|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>A little help from the HOF rookie card collectors--should the 1893 Keeler cabinet in the current Mastro auction (Lot #2105) be considered Willie Keeler's rookie card? It is a single card of Keeler as a major leaguer with the Giants and predates the E107 by a full ten years. It is the same pose that Rusie takes for his Newsboy cabinet and makes one think that there was a planned Newsboy of Keeler which was never made or is yet to be discovered.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.mastronet.com/index.cfm?action=DisplayContent&ContentName=Lot%20 Information&LotIndex=43190&CurrentRow=1" target="_blank">1893 J.U. Stead Studio Cabinet - Willie Keeler</a> <br /><br />[edited to add link]
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>Looking at that lot, that is truly a fantastic restoration job. Do you think it would affect the bidding if it was described as such in the auction?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>I know that others will disagree with me... <br /><br />but I don't consider these old cabinets to be true "baseball cards."<br /><br />They were not distributed to the public or made for advertising or collecting. To me, they are really nothing more than a polaroid picture of a player. <br /><br />If I take a picture of some major league player and write his name on the bottom... does that then become a "baseball card?" Not to me. <br /><br />If a baseball player and his family go to Olan Mills for a family photograph... does that then become a "baseball card?" Not to me.<br /><br />To be a colletible baseball card (to me)... the card needs to have been PRODUCED by some company OTHER than the person who took the PHOTO. In other words, somebody or some comany was USING the IMAGES of the players for ADVERTISING or PROMOTION or SALES.<br /><br />It also (to me) has to be a "CARD"... and not an 8" x 10" paper photograph that was inserted in a magazine or newspaper. Those are not made for carrying around in rubber bands and trading with your friends. Baseball "cards" should be made for collecting and trading. There is a reason they were called "Trading Cards" forever! <br /><br />To me, a "baseball card" is something that you had to buy SOMETHING ELSE to get the card... or in more recent years, you had to buy a pack of cards that were distributed by a card company.<br /><br />Thus, the true Keeler rookie "baseball card" is the 1903 E107 card.<br /><br />If you want to try and get the earliest "baseball IMAGE" of Keeler... then the 1892 Binghamton team cabinet of Keeler in Mastro is the oldest I have seen.<br /><br />That's just my two cents.<br /><br />I would rather have a baseball "card" that is the same type of card that I could have gone to the store and collected in 1895. In other words, if I had been a kid back then, could I have gone to the local store and picked up these cabinet cards that were only available from the photographer's studio? No.<br /><br />I want to own something that I KNOW at one point ... a hundred years ago ... was pulled out of a pack and cherished by some kid.<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>This is why I have NOT purchased the 1886 J. Wood cabinet complete set of PROOFS from TIK & TIK, even though it would be the first baseball "IMAGE" of several of the New York Giant HOF's in that set.<br /><br />I know that these photos existed BEFORE the N167 Old Judges (since the Old Judges say on the back that they were hand-copied from these very photos)...<br /><br />but the 1886 Old Judges are baseball "CARDS" that were distributed to the public for collecting and for promotion and sales of a DIFFERENT product.<br /><br />Again, just my two cents.<br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>Hal--Very valid arguements. Maybe one needs to differentiate between rookie card and rookie representation. How would you classify the 1872 Boston and 1895 Baltimore team composites? Does that mean that a rookie card collector cannot get a rookie card of Spaulding unless they get his unique G&B? By that definition don't all the game cards fall outside the rookie card group?<br />BTW, unless I am wrong, I believe that these types of cabinets were produced for sale by the photographer so they are not like a unique polaroid. They probably did not receive wide distribution but, then again, neither did E107s.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Jay: YES, the 1873 Boston team cabinet and the 1894 Baltimore team cabinets that I own are NOT "baseball cards" to me. They are just neat rare items that are the closest that I can get.<br /><br />YES, the G&B "card" of Spalding is clearly a "card" while the 1873 cabinet is NOT. However, since the G&B was produced long AFTER his playing days had ended... it is not really any different than a 1950 Callahan card of Spalding to me. In other words, Spalding has ZERO "REAL baseball cards" to me.<br /><br />YES, "game cards" DO count as cards because you had to BUY them from some company other than a photographer's studio, and because they were distributed to the public. <br /><br />Once again ... as long as I could have gone into Woolworth's in my hometown as a kid in 1895 and purchased the GAME in order to collect the "CARDS"... then it counts to me!
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>Hal--I'm with you--thanks for the clarification!
