Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   O/T Life or Death, One Game, My Starting 9 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=199650)

Lgarza99 01-09-2015 04:46 PM

O/T Life or Death, One Game, My Starting 9
 
I was thinking who I would start if my life depended on one game. Some of my picks are obvious, but others are based on one game heroics we have seen or read about through the years. Tough to pick if this was truly a life or death game. I would be twisting with each pitch so all I could do would be to trust the following team:

In batting order and position. Outfield set like an all-start team.

1. Ty Cobb, lf, played like his life depended on it. Speed on the bases at once. Intimidation, and maybe takes out one of the key opponents.

2. Derek Jeter, ss, moves runners over, just wins, and anyone who would dive into the stands for one out is on my team, it could be the last out?

3. Babe Ruth, rf, gotta have THE man. Maybe he has a three home run game? Good for at least one shot in the clutch. I gotta keep him from partying the night before though!

4. Lou Gehrig, 1b, he obviously showed up every day to excel. And he did! I know I could count on him.

5. Willie Mays, cf, that over the head catch could be a life saver, not just a game saver. Power, steals, he could do it all.

6. Mike Schmidt, 3b, great defender and power. Tough pick leaving out George Brett. I couldn't go wrong either way.

7. Johnny Bench, threw out 43% of attempted steals, great power, best defensive catcher.

8. Eddie Collins, 2b, gets on base, speed, helps turn the line up over. A winner.

9. Bob Gibson, based on one game, he has to be my starter. Just the total will and desire to win. He would leave it ALL on the line like his life depended on it.

RP, Mariano Rivera, the greatest closer of all time.

Manager, John McGraw, he would pull no punches. He would probably fight me to start Christy Mathewson though.

All that WAR stuff may say different based on career totals, but if this was just for one game, I would take these guys......and live! Lol.

EvilKing00 01-09-2015 05:01 PM

1-Cobb cf
2- Wagner ss
3- ruth - rf
4- williams- lf
5- gherig - 1b
6- chipper jones - 3b
7- bench - c
8- collins - 2b

Bonds dh if we need one hitting 5th moving the rest down

Pedro martinez sp
Rivera cl

Eric72 01-09-2015 05:20 PM

1. Oscar Charleston, CF
2. Honus Wagner, SS
3. Rogers Hornsby, 2B
4. Babe Ruth, RF
5. Lou Gehrig, 1B
6. Barry Bonds, LF (pre-steroids...for the upside, defensively)
7. Josh Gibson, C
8. Mike Schmidt, 3B
9. Walter Johnson, SP

DH, if applicable - Ted Williams

SAllen2556 01-09-2015 05:34 PM

One game - gotta win:

Rose 2b
Brett 3b
Mantle cf
Gehrig 1b
Reggie Jackson rf
Bench c
Kirk Gibson lf
Ripken ss
Koufax p

Lgarza99 01-09-2015 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric72 (Post 1364617)
1. Oscar Charleston, CF
2. Honus Wagner, SS
3. Rogers Hornsby, 2B
4. Babe Ruth, RF
5. Lou Gehrig, 1B
6. Barry Bonds, LF (pre-steroids...for the upside, defensively)
7. Josh Gibson, C
8. Mike Schmidt, 3B
9. Walter Johnson, SP

DH, if applicable - Ted Williams


Josh Gibson, interesting. I wish I knew more about him.

Eric72 01-09-2015 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lgarza99 (Post 1364628)
Josh Gibson, interesting. I wish I knew more about him.

Sr. Garza,

He is in the MLB Hall of Fame. You should be able to find highlights of his career on their website...along with others.

Best regards,

Eric

cincyredlegs 01-09-2015 06:19 PM

Kinda hard to argue with the guys on the list but if I HAVE to HAVE one guy on my team it would have to be Pete Rose. If my life depended on it, I want him on my side.

Mark

wolf441 01-09-2015 06:26 PM

If my life depended on it
 
2B - Morgan
SS - Wagner
CF- Mays
LF - Bonds (definitely while on steroids. Hey, my life depends on it :D)
DH - Ruth (okay, I'm cheating a bit here)
1B - Gehrig
RF - Clemente
3B - Schmidt
C - Bench


SP - Sandy Koufax (in his prime)
Closer - Rivera

MVSNYC 01-09-2015 06:38 PM

1. Ty Cobb, LF
2. Derek Jeter, SS
3. Rogers Hornsby, 2B
4. Babe Ruth, RF
5. Lou Gehrig, 1B
6. Willie Mays, CF (sorry Mick)
7. Mike Schmidt, 3B
8. Yogi Berra, C
9. Christy Mathewson, SP

Mariano Rivera, RP
Joe Torre, Manager

Kenny Cole 01-09-2015 06:41 PM

For one game:

2B Jackie Robinson -- Steals home in the WS and generally makes everyone nervous

SS Wagner -- Great in every respect.

RF Ruth -- enough said.

