![]() |
Yes, I am a glutton for punishment!! (OCT) GRADES POSTED!!
Anyone interest in subbing under bulk?? Raw cards abound in my humble abode. Let me know....
|
Pre 55 ok?
|
Quote:
|
In
I’m in
|
Only have 5 or 6
|
Quote:
That's good. We need to have at least 100, and I got 50 myself. |
I'm pretty sure I can dredge up some cards, Bobby.
|
Quote:
|
Bobby, I have about 6-8 cards I have been needing to have graded by PSA. I’ll gladly join your sub. I have seen your others in the past and think your communication through every step is top notch. Thank you for having another.
|
how much per card?
|
Bobby, I'm in again for a few.
|
FWIW: PSA has a quarterly special for pre 1960 cards with only a 25 card minimum and 45 day turnaround. You probably already know that but a 45 day turn is better than the 85 day turn on bulk submissions. I broke a large bulk submission into 4 smaller ones at the National and am curious what the results will be.
|
I’d love to take part (my first ever PSA submission).
Thanks for organizing this! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Do it.
I can send cards this week. |
1 Attachment(s)
Opinions needed...
I have this 1968 Mantle with an ST qualifier. The 'stain' is a tiny bit of gum/wax in front of his face, and it could be eliminated immediately with a quick wipe of the panty hose (don't get me started on my hatred of the 'stain' designation with regards to wax on the front of a card)... Attachment 362608 Should I do it? Obviously, the only reason I would is because I want the card to be more 'valuable' due to the lack of a qualifier, but I would be annoyed if it came back as a lower grade (which is always a possibility) and/or possibly graded with an OC qualifier instead, because I just realized it is somewhat uncomfortably close to the bottom (and left) border. |
Quote:
I wouldn't do it. You're right, you don't know what you're going to get. |
Quote:
|
I have a few I would love to add. Is there a maximum value?
|
OK Bobby
if you're silly enuff to repeat yourself I then have 4/5 space cards for you!
|
I'll have a few to send to you. Thanks again Bobby.
|
Crossovers?
|
I have some. Are 1955 Bowmans considered standard?
Thanks for doing this again. |
I'm in again, thanks again for doing this for us!!
|
Quote:
I have never submitted a card before. Is there a maximum value for a bulk sub? Thanks Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
I have a few that I would like to Pop
|
In. When do you need the cards by?
|
Quote:
|
Tall boys ok?
|
Subs—
Please count me in for 3/4 subs of T206
|
Max value 100. 55 bowmans OK. Tall boys ok as long as they arent too big
|
I'm in. Let's set a cut-off date.
Jeff |
Quote:
I miss the old SNL. |
Yeah, have Jon Lovitz looking at a card..."It's a PSA 3, no wait...now it's a PSA 9...that's the ticket!"
|
Sounds like plenty of interest.,
|
We are ON....for those who have subbed before, you know the routine. For those that haven't here ya go. Send the cards in a CARD SAVER 1 or 2!!! They must be STANDARD SIZE. No oversized cards!!! Include a slip of paper stating the cards, and what you classify them as. Your net 54 handle (so I can know how to contact you), and your return shipping address. Also, the value you place on the cards. This is FAIR VALUE - what you want to be reimbursed should PSA damage your cards. Don't lie and say a $5 card is worth $99. PSA will want you to prove it.
You can include a check or paypal/venmo me once I confirm receipt. DO NOT PAY BEFORE HAND. It's easier when everyone does the same thing. The cost is $9 per card. $8 is what PSA charges, and the extra $1 per card helps defray the shipping cost TO and FROM California. For this type of bulk sub, there are NO YEARLY limitations. Every year is good, however, the value per card CAN NOT exceed $100. That's it. Robert Williams PO Box 61362 Raleigh, NC 27661-1362 |
Bobby,
What about return shipping from you to us? You must need more than $1 to cover that. Sorry...my first time and want to make sure I pay correctly! Thank you! |
Quote:
|
Thanks Bobby...makes perfect sense.