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Tom Boblitt</b><p>trade my 1950 Callahan Spalding to anyone for the G&B Spalding. I agree it's a fair trade......Same for any of the others in my set like O'Rourke, etc. I'll pay shipping both ways.......<br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Although Dan McKee will obviously disagree since he owns them...<br /><br />I don't think the 1894 Alpha Engraving pictures qualify as true "baseball cards" either, since only ONE set was made and they were only produced by the photographer. Again, this is no different than a guy taking polaroids of the players in his studio. NOT cards to me.<br /><br />Same is true for the 1904 Alleghany game cards. Only ONE set ever produced, so no kid on the streets in 1904 could have EVER collected these. In fact, the only existing set was probably stolen from the U.S. Patent office years later.<br /><br />HOWEVER ... because BOTH of these sets are so rare and so cool and so well-known ... I would LOVE to own some of these and would buy them in a flash for the right price! <br /><br />But I would think of them more as RARE baseball ITEMS more than I would think of them as true baseball "TRADING CARDS."
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>Hal,<br /><br />No Alpha Photo Keeler card has ever been discovered.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Paul Krauss</b><p>MASSIVE restoration job and a very SUSPECT bidding activity.<br /><br />Isn't Jay Miller the consignor of both the J.U. Stead Keeler cabinet and the Bingos team cabinet that he previously bought from Scott Forrest?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=153652&messageid=1065317100" target=_new>http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=153652&messageid=1065317100</a><br /><br />Too bad pre-restoration scans aren't showing, but I'm sure some regulars here have them saved.<br /><br /><br />Search tool rules!!!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br />PPK<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Andy:<br /><br />I know that there is no "Keeler" in the 1894 Alpha set... but I was just jumping off of the specific topic and generalizing so as to explain my position.<br /><br />Summary: I don't think ANY of the items in the 1894 Alpha or 1904 Alleghany sets can be called "true baseball trading cards"...<br /><br />but they are still NEAT and RARE ... just like these old cabinet photos and other baseball images.<br /><br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>I think Mastro DOES say in the description that "professional mending" has taken place, don't they??<br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>But I disagree about card decks. I don't consider any cards from game decks to be true baseball cards. Same goes for those baseball game inserts in the '68 Topps set - would you really consider one of those little things a true Mickey Mantle "card"?<br /><br /><br /><br />Okay, I'll defer additional comments...<br /><br />Hal, I have re-read the Mastro lot description and "professionaly mended" refers to the four insignificant pinholes. So, having re-checked based on your post, I am copying back in the original text of this post that I had deleted:<br />.<br />.<br />.<br />But this thead is an advertisement for Jay's Keeler cabinet that goes off on Mastro this week, so let's get back to that one <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>. I consider it to be a really cool mounted photo, probably worth $2-4K (depending on who's bidding), not a rookie card. And while my original repsponse to Jay's question has been ignored, I think it's also a valid subject, and "fair" since Jay has given his Keeler cabinet the limelight - don't worry about antagonizing Jay - he's a big boy. <br /><br />Personally, I think restoration of photo mounts, is fine, as is cleaning up of the photo, as long as no new material was added. I don't even know that it's necessary to advertise such "clean up" restoration when selling, although I would. Why? Simply because in our hobby the odds are real good that many potential bidders have seen the "before" version of such a high profile item. I think that if the restoration were put in the description, those bidders would be MORE likely to bid (because they don't feel there's intent to deceive). On the other hand, bidders unfamiliar with the previous version will probably bid more not knowing it's been restored. Also, I think Mastro (and other auction houses) should ALWAYS be as up front as possible with auction descriptions, just so we'll trust them - I think it's better for their business. <br /><br />Personally, I can't believe Jay's selling this - it's historically significant and one of his favorite players, as is the Bingos cabinet (which I should have kept <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14> ).
