Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>I was fortunate enough to have dinner with Kevin Saucier(and Anthony Nex) in Los Angeles last week. Kevin seems to be pushing forward with his idea of a "seal of approval" on graded cards. A significant if not substantial collector is paying Kevin on a per day basis(or at least willing to pay him on a per day basis)to come to his house and go through as many of his already graded cards as he can. I know who it is but will let him disclose.<br />My intention is that as a condition of purchase on any "expensive" card I buy that I have doubts about, to make the purchase contingent upon Kevin's seal of approval. I am not having him go through my already graded cards.<br />I was also given a nice gift by Kevin--a T206 Back with a flip with my name on it, my birth date year and a real Honus cert number(I think).<br />Thank God Kevin has not crossed to the dark side although he did say he is inundated with requests from people to teach them what he knows.<br />Don't mean to neglect Anthony who is the one of the very best people I have ever met in the hobby. Three ex-LTSers at one dinner! Don't think I am giving away anything confidential by saying they both were down on what is happening with the grading companies.<br />A lot more but I will stop there.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>Both Anthony and Kevin are top notch human beings.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Eric Brehm</b><p>I think Kevin must have god-like qualities.<br /><br />Three ex-LTSers? We all know what LTS is. Actually, I know what LTS is, I was denied membership to that exclusive group. Didn't quite pass muster for that one.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I think what Kevin is doing is admirable, and I hope he can turn it into a successful endeavor.<br /><br />But of course this will raise a lot of questions, so let me get the ball rolling: SGC encapsulates a card and says it's good. Kevin looks at the card and says it's bad.<br /><br />Why must we assume Kevin is right and SGC is wrong?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Bruce MacPherson</b><p>Okay, I'll bite. What the hell is LTS. I have seen that acronym thrown around in the past, but have never been privy to the info on this group (and frankly never cared until Eric's post roused my interest).

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Eric,<br /><br />I wouldn't sweat it--I believe Anthony and Kevin quit the board. I on the other hand got in an argument with the president band was thrown off. This was a few months after I had resigned voluntarily.<br /><br />Bruce,<br /><br />LTS stants for Lets Talk Sportscards-a members only message board founded by Tom Papa who after I got removed from the CU message boards founded LTS to give me a place to post(true story). I then had a falling out with Papa--quit once and was later kicked off. Both Al Crisafulli who posts here and Anthony are past presidents of LTS.<br /><br />Barry,<br /><br />I am not saying we should. I am just paying someone for a second opinion because I believe SGC and PSA can make mistakes.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Everybody makes mistakes- even Kevin probably makes one once in awhile. But I have a problem with this scenario, one we've already discussed.<br /><br />If a consignor asks me to auction an expensive card, and it is slabbed by SGC (who I respect the most), and the winning bidder gives it to Kevin, who then says he thinks it might be bad, and then the buyer wants to return it to me- I have more of a headache than I think I am willing to deal with.<br /><br />And what do I tell my consignor? Would Kevin remove the card from the holder to examine it carefully? Do I then have to tell my consignor not only is he getting his card back, but to make matters worse, he's getting it back raw?<br /><br />Don't mean to be a pain in the butt, just trying to cover all my bases.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>I repeat my point from the prior thread. Without taking a card out of a holder your ability to detect alterations, particularly trimming, is severely limited. I believe even Kevin acknowedges this.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Jeff Prizner</b><p>A message board that has presidents? Sounds pretty lame.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>I agree Jeff. 80% of that concept is 50% lame.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Jeff Prizner</b><p>People can come up with statistics to prove anything. 45% of all people know that.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>Who are these elitists anyhow?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>John Basilone</b><p>I'll take a good old-fashioned dictator over a president any day! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>A significant if not substantial part of me agrees with you Jeff.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Jason L</b><p>Here I thought I was going to hear about the meal, the wine, the candlelight mood,...and we got none of that!<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David Vargha</b><p><font color=blue>LTS is filled with malcontents, ne'er-do-wells and losers. In fact, just under half of the members over there are below average, even as far as that board is concerned. Besides, aren't Nex and Crisafulli Socialists? Those kind of people don't come to power as "presidents" but more often than not as dictators for life.</font><br><br>DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>Woman: Oh. How do you do? <br /><br />King Arthur: How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? <br /><br />Woman: King of the who? <br /><br />King Arthur: King of the Britons. <br /><br />Woman: Who are the Britons? <br /><br />King Arthur: Well, we all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. <br /><br />Woman: I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. <br /><br />Dennis: You'rw foolin' yourself! We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class... <br /><br />Woman: Oh, there you go bringing class into it again. <br /><br />Dennis: Well, that's what it's all about! If only people would... <br /><br />King Arthur: Please, please, good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? <br /><br />Woman: No one lives there. <br /><br />King Arthur: Then who is your lord? <br /><br />Woman: We don't have a lord. <br /><br />Dennis: I told you, we're an anarco-sydicalist commune. We take it in turns to be a sort of executive officer for the week... <br /><br />King Arthur: Yes... <br /><br />Dennis: ...but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting... <br /><br />King Arthur: Yes I see... <br /><br />Dennis: ...by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs... <br /><br />King Arthur: Be quiet! <br /><br />Dennis: ...but by a two thirds majority in the case of... <br /><br />King Arthur: Be quiet! I order you to be quiet! <br /><br />Woman: Order, eh? Who does he think he is? <br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>The Yellow Hoard...The Red Menace. All wrapped up in one.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David Vargha</b><p><i>The Yellow Hoard...The Red Menace. All wrapped up in one.</i><br /><br /><font color=blue>The <b>Orange</b> Crush?</font><br><br>DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1192239747.JPG">

