Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   PSA Layoffs (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=336236)

taul166 06-03-2023 09:36 PM

PSA Layoffs
 
If this has been discussed, I apologize. But, did folks see that some key staff members got laid off by PSA. Maybe not a surprise given other happenings with Fanatics, PWCC, etc.

Leon 06-04-2023 07:02 AM

1 Attachment(s)
With all of the mergers and acquisitions, it's almost inevitable that people get laid off due to overlapping roles. I have seen it happen very recently at PSA with a person I have known over there for a while. I have no idea if it's anymore than that. Sometimes "right-sizing" is the correct thing to do when a company grows quickly that way.

and a PSA card that isn't really miscut for the series.
.

Rhotchkiss 06-04-2023 08:38 AM

Leon, over the years I have posted a number of cards that used to be yours. I think this may be the first time you posted one that used to be mine! Great card, enjoy, and I agree it’s mislabeled as a miscut.

Regarding PSA, there are numerous reasons companies may lay off employees (indeed, “lay off “may just be a nice word for fire/terminate). Any speculation re this is nothing more than speculation

Lorewalker 06-04-2023 09:31 AM

The article I read stated 11 people were let go. Now to those 11 people I am sure that was impactful but the company has over 1500 employees. They are still hiring to boot. Don't believe everything you hear/read.

Reminds me of the PWCC buy out. Virtually everyone has concluded that Fanatics bought them out because they were nearly insolvent. Where people got that info is beyond me. Maybe Sports Card Radio or Sports Card Investor on youtube? Doubt Fanatics would want or need to buy out an insolvent company. Yes it happens but other than PWCC contracting, as they should in a slowing market, there was nothing else out there that suggested insolvency or that they were struggling.

2dueces 06-04-2023 12:16 PM

T.o.d.d T.o.b.I.a.s was one of those laid off. Todd is probably the leading collector of AFL material and Lance Alworth collector. I’m sure he’ll land on his feet but he was a great asset to the CU board as a moderator.

Snowman 06-05-2023 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorewalker (Post 2345246)
The article I read stated 11 people were let go. Now to those 11 people I am sure that was impactful but the company has over 1500 employees. They are still hiring to boot. Don't believe everything you hear/read.

Reminds me of the PWCC buy out. Virtually everyone has concluded that Fanatics bought them out because they were nearly insolvent. Where people got that info is beyond me. Maybe Sports Card Radio or Sports Card Investor on youtube? Doubt Fanatics would want or need to buy out an insolvent company. Yes it happens but other than PWCC contracting, as they should in a slowing market, there was nothing else out there that suggested insolvency or that they were struggling.

Ya, I thought that was pretty funny. I kept reading people saying PWCC was insolvent and that Fanatics likely scooped them up for merely the cost of their debt. Lol. Zero chance that is true. They likely heard that from the SCR clown. PWCC was and is a very viable business. They may have been temporarily cash poor, but that is quite different from being insolvent. No way in hell Brent and Betsy are just walking away with empty pockets after everything that they've built and everything that has happened over the past few years. They've been looking to get acquired for a while now. They were either going down swinging or getting paid and walking away while flipping all their haters/eBay the double bird on their way out. They probably walked away with an 8-figure payday.

bobbyw8469 06-05-2023 07:07 AM

They also laid off D.a.v.i.d. Steinberger. He is the one that helped me the time PSA lost my order. I still believe an employee stole the package. But he was my customer service liason.

MikeGarcia 06-05-2023 08:58 AM

Employee Of PSA ? Or USPS ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345467)
They also laid off D.a.v.i.d. Steinberger. He is the one that helped me the time PSA lost my order. I still believe an employee stole the package. But he was my customer service liason.



.. If there are light-fingered employees of PSA they might not look twice at our forum/group wait-for-a-bargain subs ? Consider what access they have to some big-number cards, coins , stamps etc.etc. Klepto paradise. But the USPS has a history in the posts in here and the post-war side. What was the outcome in your case , if you're able to give some details ? Is there an old thread about it ? Thanks.