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>Jay,<br /><br />Perfect timing on your Keeler question.....right before the Mastro Auction ends for the Keeler Cabinet card that you consigned. Very predictable. Why not just ask us kindly to bid on your consignments?<br /><br />By the way, I was planning to bid on the Keeler, but I won't pay NrMT prices for a restored card. I liked it better when it looked like this. Scott brought up a good point. Care to explain?<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1102518577.JPG">
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Scott: <br /><br />I agree with you on "modern" game cards and inserts. Those should not count as true baseball cards.<br /><br />However, in 1913 for example, I think buying the "National Game" or "Tom Barker" card games was probably the ONLY way that a kid could have gone to the store and purchased some cards that had major league players on them.<br /><br />In other words, I take into account for old vintage cards the fact that NOBODY was really selling packs of "baseball cards" on their own yet. <br /><br />I am also convinced that kids would SAVE and COLLECT the cards that came with these old games... even long after the board itself was gone. Kids probably traded the cards between themselves and NEVER even played the stupid game. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>Hal, actually I cannot disagree with you. I feel these Alpha's were not issued to the public as you say so I do agree with you. I do consider these cards because of the size but not cards as we know that were issued and collected by the public. Dan.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>If you consider game deck cards to be "true cards" because kids couldn't get them any other way, then by that logic you would have to consider Jay's Keeler cabinet a card as well...which leads to the inevitable conclusion that it's a rookie <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> Unless you disqualify it purely because it's a real photo, in which case Old Judges wouldn't be cards either.<br /><br />We had a really interesting thread on this a couple of years ago - I believe the conclusion was that a real "card" had to possess a certain number of qualities representing "card-ness", but not ALL - and I agree that the Keeler cabinet would fail the test. I'll try to dredge up that thread.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>Scott--Let me answer both of your questions.<br />1. I got tired of collecting Keeler cards so I have consigned them to Mastro for auction. There were a few cards in the prior collector auction and the rest in here.<br /><br />2. When I gave the cabinet to the Mastro guys it was in the form that is shown in Andy's post. They decided to have it cleaned(glue removed, etc) and the first time I saw the cleaned version was when I got the catalog. I think it looks better this way but that is just my opinion.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>Should be disclosed in full......and yes, this is a very predictable thread......as usual..(that was kind of a Yogi-ism)...later
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>I didn't know Mastro operated that way. I guess that opens another can of worms (but very clean worms - no dirt or mucus).<br /><br />So Mastro makes recommendations like this to consignors, then does the work themselves if the consignor says it's okay? I wonder if they do it in house, or have a restoration service that they regularly use. <br /><br />But this wasn't purely a matter of "cleaning" - the photo had holes in it, which have been "filled" with something. If this could be done with a photo and it's mount, wonder what could be done with a .... hesitance ... baseball card? uh oh, the worm is gathering dirt again.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jimmy Leiderman</b><p>OUCH!!!<br />I love this board<br />Nice investigation report<br /><br /><br />Bill, can I start my own "bid on my mastro consignments" thread without using the regular B/S/T channel? <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>This is a little scary.<br /><br />What if someone sends a PRO graded card (trimmed) to Mastro for auction...<br /><br />and Mastro says: "Hey, let us see if we can use our 'pull' to get that in a PSA holder for you."<br /><br />Mastro would be doing the seller a favor...but it would also certainly INCREASE their income since the buyer's premium would be higher on a higher sales price.<br /><br />If there is any way that Mastro (or ANY auction house) can do this with PSA or GAI or SGC... then something would be rotten.<br /><br />Then again ... Mastro DOES say that the cabinet photo has been "professionally mended"...<br /><br />so I guess the responsibility is on the BUYER to call Mastro before they bid and ask SPECIFICALLY what was done to the cabinet photo.<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />AND ... as we mentioned a while back on the "Just So" restoration thread ...<br /><br />what REALLY scares me is that the buyer of this cabinet photo will later be able to SELL IT to people WITHOUT those buyers having any way of knowing that it was ever restored!!<br /><br />Boo, Hiss !!<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Ryan Christoff</b><p>"The cabinet appears to be in Near Mint condition, but has four insignificant pinholes, all relegated to the corners of the photo and not affecting the central image, which have been professionally mended."<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1102521967.JPG"> <br /><br /><br />I would have to say that no, unfortunately that isn't Keeler's rookie in the auction. As you can see, the example on the left that was on ebay is clearly not the same example as the one on the right that is in the current auction. The one in the current auction appears Near Mint except for the restored pinholes. The one on the left...not so much. <br /><br />Additionally, the one on the left is obviously earlier, so that one must be the real Keeler rookie. <br /><br />What would that Keeler rookie would bring if it ever came up for auction? Wow! A Keeler rookie. Can you imagine? <br /><br />Perhaps we'll never know.<br /><br /><br />-Ryan<br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>What does that mean? An auction house to whom a card is consigned has discretion to alter/restore/"clean" a card? Or did they advise the consignor they were capable of doing such things in order to fetch a higher price and the consignor consented? Or did the consignor ask them whether anything could be done to improve the card? Those before and after photos are VERY disturbing, particularly where the description in the catalog does not appear to reference the cleaning. Am I missing something here? Has anyone asked Mr. Mastro about his convenient omission?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>The responsibility is clearly on the buyer - anyone can go out and buy a microscope and easily find most repairs. I feel certain that anyone paying $4K for a cabinet card will certainly put it under the lense as soon as they receive it. JC - you use a microscope, right? Leon? Jay? Jimmy?<br /> <br />Another interesting idea: we have established that Mastro has the resources to "fix" undesirable flaws in vintage items. It also seems that most of us (me included) think this is okay for cabinet cards. Why not baseball cards? Is it simply because cabinet cards aren't slabbed by the graders? If PSA and SGC started slabbing cabinet cards, would it then be considered deplorable to restore such items? Example: now that some cdv's are being slabbed, we've seen that the restored ones have lost value. Maybe I'm wrong about that?<br /><br />Joe P must have something to say about this (seriously Joe, I'm not pissed at you anymore).
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>I don't want to see ANYTHING "restored" or "altered" or "modified."<br /><br />I think that 100-year-old things should LOOK like they are 100 years old -- that's part of the magic.<br /><br />EXAMPLE: What if someone buys a REAL version of Babe Ruth's jersey ... and cuts it into 2,000 little pieces ... <br /><br />and then uses each little piece as a starting point and manufactures 2,000 "new" jerseys that each contain a tiny swatch of the orginal??<br /><br />Can they all "technically" be said to be "Babe Ruth's REAL jersey - with some professional restoration work done to it." ???<br /><br />I don't like it. Leave things as they are.<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />But again, that is just my two cents.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>I've noticed more and more the use by auction houses of "appears near mint". What is the definition of "appears"? Does it mean that if you stand at a distance of ten feet and close one eye, you wouldn't be able to see the glue residue or erased writing? <br /><br />I think they should say "at first glance" it "seems" to be "near mint", but it isn't.<br /><br />Or maybe all cards should be described as "near mint"? (10-near mint at close range,9-near mint at 5 feet....1-near mint at 100 yards)
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>I don't know enough about them to know if restoration is considered legitimate or not, and I don't see why it would be, but I cannot BELIEVE it is legitimate to restore a card to this extent and not disclose it. I find the whole thing appalling, and I have a hard time believing the bidding would not be affected if the "before" photo was published or the details of the restoration were revealed. But again, I don't know about cabinet cards, so if I am wrong I am sure the more knowledgeable folks here can point that out.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>"Appears" near mint may be used in the temporal sense. It NOW appears near mint, although prior to the professional restoration job it APPEARED well you fill in the grade.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>...at a castle in a remote area of Spain - the "Cards Templars" are donning their robes.<br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>a very costly face-lift. At first, the two cards don't even appear the be the same card! You have to look very carefully to see tiny blemishes or marks that the two have in common that two different copies of the same photo would not have. And I'm not just talking about filling in pin-holes!
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>I might have said something similar already, but Mastro DID mention the mended pinholes. If the rest of the work was simply cleaning (no material added), I don't think we should have a problem with their description (other than the "appears near mint" grade) simply because they have better resources for "cleaning" than we do, as long as they mention any "residuals" such as glue traces and evidence of erased writing.<br /><br />Again, it was a remarkable clean-up job and should increase the value.<br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>andy becker</b><p>being a rc card collector with unlimited funds...i'm just so happy that jay took a a moment to point this out. i'll be placing a "top all bids" with mastro within minutes<br /><br />to the "other andy":<br />what a joke, GREAT CALL <br /><br /><br />and paul:<br />i haven't looked, but let's here some more about the fishy bidding. <br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Why, and I just don't know the answer, is this sort of cleaning acceptable for a cabinet card whereas I assume it would not be on a 1915 Cracker Jack or am I wrong about that too?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>Mending pinholes in a CJ would NOT be acceptable if paper/color was added - the non-disputable grading authorities would doubtless notice these, and the new owner would be screwed out of a gorgeous plastic slab.<br /><br />However, to me "cleaning" (no material added) is okay as long as the after-effects are noted when selling (pencil writing residue, etc.)