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>Anthony Nex is one of the nicest and coolest guys I have had the chance to correspond with in this hobby. <br /><br />I am amazed at the stuff Kevin posts. Always very informative.<br /><br />And ever since Jim C. got a scanner... I have loved his posts <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br />Sounds like you guys had a great dinner.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p>I concur with Joe D. Anthony Nex is TOP SHELF. Period. I don't know nor have I ever conversed with Kevin, but he seems to know his stuff and I would think SGC or PSA would be lucky to get his services....not too sure about a seal of approval on a graded card though because I think it will create a headache for guys like Barry who run auction houses.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Kevin Saucier</b><p>We had a great time at dinner! As many already know Anthony is one of the best in the hobby, has terrific family and is a good friend. It was a pleasure to finally meet Jim. He is quite a nice guy, far from what many perceive him as and "very good" natured. Just wish they both weren’t so damn tall.<br /><br />Jim’s welcome gift was a blank front & back t206 with a custom made (almost perfect) flip showing his name, the year he was born and the card number was his birthday, a Mint 9, 1953 Topps #528. Thought it would be a cool ice breaker, plus it is something money can’t buy!<br /><br />The idea of verifying a card was not mine but was a suggestion made by a few collectors...Jim being one of them. Not exactly sure how it will work yet but it won’t be for everyone. Just like grading was not in the beginning and in some cases is still not for many.<br /><br />The concept is such that if there is any doubt that a card is altered or, in some cases cannot be adequately examined, it will not get a "verified unaltered" hologram. If for any reason this is the case, an opinion based on objective findings will be given. It will not be cracked out. <br /><br />Grading companies are making mistakes which seem to be happening more frequently then some would like it. Many have also lost the trust of a few auctions houses...wonder why? Although it’s been said I have God-like qualities (LOL), I am human and will also make mistakes...just fewer of them IMO because I am spending much more time and have a good understanding of what to look for. Keep in mind this is not grading.<br /><br />It’s not too often where a card is too tight in the holder where an opinion cannot be rendered. Granted it is a helluva’ lot easier raw, which is why it takes so long to inspect a graded card, from 10-15 minutes each or more. I’ve spent an hour a few times before just the right light, angle and magnification all came together. As an example here is a recently detected altered card that took a long time to inspect. It was found to have a "repaired" tear, not to mention a trimmed edge and a glued corner tip all in a graded 6 slab:<br /><br /><img src="http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/460/psa6tear4la5.jpg"><br /><br />Sure, this can be argued all day long with pro’s and con’s. Like I said, it will not be for everyone. It’s a service that I can provide for those who want it. I don’t know how it will work out for auctions but hope it will help rather than hurt. Keep in mind this is still in the investigative stages. Here is what I have so far:<br /><br /><img src="http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/2963/hologramexamplesef3.jpg"> <br /><br /><br />Many have questioned my credentials or the fact that I am not a paid professional. I don’t know of any credentials that anyone has in this hobby other than experience. Granted, I don't have a JD or a long history of selling doctored cards. I do have several well known collectors that trust my opinion, openly considered an expert in alterations and identification by Mike Baker and a sportscard writer along with some awesome supporting comments from a nameless person at SGC and a former grader. Others may soon join in. If many don’t feel the same, well that’s alright too <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br />Kevin Saucier<br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>D. C. Markel</b><p>I am quite proud to admit that I was the first person to ask to have my membership withdrawn from that Lets Talk Sportscards group, LTS (within 72 hours of its inception - LOL!). Although there were and maybe still are a few classy people on that board, the whole idea that some people are worthy to be a part of our "secret elite society" and some aren't for the pettiest reasons imaginable turned my stomach to no end. Even the invitation by the founder to join was a slap in the face. He basically told me, "If I had my way, I wouldn't have you as a member but several people like Wayne Ellis and David Vargha insisted that you should be a part of our group." <br /><br />Besides the issue that "Scumbag Dealer W", "Sleezy Dealer X" and "Obnoxious Collector Y" were welcome and adored active members while "Knowledgable and High Integrity Collector Z" was shunned from membership over a petty matter, the smug arrogance, the overt hypocrisy, the juvenile tirades, the rampant profanity and the malicious, and unchecked gossip made it an easy decision to quit. In short, for those who were never asked to join, or never heard of it, you aren't missing a thing.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>GoSoxBoSox</b><p>(Even the invitation by the founder to join was a slap in the face. He basically told me, "If I had my way, I wouldn't have you as a member but several people like Wayne Ellis and David Vargha insisted that you should be a part of our group.")<br /><br /> <br /><br />I still feel that way. Listening to Vargha has always been an idiotic thing to do.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>MVSNYC</b><p>"...the smug arrogance, the overt hypocrisy, the juvenile tirades, the rampant profanity and the malicious..."<br /><br />aren't you talking about Net54? <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Marc S.</b><p>Of the numerous dozens of people that are currently on, or have passed through LTS, it's my sincere belief that your views represent less than 1% of the past and present members.<br /><br />~marc

