![]() |
PSA completely unethical
They have people waiting 9 months to get cards graded for submissions that used to take 30 days but they are going to do on site grading at the national. Nice
|
Agreed, sent my cards to them in October - still be "researched" 9 months later.
|
Quote:
But it is not professional or considerate to their existing and waiting customer base. The optics is bad and they should be utilizing there resources to take care of their existing back log first |
I see nothing unethical unless PSA stated that they would NOT grade at the National. I expect they did not.
The National gives collectors another option. You can fly to the National and use their on-site services if you choose. It will probably be more expensive than their mail services, but it is an option. There is no right to have your cards graded faster by entering their mail queue, unless your contract with PSA so provides. I am not thrilled that PSA has gotten so expensive and increased its wait times. My response is not to use their services. But I think it is good for them to go to the National and give collectors an additional choice. edited to add: If you call PSA and say you will pay “the National fee” to have your mail submission pulled from the queue, graded and delivered—and they refuse—then I will get where you are coming from. |
Incredibly long wait times, losing orders, slabbing altered cards, price gouging their customers and there are still people here who defend them.
|
you sound like an attorney. so let suppose the power is out at your house and your local utility sends you emails stating they are doing everything possible to get the lights back on. you with me. and then you find out they are sending a team to a more affluent neighborhood to moon light and pick up some spare cash. i don't care what they do just don't send emails out telling people you care. unethical or good business. you say tomato i say tomahto.
|
Yes I say tomato. Tomahto is stupid.
|
Their business, PSA, is not essential like the power company is, it’s a high end choice service to grade with that company.
The days of this being a blue collar hobby have sadly long been over. |
tomahto
|
Then there's this:
I hired a handyman to come out to my house Monday. He never showed. After waiting an hour and 45 minutes he finally replied to my texts with "Sorry, had problems with my truck." I asked him if he was still coming out and as of this evening, 32 hours later, no reply. So I hired a different handy man to meet me at the house tomorrow. You don't like PSA, for any reason, go with someone else. Simple. And comparing having your electricity go out to not being able to get your cardboard evaluated in a timely manner is not a good analogy. Neither would comparing waiting for PSA be a good analogy to waiting for a heart transplant. Perspective is important: PSA evaluates cardboard and ink. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
just cardboard (tell them that):
The Newport Beach, Calif.-based company expects revenues for the quarter ended Dec. 31 of $35.4 million, with a gross margin of 64% and operating income of approximately $10 million. |
Quote:
|
perspective is important
|
Quote:
I would say that Joe Orlando is closer to a utility than a handyman in terms of GDP |
An old story......
4 Attachment(s)
Anyone who has been around awhile always knew PSA was unethical. Fact.
Many years ago, there was a 1948 Bowman Basketball low number find in an attic in Vermont. My buddy had been sending new cards to Beckett for years so he sent the find to Beckett. I did not care because they were razor sharp pack fresh. Over a couple years, I bought most in Beckett holders and slowly broke them out and sent to PSA. EVERY card graded with PSA and was usually within a half grade. Sometimes lower, sometimes higher in the new PSA slabs. Here's the story.....at the end I got tired of breaking them out so I sent PSA my last 4 BVG 8's. Waited patiently and they popped one day! "did not meet min grade" which I had put down as 8 since they had been very consistent. I was mad. I called PSA and had them "admin hold the cards for re-checking". 2 days later they called, told me the head grader reviewed them, and sent them back to me. I basically paid about $160 at the time for PSA to look at my cards and tell me they were not 8s and they sent them back in the Beckett 8 holders!!!! $160 for NOTHING! I was livid, broke all 4 out and resubmitted! Yes PSA is such a genius at getting our money twice. Take a guess what all 4 cards graded out as? BINGO. PSA 8, PSA 8, PSA 8, PSA 8 Absolutely unethical and incompetent! I knew they were 8s. Beckett knew they were 8s....... PSA had to get 2 rounds of cash to tell me that they were 8s! UGH! Mike PS I have the 6th ranked Registry Set and the 3rd highest GPA due to this find. Highest grades were 9s. I only did it for the Registry! I wish SGC still had a registry! ugh Attachment 469988. Attachment 469989 Attachment 469990. Attachment 469991 |
Quote:
Mark17 or whoever you are if its just "cardboard and ink" why is it so expensive to evaluate and why should you have 64% profit margin to do such "simpleton" work as you say. these people are worthy of criticism as are we all. then again i am a "simpleton" from pittsburgh |
Quote:
you are wrong John. If Amazon did not deliver your "stuff" when they said they would you would be an "unhappy John" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
depends....