CF Mantle. I love Mays and Charleston, but Mantle was so dominant in the post-season that I have to pick him

1B Gehrig.

LF Bonds. Hands down. Far and away the greatest hitter I've ever seen in person, and I've seen many of them. IBB with the bases loaded? Seriously? No one ever wanted to pitch to him

3B Schmidt

C Probably go with Gibson over Bench by just a touch.

P Koufax. ERA in the world series he pitched in was miniscule.

Northviewcats 01-09-2015 06:45 PM

If they were in their prime...
 
CF Ty Cobb
2B Martin Dihigo
RF Babe Ruth
1B Lou Gehrig
LF Joe Jackson
3B Pete Rose
C Johnny Bench
SS Derek Jeter

SP Walter Johnson

Runscott 01-09-2015 06:52 PM

Intriguing question

2b - Joe Morgan
ss - Honus Wagner
cf - Joe DiMaggio
1b - Lance Berkman
rf - Carlos Beltran
dh - Kirk Gibson
c - Yadier Molina
lf - Ted Williams
3b - Brooks Robinson
sp - Curt Schilling
rp - Dennis Eckersley

VoodooChild 01-09-2015 07:08 PM

1. Pete Rose 2B
2. Tony Gwynn RF
3. Ken Griffey Jr. CF
4. Mike Schmidt 3B
5. Frank Thomas 1B
6. Johnny Bench C
7. Bo Jackson LF
8. Ozzie Smith SS
9. Greg Maddux SP

z28jd 01-09-2015 07:13 PM

If it's life or death, I don't know how you could pass on Bonds for your team, especially during his peak years. I'd also go for the best player for every position regardless if what I thought of their desire. Sure Rose or Jeter are great players, but you have to leave off all-time greats that dwarf them to put them on the team and I wouldn't risk that for one game with so much on the line.

Bench-Gehrig-Hornsby-Wagner-Schmidt
Bonds-Mays-Ruth
Ted Williams DH
Mathewson starting, Walter Johnson relief pitcher. In one all or nothing game you have to go with the two best pitchers ever.

Mikehealer 01-09-2015 07:17 PM

Only going with players I saw play, so from the mid 70's to present day.

SP-Randy Johnson
C-Johnny Bench
1B-Don Mattingly
2B-Roberto Alomar
3b-George Brett
SS-Alan Trammell
LF-Barry Bonds
CF-Ken Griffey
RF-Dwight Evans

If Brett is up late, with the game on the line, I like the chances of this team.

Runscott 01-09-2015 07:22 PM

John, since it is all about one critical game, opinions are going to vary widely. I will take a season of Bonds but one game from Carlos Beltean
I almost put Dave Henderson and Scott Rolen on my team just because of a couple of key clutch performances I saw.

Runscott 01-09-2015 07:24 PM

I personally saw the game where a lefty ph was needed and Griffey jr was sleeping.

botport 01-09-2015 07:28 PM

Here goes....
 
Cobb-lf
Clemente-rf
Mays-cf
Ruth-p
Gehrig-1b
Wagner-ss
Bench-c
Robinson-3b
Sandberg-2b

AndrewJerome 01-09-2015 07:54 PM

1. Rickey Henderson LF
2. Honus Wagner SS
3. Mickey Mantle CF
4. Babe Ruth RF
5. Edgar Martinez DH
6. Lou Gehrig 1B
7. Yogi Berra C
8. George Brett 3B
9. Martin Dihigo 2B

Randy Johnson SP
Satchel Paige middle relief
Mariano Rivera CL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ElCabron 01-09-2015 08:40 PM

In one game, all that really matters is the guy on the mound. Pick any one of the following as my starter and I like my odds: Bob Gibson, Sandy Koufax, Christy Mathewson, John Smoltz, Madison Bumgarner.

Mariano Rivera as my closer, though I doubt he'd get in the game. And PLEASE, let me play one of these teams that has Ty Cobb, a .262 career postseason hitter who never won a championship.

-Ryan

pgellis 01-09-2015 08:52 PM

I can't believe what I'm reading:

Lance Berkman
Derek Jeter
Carlos Beltran
Madison Bumgarner

Come on guys!

z28jd 01-09-2015 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runscott (Post 1364679)
John, since it is all about one critical game, opinions are going to vary widely. I will take a season of Bonds but one game from Carlos Beltean
I almost put Dave Henderson and Scott Rolen on my team just because of a couple of key clutch performances I saw.

Obviously people can have their own opinion in something like this, but I don't see anyone better.

I think if you remember the early playoff Bonds, you remember someone that tried too hard to win and got out of his game, or just didn't play well under pressure. I would not take the Pirates version in a critical game, even though he was perhaps the best player in the game then.