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I never heard of LTS before this thread, so of course I have no opinion.<br /><br />But an elitist chatboard that only lets members in on approval wouldn't be my cup of tea.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>sagard</b><p>God forbid people disagree with moderators and start their own board. Sometimes it works and enough people join to make it interested, other times it dries up due to lack of interest. These type of splits have been going on since the Internets first days with the news groups.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p>I'm surprised I'm the first to quote the Groucho Marx line: "I wouldn't belong to any group that would have someone like me as a member."

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Neal Kane</b><p>or is it gravy? I prefer a meatless sauce/gravy with a hint of garlic. No chunks either. <br /><br />also <br /><br />Does the Pope collect cards and if so would he have them graded? Would he prefer frozen pizza or a burger?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Paul- as I was walking around doing my errands, that's the line I thought of and I was going to post it when I returned. But you beat me to it. Groucho also had another line:<br /><br />"I'd like to join a club and beat you over the head with it."

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David Vargha</b><p><i>Listening to Vargha has always been an idiotic thing to do.</i><br /><br /><font color=blue>First damn thing on this thread that's made any sense so far . . .</font><br><br>DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>LTS? Sounds like more of a subversive organization to me. <br /><br /><br />Then again Net54? Why the 54? Perhaps someone who is familiar with numerology and the occult could answer this one.<br /><br />42 I can understand. That, after all is the answer to everything.<br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p>"The concept is such that if there is any doubt that a card is altered or, in some cases cannot be adequately examined, it will not get a "verified unaltered" hologram. If for any reason this is the case, an opinion based on objective findings will be given."<br /><br />So the TPGs verify a card as unaltered and Kevin verifies the verification as unaltered (or not). So my question is: who verifies that Kevin is unaltered? Believe me, Kevin is a dear friend - this is a legitimate concern.<img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Eric Brehm</b><p>I think what Jim C. and Kevin S. are doing for the hobby is a good thing and I applaud their efforts. At least they are trying to do something about the problems and not just talking about it.<br /><br />On the LTS thing, I believe I was rejected not because they didn't like me, but because they didn't know who I was. I apologize if I violated any confidence by bringing that up. But then Jim C. was the one who mentioned LTS first, so I felt justified in talking about it.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>boxingcardman</b><p>Honestly, getting all bunged up about a private chat board some fellow collectors have...you guys need a hooker and a screwdriver, stat.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Lee Behrens</b><p>LTS sounds like the masonic temple of card collecting. Is there a ceremony and hazing to gain membership? <br /><br />I am sure as everything it is good for some and not for others. Once again I see bashing done by some hiding there name, why don't you have the balls to put your name when bashing? Hell it doesn't even take balls get a matter of typing your name and standing behind what you are writing.<br /><br />Lee

