![]() |
Its not just moser/pwcc...more trimmers exposed
|
They have outed several on the modern side.
There are others on the vintage side who don't have the paper trail too. |
From a pure business standpoint why would PWCC want to be linked to known card doctors who I believe are committing FRAUD?????? I think altering a card and misleading a potential buyer should be a punishable felony.
|
As long as they're getting through PSA these guys can buy the cards through multiple Ebay IDs and sell them through any auction house. The only way to stop this is to figure out how or why so many doctored cards are making it through. Especially the modern trimmed cards which should be easy to measure.
If anyone has been thinking about starting a third party grading service now may be the time to do so. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This widespread problem transcends PWCC. As long as the "card modifiers" continue to dupe PSA, these issues can and will rear their ugly head potentially anywhere.... eBay, Auction Houses, net54's BST, direct sales, trades, etc. And why can't PSA just measure the cards, again? Has there been any response from them at all? It will be interesting to see if they ever acknowledge it, and how much their attorneys spin/downplay it. The power they have within the hobby is disgusting and shameful, and I wish that someone, somehow, some day could take them down. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you go through THAT trouble for cards under $300....yikes man. YIKES. |
Quote:
|
Have every graded card measured to the exact “...“ And put that measurement on the back of the label in small print. If it doesn’t measure correctly but is within a graders tolerance, the buyer can determine if that is ok.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
3:1 odds. You in? |
Quote:
|
I just think it would be really, really hard to prove that Brent knowingly accepted doctored cards on consignment. And even if you could prove it, I'm not sure exactly what you would charge him with? Wouldn't part of his defense be that the industry's most trusted third party authenticator said they were good?
I'm not defending him, just saying it would be really hard to get a conviction. Oh, what the hell. 4:1 odds. Jeff? |
Quote:
|
:)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Tip of the iceberg. It’s gaining momentum. Even the doubters and supporters from the early Blowout threads are turning as they realize ALL graded cards are suspect.
This will be one heck of a National. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Edited to add: But there has to be a time limit. Within one year? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If a year is not sufficient, why are people so concerned about the upcoming National, as if something big (arrests is what I believe was alluded to) is going to happen there? |
Quote:
|
It's, to me, very similar to a situation in poker a few years back where a previous WSOP Main Event winner was founder of a poker site that was later discovered to be actively cheating the players by giving him and anyone he designated super-user status where they could see the other players cards.
By the online reaction you'd have thought He would've been risking death if he showed his face at the WSOP ever again. When he did there were a few snide remarks, but the internet vigilantes were, amazingly, nowhere to be found. This has nothing to do with law enforcement issues, but with the internet muscles that people think will lead to live confrontation at an industry event. |
Fun facts...you guys realize there are over 10,000 members on Net54 and hey guess what? I see the same handful of guys talking about the same thing on multiple threads. It’s very possible the other 9,990 members have differing opinions. So where is this going to lead us...I’ll give 9,990 : 1 odds that someone starts another thread related to the same topic. :D
Take a vacation and enjoy the rest of your holiday weekend! |
Martin, you’re aware that trying to stop discussion about Brent’s fraud wouldn’t stop a criminal investigation, right? Just checking.
|
Come on, Martin is all sunshine and roses.
|
Trimming
Quote:
Most of us who belong to Net54 are content with our low grade raw T206's and T213's. My guess is that there are only a few dozen people on this forum who give a rat's ass about a trimmed $5000 Giannis rookie. |
Quote:
Punished if/when caught. This is where i stand. |
Quote:
T227 Cobb, and the Red T206 Cobb that went from 1.5 to 3 that have been shown as possibly bad on blowout. These are just a few I found this morning. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Quote:
|
I think Brent was part of the 'buyer's club' that ran/shilled prices up. Why? To give an appearance that PWCC cards command higher prices. PSA was pushing heavily on advertising these record prices, too.
When the buyer's club was outed, Brent went of defense and made some posts to try to clear the air and do damage control. Then came the next best thing: PWCC assigning grades to already graded cards. It was ludicrous, but I guess it worked as it kept the premiums coming. Now an altered '52 Mantle exposes hundreds of other altered cards and trimmers and there is an apparent connection between one of them and Brent. Brent again goes on defense, possibly knowing the level of fraud that took place and wanting to get ahead of it goes on record trying to link/normalize it to restoration and conservation, which it is not. The common denominator here is Brent/PWCC. If anyone on the Blowout forum is reading this, please look into the Topps Bobby Hull rookie, Topps/OPC Wayne Gretzky rookies, and 1989 Topps Joe Sakic rookie. There have been some phenomenal examples come to light in the past three years offered by PWCC. The 1989 PSA 10 Sakic stayed at a POP 2 for YEARS and then suddenly got flooded. Hull (a notoriously OC card) has had some clean centered ones slabbed in this time, and the Gretzky cards have been graded with too nice of edges. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Everyone should be worried about this. It affects the very reputation of the TPG who grades or graded YOUR cards. It's a direct negative reflection on the integrity of EVERY PSA and BGS graded card. If they can't or won't catch alteration, what the hell good are they. This renders third party grading essentially useless, beyond card protection. You can't trust a grade. If you aren't worried, your'e oblivious. Every card now carries a stigma of possibly being trimmed by these criminals. Criminals who have been handed a means to commit fraud by TPG's not doing what is supposed to be their core objective.
|
Quote:
|
Long holiday weekend allows for reading every Blowout post.
So, we have a handful of trimmers who ONLY deal in grading and selling their handiwork. Looks like over 30,000 cards so far when Block is included and using submission data. Averaging about $1,000 per card in sales. Over $3 million in fraud sales and growing. That has to affect everyone at some point. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
This was just posted on Blowout from the most recent National. Notice the top and bottom names.
|
Probably a coincidence on Moser.
|
Although, if they have that board running again this year, it would be really smart to take a picture of it every couple of minutes.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look at that awful, obviously altered right border. Nice job, PSA :confused: |
Is that board really legit? I thought Matt Miller was banned from subbing to PSA. Not for trimming, but a beef he had with them involving a card that they damaged during grading.
|
The more I read about this the more I stew about PSA. What kind of crap are they putting out as unaltered. I see there is no reply from them about any of this. They will just wait until it blows over and then continue with the same nonsense. What a friggin joke they have become.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And their failures (whether it's pure ineptitude or "favorable" treatment) are much more dangerous and further-reaching than PWCC. |
Quote:
I HOPE they are doing something internally about this, surely they do or will perceive a threat to the brand and that should motivate them. |
Good golly Miss Molly.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1925 |
Quote:
Who owns that green conby?? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That green Cobb exhibits perhaps the most "work" of any of the exposed cards, to date...
With regard to the original, all 4 corners exhibited significant corner creases (in addition to the obvious corner wear). Yet the creases have all seemingly vanished in the "worked" version. Not to mention the cleaning, rebuilding, etc. Very discouraging. :( |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 AM. |