When he was at his best, he was a machine that most people who didn't see him daily, don't give him credit for. He had the tiniest strike zone in the business, stood on top of the plate due to that body armor they let him wear and he never swung at a bad pitch. That Bonds was so zoned in(plus the umpires basically let him call strikes) that he would be perfect on any team. Most people just think steroids, but if you watched him everyday(thank you MLB package for his last five years), you saw the perfect hitter. He was basically playing t-ball and even Mario Mendoza could have been a great player if every pitch he swung at was right down the middle.

ElCabron 01-09-2015 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pgellis (Post 1364730)
I can't believe what I'm reading:

Lance Berkman
Derek Jeter
Carlos Beltran
Madison Bumgarner

Come on guys!

Have you watched baseball at all in the past 80 years? All 4 of those guys are amazing in the postseason. Bumgarner just had the best postseason of any pitcher in the history of baseball. And I hate the guy. But things are the way the are.

-Ryan

ethicsprof 01-09-2015 09:10 PM

one game I have to win
 
batting order with position

cobb LF
hans wagner ss
Gehrig 1st
young Ruth P
josh Gibson c
Hornsby 2nd
Yankee Ruth rf
DiMaggio cf
Schmidt 3rd

best,
barry

Runscott 01-09-2015 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by z28jd (Post 1364740)
Obviously people can have their own opinion in something like this, but I don't see anyone better.

I think if you remember the early playoff Bonds, you remember someone that tried too hard to win and got out of his game, or just didn't play well under pressure. I would not take the Pirates version in a critical game, even though he was perhaps the best player in the game then.

When he was at his best, he was a machine that most people who didn't see him daily, don't give him credit for. He had the tiniest strike zone in the business, stood on top of the plate due to that body armor they let him wear and he never swung at a bad pitch. That Bonds was so zoned in(plus the umpires basically let him call strikes) that he would be perfect on any team. Most people just think steroids, but if you watched him everyday(thank you MLB package for his last five years), you saw the perfect hitter. He was basically playing t-ball and even Mario Mendoza could have been a great player if every pitch he swung at was right down the middle.


You are correct - if you watched him every day. Playoffs are different, especially in a one-game scenario. The guys on my list are for the most part people who I saw play under pressure.

Runscott 01-09-2015 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1364745)
Have you watched baseball at all in the past 80 years? All 4 of those guys are amazing in the postseason. Bumgarner just had the best postseason of any pitcher in the history of baseball. And I hate the guy. But things are the way the are.

-Ryan

I haven't seen Phil's list, but I'm certainly curious. I forgot about Bumgarner or I would probably have listed him instead of Schilling. Tough call there.

This has got me thinking about star played who I wouldn't want anywhere near a 'one game-winner takes all' scenario.

conor912 01-09-2015 09:35 PM

I'm not sure why, but at some point as I was reading this thread it occurred to me that it was possible to make up a team of just Yankees. I know it will have naysayers, but I think on any given day this team could beat any team made up of any players in MLB history....and I'm from Boston, so that's saying a lot.

1. Boggs 3b
2. Lazzeri 2b
3. Mantle lf
4. Ruth rf
5. DiMaggio cf
6. Gehrig 1b
7. Jeter ss
8. Berra c
9. Ford p

Rivera rp

conor912 01-09-2015 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VoodooChild (Post 1364675)
7. Bo Jackson LF

Nice

jbhofmann 01-09-2015 11:47 PM

LF Bonds (yes leadoff..want him getting all the PA he can get)
RF Ruth
2B Hornsby
1B Gehrig
CF Mays
3B Cabrera
C Bench
SS Wagner

SP Paige

oldjudge 01-10-2015 12:04 AM

1. Mays CF
2. Jeter SS
3. Ruth DH
4. Gehrig 1B
5. Bonds LF
6. Schmidt 3B
7. Reggie Jackson RF
8. Berra C
9. Alomar 2B

P--Koufax
RP-Rivera

Centauri 01-10-2015 12:20 AM

My 2 cents:

LF Ty Cobb
RF Ichiro
1B Stan Musial
CF Willie Mays
3B Brooks Robinson
2B Roberto Alomar
C John Bench
SS Ozzie Smith
P Pedro Martinez

Hard for anything to hit the ground with that outfield. And the infield? Unbelievable. If I had to have a DH, Paul Molitor or Pete Rose.

My team is built to hit the ball, get on base, play great defense and have speed everywhere. Big time winners, clutch performers.

pgellis 01-10-2015 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1364745)
Have you watched baseball at all in the past 80 years? All 4 of those guys are amazing in the postseason. Bumgarner just had the best postseason of any pitcher in the history of baseball. And I hate the guy. But things are the way the are.

-Ryan

Yes Ryan, I have watched baseball in the past 80 years.

Beltran's post-season numbers are skewed from his insane 2004 post-season. That was an amazing post-season. He has only appeared in 1 World Series...vs. Boston in 2013. His World Series numbers for his career are:

6 Games - .294 Ave. - 0 HRs - 3 RBIs - 1 Run

Also in 2013, he batted .222 in the NLDS and .286 in the NLCS. Sorry, but no.

