Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   How important is centering to you? Green Cobb choice (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=158427)

Leon 11-01-2012 08:22 AM

How important is centering to you? Green Cobb choice
 
I got to thinking that one of the things I really like with vintage cards is centering. I will usually pick better centering over slightly better corners or other characteristics. Which of these T206 Green Cobbs would you prefer? (I don't know either seller at all)

A http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-T206-Ty...item3f1e80335a

B http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-T206-Ty...item1c2afa359a





.

oldcardboard 11-01-2012 08:33 AM

Centering is everything. I would go with "B".

CharleyBrown 11-01-2012 08:33 AM

Definitely B - that T/B centering would annoy me every time I look at the card.

ullmandds 11-01-2012 08:37 AM

I've never been a big condition/grade kinda guy...definitely B.

Vegas-guy 11-01-2012 08:38 AM

I would much rather have the overall condition of EX but if it's solely based on centering I would go with B

cubsfan-budman 11-01-2012 08:40 AM

no question, B.

However, I think that something be badly centered top to bottom looks better than something off-center left to right. not sure why.

sportscardpete 11-01-2012 08:49 AM

I would take A. I agree with the above poster - top down centering issues are easier to digest than left/right. Plus I like sharper corners. But that is just me.

tedzan 11-01-2012 09:03 AM

T206 Green Cobb
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1049286)
I got to thinking that one of the things I really like with vintage cards is centering. I will usually pick better centering over slightly better corners or other characteristics. Which of these T206 Green Cobbs would you prefer? (I don't know either seller at all).


Leon

It seems to me that we've had this discussion once before regarding the T206 Green Cobb.

Anyhow, I will reprise what I've said back then....it's my experience that a fair majority of the Green Cobb's with the PIEDMONT 150 backs will be off-center to the top border.

This card's front image with the PIEDMONT 350 back, or the SWEET CAPORAL 150 (or 350) backs, or the SOVEREIGN 150 back will usually be found centered.


http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...encobbp150.jpg..http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...p150sov150.jpg


TED Z

Leon 11-01-2012 09:31 AM

Ted- I agree that this specific card type has a preponderance of being T/B off center. I think where you got sideways a bit is stating the percentage was super high, maybe 90+%....which is debatable. Interesting thoughts so far.....

bbcard1 11-01-2012 09:32 AM

I would pick B and take the wife for a few days at an all inclusive in Jamaica with the money I saved. Win/Win, baby.

bunst 11-01-2012 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbcard1 (Post 1049302)
I would pick B and take the wife for a few days at an all inclusive in Jamaica with the money I saved. Win/Win, baby.

Isn't the question if the cards were the same cost?...ie: A for $5000 or B for $5000. I'm surprised more haven't said they would prefer A as it is definately in better condition as far as wear.

ullmandds 11-01-2012 10:00 AM

question doesn't state anything about cost...but since when does anyone pay attention to the question asked anyway?!

bn2cardz 11-01-2012 10:13 AM

I take factory condition issues over owner wear and tear any day. The centering is the way the card was made. It isnt something caused by some previous owner. My collecting habits make me wonder why any one could consider an off centered card to be flawed.

I am only answering which flaws i would rather have. For the cost I would take a common in the set. They come from the same press.

Leon 11-01-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn2cardz (Post 1049307)
I take factory condition issues over owner wear and tear any day. The centering is the way the card was made. It isnt something caused by some previous owner. My collecting habbits make me wonder why any one could consider on off centered card to be flawed.

I am only answering which flaws i would rather have. For the cost I would take a common in the set. They come from the same press.

Because one of the main things we look at in acquiring our gems is aesthetics. This card in question, that is top to bottom O/C, is flawed from the mfg, imo. It isn't a man-made flaw but a factory one.
When cards are close in condition I prefer better centering, as most members so far in the poll do.

corrected myself concerning value...I did put it in the question :)

freakhappy 11-01-2012 10:22 AM

Cobb
 
I love centering, but for vintage cards I would take overall appeal over just centering. In this case I would pick B, but honestly would love to have either because both look great.

Plus sometimes with o/c cards you get the fat borders...but not in this case.

bunst 11-01-2012 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1049304)
question doesn't state anything about cost...but since when does anyone pay attention to the question asked anyway?!

