Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Outed cards, now including a 130K gain on an Aaron rookie (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=269583)

1952boyntoncollector 10-03-2019 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1920972)
So one lawsuit brought -- which was actually a counterclaim -- makes a situation hugely problematic for hobbyists but that no lawsuits brought means that this is a non-issue? Are you aware that the one counterclaim brought against Mastro occurred years after the criminal investigation began? Much further down the road than where we are now with the revelations about PSA and grading of trimmed cards.

As for an insult, there's no need really to insult you. I can't do any better than your own words, your own faulty logic. Even the non-lawyers have more acumen than you on these issues.

there you go. Another post that you know all the answers and another insult. What a surprise.

You have your own narrative and you dont factor in anything. I understand you are making your argument and have a client in this issue. Nobody knows everything. I never said this is a non-issue, i always said theres there is an issue. I just said there are issues where lawsuits are involved and issues where lawsuits are not involved.

To me, i think thats a big difference. I would think in the HOF of the biggest scams in the world where people are wronged and lost tons of money and were all unhappy a lawsuit would be filed whether now or 3 years from now. People are saying that in time it will happen, I am just saying theres a good chance there wont if everyone is satisfied to a degree/dont care that nobody will file lawsuit.

I can spare you your next post. Jake- people in grade school know more than you. I am great, look at how i bully and insult.

1952boyntoncollector 10-03-2019 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1920984)
Just to end these posts by Jake, I am filing suit tomorrow on behalf of myself and a class that I'll figure out later against all three grading companies, PWCC, 17 card doctors, and 17 other defendants to be named later for intentional infliction of emotional distress for all the angst they have caused me since the scandal began. Even though they haven't consented I am including Johnny and Chuck as named plaintiffs. Anyone else who wants to be named you'll have to pay me but you will need a minimum of 500 posts on the subject to qualify. Blowout doesn't count. On Kenny Cole's law school classmate's advice I am avoiding California courts like the plague. I am still debating Oregon (no sales tax, home of PWCC and vault and Martin) or Texas (home of Leon and Adat Chaverim show). Jake, I'll send you a copy once it's filed.

Edit to add To appease some message board wannabes I will also have a RICO count and a request to shut down PSA.

Ill await the copy......

calvindog 10-03-2019 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1921090)
there you go. Another post that you know all the answers and another insult. What a surprise.

You have your own narrative and you dont factor in anything. I understand you are making your argument and have a client in this issue. Nobody knows everything. I never said this is a non-issue, i always said theres there is an issue. I just said there are issues where lawsuits are involved and issues where lawsuits are not involved.

To me, i think thats a big difference. I would think in the HOF of the biggest scams in the world where people are wronged and lost tons of money and were all unhappy a lawsuit would be filed whether now or 3 years from now. People are saying that in time it will happen, I am just saying theres a good chance there wont if everyone is satisfied to a degree/dont care that nobody will file lawsuit.

I can spare you your next post. Jake- people in grade school know more than you. I am great, look at how i bully and insult.

You're Peter Chao. I don't think you're malignant but you proudly wave around your ignorance as if it is supposed to impress someone.

Sometimes it makes sense to listen to people who know more than you on an issue, who have actual experience on an issue, who are involved in the issue.

Again, and I'll type this slowly for you: litigation does not need to be brought in order for victims to be made whole. The number of lawsuits brought is not directly related to the harm perceived or suffered. Yes, this is grade school common sense of which non-lawyers on the board seem to understand well.

The fact that I have a client involved would suggest that I would be looking to downplay what occurred here. I am not. For an obvious reason. Again, and s l o w l y: what occurred here rocks the foundation of the hobby. Lawsuits or no lawsuits will not change that.

tschock 10-03-2019 08:57 AM

To paraphrase Barbie. Lawyering is hard.
All this civil suit discussion has got me wondering if I need to file a civil suit against the grocery store for the bag of bad apples they sold me. Do I need a retainer? And if so, how much with that run?