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Interesting dilemma.<br /><br />If I had a baseball card that's ONLY blemish was some GLUE on the back from where it had been stuck in an album...<br /><br />and someone could REMOVE the glue WITHOUT re-coloring the card or bleaching it or adding any new paper or anything like that...<br /><br />then I would have no problem with someone removing the glue and "cleaning" the card.<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />But once PINHOLES have been repaired ... then a card has gone from being "cleaned" to being "restored", and the value drops WAY down for me. <br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />Again, this is why I REALLY WANT someone reputable like SGC to start slabbing cards as "Authentic-Rebacked" or "Authentic-Bleached" or "Authentic-Trimmed"...<br /><br />although there would still be NOTHING stopping someone from REMOVING the card from the slab and selling it to unsuspecting buyers WITHOUT disclosing any of those problems.<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Obviously reasonable minds can differ, but to me adding v. subtracting is at some point a matter of semantics. Is "subtracting" a crease that was there OK? Is bleaching a card OK, it doesn't add anything? Is power erasing a card to make it better centered OK, it doesn't add anything? To me, what Mastro did (leaving the pinholes out of it) completely altered the condition and appearance of the card. I can't see a way to rationalize that particularly where it was not disclosed. I admit there may be instances where "cleaning" is so de minimus that I wouldn't care but this doesn't feel right to me. And full disclosure doesn't solve the problem either for the reason that Hal pointed out. Somewhere down the line someone is gonna get hoodwinked. Just my two pennies.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Good points about "adding" vs. "subtracting".<br /><br />I would not be OK with a card that once had ink writing on the white border ... but was then "power erased" so that a layer of paper was removed to erase the writing.<br /><br />I would HOPE that the grading companies would spot this on a card, however.<br /><br />Like I said...<br /><br />I just wish everyone would LEAVE everything THE WAY IT IS!!
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Too much money in it. I would like to think that cleaning of that sort is detectable on close scrutiny, or at least by our favorite professional graders, but one can only wonder.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>When I say cleaning to "remove" I'm of course referring to removing things that weren't there originally...and the pinhole mending IS in the description.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>Hal,<br /><br />I've been suggesting to SGC that they slab altered or trimmed for years now... for some reason they won't which is particularly odd to me since their sister company (CGC) has been doing this with comic books since day one. You see many restored comics in plastic tombs assessed "Apparent (--- grade)" and what was done to the book. The labels also have a different color and thses books do ell at a considerable discount compared to an unrestored book of the same grade.<br /><br /><br />PASJD,<br /><br />Bleaching sure as heck does "add" something - chemicals - which will eventually eat away at the stock of the card. Of course a restored card will look different - that's the whole point. I'd love to do an air analysis inside some PSA holders.... and yes, it can be done without even opening the slab. <br /><br /><br />General observation:<br />What's interesting to me is the "outrage" type response people have regarding a PROFESSIONAL retoration job but when it was suggested that people do it themselves at home - dipping card in water, removing glue or paper pieces, pressing the card between two heavy objects to "flatten" the card, no one had a problem and thought it was great idea..... go figure.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>To me the wear and tear a card gets in its natural lifetime, including getting stained, or written on, or whatever, becomes part of the card, and anything non-trivial that gets done to it to restore it back towards its original (i.e., new) condition should be disclosed so that the purchaser can make up his or her own mind based on all the facts. Again, I am not sure how I would define non-trivial, but what Mastro did ain't non-trivial and if I had purchased that item for thousands of bucks and then found out what he had done to it and what it looked like before I would be livid.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Don't you think any of the cleaning Mastro appears to have done involved "chemicals"? What's the difference? I am sure he didn't just use soap and water.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>There are chemicals....and then there are CHEMICALS. A professional restorer doesn't use bleach. There are non-corrosive cleaners and solvents which I'm sure were used to clean the card or remove glue residue or dirt. Mastro isn't a back alley auction house, I'm sure they didn't just whip out the Clorox... <br /><br />The primary goal of a PROFESSIONAL restorer it to protect a piece, stabilize any type of damage that may get worse - like a stain caused by bacteria from humidity, any yellowing, or brittleness, etc. and leave it in a more stable state from before. Bleaching is NOT a professional process, it's a destructive one that eventually destroys a piece.<br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Rhys</b><p>There is a rebacked N172 Anson on ebay right now with "Authentic" as he grade. I have also seen a few other like this lately so perhaps GAI is grading cards as authentic which have been restored/altered.<br /><br />Also, I disagree on the cabinets are not cards argument, but it is just my opinion. I do not see any difference between a cabinet with a photographers advertisement on it being used to sell pictures to the photographer, or get people into his store than an advertisement for gum or tobacco on the bottom to get people to use their product. Most of these cabinets were not just taken once and given to players. These guys were celebrities and their cabinets were produced and sold to the public most of the time, especially photos of the player in uniform. You could have walked into the photographers store and said give me a keller cabinet, and they would have sold you one. hey probably had a sign outside that offered photos of the New York Giants for a price. These popular studio cabinets were advertising tools, the same as Old Judge cabinets. Only difference is the product is the picture itself and not gumor candy.<br /><br />If the cabinet was produced wih an advertisement at the bottom which said, "Come to Duffy's Bar" it would be a trade card, used to advertise the bar just like Tobin lithograps. If it said, "Drink Duffys beer", it would definely be a card and I see little difference in the two. In both cases the card is being used to solicit business and is used the same way baseball cards were later.<br /><br />I know others will disagree with me, but that the way I see it and always will. A good understanding of 19th century advertising can shed a lot of light on the subject.<br /><br />Also, I have a friend you sent a complete ungraded gum set to mastro and they told him flat out they were going to "send it off to have it worked on". Kind of scary.<br /><br />Rhys
