Fabulous Monroe photo.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Hey Jeff, nice photo but lets get back to baseball! :D

Great photo. This one and the "Happy B-day Mr. President" photo are (to me) her most desirable photos.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...PSA%20AUTH.PNG

https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...PSA%20AUTH.jpg

this is a great photo!

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

Here is one of mine of the Chief.

old pete
 

GCA in the house:

Attachment 549081

Attachment 549082

A recent acquisition. Photo Used for Reds Dan Dee and Hunters Wieners. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...fd42c4b72a.jpg

Just picked up this beauty.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...34a8283ca8.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great photo of WaJo, Todd! Congrats!

Thank you Scott!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Matty brothers

If I recall correctly, this scene from "The Seven Year Itch" made Joe D. Furious and was the beginning of the end of their short marriage.

I have this photo of a non HOFer, Hi (Hy) Myers but I'm not sure if it's considered a Type 1 photo. I'm not a photo guy. It measures 4x6 inches. I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me if it's a type 1 photo or not. Thanks in advance.

The Babe

Not a type 1, but a nice photo!

Thank you for that information. Could you tell me what type it is?

Likely a type 2.

It would've been a similar photographer to Burke or the like who made period copies to sell.

The almost card style papery texture is a telltale sign that it's not a type 1.

Thank you again!!

Here's Stan with his back to the camera.

Honus Wagner Type 1 Snapshot
 

Wanted to share this one:

type one, etc
 

The "clips" were phased out in the early 1920s. That type of printing, where the photo came to the edge of the paper, is known as "full bleed." Conlon, for example used full bleed until about 1915 or '16.

If you have a Conlon of Joe McGinnity with white borders, you can be certain Conlon printed it after Iron Joe was retired. It shouldn't matter, Charlie took the photograph and printed it himself, but there is a distinction.

NEA, the photo service, was slow to adapt. You can find their prints with the white globs in the corners into the 1920s.

The early photo paper, the thin stuff, hasn't existed for a century. It would be easier to fake a Vermeer than a vintage Conlon contact print. Also, look at the patina, which you can't recreate. Buy a black light and a pair of cheap calipers.

lumberjack

Circa 1910-11, Spooner & Wells -- Zack Wheat
 

So….I am interested in collecting these. What would I do with calipers and a black light? Thanks

A Roger Bresnahan Type 2 I picked up recently. Sure, developed several decades after the fact but still from the original neg and image quality can’t be beat.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...45385261c5.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s a great photo Andrew

Thanks, Chris. I think so too and got it at auction for next to nothing. Here’s one of my Paul Thompson Type 1’s — Miller Huggins at the Polo Grounds in 1910.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...6a97a73d77.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow
 

Cant say I've ever seen anyone choke up on the bat at much and that bat is not even close to being straight!!

Love how high he is choked up on that bat! How could anyone hit like that? Awesome in-action photo...

tinker
 

awesome photo in a horrible oversized slab LOL:

Attachment 560606