Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   What's wrong with photo cards grading standards (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=79585)

Archive 12-29-2005 12:49 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I know we just talked about this but this is a prime example of what's wrong with grading standards for photographic type cards. No doubt this is technically correct at a 40....but visual appeal is somewhat less. <br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-SGC-40-Old-Judge-Candy-Nelson-Spotted-Tie_W0QQitemZ8744541282QQcategoryZ57993QQrdZ1QQcmd ZViewItem" target="_new">http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-SGC-40-Old-Judge-Candy-Nelson-Spotted-Tie_W0QQitemZ8744541282QQcategoryZ57993QQrdZ1QQcmd ZViewItem</a>

Archive 12-29-2005 12:54 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>Marc S.</b><p>when I saw that, Leon. [obviously we both troll on Ebay's new today listings...].<br /><br />I guess I just can't understand how they do not consider the photo clarity - or, at the very least, have a "minimum clarity" guideline for each particular grade. If the contrast is not sharp and distinct, no way should the card be above a 5 or 6, for example. Obviously it is a subjective standard - but much of grading is. This card has the eye appeal of a 1 - and thankfully most informed collectors would not pay any slabbed premium on an example like this, simply because it is a 3.

Archive 12-29-2005 01:56 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Not only is the photo awful but something looks wrong with that card. It doesn't even look genuine. Weird cut, nearly invisible image, I wouldn't touch that one.

Archive 12-29-2005 02:06 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>.</b><p>.

Archive 12-29-2005 06:15 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>At the least the card is trimmed and badly stained. This is just a mistake; no implications as to what SGC40 means should be drawn from this card. I have talked to Shawn about it and, to SGCs credit, they are attempting to correct the error(one made by a prior group of graders I might add).

Archive 12-29-2005 07:16 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I noticed the trimming after I posted originally and should have modified my first post to include the obvious error... A question for you- Have you seen any old judges that don't have the Goodwin at bottom and not be trimmed?

Archive 12-29-2005 09:16 PM

What's wrong with photo cards grading standards
 
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>Leon--Just a bad miscut.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM.