SGC Evidence of Trimmimg
Greetings and Happy Holidays to all. I was wondering if anyone ever submitted a card to SGC for grading and it came back evidence of trimming? This particular card was a 1914 Crackerjack. Then you sent the card back in to SGC and it graded? Just curious since we all know grading is not a science and is subjective to the graders skills and how he interprets the criteria.
Thank You |
Quote:
|
I've had several cards in SGC holders rejected by PSA for evidence of trimming. And in at least one case, where a guy only wanted to buy my PSA card if it crossed to SGC, it happened in reverse. The better the alteration, the harder it is to detect and the more inconsistent the grading services will be.
|
Yes that has happened to me with a T218. I resubmitted only because I was certain that the card was not trimmed. Got an 84 the next time in.
|
Quote:
|
I've had three rejected, all T206s
Miscut top and bottom -rough factory cut that I guess was just a bit too rough. Min size- yeah, small top to bottom but factory. The vertical dimension I think gets looked at harder than side to side. EOT- Got it back and checked it and wondered why I'd sent it in the first place. Definitely trimmed, but nice and even so also a deceptive trim. I won't be resending unless it's to get it slabbed as "A" before selling. Modern cards would be a bit tougher to tell, since the edges are typically cleaner all around. Steve B |
I've had SGC call a card trimmed...only to end up in an sgc holder with a grade by someone else at a later date.
I've had SGC call a card altered...only to have it end up in a PSA holder mid-graded. I've had a t206 downgraded by PSA to a lesser grade...this was the most shocking to me!!!! |
Is someone actually questioning SGC on this forum? Damn, where's the media?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM. |