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>But let's also be realistic - I'm talking about cleaning that cannot be detected. If you flick off some small pieces of tobacco from an old Polar Bear-backed card, or soak off some minor bits of album residue, to a point that no one could tell it was ever there, what's the point in mentioning it? The exception is removing writing where some evidence remains - but then again, how can you tell how intense the writing was to begin with?<br /><br />And to be devil's advocate, what if the "aging stuff" was added recently? What if some kid got hold of Dad's NM t206 card and got crud and writing all over it...say yesterday...is it okay to remove that?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Man...<br /><br />I can't WAIT to see what Andy Baran's "Just So" Burkett card looks like after seeing this!<br /><br />I honestly had no idea that things could be made to look so "new" again. <br /><br />Sure, everyone will know that Andy's card has been "restored" since the card is one-of-a-kind...<br /><br />but it will sure look a LOT cooler than it did when it was all trimmed down!!<br /><br />What are you hearing on the progress, Andy?<br /><br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Petecld that distinction makes sense, thank you for explaining it, but if Mastro is so professional why don't they disclose their noble efforts at protecting the card so that the bidder is aware of them.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>Several months to go.......
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Rhys:<br /><br />I see your points about the "cabinets" vs. "cards" argument...<br /><br />but what if someone at Duffy's Bar drew charcoal sketches of the ballplayers as they sat at the bar, and then sold them on the street with an ad for Duffy's Bar on the back?? <br /><br />Would these be baseball "cards"??<br /><br />Not to me.<br /><br />Or in modern times, what if someone at Duffy's bar took photos of the players and sold them to customers with a "Duffy's Bar" ad on the back. NOT "trading cards" to me.<br /><br />They might be baseball ITEMS or baseball ADVERTISEMENTS...<br /><br />but just not "trading cards" to me.<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />I understand your position about the photographers making BUNCHES of these "cabinets" and then giving them out to the public as a way to ADVERTISE for their photography business...<br /><br />but I still don't think that a kid in 1890 could have walked up to the photography studio and collected a whole set of these cabinets.<br /><br />I think it was probably somewhat expensive to make each one, and they were probably given out JUDICIOUSLY to certain people more as "business cards" for the photographer.<br /><br />But hey, to each his own! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Gilbert Maines</b><p>Restoration is here to stay. It and reprints are only going to become more sophisticated, and less detectable. As I have said before. It will not be long until the only way to establish a card's degree of originality is by its documented provenance.<br /><br />For this reason, full and clear disclosure by auction houses and others is crucial to the credibility of our collectibles. Or, I guess, buying cards which grade 4 or less currently appears to be a viable alternative.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>I cannot believe that Mastro did that much work on the card. Wow. I would like to see any sale of a card with that much work on it carry a before and after image and have a statement from the restorer explaining what had been done. And I'd like a solid gold toilet seat too, but that's not in the works (quote stolen from Austin Powers). I don't think selling it any other way is fair to the customer, but call me crazy. Or just a damn lawyer who likes to see the laws of his state followed by an auctioneer who sends catalogues and sells cards to California residents...<br /><br />PSA already grades cards that have had writing removed. I know because I just recently bought one, and I am none to happy with it. I bought an E90-1 Crawford graded PSA 3 (MK). The MK looked to be a small pen mark at the top, which was no big deal to me. When I looked at the card closely, however, I found a lot more writing that had been erased. I've also had cards with writing on them slabbed by SGC and GAI. So, we are to some extent debating a done deal, as the major slabbers all already slab cards with writing on them. <br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>I spoke to someone at Mastro a few minutes ago about this issue. They are going to modify the item description, and notify all of the bidders about the change. They also described for me what "work" was done on the card (other than the pinhole repairs which were disclosed), which basically involved professional cleaning to stabilize the card, as Pete suggested above. I am comfortable with the discussion that I had, and would suggest that anyone who would like further information contact Mastronet directly.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Wesley</b><p>Professional cleaning to stabilize the card? Does the cleaning solution that they used also recolor the white spot on Keeler's stomach?<br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>PASJD,<br /><br />They do say there was work done and use the term "appears" whatever. But a more detailed decription wouldn't have hurt.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Wesley: That white spot on the original DOES look like "paper loss," doesn't it??<br /><br />I guess it wasn't... because if it was... they "patched" more than just pinholes.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Tom Boblitt</b><p>hmmm....