Now, I just need to buy some magnification so my old eyes can pick what cards to submit! |
I don't agree with bobby on PSA topics, but admire his ability to boldly stand up for himself.
|
I'm In! Will try to ship Wednesday.
|
I should be able to ship mine Wednesday also.
Thanks Bobby! |
Are you able to do reviews as part of this bulk deal? Typically you would just pay an additional shipping cost, but not sure you have factored that in? I will send roughly 25 if so.
Thanks |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hi Bobby.
Count me in for around 20. I'll have them in the mail to you by Friday. |
Hi Bobby,
I have 20 cards going out USPS Priority in tomorrow's mail. Please confirm receipt via pm. Thanks, Jeff |
I will be sending you some cards as well. Thanks for putting this together!
Dave |
I may do a few, when do you need cards by? and where do I send to?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bobby - thanks so much for doing this . . . AGAIN!!
I have one '61 Union Oil PCL card. Size is 3" x 4". Sokay? Also a few Topps '52. |
The 1952 Topps are definitely OK.....they CAN NOT be bigger than Tall Boys....here is the largest they can be....
3 1/2" x 5 1/6 They MUST be that size or smaller. And cards only. No pins. No coins. |
Hi Bob, I have 10 T206 that I'll send later this week. Thanks again.
|
Bobby, same here. Getting together about 10-15 by early next week.
|
I sent 18 yesterday, 8/21.
Thanks |
Yes, when are they needed by?
|
Quote:
|
Sent. Thanks Bobby
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
Bobby, I have this 1997 Topps Certified Autograph Willie Mays card. Does it count...or does the auto throw a monkey wrench into the works?
Attachment 363776 Wouldn't mind getting it into a protective slab. Have a Tony Gonzalez somewhere, too. |
Quote:
|
Inevitable
Was it shipped?
Was it received? Was it logged? Any update? Any update? What step is it on? Grading? Assembly? QA one or two? Shipped? Didja get them yet? Where are my cards? Just thought I’d get these out of the way up front. 🤓 And, last but not least - THANKS, BOBBY!! |
Quote:
|
Bobby,
Sent 8 cards your way today...estimated delivery is Tuesday. Just realized I meant to include a check but forgot...will pay via PayPal! Thanks again for doing this...didn’t send anything high value, but interested to see what grades they get (yes, I understand I could have a LONG wait!) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
bulk sub psa
I may have 4 or 5 cards. Will send by September 10.
|
All paid up. Bobby, thank you again. These community subs are fun.
:cool:! |
7 1952 topps heading your way
|
Quote:
|
Just sent out 11 cards to you.
|
Are 52-55 Red Mans too big?
|
3 Attachment(s)
More advice needed...
In scanning through my cards to find ones worthy of grading through Bobby's group sub, I've come to a fork in the road. This second-year 1964 Pete Rose is obviously way off center and verging on miscut, but the card sells for a decent amount in all grades, so I'd like to have it graded simply to make it easier to move sometime down the road (hopefully a long time from now). Attachment 365246Attachment 365247 Here's the problem. The corners are nicely squared and the only really visible 'problem' is that tiny notch (so to speak) at the top (which looks 1000% worse in the scan than it does in real life). But, and it's a big but...on back there are 4 microscopic black dots that I have to assume are marks. No matter how much they are magnified, I can't tell what the heck they are, and the cardboard isn't indented from a pen. If this card was graded, I assume the MK qualifier would take precedence, correct? Even though it's wildly OC, it would get whatever grade they deem it is with an MK on the label, or does it get downgraded due to the centering PLUS the added qualifier?? As an example, here's a random Pete Rose RC (screengrab from ebay) that is also obviously way OC, but it got a ST designation instead... Attachment 365248 Should I get my '64 Rose graded? Opinions are very welcome. |
Quote:
|
Up to 295 and cards still coming in.
|
I sent 20 yesterday via Priority.
|
322
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM. |