Montana Rice sigs look OK?
 

I got this ball several years ago, long before I knew about N54. It came with a couple paper COAs, and sigs looked good to me.. but figured I'd ask opinions of the folks here. Any comments are much appreciated.

Bumping to see if anyone has an opinion on these. Thanks

Here is mine that has psa\dna cert to compare with.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...rabilia/JM.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...bilia/jr80.jpg

:):):):):)m
:):):):):)r

Ian, I don't know who the first guy is, but at least you have an authentic 'Jay Rue' signature.

If rice doesn't look like Rue, then its not authentic. LOL

Thanks John/Scott/Shelly.. I feel mo' betta now:D

My other Rice and Joe sigs-
(looks like PSA also concurs with your "Jay Rue" rule)

Both are good, enjoy

Man I have alot to learn. The top two on the football look nothing like the 4 Certed ones, so which ones are real and which ones are fake?

With signs like that why bother.

I think if anything, they're very different signing surfaces. I have another Rice, which I got as a kid at a football camp.. It looks much more similar to the auto on the ball as compared with the PSA rookie card.

Feedback so far makes me much more comfortable about the ball though.. Thanks for input