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Andy Baran</b><p>Again, I would like to emphasize to contact Mastro directly to get a better understanding of the situation. I'm not saying that what they did was right or wrong, but they do have an explanation, and they are willing to discuss it.<br /><br />As to the area of concern at the bottom center of the photo, they are looking into whether there was paper missing, or if there may have been paper or something like white out on the photo that was removed. This is probably why the description hasn't been updated yet.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Wesley</b><p>The auction description has been recently updated.<br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Rhys</b><p>I am not making an argument that all cabinets should be considered cards, and I completely see your point of view. However, there are some cabinet photo groups which are more like cards than a lot of the cards we collect, and then there are thousands which are just like you said, similar to player snapshots. I would say that a studio photo of a baseball player on a professional team in uniform with photographer advertising on it is absolutely a card as these were almost exclusively done to increase business for the studio and not because the professional player decided to pop in one day with his uniform on and hair combed for a keepsake.<br /><br />The studio cabinets of ballplayers wearing dress clothes were primarily done for themselves, with some exceptions like the Stevens cabinets which were produced for resale by the studio.<br /><br />Not real similar to a charcoal drawing scenerio because these were mass produced (in varying quantities) and in many many situations, there are more of these particular cabinet cards out there than most of the 19th century "cards". My guess is that there were probably several hundred at least of these Keeler cabinets produced in the New York area and distributed by the photographer or sold as advertising pieces for his studio. It is just that only a few have surfaced in the last 20 years.<br /><br />This is abviously a huge grey area which will never be resolved to anyones satisfaction, but it makes for a nice debate. <br /><br />Rhys<br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Sounds to this cynic like Mastro done been found out and they are trying to figure out the best way to cover their tracks. "Looking into" whether there was paper missing? HUH? Plus the modified description doesn't tout the fact that the card has been "stablizied," gee I would think they would point that out because it should increase its value. The whole thing is a non-sequitur anyhow, it starts out saying inquiry has been made about the pinholes and then goes on not to explain how they were mended but to talk about the cleaning.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>MW</b><p><i>"As to the area of concern at the bottom center of the photo, they are looking into whether there was paper missing, or if there may have been paper or something like white out on the photo that was removed. I was told that these findings would be disclosed in their revised description. This is probably why the description hasn't been updated yet."</i><br /><br /><br />Should the disclosures have been made prior to or after listing the item in their catalog auction (and online)?<br /><br />Also, what does it mean that they are "looking into" whether there was paper missing? Do they not know? Who restored the card?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>MW</b><p>What does "stabilized" mean in the present context? Can one "stabilize" an unstable paper object without physically adding something to it? Is "stabilization" some kind of metaphysical process that transcends the physical limitations of the card through supernatural restorative means? Or is "stabilized" another way of saying "paper added to reinforce the card"?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Sounds like a euphemism to me meaning absolutely nothing.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Jay Miller</b><p>Mike--The lot description has been modified by Doug Allen. The only restoration was the pinhole repair. As to stabilizing the card, according to Doug that involved the common process of deacidifying the paper.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>"Stabilized" to me almost sounds like they put a "protective coating" over the whole card???<br /><br />That would be interesting... and certainly something that should be disclosed.<br /><br />Heck, that might INCREASE the value of the cabinet to some people.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Jay: Any idea what "de-acidifying" entails??<br /><br />Do they just dip the whole card into something... or what?<br /><br />I am not familiar with this. Is this something that is done to Old Judge cards or any other old cards that actually consist of old photographs attached to cardboard backings??<br /><br />Just curious and interested. I would assume that if it can be done without messing up the cards... then it has probably been done HUNDREDS of times to old photo cards... and should maybe be done to ALL such cards?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Anyone have any stabilizing fluid they can sell me, would sure like to protect my cards as best I can.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Sounds to me like stabilization might be a good substitute for people who don't take to slabs.