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Andrew</b><p>Many who bash the exclusiveness would probably join if invited, LTS or other. This of course excludes those on the moral high horse who tout the friendly, on topic, non-combatitive, non-secret (wait, aren't you required to put your name), non-gossipy character of this board. Gosh, I hope I don't need to edit as you'll know that I did (an important thing.)<br><br>"Take your life in your own hands and what happens? A terrible thing: no one to blame." -- Erica Jong

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>cmoking</b><p>========<br />"The concept is such that if there is any doubt that a card is altered or, in some cases cannot be adequately examined, it will not get a "verified unaltered" hologram. If for any reason this is the case, an opinion based on objective findings will be given."<br /><br />So the TPGs verify a card as unaltered and Kevin verifies the verification as unaltered (or not). So my question is: who verifies that Kevin is unaltered? Believe me, Kevin is a dear friend - this is a legitimate concern. <br />==========<br /><br />IMO, in the end, the question is "who do you trust?" If you trust PSA, no problem, you can be happy and collect PSA cards. I'm sure many people trust PSA (I'm no longer part of that group), including many people with a lot more money than I do. Others trust SGC and cross many of their PSA cards to them. That can be counted as verification of the grade and alteration (or lack thereof). <br /><br />Kevin's opinion is just that - his opinion. I think people are getting a bit bent out of shape. Its his opinion. You either appreciate it or you don't. I, for one, appreciate his opinion as he's found all sorts of crap on my cards that I would have never seen. That includes cards bought from every auction house (yes, inclduing Barry's).<br /><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Kevin Sacuier</b><p>"So my question is: who verifies that Kevin is unaltered?"<br /><br />No brainer, he is obviously trimmed.<br /><br /><br /><br />For what it's worth I enjoyed my time (3 years?) on LTS and made several good friends there. Many are still there and other have moved on but the friendships are still solid.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>"He is quite a nice guy, far from what many perceive him as and very good natured"<br /><br />Kevin????--is there really anybody who does not think I am a nice guy and good natured--I'm stunned.<br /><br />Actually for those not aware, LTS members have been infiltrating this board for some time now--perhaps they are planning a takeover. Actually despite being thrown off I have to disagree with Dan--the vast majority of LTS members are very nice people--there are only a couple of people that I would advise people to stay away from.<br /><br />I am not aware there is a rule against outing LTS members but on this thread alone there is MorrellMan(current president and dictator)who I think is a very nice guy; Paul Moss(Zardoz) who in his spare time is moderator or maybe even head moderator at the cu boards; Neil Kane who I used to have knock down drag out arguments with but now at least have a cordial relationship with; GoSoxBoSox(Tom Papa) who I know doesn't consider me as a friend but hopefully not as an enemy either; Peter Spaeth whose reputation speaks for itself; John Basilone who has sold me cards and was last seen duking it out with Toppsgun on the SGC boards; Marc Schoenen who is a great guy and a close collecting friend; and David Vargha who is one of the most colorfukl people in the hobby and someone I also consider a collecting friend.<br /><br />Jim

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Whoops--I forgot--King is also a member of LTS--a real quality guy if there ever was one.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>John S</b><p>These holders are going to start looking like travel trunks with all the train stop stickers. I have grown to tolerate the slabs, but this verification of "verified" material is over the top for me. I enjoy collecting too much (and I am not implying that others do not) to get involved. It just removes the enjoyment. Call me a fool, but ultimately I trust my own judgement regarding cards. <br /><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Just out of curiosity, why is this LTS board for members only? What is so special about it that you need the co-op board to first give its approval?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David R</b><p>If someone wants Kevin to inspect his or her cards and want to pay him to do it (or if he will do it for free), I think that's great. Kevin seems to spot a lot of things that others sometimes miss or maybe care as much about. If others don't see any value in it or trust their own judgment or that of PSA or SGC, that's great too. <br /><br />If people want to join their own exclusive club for whatever reason (maybe it makes them feel special or they don't like the folks on the public boards or don't want the whole world to see their musings), that's fine too. <br /><br />I guess it's not unexpected given that we're all adults who are still collecting little pieces of cardboard, but all this bickering about who belongs to what click, why they didn't invite me to join, etc., etc. sounds like those groups of high school or sorority girls that I always found so annoying.<br /><br />Jim, it sounds like you had a nice dinner and that you think that Kevin can be very helpful to you. I am happy for you. <br /><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Barry,<br /><br />So when they talk about you behind your back you are not supposed to know.<br /><br />Actually, in addition to finding a board I could post on, the initial idea also was that since most if not all initial members were on the CU boards it was hard to say anything anti-PSA. This allows members to blast away to their hearts content.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Eric Brehm</b><p>I nominate Barry Sloate for LTS. Of course I'm not a member, so I don't have that power. But I think if they don't take him, they are idiots.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Eric,<br /><br />Sorry to break the news to you but they rejected you because they didn't like you:(