Fuddjcal 10-03-2019 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1920984)
Just to end these posts by Jake, I am filing suit tomorrow on behalf of myself and a class that I'll figure out later against all three grading companies, PWCC, 17 card doctors, and 17 other defendants to be named later for intentional infliction of emotional distress for all the angst they have caused me since the scandal began. Even though they haven't consented I am including Johnny and Chuck as named plaintiffs. Anyone else who wants to be named you'll have to pay me but you will need a minimum of 500 posts on the subject to qualify. Blowout doesn't count. On Kenny Cole's law school classmate's advice I am avoiding California courts like the plague. I am still debating Oregon (no sales tax, home of PWCC and vault and Martin) or Texas (home of Leon and Adat Chaverim show). Jake, I'll send you a copy once it's filed.

Edit to add To appease some message board wannabes I will also have a RICO count and a request to shut down PSA.

I consent. Class action, Rico & shut it all down! I'm currently in a class action lawsuit with the gas company going on for 5 years now, so I don't expect Rome to be built in a day. Get it going. Where should I ship all the evidence, All My FAKE trimmed cards in these stupid plastic rip off holders?

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2019 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fuddjcal (Post 1921104)
I consent. Class action, Rico & shut it all down! I'm currently in a class action lawsuit with the gas company going on for 5 years now, so I don't expect Rome to be built in a day. Get it going. Where should I ship all the evidence, All My FAKE trimmed cards in these stupid plastic rip off holders?

The Vault will make a nice home for them, I think. Send them along to be ingested.

Johnny630 10-03-2019 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1921105)
The Vault will make a nice home for them, I think. Send them along to be ingested.

Lmao !

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2019 12:35 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The vault, getting ready to ingest another victim.

steve B 10-03-2019 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1920984)
Just to end these posts by Jake, I am filing suit tomorrow on behalf of myself and a class that I'll figure out later against all three grading companies, PWCC, 17 card doctors, and 17 other defendants to be named later for intentional infliction of emotional distress for all the angst they have caused me since the scandal began. Even though they haven't consented I am including Johnny and Chuck as named plaintiffs. Anyone else who wants to be named you'll have to pay me but you will need a minimum of 500 posts on the subject to qualify. Blowout doesn't count. On Kenny Cole's law school classmate's advice I am avoiding California courts like the plague. I am still debating Oregon (no sales tax, home of PWCC and vault and Martin) or Texas (home of Leon and Adat Chaverim show). Jake, I'll send you a copy once it's filed.

Edit to add To appease some message board wannabes I will also have a RICO count and a request to shut down PSA.

I'm.... wait, I have to make 500 posts AND pay you? That's just too much work for me. I probably couldn't afford it anyway.

steve B 10-03-2019 01:06 PM

PSA after the class action.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZTdqh-a0tU

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2019 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1921133)
I'm.... wait, I have to make 500 posts AND pay you? That's just too much work for me. I probably couldn't afford it anyway.

Fees waived for locals.

samosa4u 10-03-2019 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peter_spaeth (Post 1921131)
the vault, getting ready to ingest another victim.

lmao!!!!!

The Vault is guarded by:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nY9uBSw6uoQ/maxresdefault.jpg

1952boyntoncollector 10-04-2019 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 1921149)
lmao!!!!!

The Vault is guarded by:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nY9uBSw6uoQ/maxresdefault.jpg

appropriate as October 31 is approaching...

Peter_Spaeth 10-10-2019 12:00 PM

Up the ladder to the roof, as the Supremes song goes.

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1642

ullmandds 10-10-2019 12:03 PM

THERE'S THE PROOF...paying huge $$$$$ for 9's or 10's is just plain stupid!!!!! Because on any given day they could be 8's!!

perezfan 10-10-2019 12:52 PM

I don't know how to copy/paste a single post like Peter did...

But if you go over to that same thread in Blowout, you'll see another '56 Topps card that made the same jumps from PSA 8 to 9 to 10. The 1956 Red Schoendienst was proven trimmed, whereas they detected no difference in the Neal.

So which is which is worse? The random numerical grades assigned for the same exact Neal card (which jumped from $66 to $3,894). Or the obviously trimmed Schoendienst (which jumped from $109 to $1,780).

Is there really a minute chance that the grader(s) made these highly coincidental mistakes legitimately and in honest fashion? Or are these further examples of PSA turning a blind eye for a preferred submitter? Neither scenario bodes well for them.

1952boyntoncollector 10-10-2019 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1921094)
You're Peter Chao. I don't think you're malignant but you proudly wave around your ignorance as if it is supposed to impress someone.

