Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   "AUTHENTIC" graded cards are not always what that "A" represents them to be ? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=231495)

tedzan 11-21-2016 02:32 PM

"AUTHENTIC" graded cards are not always what that "A" represents them to be ?
 
As most of you on this forum know, I'm not a fan of Graded cards. But, even I realize that there are times when....."you have to go with the flow".

I prefer to collect Sportscards as I did when I was a kid...... the feel of the cardboard.... to caress them.... and, to smell them :) And, don't laugh,
that last factor is an important one because would you like to deal with cards that have been subjected to a damp environment ? I don't think so !

Anyhow, a year ago I submitted to SGC this Jennings from my AB 460 subset. And of course, I first cracked it out of its original "A" holder before I
submitted it to the guys at SGC.


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ngsHandx50.jpg . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ingsSGC60b.jpg


SGC returned this card to me with a grade "60"....which now makes my Jennings/AB 460 card the highest graded one of its kind.


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ningsSGC60.jpg



Therefore....do I now try my luck with these two gems ?



http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...kSC150x30x.jpg . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...SC150x30xb.jpg


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...CobbSGCx50.jpg . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...obbSGCx50b.jpg



Hey guys....how's about sharing with us some of your similar experiences with the "world of graded" cards ? ?


TED Z
.

ccre 11-21-2016 02:39 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Maybe it's an American Beauty thing??:confused:?? because I sure don't think this one I have is really in FAIR condition.

njdunkin1 11-21-2016 03:27 PM

I think a huge part of it is the grader, for real. Check out this Bastian that just sold on eBay not too long ago - looks quite small to me (trimmed), but still received a letter grade. SGC is usually pretty good about this, I bet this one slipped through their fingers. What do you think, Ted?
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3JgAAO...U6/s-l1600.jpg

Jobu 11-21-2016 03:49 PM

Congrats on the Jennings Ted, that is a big difference.

I would LOVE to see you resubmit the Plank (that is a truly stunning card, btw).

ccre 11-21-2016 04:14 PM

Yeah ... I would re-submit that Plank all day long!

RCMcKenzie 11-21-2016 04:23 PM

5 Attachment(s)
I have never really evolved from the grading of the 1970's. I would still call the T215 "g" and the T214 "mint'...

That Plank is a great card. I'd hate to put it in the mail, but you could always have it reviewed at a show.

rgpete 11-21-2016 05:10 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I guess it depends on the person, grading the card.

rats60 11-21-2016 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ccre (Post 1604090)
Yeah ... I would re-submit that Plank all day long!

The Plank has color added. I think it would be a waste of money. On a card where it is close on size like the AB, I can see taking a chance at getting a number grade.

tedzan 11-21-2016 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njdunkin1 (Post 1604074)
I think a huge part of it is the grader, for real. Check out this Bastian that just sold on eBay not too long ago - looks quite small to me (trimmed), but still received a letter grade. SGC is usually pretty good about this, I bet this one slipped through their fingers. What do you think, Ted?
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3JgAAO...U6/s-l1600.jpg


NJ

It does appear to be on short side (top to bottom), as is evident by the gap in the upper part of the SGC frame.

The SGC grader probably had a hectic day grading 100's of cards, and this one was graded near the end of the day.

TED Z
.

CMIZ5290 11-21-2016 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan (Post 1604127)
NJ

It does appear to be on short side (top to bottom), as is evident by the gap in the upper part of the SGC frame.

The SGC grader probably had a hectic day grading 100's of cards, and this one was graded near the end of the day.

TED Z
.

I have many HOFers with this grade, they all appear to be 8 or better quality.....

tedzan 11-21-2016 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie (Post 1604093)
I have never really evolved from the grading of the 1970's. I would still call the T215 "g" and the T214 "mint'...

That Plank is a great card. I'd hate to put it in the mail, but you could always have it reviewed at a show.


Hi Rob

Your Sweeney is absolutely the nicest T214 that I have seen.

Try re-submitting it....you may luck out this time.


TED Z
.

Scocs 11-21-2016 08:08 PM

Yeah, what's the deal with that T214...does it measure short? My only guess is slight trimming.

Jobu 11-21-2016 10:09 PM

The Sweeney looks great but I suspect the A is because the bottom border is a little concave.

pherbener 11-22-2016 09:40 AM

I was thinking of trying with this guy.

https://c5.staticflickr.com/9/8478/2...5df0dc10_c.jpgE90-1 Cy Young Boston by Paul Herbener, on Flickr

dougscats 11-22-2016 10:57 AM

Bastian--
 
Pardon my temerity,
but that Bastian looks okay to me.

It's a "diamond cut" for sure, but the top and bottom sides are parallel and the corners look okay; that's why I'd think that it's untrimmed. It might be slightly short, but not unusually so.

Just my opinion on it.

RCMcKenzie 11-22-2016 02:21 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Thanks, Ted, I think REA sent it in for grading and actually I got a better deal on it because it was graded "Auth" instead of a number grade. I guess I'm going to do a Jeff Sweeney back run now

tedzan 11-22-2016 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie (Post 1604370)
Thanks, Ted, I think REA sent it in for grading and actually I got a better deal on it because it was graded "Auth" instead of a number grade. I guess I'm going to do a Jeff Sweeney back run now

Rob

DITTO....for all three "Auth" graded cards I posted to start this thread.

Six years ago, I acquired the AB 460 Jennings for less than $100. I was only the 4th bidder on ebay for it.
It's like you said....I got a good deal on it since it didn't have a numerical grade.

I acquired the Plank with a very reasonable cash/trade deal because it's an "A".

The red Cobb/SOVEREIGN 460 card is extremely rare (less than 6 known); and, I acquired it for a very fair price....again, because it is an "A".


TED Z
.

tedzan 11-22-2016 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan (Post 1604061)
As most of you on this forum know, I'm not a fan of Graded cards. But, even I realize that there are times when....."you have to go with the flow".

Anyhow, a year ago I submitted to SGC this Jennings from my AB 460 subset. And of course, I first cracked it out of its original "A" holder before I
submitted it to the guys at SGC.


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ngsHandx50.jpg . http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ingsSGC60b.jpg


SGC returned this card to me with a grade "60"....which now makes my Jennings/AB 460 card the highest graded one of its kind.


http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...ningsSGC60.jpg



TED Z
.


Actually, I do not understand how any Grading Co. can assign an "A" to any T206 American Beauty card whose top-to-bottom dimension is within the specified limit.

As is the case with this Jennings card.


TED Z
.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.