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Jim- the smiley face has the parenthesis going the other way <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />Eric- thanks, but one board takes up enough of my time, and I feel right at home here.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Barry,<br /><br />No--I was sad for Eric that they did not like him--I think Eric is a nice guy:)<br /><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>I feel like we're approaching a happy place here with all the mutual admiriation. Much preferable than the personal bashing. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> I think I won't take my meds today.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Joann</b><p>Like many that sell graded cards, I generally don't take returns on them unless I have missed something substantial in the description. This is because I don't want to start haggling with someone over a third party description.<br /><br />If I sell a raw card and say it is EX, and the buyer disagrees, then I think it's okay to continue to negotiate a return based on a disagreement between us about the card's condition. <br /><br />But I don't want to start with a buyer disagreeing with the opinion of a third party that is not part of the transaction, that has independently given an opinion of grade (or lack of alteration) as a professional activity for a fee, and upon which both the buyer and I are entitled to rely.<br /><br />So if a buyer takes an SGC graded card, breaks it out to send to PSA and it comes back trimmed, I would have a hard time bearing responsibility for that. (Honestly, I would have a hard time not bearing responsibility too, because I would feel terrible about it.) But at the most objective level you have to, at some point, say that the third party opinion was reasonably relied upon, and if there is a dispute it is with the third party grader.<br /><br />Therefore, if I sold a graded card to someone who then took it to Kevin who said it was altered I would probably take the same stance and say it is between the buyer and the grading company (unless there was something so obvious it would be crazy for me to not have seen it - then it's a maybe). <br /><br />The bottom line is that once a card is graded, I don't think it really matters who the next set of eyes on it belongs to. The next opinion up the road - be it the buyer, another grading company, or Kevin - is nothing more than the next opinion up the road, and I can't see that there is any hierarchy that says subsequent opinions automatically have more credibility than the graded opinion.<br /><br />If I sold a card raw and the buyer took it to Kevin (or any other credible party) who said it was altered, that would be different and I would take it back. <br /><br />I can also see that if someone like Jim spending big money wants to make that second opinion a condition of sale, he has that right and it might be wise.<br /><br />But as a general after-sale activity, I am having trouble seeing how there will be any more acceptance of Kevin as a second-guesser than any other party or company. Typical (although not universal) practice is to disallow return of graded cards based on subsequent opinions, and I don't see how it will be different here.<br /><br />Joann

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Joann,<br /><br />Good points. There are quite a few dealers I buy from that carry vintage graded cards in their inventory. All of them have indicated to me that they have absolutely no problem making a sale contingent upon 3rd party inspection--be it Kevin or anyone else. SGC or PSA could have missed something. With the stories about restoration, I think its prudent when spending a lot of money to get a second opinion.<br /><br />Jim