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>andy becker</b><p>the irony of the whole thread is, this post will probably deter potential bidders, or even better (or worse, depending on your point of view) get bidders to cancel their bids.<br />i'm just finding it pretty humorous since this thread was started by the consignor of the altered card. <br />as some beer company says "know when to say when" <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p>I dont think the extra info will matter that much for a few reasons.Whether its a 'rookie card' or not the fact that its an extremely early cabinet photo of a popular hall of famer that you might not see for sale again for a long time,people will forget the condition<br /><br />When something is so extremely rare it could be in vg or ex condition and it will probably go for the same price.If im looking for something one of a kind for a long time and it comes up for sale im not going to bid XX amount because its only vg condition,im going to try my best to win it and upgrade later if it ever comes along<br /><br />Thats exactly what will happen with this card.I would be very surprised if someone who really wants it bad enough to bid 4k plus now changes their mind because the card looks nicer than it used to, which wasnt as nice as it originally was to begin with
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>So if I buy this "cabinet"...<br /><br />will it actually INCREASE in value if I "re-restore" it to its original condition...<br /><br />by sticking some pins in it and spreading glue all over it??<br /><br />That might be fun. <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p>I think you would actually make more money Hal if you wrote the word Yankees under New York cause we all know Yankees items sell the best.<br /><br />I might win it and stick it in my safe and it will never see the light of day again except when company comes over on thanksgiving<br /><br />PS Hal,give some thought to those other non-rookie cabinets we talked up moneybags.I wont tell anyone about it
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>But John ...<br /><br />those 1886 J. Woods that TIK & TIK are selling are NOT "cards" to me...<br /><br />because NOT ONLY are they "cabinets"...<br /><br />but they are also "proofs"...<br /><br />and I am not a fan of proofs.<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />To me, this is like me taking a photograph of myself and then giving it to Salvador Dali to paint some portraits of me.<br /><br />Which has value?? The original photo ... or the artist's actual creations??<br /><br />To me, having the proofs just isn't as "appealling" as having the real final product: The "cards" themselves as they were INTENDED to look.<br /><br />Again, just my two cents.<br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br /><br /><br />
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>MW</b><p>Is this an area of paper loss or excess paper? Can any of the pre-restoration owners shed any light on this?<br /><br /><img src="http://members.aol.com/bmwcards/Keelerspot.jpg">
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>PASJD</b><p>Mike, it wasn't "restored," it was "cleaned/stablized," where do you get these notions?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>MW</b><p><i>"Mike--The lot description has been modified by Doug Allen. The only restoration was the pinhole repair. As to stabilizing the card, according to Doug that involved the common process of deacidifying the paper."</i><br /><br />Jay,<br /><br />I'm wondering the same thing as Hal. Is this something that Mastro routinely does to all its vintage memorabilia and baseball cards or are only certain items selected?
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>ramram</b><p>I still don't get it...if they can clean up the Mona Lisa and the Sistene Chapel why the heck can't they clean up baseball cards, etc.?? I still don't understand this whole leave 'em as they are and slab 'em mentality. I say - clean them up, fix them up, make them look their best and sell them. That's what you do with art, cars, women (sorry Julie) and everything else in the world!<br /><br />IMHO,<br /><br />Rob M.
|
WHAT IS THE KEELER ROOKIE
Posted By: <b>Hal Lewis</b><p>Rob:<br /><br />Only because nobody is worried about somebody ever trying to SELL the Mona Lisa or the Sistene Chapel to someone else down the road.<br /><br />That's my only concern. How on earth will ANYONE ever know in 20 years that this cabinet once had holes in it? <br /><br />Maybe some people wouldn't care if it did and would buy it anyway...<br /><br />but then those people shouldn't care if the card is somehow "permanently tagged" as having been restored.<br /><br /><img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />Don't get me wrong.<br /><br />This cabinet is indeed BEAUTIFUL now that it has been cleaned up, and it will make someone very happy. Like John said, if I wanted it, I would buy it in a heartbeat regardless of the condition.<br /><br />I just wish that there was some way of PERMANENTLY letting future generations know that work has been done on the piece.<br /><br />Maybe they should put a checklist on the BACK of the cabinet like you see in restaurant bathrooms:<br /><br /><br />Restored and Cleaned by:<br />---------------------------<br />Date: --/--/---- Person:<br />Date: --/--/---- Person:<br />Date: --/--/---- Person<br /><br /><br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 PM. |