I know how everyone was crowing about Bumgarner last year, but it was not the best post-season ever by a pitcher.

He won 4 games last year in the post-season, but Randy Johnson won 5 in 2001 and Christy Mathewson threw 3 complete game shutouts in a World Series back in early 1900s....that was before Wild Card and Divisional Series. Tough to top that.

obcbobd 01-10-2015 07:03 AM

cf Mays
2b Lajoie
rf Ruth
lf Bonds
dh Williams
3b Schmidt
ss Wagner
1b Gehrig
c Gibson

sp Koufax
rp Johnson and Pedro
ph/pr Cobb
mgr Stengal

I agree Rivera is the best closer of all-time, but there were 20-30 starting pitchers who could have been just as good or better

rats60 01-10-2015 07:09 AM

Cobb cf
Wagner SS
Ruth lf
Gehrig 1b
Ted Williams DH
Clemente rf
Brett 3b
Hornsby 2B
Bench c
Koufax p

frankbmd 01-10-2015 07:11 AM

Who gets shot after the game? The players or the manager.

freakhappy 01-10-2015 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1364745)
Have you watched baseball at all in the past 80 years? All 4 of those guys are amazing in the postseason. Bumgarner just had the best postseason of any pitcher in the history of baseball. And I hate the guy. But things are the way the are.



-Ryan


One great postseason makes a player elite and worth starting over all of the all time greats? Laughable. Bumgarner is a really good pitcher, but let's not get carried away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

pgellis 01-10-2015 07:44 AM

LF: Rickey Henderson
CF: Ty Cobb
3B: George Brett
DH: David Ortiz
1B: Lou Gehrig
RF: Reggie Jackson
C: Johnny Bench
2B: Joe Morgan
SS: Ozzie Smith

SP: Bob Gibson
RP: Mariano Rivera


Tough to leave Ruth off the list, but Reggie & Ortiz were so clutch. I think the toughest positions are C, 2B, & SS.

glynparson 01-10-2015 08:44 AM

My fate of the world Starting 9 in the Prime
 
1b- Lou Gehrig
2b- Joe Morgan
3b- Mike Schmidt
ss- Honus Wagner
rf- Babe Ruth
CF- Willie MAys
Lf- Barry Bonds
c- Roy Campanella
SP- Sandy Koufax
RP- Mariano Rivera
DH- Ted Williams

Lineup
1.Honus Wagner
2.Ted Williams
3.Babe Ruth
4.Barry Bonds
5.Lou Gehrig
6.Willie Mays
7.Mike Schmidt
8.Roy Campanella
9.Joe Morgan

Huysmans 01-10-2015 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakhappy (Post 1364847)
One great postseason makes a player elite and worth starting over all of the all time greats? Laughable. Bumgarner is a really good pitcher, but let's not get carried away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1

rats60 01-10-2015 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakhappy (Post 1364847)
One great postseason makes a player elite and worth starting over all of the all time greats? Laughable. Bumgarner is a really good pitcher, but let's not get carried away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You take Bum if we are talking current players, but all time he's not in the discussion. Koufax, two shutouts on 2 days rest. Gibson 7 world series wins in a row or Mathewson 3 shutouts in 5 games are easy picks over him in my opinion.

z28jd 01-10-2015 09:21 AM

I think it's interesting how people are picking old pitchers and also throwing a reliever in there as if you're going to take out Walter Johnson, Sandy Koufax or Christy Mathewson for anyone else with your life on the line.

The other interesting part, why pick a reliever, what if the game goes extra innings, or what if your starter doesn't have it at all? I picked Johnson and Mathewson. I would never take a reliever, not even Roy Face, who went 3+ innings numerous times. That seems like an awful risky thing to do in this situation.

As for the all Yankees lineup, how about an all Pirates lineup. You have the two best shortstop of all-time, so that hurts a little, but you could still put out:

CF Carey
SS Wagner
RF Clemente
1B Stargell
DH Kiner
LF P.Waner
3B Traynor
2B Mazeroski
C Sanguillen(or Al Lopez if you want all HOF)
Bench: Vaughan, Cuyler, L.Waner, Beckley
P Pud Galvin

Runscott 01-10-2015 09:31 AM

If this is a thread based entirely on post-season stats, then someone should just do some googling and give us 'THE ANSWER'.

If not, then I'm very happy with my roster and while some of the incredible all-star rosters I'm seeing don't impress me (I'm certain my team could whoop your team), I'll just raise my eyebrows a little and move on.

Eric72 01-10-2015 09:57 AM

Would there be any way to create rosters and have a tournament, using some sort of computer baseball game simulator?

16, 32, or 64 teams...single elimination.

Obviously, this would mean more than just one game. Oh, and we certainly wouldn't be playing for the stakes mentioned by the OP. :eek:

Sounds fun to me. Anyone else have an interest - or - know how to run the simulations?