..

bobbyw8469 06-05-2023 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeGarcia (Post 2345484)
.. If there are light-fingered employees of PSA they might not look twice at our forum/group wait-for-a-bargain subs ? Consider what access they have to some big-number cards, coins , stamps etc.etc. Klepto paradise. But the USPS has a history in the posts in here and the post-war side. What was the outcome in your case , if you're able to give some details ? Is there an old thread about it ? Thanks.

..

I'm sure you can search it here. It was a group sub that was done here.

parkplace33 06-05-2023 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman (Post 2345445)
Ya, I thought that was pretty funny. I kept reading people saying PWCC was insolvent and that Fanatics likely scooped them up for merely the cost of their debt. Lol. Zero chance that is true. They likely heard that from the SCR clown. PWCC was and is a very viable business. They may have been temporarily cash poor, but that is quite different from being insolvent. No way in hell Brent and Betsy are just walking away with empty pockets after everything that they've built and everything that has happened over the past few years. They've been looking to get acquired for a while now. They were either going down swinging or getting paid and walking away while flipping all their haters/eBay the double bird on their way out. They probably walked away with an 8-figure payday.

I agree with most of what you are saying, but not sure about this part

They probably walked away with an 8-figure payday

They def got a paycheck, but not sure about 8 figures.

bnorth 06-05-2023 11:00 AM

Layoffs, I guess that could explain why it seems like I am on year 3 of waiting on my last submission.:rolleyes:

Yoda 06-05-2023 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 2345513)
Layoffs, I guess that could explain why it seems like I am on year 3 of waiting on my last submission.:rolleyes:

I highly suspect that their business model was far more profitable when they were under the wing (armpit) of Ebay. Their current auctions have been weak on vintage with fewer bidders. Fanatics helped save a deteriorating financial picture.

Aquarian Sports Cards 06-05-2023 12:38 PM

It's 11 people guys, not 1/3 of employees like PWCC. It's literally under 1%

Peter_Spaeth 06-05-2023 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 2345518)
I highly suspect that their business model was far more profitable when they were under the wing (armpit) of Ebay. Their current auctions have been weak on vintage with fewer bidders. Fanatics helped save a deteriorating financial picture.

Ben is talking about PSA, not PWCC.

Snowman 06-05-2023 02:39 PM

If a company with 1500+ employees terminates the employment of 11 seemingly random people while simultaneously posting 42 open jobs recs on their website (many of which are likely for multiple positions with the same job title), then those 11 people were fired. They were not "laid off".

taul166 06-05-2023 07:41 PM

Is Steve Sloan still with PSA or another part of Collectors?

raulus 06-05-2023 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by taul166 (Post 2345648)
Is Steve Sloan still with PSA or another part of Collectors?

I think this is the latest, although someone will correct me if I’m wrong.

https://clutchpoints.com/nba-card-ne...down-from-role

japhi 06-05-2023 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman (Post 2345445)
Ya, I thought that was pretty funny. I kept reading people saying PWCC was insolvent and that Fanatics likely scooped them up for merely the cost of their debt. Lol. Zero chance that is true. They likely heard that from the SCR clown. PWCC was and is a very viable business. They may have been temporarily cash poor, but that is quite different from being insolvent. No way in hell Brent and Betsy are just walking away with empty pockets after everything that they've built and everything that has happened over the past few years. They've been looking to get acquired for a while now. They were either going down swinging or getting paid and walking away while flipping all their haters/eBay the double bird on their way out. They probably walked away with an 8-figure payday.

None of us have seen PWCC's books, but them selling into a down market suggests things weren't going well.

Also not a stretch to assume their lending program was in trouble - the assets backing the loans were off 25-90%, and the cost of capital had increased dramatically. Let's be real - this is a financial environment where banks have failed and are still in trouble - what are the odds their lending program was in good shape? That program going south could easily sink the ship. When business fail, they fail fast.