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>Should there not also be a policy about sellers refudning the price of a raw card which comes back from two grading companies as altered?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Joann- thank you for rather eloquently expressing how I feel about the matter.<br /><br />Getting a second opinion on a graded card is a pretty complicated issue. Most of my inventory is consigned to me. If someone gives me a graded card to sell, and after the transaction I tell him he is getting the card back because another party looked at it and said it was no good, all hell will break loose.<br /><br />Try telling the consignor that the PSA or SGC card that he spent a few thousand dollars for is altered, and that someone who is not affiliated with any grading company rendered that opinion. I will have to take the wrath of the consignor and the buyer at the same time, and I just can't go there.<br /><br />I sell all my graded cards in good faith. If something is wrong with any of them, go tell it to the graders; I putting in my earplugs and tuning out the rest.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>D. C. Markel</b><p>As mentioned there are some outstanding people who accepted the invitation to join LTS like Jay Wolt, Ray Beohm, Wayne Ellis, Frank Bakka, Joe Turrillo, Dave Jacobs and many more. However, in my three day tenure, I recall vividly the most active thread on that board was a direct attack towards a friend of mine. People are certainly entitled to called someone a jerk, but when they start fabricating blatant lies about that person and that person doesn't even have clue he's being crucified, it was all I could stomach and quit in disgust. There was also a second thread as I recall that was crucifying a dealer, which again I knew what was being said was not true. If the people that contributed to those particular threads are less than 1% of its entire membership, then good for LTS.<br /><br />To me, if the LTS is "the most knowledgeable group of collectors in the hobby" as has been touted by its members, why do they have to go into hiding? It does nothing towards promoting baseball card collecting to the public at large.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Kevin Saucier</b><p>"Getting a second opinion on a graded card is a pretty complicated issue."<br /><br /><br />I understand for an auction house it might become complicated. I tend to think it would be between the buyer and the grading company after the sale has been completed.<br /><br />I can also understand where the high-roller's might want to make an arrangement before hand. Kind of like sending a car to your own mechanic before buying it...except cards can cost more.<br /><br />For curiosity sake, I wonder if an auction house and/or buyer would have an increased comfort level if a card was verified prior to the beginning of an auction or if it would sell for a little more?<br /><br />Barry, I would be happy to give it a try at no cost if you were ever interested. Shoot me an email if you want and we can talk about it.<br /><br /><br /><br />Kevin <br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Wayne Ellis</b><p>I hope it's okay if I join in here as this is my first post. I joined LTS in the very beginning and what was and still is appealing about LTS is that it has been a safe place to discuss sportscards without the constant bashing by anonymous trolls such as what happens on CU. I've always collected post war cards (for the past 4 years 1955 Bowman football) and I don't know anything at all about the pre war cards that I understand are mostly talked about here. I may be wrong on this but that is just what I've heard. <br /><br />I just want to clear up a couple of things. There are a lot of great people of LTS and most of what is discussed is very good. It's not perfect but it's much better than CU. I don't consider it to be an elitist group. It's just a place to talk cards. Like any other forum there are times when it becomes far from perfect and deviates from the discussion on cards - but I forgive Varha for this.<img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <br /><br />Dan - It's been a long time and I hope you and your family are doing well! I remember that initial discussion and I didn't agree with what was being said either but I do want you to know that isn't the norm. It's been a great board. I do appreciate all of the help you've been to me over the years.<br /><br />Anthony - I can't tell you how much I miss you on LTS! I'm not involved in the politics and I honestly don't have any idea why you left other than something happened but anyways I hope that everyting is going well for you. (I did finally buy a digital camera as per your recommendation.)<br /><br />Dav - your collection just continues to impress. I've been building the 55 bowman football set for 4 years now and I'm down to 6 cards that I need in PSA 8 or better to finish. Now that you're pretty much done maybe I can find those cards! (lol) Like the others, I do miss you being on LTS. <br /><br /><br />Whether you choose to post here, CU, or LTS I just think it's much more important to enjoy our hobby, enjoy collecting our cards, and enjoy exchanging knowledge. <br /><br />Take care all!<br /><br /><br />Wayne Ellis

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>"It does nothing towards promoting baseball card collecting to the public at large."<br /><br />And this thread does?<br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>D. C. Markel</b><p>Great hearing from you. I trust all is well with you and your loved ones. <br /><br />What the Post WWII collecting community at large really needs to do is be active on the Net 54 Postwar Sportscard Forum. See the link at the top of the page. It has the potential to be the best forum in the hobby.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Kevin- I appreciate the gesture and I even think it's a good idea. But again, these aren't my cards, and I would have to get the permission of the people who own them.<br /><br />And I kind of doubt they would be interested. If you give a card your blessing, it is unclear to me that it would sell for more money. And if you say it's no good and I had to return it- and let's say several cards fell into this category- a consignor might ask for his whole collection back. Very slippery slope for me.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David Vargha</b><p><font color=blue>I think that the "baseball card collecting public who is large" reference was directed at Jay Wolt.</font><br><br>DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p>D.C. - you were reading my mind -- that's what I thought when I read his post. I was and still am wondering where more of these post-war collectors are. Wayne, we are a small happy family over on the post-war forum and let the pre-war board handle the "dirty" stuff.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>John Basilone</b><p><img src="http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~gm60/illuminati_logo2.jpg">