Quote:
Messy but Yummy! :) Mike |
Quote:
|
Nice....
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Mike Attachment 469994 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Do business with PSA 2. Don't do business with PSA What so many people here do is choose #1, and then complain ad nauseam, in thread after thread after thread, about how bad and over-priced and slow PSA is. Hasn't that horse been beaten to death yet? I collect GU jerseys but if cards were my thing, I'd be into raw, or would've switched over to Beckett or SGC long ago. If I continued to use PSA, with all the problems so thoroughly and repetitively enumerated here, I would accept the reality of the situation rather than complain as I hand them more cash. It reminds me of the guy who bangs his head against the wall and complains that it hurts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I really do wish someone would start a cross-TPG registry for those people who are into that. I also hope other TPGs will enter the market with quality services. Competition is good. |
Quote:
that should be their mission statement they should not be offering any services until they get through the glut of submissions that they accepted knowing full well they were not going to be able to deliver you can argue all your dog eat dog comments you want but most people on this board just seem to enjoy this as a hobby and then you have PSA that wants to monetize every opportunity and deliver crappy service for gods sake i collect track and field cards i must have rocks in my head |
Quote:
|
Mark, I agree with you, and I'll add that of all the questionable things PSA does that throw sand in my gearbox, having longer than expected wait times at a time when they've been so busy they had to stop taking new submissions doesn't make my list.
|
If anyone can feel your pain, it is me. Not many people can say that PSA has lost one of their orders. I can. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt and will reserve judgement for how they handle my situation. Right now, it isn't looking favorable.
|
PSA sucks...they have proven since day 1(with the grading of Gretzky Wagner) they're not capable of accurately assessing cards. They have reinforced this over the years with their inconsistent and ever changing grading standards.
The folks over at Blowout forums have exposed this over and over...time and time again. At what point does it become an issue of PSA's fanboys/customer base are greedy and only care about the all mighty dollar...kinda like PSA. With most business models...if a business operated the way PSA does...they'd be out of business lickety split...not thriving and making money hand over fist. Not to even mention the ridiculous cost/wait times? So who's to blame here??? |
I've had it, never again will I send them a card.
|
Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk |
Quote:
So are the people that sell their High Grade PSA cards. Have you seen the latest Auction Prices. That is the reason why they have so many submissions. I collect Pre War but even all of the new stuff is getting record prices. Glad that I bought mine before the latest surge. PS . I agree that the long wait time is not what you sign on for based on the Submission that you agreed on and that PSA should give something back to its customers like free subs but with the success they are having I don’t see it. Also You will have to pay a heavy price to have cards graded at the National. John P |
I don't know why anyone should be surprised by this. Bottom line is you have a choice to use PSA or not it's as simple as that.
|
Quote:
|
I agree Tim.
And PSA isn't doing anything unethical. It's business. Are they screwing a lot of customers over, absolutely. But it doesn't matter to them, or their customers apparently, as the more people submit the more money they and PSA make. It's not rocket science. I applaud them for taking advantage of the situation and just shake my head at the comments from those that can't wait to submit and complain too. My prediction is yet another grading company comes to fruition soon. You heard it here first. :) Why wouldn't someone enter the market with the chaos and money involved? . Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If I do another group sub with them, I have no one to blame but myself. Of course, if they make this right with me, I would be tempted. Leon nailed it. You hate to use anyone else, because PSA cards are getting a premium. If this isn't the proverbial "catch 22", I don't know what is......
|
Quote:
|
PSA has had my submission of about 50 really nice vintage post-war Hof'ers since May of 2020. The cards now appear to be in grading, but who knows? This will be my last submission to PSA.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A few months ago I decided to complete this whole set in high grade. However, I didn't care if the cards had print lines on them or if they were off-centered. I had no idea how challenging it was going to be! A lot of raw examples that I purchased online from various sellers had light creases in them. A couple were under-sized as well. And finding the high numbers in good shape is a nightmare! They're expensive and many of them are hand-cut too. Do you have any high numbers? The Mikan is the big one, but there are a lot of other stars in the high number series as well. |
Quote:
|
I think from now on onsite grading is probably the only opportunity I'll take advantage of to get my cards graded. So, may there be more!
|
I think I'll just keep ALL my cards as they are...raw.