The poll question says: "Which would you take if both were valued the same?" I take value to also mean cost, but maybe I'm looking at it wrong

ullmandds 11-01-2012 10:33 AM

oh...oopsie...I didn't read the poll question...sorry!!!!

majordanby 11-01-2012 10:51 AM

i always find it hard to digest off centering for portraits...especially one as iconic as the t206 cobb

barrysloate 11-01-2012 11:03 AM

I thought B was nicer, and at less than half the price. No comparison.

Big Six 11-01-2012 11:06 AM

I'd take B all day...even if the other card was a higher graded off-center...centering bothers me more than anything else.

paulcarek 11-01-2012 11:13 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Agree with majordanby. When the image is "symmetrical," as in a portrait, bad L/R centering bothers me. When the image favors one side, though, a wider border on the other side can actually sort of balance things out. (Not my card, BTW.)

brob28 11-01-2012 11:14 AM

All other things equal, I'd take B, centering is critical to me.

John V 11-01-2012 11:28 AM

It's all about eye appeal. B is my choice also.

wonkaticket 11-01-2012 12:22 PM

My current two, based on looks above I would take B but A is also a very nice card.

http://photos.imageevent.com/piojohn...size/Cobbs.jpg

GoldenAge50s 11-01-2012 12:23 PM

"B" wins for me, altho T-B centering on A does not stress me at all! Bad L-R centering does make me think twice, however.

calvindog 11-01-2012 12:37 PM

John, love that 70. LOVE.

wonkaticket 11-01-2012 12:39 PM

Jeff I think I love your Green Cobb more, even though it's a tad O/C. ;)

T206Collector 11-01-2012 02:37 PM

If the 3.5 and the 60 were equally priced, and you had to buy one, I would be shocked to learn someone would buy the 3.5 ...I don't care how good it looks.

Holding price constant, I'd take the higher TPG every time ...blind.

Leon 11-01-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T206Collector (Post 1049386)
If the 3.5 and the 60 were equally priced, and you had to buy one, I would be shocked to learn someone would buy the 3.5 ...I don't care how good it looks.

Holding price constant, I'd take the higher TPG every time ...blind.

If I were handed both and was told to take one and keep it I would take B. The corners on the 60 aren't that much sharper and the other displays tons better, for my tastes. To each their own though. I thought the answers would be interesting and they are....

christopher.herman 11-01-2012 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharleyBrown (Post 1049288)
Definitely B - that T/B centering would annoy me every time I look at the card.

Agreed.

Here's mine. A beauty for a "3" imo.

http://www.collectorfocus.com/images...green-portrait

Phillies*phan 11-01-2012 04:11 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Tell me this red Cobb isn't beautiful.

Matt 11-01-2012 04:24 PM

I like B better also, but not because of the centering; that centering doesn't bother me. I'd just have a really hard time paying that much more for a card that has very similar eye appeal.

Texxxx 11-01-2012 06:18 PM

I dont have a problem with off centering top to bottom. As can be seen from my Cobb below. Dont really like if its off from side to side. I dont like cards that are off registration or has creases through the center.
I dont think I have ever bought a card because of the border. I buy them for the picture.

http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/...rait-Front.jpg

freakhappy 11-01-2012 06:32 PM

Cobb
 
That's a beauty, Bruce! I think you have a great point in that you buy them for the picture and not necessarily for the centering and such. That's what I love about this hobby...there is no wrong way to collect!

tedzan 11-01-2012 06:57 PM

PIEDMONT 150 green COBB's
 
Hey guys

As I have said before, and I will repeat....A FAIR MAJORITY OF THE PIEDMONT 150 GREEN COBB'S ARE OFF-CENTER (TO THE TOP BORDER)

There are 6 - PIEDMONT 150 green Cobb's currently on Ebay ..... 5 of them are O/C to the TOP border. Furthermore, at any given week on Ebay
you will find this same ratio (approximately) of O/C PIEDMONT 150 green Cobb's to centered PIEDMONT 150 green Cobb's.

Check this out....here is a great example of what I have been telling you guys.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-Ty-Cobb...item4abddd3f2d



NOTE.....If you desire a well-centered green Cobb look for a PIEDMONT 350, or a SWEET CAPORAL 150 (or 350), or a SOVEREIGN 150 card.