I also suspect the move off eBay hurt sales pretty dramatically, and they for sure lost significant share to Goldin.

Do agree the would have received a decent payday, their client base and technology has real value.

But there is no doubt in mind they sold for a fraction of what they would have exited for 12-18 months prior, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they were buried in bad debt. Hard to believe that it wasn't a distressed asset when Fanatics acquired it.

Casey2296 06-05-2023 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japhi (Post 2345657)
None of us have seen PWCC's books, but them selling into a down market suggests things weren't going well.

Also not a stretch to assume their lending program was in trouble - the assets backing the loans were off 25-90%, and the cost of capital had increased dramatically. Let's be real - this is a financial environment where banks have failed and are still in trouble - what are the odds their lending program was in good shape? That program going south could easily sink the ship. When business fail, they fail fast.

I also suspect the move off eBay hurt sales pretty dramatically, and they for sure lost significant share to Goldin.

Do agree the would have received a decent payday, their client base and technology has real value.

But there is no doubt in mind they sold for a fraction of what they would have exited for 12-18 months prior, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they were buried in bad debt. Hard to believe that it wasn't a distressed asset when Fanatics acquired it.

+1 agree.

brianp-beme 06-06-2023 02:01 AM

I wonder if PSA publicized the layoff by issuing a PSA?

Brian (and here is another Public Service Announcement...I'm so lame)

Yoda 06-06-2023 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2345547)
Ben is talking about PSA, not PWCC.

Peter, right you are, but I think my point about PWCC and Fanatics is valid.

glynparson 06-06-2023 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2345652)
I think this is the latest, although someone will correct me if I’m wrong.

https://clutchpoints.com/nba-card-ne...down-from-role

I was told by upper management that Steve is no longer with the company. This was about a month or two ago. I looked it up I was told this March 3.

Peter_Spaeth 06-06-2023 10:53 AM

Are Jackie and Cosetta still there?

glynparson 06-06-2023 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2345774)
Are Jackie and Cosetta still there?

To the best of my knowledge Yes. Thank god.

Peter_Spaeth 06-06-2023 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glynparson (Post 2345778)
To the best of my knowledge Yes. Thank god.

Those two have made PSA what it is more than anyone, from what I understand.

bobbyw8469 06-06-2023 11:23 AM

PSA is losing a lot of market share to SGC.

bnorth 06-06-2023 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345784)
PSA is losing a lot of market share to SGC.

LOL, now that is some funny stuff. I can't imagine SGC wanting more cards to grade with the way they have done business for a very long time.

Johnny630 06-06-2023 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2345783)
Those two have made PSA what it is more than anyone, from what I understand.

Agree Jackie I know first had is great.

Peter_Spaeth 06-06-2023 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345784)
PSA is losing a lot of market share to SGC.

Evidence?

parkplace33 06-06-2023 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345784)
PSA is losing a lot of market share to SGC.

Disagree. If anything, I could see CSG becoming number 2 in terms of grading.

Johnny630 06-06-2023 12:52 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345784)
PSA is losing a lot of market share to SGC.

I don't really see anyone close...SGC sadly has shown us their reach is limited

Peter_Spaeth 06-06-2023 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkplace33 (Post 2345798)
Disagree. If anything, I could see CSG becoming number 2 in terms of grading.

If the stats John posted are apples to apples, they already are.

bobbyw8469 06-06-2023 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parkplace33 (Post 2345798)
Disagree. If anything, I could see CSG becoming number 2 in terms of grading.

I can't. There cards barely scratch the surface compared to their counterparts.

bobbyw8469 06-06-2023 01:37 PM

Take two graded cards. Pick say something like a 1956 Jackie Robinson. All graded a '4'. Try to see what each one brings value wise. Real talk. You'll find out real quick what cards in what holders you want.

G1911 06-06-2023 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345811)
I can't. There cards barely scratch the surface compared to their counterparts.

