PWCC Huigens Now Has a Criminal Defense Attorney
|
Rob, he got the information here lol.
|
Ha! I saw the headline before I read the article. Was not aware he was a board member...
|
:)
|
Hopefully, Jeff’s involvement will lead to the exposure of all the criminals involved and their imprisonment. I think this ultimately will be a net positive for the hobby.
|
Well if Jeff is representing some of the criminals I am going to go out on a limb and guess that he might be fighting against their imprisonment.
|
A little surpised by this...but then again...not so much.
How the hell is PWCC still actively selling on eBay? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
His sad letter on conservation (once the waters got hot) is proof alone of this. And any “good deeds” he’s doing now (refunds + acknowledgement of misrepresentation) are being done at the firm instruction of his legal team. A classic case of changing one’s tune, only because they were caught. |
I'd have to go back to the beginning of the PWCC debacle. But could swear Jeff made not just one or two, but numerous comments negatively towards Brent. Ahh, to be a criminal defense attorney in the good ol' USA.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So I am thinking of sending my collection to this vault in Oregon, what do you guys think?
Quote:
Keep fighting the good fight BODA - the tide seems to be turning. Thanks again |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jay, I was totally joking. I will no longer bid or buy from PWCC, so the last thing I would do is send my cards to them! I guess my "joke" missed the mark. I just hope the pitchforks have better aim!
|
Don't forget the sarcasm font. ;)
|
***************
|
Good luck to everyone involved
|
Guys, if you don't mind, I'd like to keep discussions about me limited to my dealings with cards. I come to this board to discuss cards and nothing else in my life and it's an oasis for me in an otherwise stressful career for this reason.
If that's too much for some of you to handle, I'll no longer post about the hobby-related cases, etc. I'm involved in or respond to questions. I hope you can understand that I'm not going to make myself available to discuss these issues with you all while also having to deal with every idiot who posts about my other cases, etc. |
Quote:
It will all be swept under the rug don't worry. BUSINESS AS USUAL. Including recoloring, trimming and soaking in chemicals. Whatever it takes to keep PSA & PWCC in business with ZERO ramifications for their business plans to ALWAYS have new cards popping out of THIN AIR, just like they have been doing. You can count on it. |
Quote:
They are water under the bridge....just like this one is. It's already passed and over with now that you're on the case. Like I said, It's just hard to swallow, maybe it's the Novocain |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think everyone understands you can no longer comment on this case on this forum. It’s just not going to stop everyone else from putting in their two cents. As far as PWCC, Those that can afford upper echelon council have always retained such. That’s always been the American way too. |
Quote:
I'm not sure how this situation moves too far along without PWCC throwing PSA under the bus. Seems inevitable that your role is not only to defend PWCC, but establish the rules of how baseball cards are graded and authenticated. Can you divulge if PSA's attorney is cooperating with the FBI? Let's be clear here, PWCC never encapsulated an altered card, PSA did. If PSA has deficiencies in detecting altered cards, that is not PWCC's fault, nor any other 1,000's of submitter's. There are some very important precedence's that could be established from this case. Most of which, IMO, could be good for the industry. Your carrying a big torch here Jeff, and it appears you are prepared. |
My only question would be, what took him so long?
|
Very interesting that a guy who thought all this was a ripoff, then decides to represent this guy who ripped off collectors. As a collector I would think you would have thought about what you are doing before taking the job of sticking collectors with their altered stinking cards. Disgrace.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree. If Brent listens and does everything Jeff tells him to do, this is an absolute masterstroke. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I have it wrong, by all means someone please correct me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, he loses just about every argument he says on net54 now with posters in the past given the hypocritical nature of all. Tough to know what he really believes But if losing all arguments on net54 is the negative, the positive is the tons of money he will make and continue to buy cards most of us will never sniff and its just at the expense of being net54 bait.. Most people would choose the job and the money. Is net54 bait really that bad thing to be? Lots of people rather have the big money and the job..even if the job is stressful as he said.... |
Huigens is obviously doing this for two reasons- one, Lichtman's prowess as an attorney, and two, Lichtman's strong knowledge of the sports card trade. Having said that, can his public posts and tirades towards PWCC come back and haunt him in the end.....
|
Quote:
It is obvious that PSA is the one at fault here. Brent didn't encapsulate any of the 10-15 bad cards that got past PSA. Now Brent feels so bad that he was taken advantage of he is trying to get those 10-15 people their money back. Now in the best interest of the hobby we should never speak of this tiny insignificant error ever again. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 PM. |