As is evident here, I'm not too picky about centering, so I'm quite pleased with my sharp-looking PIEDMONT 150 Cobb.
http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...encobbp150.jpghttp://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...p150sov150.jpg


T-Rex TED

jthorst75 11-01-2012 07:20 PM

Ted-- I am really digging that miscut Cobb on Ebay. I would like to add that one to my collection if things work out right. I am waiting for that half bottom half top green Cobb thats on the the forum to pop up on this thread soon. I never get tired of seeing it......

25801wv 11-01-2012 07:25 PM

I picked B because of the rounded corners. I think it looks more attractive that way.

atx840 11-01-2012 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jthorst75 (Post 1049463)
Ted-- I am really digging that miscut Cobb on Ebay. I would like to add that one to my collection if things work out right. I am waiting for that half bottom half top green Cobb thats on the the forum to pop up on this thread soon. I never get old seeing it......

Please show it Jeff ;)

jcmtiger 11-01-2012 09:54 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Some very nice green Cobbs, especially your's bruce, here is mine, has been posted before.

Joe

alanu 11-01-2012 09:59 PM

I chose "A" because I 'm more lenient on top to bottom centering. If it was L-R centering or skewed, I would probably have chosen "B"

DeanH3 11-01-2012 11:33 PM

I would take B. Centering trumps corners for me.

3-2-count 11-02-2012 06:12 AM

"A" for me. As others have stated top to bottom centering doesn't bother me as much as side to side does. Here is the green Cobbie I finally decided on for my collection. I'm very happy with it.........

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a95...eenfront-2.jpg http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a95...reenback-2.jpg

t206hound 11-02-2012 08:11 AM

Goodwin may speak volumes...
 
The current Goodwin auction has two Matty Portraits: a PSA 5 that is well centered and an SGC 70 (5.5) that is off-center.

With roughly two weeks to go, the PSA 5 is at $1129 while the SGC 70 is at $368. We'll have to wait until the end to know for sure...

(images from the goodwin site)
http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotImages/35/256a_med.jpeghttp://www.goodwinandco.com/LotImages/35/263a_med.jpeg

ullmandds 11-02-2012 08:23 AM

1 Attachment(s)
One of a few T206's I still have...I've always loved the greenie.

kkkkandp 11-02-2012 09:14 AM

Well, It Depends...
 
Based solely on the two cards in the poll, I'd prefer the better-centered one.

That having been said, for better or for worse corners mean a lot to me for some reason. So, assuming the picture quality was the same if I had a choice between an off-centered card with nice corners and a well-centered card with poor corners, I'd be picking the one with better corners.

novakjr 11-02-2012 09:21 AM

In general, I'm not very condition sensitive. So I would almost always go with the cheaper one. NOW while that also applies in this case, I also happen the think that the 2nd one is MUCH more visually appealing, and would prefer that one regardless of price..... B. Definitely B..

Runscott 11-02-2012 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3-2-count (Post 1049545)
"A" for me. As others have stated top to bottom centering doesn't bother me as much as side to side does. Here is the green Cobbie I finally decided on for my collection. I'm very happy with it.........

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a95...eenfront-2.jpg http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a95...reenback-2.jpg

Tony, your example just shows how much this is a matter of personal preference. I personally don't like T206's with large top borders and short bottoms; however, the green Cobb that I chose for my collection is almost an exact duplicate of the one Ted posted, and I never was concerned about the short top.

bn2cardz 11-02-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn2cardz (Post 1049307)
I take factory condition issues over owner wear and tear any day. The centering is the way the card was made. It isnt something caused by some previous owner. My collecting habits make me wonder why any one could consider an off centered card to be flawed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1049309)
Because one of the main things we look at in acquiring our gems is aesthetics. This card in question, that is top to bottom O/C, is flawed from the mfg, imo. It isn't a man-made flaw but a factory one.
When cards are close in condition I prefer better centering, as most members so far in the poll do.

I understand everyone has differing collecting habits, I am just saying from my mindset I can't equate pre-distribution errors (factory flaws) with post distribution flaws.