You guys are a bunch of investment brokers and speculators, not card collectors in the hobby. Stop, stop pretending. |
Quote:
They didn't. Accepting money to let latecomers jump the line when not giving that opportunity to those already in line is unethical. |
They're not "jumping the line." It's no different than submitting at a higher level through the mail. The higher level submissions always came before bulks, etc. That's never been a secret, it's outright stated on the forms.
|
Quote:
|
Jumping the line implies something unfair. Everyone has the same opportunity to pay the same rates and get the same treatment. As far as I know nobody gets special line-jumping privileges because they are a snappy dresser. So if it's a known practice, and applied equitably, to me it's not line jumping. If this has always been the practice, acting outraged because it's still the practice seems a little silly.
|
This doesn’t make them unethical. So tired of people
Not understanding the process so they spout stupidity. In the holder their assessment was that it was not definitely worthy of crossing so they rejected it. Common sense would tell A rational thinking person that it’s harder to see an entire card in a holder and since they can’t put it back in the other companies holder they have to error on the side of caution and only cross if positive it will cross. This isn’t unethical but smart business. It’s not their responsibility to cover for your laziness and it’s not their fault you don’t understand the process fully. But hey it’s net 54 so a good anti PSA conspiracy sounds like par for the course. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Laugh of the day.....
Quote:
That was pretty funny. I needed that! lol LMAO! Mike PS I apologize. Maybe you have never had the thrill of seeing pack fresh cards pre-1950. I have and I still own most of them. The 4 cards I sent were the last of the 1948s. Most had already graded 8s or 9s so PSA was well aware of this "find". I literally sent them in small batches because I was afraid the post office would lose them! The cards I sent in BVG holders were BLAZERS. Hellen Keller would have given them 8.5s on feel alone (sorry Helen :). That was uncalled for. I understand because you have not seen the cards. They were dripping original 1948s. Sharp corners, pristine look to them. They almost appear oversized due to so many other 1948s being slabbed when I can clearly see "alterations" on alot of them that are out there. For PSA to not slab them showed me their true colors. I knew they were going to grade as 8s raw but it was almost a litmus test. You say I was lazy for not breaking 4 cards out of holders? That really made me laugh. You have a nice day Mr. Parson. Peace, Mike |
Thanks!
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 470132 Attachment 470133 Attachment 470134 Attachment 470135 |
Some more.....
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Mike Attachment 470136 Attachment 470137 Attachment 470138 Attachment 470139 |
Quote:
That being said I HAVE actually called PSA and upgraded a submission to speed it up, so, yeah, kinda. |
Money talks and Bull Shit Walks. If you have the money you can pretty much do it, everyone has a price, you most likely would too.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sweet cards! I wanted to complete the set, but I didn't! I ran into too many problems buying them and got fed-up! I don't have the Mikan card. Finding one with strong corners is going to cost a lot, and it'll probably be trimmed too! :D Like you pointed out, many of these cards came out of the factory over-sized and I'm pretty sure that some high-grade examples out there went through guys like Gary Moser! :eek: |
https://www.ebay.com/itm/37365748279...oAAOSwHHtg-aD2
PSA should not have graded this card. If you see any of them missing color, then they were post-factory cut. If you look at the scan, then you can see how rough the top and bottom edges are, and that's not normal. Only the left and right edges are supposed to be rough, while the top and bottom are supposed to be smooth. You really gotta' know your shit when you buy these cards or you're gonna' run into so many problems, you know what I'm saying? |
I still chuckle about the title of this thread.
Most people use PSA because their expectancy value is higher than their grading fees, discounted for inflation and risks of loss. Taking a highly simplified example, if you have a raw card worth $1000 and you think there is a 50% chance it will be worth $2000 after grading and a 50% chance it will be worth $1000 after grading, your expectancy value is $1500 less grading fees, inflation (while you wait) and risks of loss. Let's say inflation and risks of loss total $200, reducing your expectancy value to $1300. You will still pay up to $300 in grading fees (maybe somewhat less if you are risk averse, as most of us are) because your expectancy value will still be greater than the value of your ungraded card. I am sure there are collectors who have legitimate moral concerns about PSA but this is how many people, myself included (and probably PSA) view the situation. In sum, it's fine to complain about how PSA has "screwed" collectors, but that sentiment needs to be balanced against the value that PSA has created for collectors. And, no, I am not on PSA's "payroll." I have met Joe Orlando and David Hall but neither one ever offered me a dime. I do, however, have cards that are worth a lot more because they are in PSA holders. |
Quote:
|
My name is not "Mr. Chuckle." Please do not engage in ad hominem. It just makes you look bad. If you are not happy with PSA , I suggest that you use other grading services.
Edited to add: I think it's cool that you collect track and field cards. I love 20th century American ephemera from T206 to Warhol paintings. Good luck with your collecting pursuits. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They are still a small company $35m in a quarter is really peanuts for most businesses as is $10m operating income and the profit margin is nothing wild either. The premium the cards get over SGC which grades every bit as tough but has a much less checkered background is mind boggling to me.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 AM. |