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Wayne,<br /><br />Wonderful to hear from you. I always thought you were one of the greatest guys on CU and LTS.<br /><br />As others have said there is a postwar forum here that seems to be doing well. Please chime in.<br /><br />I agree with your commeny about CU--enough people had multiple identities that it was getting ridiculous.<br /><br />God Bless,<br /><br />Jim

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>I've been collecting baseball cards for over 40 years, and I can remember about 30 of them...<br /><br />I've never heard of LTS, nor Kevin Saucier... and I'm not really aware of how my lack of knowledge has detracted from my collecting. Who is Kevin?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Al C.risafulli</b><p>That crunching sound you all just heard was the sound of dozens of egos being crushed with the knowledge that Frank has never heard of "LTS" or Kevin.<br /><br />None of those people will ever be the same, I'm sure.<br /><br />-Al

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Frank,<br /><br />Of the 150-200 (thats a guess) members on LTS I would bet noone has heard of you? There is a whole world you are not aware of if you collect just ungraded sportscards.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Sounds like LTS may be made up primarily of PSA Registry guys. So it doesn't surprise me that Frank, as well as many others of us on this board, have not heard of it. <br /><br />It's okay with me as I have nothing in common with them. <br /><br />/S/ A confirmed "armpit" collector.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Wayne Ellis</b><p>Dan,<br /><br />I don't have your email address anymore. Can you drop me an email at wayne840@gmail.com.<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Wayne

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>Does anyone like bottled water?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Kevin Saucier</b><p>"dozens of egos being crushed with the knowledge that Frank has never heard of "LTS" or Kevin.<br /><br />Personally my ego is not crushed as all. Although some may disagree, I'm not sure I had enough to crush.<br /><br />Bottled water is way over-rated. Haven't they proved that some brands use regular tap water? Leon...this is on-topic as I'm sure it wil leading to soaking <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>. <br /><br /><br />Kevin

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>Well my comment was sincere. I see Kevin posted, I still don't know who he is...<br /><br />I know about Mr. Lipset. Buck Barker, E C Wharton-Tigar... I've exchanged emails with Bill Heitman. Used to talk with Bill Haber on the telephone, he knew a bunch about ball cards and ball players. Jim Horne and Richard Egan, I know about those guys.<br /><br />Seriously, what is Kevin's forte? I infer from the posts that he has something to do with card grading. I was just seeking some enlightenment...

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Al C.risafulli</b><p>Frank, you weren't seeking enlightenment at all. You were trying to be demeaning. Which is nothing new for you, I know.<br /><br />Kevin, my last post wasn't a jab at you, it was directed toward Frank, who evidently felt that he just couldn't let this thread go by without coming in and letting us know how unimportant it all is to him.<br /><br />As for bottled water, I prefer Dasani for myself but buy Aquafina for others since Aquafina is more popular, and thus is more liquid.<br /><br />-Al<br /><br />

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>David Vargha</b><p><font color=blue>I know of a Frank Wakefield who is a bluegrass artist. But I'm not familiar with the baseball card collecting one.</font><br><br>DavidVargha@hotmail.com

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Todd Schultz</b><p>I met Kevin at the 2006 National--nice guy.<br /><br />I met and re-met several Net54 and LTS guys at the 2007 National--it was all good. Had beers with many of them, even at the same time. There was no us vs. them atmosphere at all.<br /><br />At the 2007 National, I listened to collectors from those two boards explain to me the nuances of certain OJ cards, Topps Venezuelans, W502s, Plows, stadium postcards, D304s, '72 Topps Baseball, Obaks and other things of interest.<br /><br />I chatted with collectors from their teens to their 60s that participate on these boards, and all shared the same passion. I drank with the moderators of each forum, again at the same time. Two thumbs up to both.<br /><br />My point: Go to the National, and do some face to face interaction. You can't beat it. See you in Chicago--the first drink's on me.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>pas</b><p>Frank, Kevin is trying to establish himself as what I refer to as an "ubergrader," expressing opinions on whether the grading services have appropriately authenticated cards. He has made many posts concerning the detection of various types of alterations, and I guess each of us has to judge his qualifications for him or herself.

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p>Al -- some of that bottle water is actually tap water. How do you know what you are getting?

Dinner With Kevin Saucier
 

Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Al,<br /><br />Absolutely right and par for the course.<br /><br />You could not help even as just an occasional casual reader of Net54 not know who Kevin Saucier is.