Leon you seem to be an enigma to me. I am relatively new to the boards but I have seen you show printing freaks (like your multi-printed back t206 Mullaney), but now you talk about the aesthetics and refer to production flaws to be equivalent to post distribution flaws. (Not judging your collecting, but I was surprised to see that you were on the pro centering side of the coin)

ullmandds 11-02-2012 10:47 AM

Leon is the ultimate type collector...he doesnt discriminate.

Runscott 11-02-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn2cardz (Post 1049611)

Leon you seem to be an enigma to me. I am relatively new to the boards but I have seen you show printing freaks (like your multi-printed back t206 Mullaney), but now you talk about the aesthetics and refer to production flaws to be equivalent to post distribution flaws. (Not judging your collecting, but I was surprised to see that you were on the pro centering side of the coin)

Not that Leon is not an enigma, but my guess would be that if there was only one green Cobb with a short top, and through some miracle of technology we could be certain that it was factory-cut, Leon would have to have one.

tedzan 11-02-2012 01:33 PM

Hey Scott
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Runscott (Post 1049590)
Tony, your example just shows how much this is a matter of personal preference. I personally don't like T206's with large top borders and short bottoms; however,
the green Cobb that I chose for my collection is almost an exact duplicate of the one Ted posted, and I never was concerned about the short top.

I had this green Cobb in my 2nd set of T206's (hybrid back set). In 2005, when broke up this set in order to start on my adventure of an all - PIEDMONT set, I searched
for a better centered PIEDMONT 150 green Cobb. That's about the time that I observed that a fair majority of these PIEDMONT 150 Cobb's were O/C to the top border.
Sure, I came across a few that were centered; however, not as sharp looking as the Cobb I have.

Furthermore, I bought this Cobb years ago. I paid only $200 for it. "It don't come easy" (Ringo Starr, circa 1971) anymore to acquire a green Cobb at a price that low :)
http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...encobbp150.jpghttp://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...p150sov150.jpg


TED Z

Leon 11-02-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn2cardz (Post 1049611)
I understand everyone has differing collecting habits, I am just saying from my mindset I can't equate pre-distribution errors (factory flaws) with post distribution flaws.

Leon you seem to be an enigma to me. I am relatively new to the boards but I have seen you show printing freaks (like your multi-printed back t206 Mullaney), but now you talk about the aesthetics and refer to production flaws to be equivalent to post distribution flaws. (Not judging your collecting, but I was surprised to see that you were on the pro centering side of the coin)


I love printing freaks and have several more to put in the new pick up thread. However, when they are regular cards I like them to be centered. I know it's not normal but I never claimed to be normal :).

Runscott 11-02-2012 05:37 PM

Ted, here's mine - seems to fit your theory. I just cracked it out a few days ago:

danmckee 11-02-2012 05:42 PM

I am not heavy on centering, I am more about corners but the 2nd card just looks so much better. Many of my Topps and Bowman sets are EX+ to NM but with several off centered cards which doesn't bother me.

tedzan 11-02-2012 07:00 PM

Hey Dan and Scott
 
DITTO.....to what you guys said. And, here is just a sample of some of my O/C cards across the spectrum. Who cares if they were cut off-center ?

I don't.....its the aesthetics of the image that really matters to me.


http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/d...rfranknagy.jpghttp://i529.photobucket.com/albums/d...oftsmcgraw.jpghttp://i529.photobucket.com/albums/d...ieplanke91.jpg


http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...doylesgc40.jpghttp://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...titussmith.jpg


http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/d...zaz/paige2.jpg

http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/t...varyoungoc.jpg


TED Z

Leon 11-03-2012 09:59 AM

so,....
 
So from this tiny experiment I am going to continue to think centering is very important (and maybe more important) than a bit sharper corners. Again, no right or wrong answer and if someone likes pointy corners and doesn't mind O/C then that is wonderful too. Happy collecting!!

freakhappy 11-03-2012 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1049859)
So from this tiny experiment I am going to continue to think centering is very important (and maybe more important) than a bit sharper corners. Again, no right or wrong answer and if someone likes pointy corners and doesn't mind O/C then that is wonderful too. Happy collecting!!

So you let everyone else determine what you like? I'm confused :confused::eek:

teetwoohsix 11-03-2012 10:34 AM

I picked B, but I'd really be happy with either one. OC doesn't bother me, paper loss and creases are more of an issue to me when buying a card.