Big Ben 01-10-2015 10:30 AM

Batting order for my lineup

Jeter
Mays
Ted Williams
Mantle
Ruth (DH)
Brett
Gehrig
Berra
Jackie Robinson

SP Koufax
Relief pitcher Bob Gibson
Closer Mariano Rivera.

Mountaineer1999 01-10-2015 11:11 AM

I am of the opinion that one could take 9 of the best players today and you would win more than you would lose against any other team put together.

Molina
Cabrera
Cano
Tulo
Beltre
Stanton
Trout
McCutchen
Kershaw

Runscott 01-10-2015 11:44 AM

Donnie, you might be right about that. When I was trying to pick a second-baseman, I wanted to go with Jackie Robinson, but I of course have never seen him play, and I wasn't sure what his postseason performance was. I chose my team based soley on my own gut feel about the players, with one exception: I wanted to put Scott Rolen at 3B because I remember being scared to death when Houston had to face him in the playoffs; however, I also remembered some choking. So I looked up his stats and dropped him in favor of Brooks Robinson, who I remembered making some jaw-dropping plays during the World Series. I chose Williams because of his performance in the last game of his .406 year. Not sure why I chose DiMaggio - just gut feel.

But you remind me that I forgot Cano, which amazes me, given that I collect Cano memorabilia and I don't particularly like Joe Morgan. My only problem with Cano is that he doesn't hustle, and in a life-or-death game, you need hustle - no one could accuse Morgan of laziness. Same for Jackie Robinson.

Eric - computer simulation would not work. What makes this thread concept so fantastic (to me, anyway) is that so much of the choice-making is based on intangibles. Overall Post-season stats might be terrible for a player, but during the most critical moments they might be incredibly good. Curt Schilling had a terrible first game in the World Series, but he was lights-out on a bloody foot when he absolutely had to be.

Great, great topic.

Edited to add: another player that Phil would wrist-slap me for adding is Dave Henderson. But anyone watching playoff games in the mid-80's will remember that, despite his mediocre playoff stats, he did some stuff. His jumps at the left-field wall were sensational as well.

Lgarza99 01-10-2015 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runscott (Post 1364998)
Donnie, you might be right about that. When I was trying to pick a second-baseman, I wanted to go with Jackie Robinson, but I of course have never seen him play, and I wasn't sure what his postseason performance was. I chose my team based soley on my own gut feel about the players, with one exception: I wanted to put Scott Rolen at 3B because I remember being scared to death when Houston had to face him in the playoffs; however, I also remembered some choking. So I looked up his stats and dropped him in favor of Brooks Robinson, who I remembered making some jaw-dropping plays during the World Series. I chose Williams because of his performance in the last game of his .406 year. Not sure why I chose DiMaggio - just gut feel.

But you remind me that I forgot Cano, which amazes me, given that I collect Cano memorabilia and I don't particularly like Joe Morgan. My only problem with Cano is that he doesn't hustle, and in a life-or-death game, you need hustle - no one could accuse Morgan of laziness. Same for Jackie Robinson.

Eric - computer simulation would not work. What makes this thread concept so fantastic (to me, anyway) is that so much of the choice-making is based on intangibles. Overall Post-season stats might be terrible for a player, but during the most critical moments they might be incredibly good. Curt Schilling had a terrible first game in the World Series, but he was lights-out on a bloody foot when he absolutely had to be.

Great, great topic.

Edited to add: another player that Phil would wrist-slap me for adding is Dave Henderson. But anyone watching playoff games in the mid-80's will remember that, despite his mediocre playoff stats, he did some stuff. His jumps at the left-field wall were sensational as well.

Scott, I'm with you. I totally went with gut feeling. And as I read some of these teams I do another gut check. B. Robinson, J. Robinson, heck even F. Robinson, Schilling when all the marbles are on the table, and I can't forget Kirby Puckett. Pete Rose too. He may have made my team before I knew about his betting? I do feel like he wants to win every game he competes in, but???

chaddurbin 01-10-2015 12:16 PM

where is the game being played? indoor/outdoor, grass/astroturf, petco park/coors field? mars....? depending on location/season i will craft a sabrmetric lineup that will embarass the all-time greats! long live david eckstein!!!

Lgarza99 01-10-2015 12:44 PM

How about outdoors and in Wrigley Field.

nolemmings 01-10-2015 12:58 PM

Quote:

I know how everyone was crowing about Bumgarner last year, but it was not the best post-season ever by a pitcher.
Agreed. Koufax in '65 against my beloved Twins was better. 2 complete game shutouts, the second on the same short rest as Madison, 29 Ks in 24 innings back when hitters were ashamed to strike out, and one earned run in those 24 innings. Might have won game 2 also, had Alston PH someone other than Don Drysdale for him in the 7th with men on 2nd and 3rd and one out, although the BP got blown up thereafter.

These things are fun and of course debatable, but I really don't see how you can leave out Mantle. The guy was always clutch, even or especially on the biggest stages. Great against the ordinary and the extraordinary. I'd also be hard-pressed to leave out Reggie, who seemed to adore and thrive in pressure.

