
either way it has nice eye appeal and would look nice in anyone's collection.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.