Statistically, it seems that they are in fact second right now already.

bobbyw8469 06-06-2023 01:42 PM

CSG grades a lot because people love the $12 per card grading. $12 vs $18 is a huge gap. 50% more. Try to sell that CSG card though. You will get your feelings hurt real quick.

Johnny630 06-06-2023 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345817)
CSG grades a lot because people love the $12 per card grading. $12 vs $18 is a huge gap. 50% more. Try to sell that CSG card though. You will get your feelings hurt real quick.

Bobby, it’s true CSG cards don’t sell for much compared to their counterparts. I agree with you however if we are talking about business-graded card volume CSG is grading and doing more business than SGC. The numbers don’t lie that’s why they are number two SGC is behind them, and both companies are miles behind PSA. Sgc will never get close to catching up because they have no registry or pop report. Psa owns the common card marker.

Two hobby terms across all sports/gaming and era are registry and pop.
Psa owns both. They will continue being number one into the foreseeable future.

G1911 06-06-2023 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345817)
CSG grades a lot because people love the $12 per card grading. $12 vs $18 is a huge gap. 50% more. Try to sell that CSG card though. You will get your feelings hurt real quick.

You can get a place to grade cards for even less, people seem to be betting that the $12 at CSG will generate more profit to them than $18 will at SGC. It seems to be the measurable case that CSG is moving up and SGC is not. Submissions seems to be a reasonable criteria to see who, at the moment, the market is leaning too. I’m not sure I see the case that SGC is going up, or stealing market share from PSA as you claimed. It appears to actually be CSG doing that, in measurable fact. Not that either is a short term threat to PSA’s dominance, their market share advantage is gigantic.

raulus 06-06-2023 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 2345817)
CSG grades a lot because people love the $12 per card grading. $12 vs $18 is a huge gap. 50% more. Try to sell that CSG card though. You will get your feelings hurt real quick.

I wonder how many of CSG's submissions are at $12 a pop. I suspect that with some of their allies (i.e. PWCC, maybe some others), preferential pricing could be a lot lower in exchange for the volume and repeat business.

Leon 06-07-2023 07:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I like the CSG brand so far..... I hope they keep doing well.

The Detroit Collector 06-07-2023 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny630 (Post 2345824)
Bobby, it’s true CSG cards don’t sell for much compared to their counterparts. I agree with you however if we are talking about business-graded card volume CSG is grading and doing more business than SGC. The numbers don’t lie that’s why they are number two SGC is behind them, and both companies are miles behind PSA. Sgc will never get close to catching up because they have no registry or pop report. Psa owns the common card marker.

Two hobby terms across all sports/gaming and era are registry and pop.
Psa owns both. They will continue being number one into the foreseeable future.

This data only shows information for a week, if you look at the month of May SGC has about 20K more graded cards than CSG.

I believe the numbers for May were

PSA over a million cards graded
SGC 88K graded cards
CSG 66K graded cards

Johnny630 06-07-2023 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Detroit Collector (Post 2345980)
This data only shows information for a week, if you look at the month of May SGC has about 20K more graded cards than CSG.

I believe the numbers for May were

PSA over a million cards graded
SGC 88K graded cards
CSG 66K graded cards

Ok cool

yomass 06-07-2023 10:53 AM

The data on grading volumes is a little misleading
 
I had never seen the volume data from gemrate.com before so I did a little digging. About half that PSA volume is Pokémon and other TCG cards. If you break down May 2023, PSA graded 465k sports cards, 4.3% were pre 1950, so they graded about 20k “vintage” sports cards. SGC graded 71k sports cards of which 13.5% were pre-1950, so they graded just under 10k “vintage” sports cards. This is probably a better indication of SGC’s share in its core market. Their share undoubtedly declines in the post-war era due to PSA’s registry. Beckett and CSG aren’t really viable competitors in the vintage market.

BillyCoxDodgers3B 06-07-2023 10:58 AM

Funny, I was jokingly going to ask how much of last month's zillion PSA-slabbed cards were of the Pokemanian persuasion.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.