Mark70Z 01-10-2015 01:21 PM

Correct Answer (see below)
 
2B - Pete Rose
1B - Lou Gehrig
RF - Roberto Clemente
DH - George Herman Ruth
SS - Cal Ripken Jr.
3B - B. Robby
LF - Ted Williams
CF - Willie Mays
C - Johnny Bench

SB - Gibson

Runscott 01-10-2015 02:20 PM

I changed my mind. All of these guys were flawless in the playoffs:

of - Clyde Milan
of - Harry Heilman
2b - Nap Lajoie
1b - George Sisler
of - Frank Thomas
dh - Don Mattingly
ss - Ernie Banks
3b - Ron Santo
c - Joe Torre
p - Felix Hernandez

ElCabron 01-10-2015 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakhappy (Post 1364847)
One great postseason makes a player elite and worth starting over all of the all time greats? Laughable. Bumgarner is a really good pitcher, but let's not get carried away.


Um, one postseason? Madison Bumgarner has 3 rings. That's as many as Koufax. That's as many as Bob Gibson and Walter Johnson combined. Oh, and he's 25 years old. What's laughable is the willful ignorance displayed by so many that automatically think older is better. The theoretical question posed here was about who would be best in one game, LIFE OR DEATH, meaning the highest possible pressure situation. The closest comparison as far as baseball stats would be when the pressure is highest, namely, the postseason. More specifically, the World Series.

So, tell me this, without cheating and looking below, which postseason stats are better:

A) 4-0, 0.25 ERA, 0.528 WHIP, 31 K, 36 IP, 1 shutout.
B) 7-3, 2.14 ERA, 0.883 WHIP, 77 K, 88.1 IP, 2 shutouts.
C) 3-3, 2.52 ERA, 1.420 WHIP, 35 K, 50 IP, 1 shutout.
D) 4-3, 0.95 ERA, 0.825 WHIP, 61 K, 57 IP, 2 shutouts.
E) 7-2, 1.89 ERA, 0.889 WHIP, 92 K, 81 IP, 2 shutouts.
F) 3-0, 0.87 ERA, 0.935 WHIP, 8 K, 31 IP, 1 shutout.

Perhaps that will help give you some objectivity. There are still other factors that should be considered, such as the 60s being an incredibly pitcher-friendly era, and the modern game's dearth of complete games, and therefore shutouts.

So would you like to know who is who? Here ya go:

A) Madison Bumgarner - career World Series
B) Madison Bumgarner - career postseason total
C) Walter Johnson - career postseason (all World Series)
D) Sandy Koufax - career postseason (all World Series)
E) Bob Gibson - career postseason (all World Series)
F) Babe Ruth - career postseason (all World Series)

And for the record, I chose 5 pitchers and said I'd be fine with any of them. Bumgarner was one, and still is. And like I said before, I HATE HIM! I also chose Mathewson, but it's very difficult to compare pitching stats from the deadball era.

-Ryan

z28jd 01-10-2015 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 (Post 1364981)
I am of the opinion that one could take 9 of the best players today and you would win more than you would lose against any other team put together.

Molina
Cabrera
Cano
Tulo
Beltre
Stanton
Trout
McCutchen
Kershaw

It's possible due to training that they would, but if we are somehow assuming a player like Wagner could be in the same game as Mike Schmidt, then what are the condition the games are being played under? There isn't a major leaguer playing right now that could survive a week if they were thrust into a 19th century game facing Old Hoss Radbourn from 50 feet away and they're not wearing a batting helmet. A week in 19th century conditions and they would quit. I'm sure a 19th century player would have to adjust too, but he's adjusting the opposite way. He could get lazy with all the amenities.

freakhappy 01-10-2015 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1365179)
Um, one postseason? Madison Bumgarner has 3 rings. That's as many as Koufax. That's as many as Bob Gibson and Walter Johnson combined. Oh, and he's 25 years old. What's laughable is the willful ignorance displayed by so many that automatically think older is better. The theoretical question posed here was about who would be best in one game, LIFE OR DEATH, meaning the highest possible pressure situation. The closest comparison as far as baseball stats would be when the pressure is highest, namely, the postseason. More specifically, the World Series.



So, tell me this, without cheating and looking below, which postseason stats are better:



A) 4-0, 0.25 ERA, 0.528 WHIP, 31 K, 36 IP, 1 shutout.

B) 7-3, 2.14 ERA, 0.883 WHIP, 77 K, 88.1 IP, 2 shutouts.

C) 3-3, 2.52 ERA, 1.420 WHIP, 35 K, 50 IP, 1 shutout.

D) 4-3, 0.95 ERA, 0.825 WHIP, 61 K, 57 IP, 2 shutouts.

E) 7-2, 1.89 ERA, 0.889 WHIP, 92 K, 81 IP, 2 shutouts.