Sincerely, Clayton

Leon 11-03-2012 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakhappy (Post 1049870)
So you let everyone else determine what you like? I'm confused :confused::eek:


I was only getting opinions. I could care less what others like for my personal preferences. I collect what I like not what others like. As far as you being confused. You said it not me.

E93 11-03-2012 12:58 PM

I'm suffering.
JimB

http://photos.imageevent.com/jimblum...green_0001.jpg

CW 11-03-2012 02:27 PM

Well, since everyone's doing it.... :)

Centered a bit low, with a slight tilt, nice corners, 2 minor surface wrinkles, and low-grade affordability -- just how I like 'em. ;)

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/3...encobbdual.jpg

freakhappy 11-03-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1049859)
So from this tiny experiment I am going to continue to think centering is very important (and maybe more important) than a bit sharper corners. Again, no right or wrong answer and if someone likes pointy corners and doesn't mind O/C then that is wonderful too. Happy collecting!!

Lol! You're a sharp one, Leon! I was just messing around but I thought I would call you out since by your post it seemed like this thread affected your thinking and collecting habits....but I've been around here long enough to know that's not true.

Carry on...

Leon 11-03-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakhappy (Post 1049937)
Lol! You're a sharp one, Leon! I was just messing around but I thought I would call you out since by your post it seemed like this thread affected your thinking and collecting habits....but I've been around here long enough to know that's not true.

Carry on...

Mike- I am crazy all by myself. :) ....I have no earthly idea why I love the print freaks and also love well centered cards. I guess it's because ...well, actually, I don't know.

freakhappy 11-03-2012 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1049939)
Mike- I am crazy all by myself. :) ....I have no earthly idea why I love the print freaks and also love well centered cards. I guess it's because ...well, actually, I don't know.

I can definitely relate. I never used to collect and appreciate vintage cards until I found out about this site. Collecting modern cards are usually about having mint cards where vintage can be on the opposite end sometimes. I have a full appreciation of all cards and conditions...older cards catch my eye because they look "used" and pre-owned...maybe like they should. Like you said before, there is no wrong way to collect. That's the great thing about this hobby!

Keep up the great work, Leon!

AndyG09 11-03-2012 03:55 PM

Chuck, I love that green Cobb. That is exactly what I am on the hunt for to add to my set. The perfect "low grade" card. Thanks for sharing.

Best,

Andy

Rob D. 11-03-2012 04:03 PM

Thanks, Trapper.

http://photos.imageevent.com/ineedan...cobb-green.jpg

Big Ben 11-03-2012 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn2cardz (Post 1049307)
I take factory condition issues over owner wear and tear any day. The centering is the way the card was made. It isnt something caused by some previous owner. My collecting habits make me wonder why any one could consider an off centered card to be flawed.

I am only answering which flaws i would rather have. For the cost I would take a common in the set. They come from the same press.

I am in this camp especially for vintage. Both are nice cards, but if the price was equal I would prefer A which is the cleaner card. On a separate note, I have alway thought that overall, grading companies tend to be a little lenient with Cobb cards. Saying that, I know that there are far more informed people on this board than me.

CW 11-04-2012 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyG09 (Post 1049958)
Chuck, I love that green Cobb. That is exactly what I am on the hunt for to add to my set. The perfect "low grade" card. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks for the kind words, Andy. I'm sure you'll get your Cobb sooner or later, and, as we all know, the chase is half the fun.


Regarding the poll that started this thread....

At first glance, I was going to choose the lower grade PSA card, as I put a lot of value on centering. However, after really looking at both cards closely, I noticed the PSA card also has that smudge on Cobb's face, which detracts from the overall eye appeal. If the PSA card were valued about 30% less, I'd go with the PSA card all day. But with both cards valued the same in this poll, I'd choose "A" (the SGC card) due to its superb image, surface, and corners.

If the PSA card did not have the smudges on Cobb's face, I'd have a much tougher time choosing between the two. If the OC on the SGC card was L/R instead of the more acceptable T/B, then I'd also have a tougher choice. I guess this just shows that many factors are to be considered when picking that card for your collection.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 PM.