F) 3-0, 0.87 ERA, 0.935 WHIP, 8 K, 31 IP, 1 shutout.



Perhaps that will help give you some objectivity. There are still other factors that should be considered, such as the 60s being an incredibly pitcher-friendly era, and the modern game's dearth of complete games, and therefore shutouts.



So would you like to know who is who? Here ya go:



A) Madison Bumgarner - career World Series

B) Madison Bumgarner - career postseason total

C) Walter Johnson - career postseason (all World Series)

D) Sandy Koufax - career postseason (all World Series)

E) Bob Gibson - career postseason (all World Series)

F) Babe Ruth - career postseason (all World Series)



And for the record, I chose 5 pitchers and said I'd be fine with any of them. Bumgarner was one, and still is. And like I said before, I HATE HIM! I also chose Mathewson, but it's very difficult to compare pitching stats from the deadball era.



-Ryan


Easy bub...you act like it matters. I know the World Series is the biggest stage, but there are usually five or so pitchers better than bumgarner every year....but this coming year he may be top three. I get he just had an amazing playoff run this past year, but it was in fact, this year's run that put him on your list. So those scoring at home, it's....

Ryan 1
Mike 1

;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ElCabron 01-10-2015 06:03 PM

Did you just really call me Bub? Anyway, I wouldn't put Bumgarner in the top 5 last year or this year. He's a good pitcher, but not close to Kershaw. And there are several others that are also currently better than him. But he becomes someone else when it matters the most, and that's what we're talking about.

-Ryan

Runscott 01-10-2015 06:12 PM

At least no one picked Kershaw for their 'one game only' team. That would certainly be lunacy, given his meltdown in critical post-season games.

I agree with Ryan that the only do-able way to quantify 'one game only' performance is through post-season stats, but if you had the time (the 'Stache being the only person here who has that kind of time) I suppose you could go through a list of candidates' careers, picking out critical games only;e.g-I wouldn't count game 4 of the World Series if your team is up 3-0, but I would count critical games at the end of the season when you are in a pennant race.

In the end, gut feel seems to be as good a method as any. Personally, I find the wide variety of 'gut feels' on our forum to be very interesting, especially among those of us who have followed baseball players during the same periods. It's also interesting to see all the names on people's lists that represent completely non-quantifiable players, given that they played during periods where we don't have enough stats to make such judgements. But even in those instances, 'gut feel' based on what they've read about such players, is as valid as any method for choosing.

Lgarza99 01-10-2015 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1365189)
Did you just really call me Bub? Anyway, I wouldn't put Bumgarner in the top 5 last year or this year. He's a good pitcher, but not close to Kershaw. And there are several others that are also currently better than him. But he becomes someone else when it matters the most, and that's what we're talking about.

-Ryan

That's what we are talking about. Like Kershaw being the top starter in this day and age. But, he wouldn't sniff the ball park in a life and death game for me!

Orioles1954 01-10-2015 06:14 PM

Compare Brooks Robinson's postseason stats to Mike Schmidt and the player who I would want manning the hot corner becomes very, very evident.

btcarfagno 01-10-2015 06:24 PM

If my life depends on it defense goes out the window. My pitching will be good enough and offense good enough that it won't matter.

LF Ty Cobb
2B Rogers Hornsby
RF Babe Ruth
1B Barry Bonds
DH Ted Williams
CF Willie Mays
SS Honus Wagner
C Josh Gibson
3B Mike Schmidt

SP Walter Johnson
Relief Randy Johnson
Closer Mariano Rivera

That team would beat any team made up of any other players 10 times out of 10.

I think.....

Tom C

packs 01-10-2015 06:38 PM

LF - Rickey Henderson
SS - Honus Wagner
RF - Babe Ruth
1B - Lou Gehrig
CF - Ken Griffey Jr.
DH - Ted Williams
2B - Rogers Hornsby
3B - George Brett
C - Yogi Berra

SP - Walter Johnson

freakhappy 01-10-2015 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElCabron (Post 1365189)
Did you just really call me Bub? Anyway, I wouldn't put Bumgarner in the top 5 last year or this year. He's a good pitcher, but not close to Kershaw. And there are several others that are also currently better than him. But he becomes someone else when it matters the most, and that's what we're talking about.



-Ryan


I was having some fun ;) glad you didn't take offense to it.

Anyway, it might sound ridiculous, but kershaw is better than bum and I'd still take him in one game. I think he will prove it to us in the near future. That being said...bum has been great in the playoffs and I get why anyone would want him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lgarza99 01-10-2015 06:48 PM

I still couldn't go with Kershaw because the future is now. There is no future if Kershaw is taking the mound. :eek:

btcarfagno 01-10-2015 06:54 PM

I don't really get the idea of using the playoff stats as what I will base my life on. I mean....if small sample sizes are what I am going to base it on why not go with Mark Whiten on the day he hit four homers? Ed Delahanty the day he hit four? Len Barker the day of his perfect game?

I wouldn't base my life on the outcome of small sample sizes. My "team" has so much hitting and pitching that it will more than make up for any "lack of clutchness" or whatever those using playoff stats are trying to say.

Tom C

freakhappy 01-10-2015 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btcarfagno (Post 1365211)
I don't really get the idea of using the playoff stats as what I will base my life on. I mean....if small sample sizes are what I am going to base it on why not go with Mark Whiten on the day he hit four homers? Ed Delahanty the day he hit four? Len Barker the day of his perfect game?



I wouldn't base my life on the outcome of small sample sizes. My "team" has so much hitting and pitching that it will more than make up for any "lack of clutchness" or whatever those using playoff stats are trying to say.



Tom C


This is why I choose kershaw...because overall he is a beast and has better overall numbers. But bum has been really good in the postseason, so apparently he is better than Walter Johnson and Christy Mathewson....uh, no


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bnorth 01-10-2015 07:14 PM

1B Tino Marteniz
2B Robinson Cano
SS Derek Jeter
3B Wade Boggs
C Yogi Berra
OF Mickey Mantle
OF Babe Ruth
OF Bernie Williams
DH Joe DiMaggio
SP Roger Clemens
Closer Mariano Rivera

I want them Roided to the gills.

paulcarek 01-10-2015 08:13 PM

CF Mays
LF Musial
DH Williams
RF Ruth
C Posey
1B Clark
SS Wagner
2B Molitor
3B Sandoval

P Mathewson

Gamers, all. (Yes, I'm a Giants fan.)

glynparson 01-11-2015 09:48 AM

For the all pirates
 
If you don't go with Lopez, I'd go with Tony Pena at Catcher or maybe even Kendall.

rats60 01-11-2015 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orioles1954 (Post 1365195)
Compare Brooks Robinson's postseason stats to Mike Schmidt and the player who I would want manning the hot corner becomes very, very evident.

Brett OPS 1.023 .337 .397 .627
Brooks OPS .785 .303 .323 .462
Schmidt OPS .690 .236 .304 .386

It's clear to me who I want manning the hot corner, George Brett.

Runscott 01-11-2015 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lgarza99 (Post 1364598)
I was thinking who I would start if my life depended on one game. Some of my picks are obvious, but others are based on one game heroics we have seen or read about through the years.

First sentence of first post seems to have gotten lost and been replaced with "who had the greatest career or best stats over a few years?", which is also a very interesting topic, but not the OP's.

btcarfagno 01-11-2015 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 1365381)
Brett OPS 1.023 .337 .397 .627
Brooks OPS .785 .303 .323 .462
Schmidt OPS .690 .236 .304 .386

It's clear to me who I want manning the hot corner, George Brett.

Small sample sizes such as "post season batting" can be so misleading. You make it seem as if Brett was somehow Mr. Clutch throughout his career in the post season. What if 1981 playoffs George Brett shows up? 1984? Again, if we are just looking at one game as a sample size and are willing to look at 150 at bats in the playoffs versus an entire career, why not just go with performance in one game? Didn't Rennie Stennett go 8 for 8 one game? That would make him the choice over Hornsby etc.

Now... Brett is a fine choice at third no matter the criteria, especially in his prime. Just don't base it exclusively on what he did in 150 at bats over the course of 12 seasons.

Tom C

Mountaineer1999 01-11-2015 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btcarfagno (Post 1365413)
Didn't Rennie Stennett go 8 for 8 one game?


Tom C


Stennett went 7 for 7 :)

bravesfan22 01-11-2015 02:14 PM

Lf Ricky Henderson
2b honus Wagner
Cf willie mays
Rf hank aaron
DH babe ruth
1b:Lou Gehrig
3b:Chipper jones (homer pick)
SS: Derek jeter
Catcher: Yogi Berra
Pitcher: christy mathewson
Closer: mariano Rivera

Unless I missed it I was the only one so far to pick hank Aaron which surprises me looking at his postseason stats. All a matter of opinion but I expected to see his name more.

Chipper was a Braves fan pick for me. A lot of postseason experience.
Wanted to put tom glavine as my pitcher based solely off of game 6 in 95 and my favorite player of all time but can't deny what Mathewson did in multiple series.

Runscott 01-11-2015 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 (Post 1365437)
Stennett went 7 for 7 :)

Steve Balboni was known to perform fairly well when there was no pressure. You should have him bat clean-up.

pgellis 01-11-2015 03:23 PM

Watched him playing in the Cape League

mark evans 01-12-2015 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 (Post 1364981)
I am of the opinion that one could take 9 of the best players today and you would win more than you would lose against any other team put together.

Molina
Cabrera
Cano
Tulo
Beltre
Stanton
Trout
McCutchen
Kershaw

I think this is largely correct. As a rule, it seems to me that players are bigger, stronger, more athletic, better trained, start younger, and have to excel against better competition to make the majors than heroes of the past.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 PM.