Sometimes it makes sense to listen to people who know more than you on an issue, who have actual experience on an issue, who are involved in the issue.

Again, and I'll type this slowly for you: litigation does not need to be brought in order for victims to be made whole. The number of lawsuits brought is not directly related to the harm perceived or suffered. Yes, this is grade school common sense of which non-lawyers on the board seem to understand well.

The fact that I have a client involved would suggest that I would be looking to downplay what occurred here. I am not. For an obvious reason. Again, and s l o w l y: what occurred here rocks the foundation of the hobby. Lawsuits or no lawsuits will not change that.


I think you are Peter Chao (see how it looks when you say that).

You said what occurred rocked the foundation of the hobby. Do you mean the buyer or the sellers or both? Are prices at auctions getting rocked now versus before. Less submissions to PSA? No lines to get cards graded? The stock price for collector universe has gotten rocked? We already know no lawsuits.



Please advise as to how the foundation has been rocked. Ill say it slowly 'R o c k ed'

perezfan 10-10-2019 02:06 PM

Poor Peter Chao...

Looks like his infamous legacy will never end here. Hope he found a friendlier and more accepting place to hang out. :rolleyes:

Rich Klein 10-10-2019 02:09 PM

Peter has not done much with his linked in profile -- but if you are interested in chatting with him: And yes, this is HIS profile

https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-chao-71a84863/

Regards
Rich

HRBAKER 10-10-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1922560)
Up the ladder to the roof, as the Supremes song goes.

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1642

Nothing to see here, three different days - three different "opinions."

calvindog 10-10-2019 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1922594)
I think you are Peter Chao (see how it looks when you say that).

You said what occurred rocked the foundation of the hobby. Do you mean the buyer or the sellers or both? Are prices at auctions getting rocked now versus before. Less submissions to PSA? No lines to get cards graded? The stock price for collector universe has gotten rocked? We already know no lawsuits.



Please advise as to how the foundation has been rocked. Ill say it slowly 'R o c k ed'

You’re an idiot and have the legal acumen of a flea. Which is why you are the only civil litigator aggressively discussing lawsuits against PSA and your own mother wouldn’t hire you. No one with any grey matter on this board will. You simply have no common sense. (See how it looks when I say that?)

Peter_Spaeth 10-10-2019 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 1922606)
Poor Peter Chao...

Looks like his infamous legacy will never end here. Hope he found a friendlier and more accepting place to hang out. :rolleyes:

Nor should it end. His Virginia Tech thread, which I linked to someplace recently, will never be matched.

Nor, for that matter, will his question why Joe Jackson didn't get hurt if he played without shoes.

glynparson 10-11-2019 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1918049)
Excellent thoughts. I remember well a poster here from a decade ago who, at least in his public stance, fit squarely into category 3.

Correct Jim talked a good game but that was it.

1952boyntoncollector 10-11-2019 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1922642)
You’re an idiot and have the legal acumen of a flea. Which is why you are the only civil litigator aggressively discussing lawsuits against PSA and your own mother wouldn’t hire you. No one with any grey matter on this board will. You simply have no common sense. (See how it looks when I say that?)

well this idiot predicted you would bully on your posts and attempt to belittle.

Surprised you would resort to a 'your mother' joke. Guess thats why you are so expensive. Such original insults. I am not sure what yo mean about aggressively discussing lawsuits against PSA

I have been discussing the opposite. Have I not stated a number of times that I guess everyone is satisfied/refunded that NO lawsuits have been filed.

It seems you are the one that is stating that the hobby has been rocked and just because there are no lawsuits its a HUGE issue and worthy of litigation or other major fix. I also asked the questions about whether past sales at auctions shows how bad the hobby has been rocked as you stated which you didnt answer. I dont think recent auction sales reflect that. Thats a position that would be contra to discussing lawsuits.

It sounds like from what you are saying that you are encouraging aggressively discussing lawsuits. (see how that sounds) You just keep making up your own narrative no matter what i state and be a bully.


Also its interesting you yourself were critical of PWCC (one would think you were looking for clients) and now you represent them

Peter C lives!

calvindog 10-11-2019 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1922760)
well this idiot predicted you would bully on your posts and attempt to belittle.

Surprised you would resort to a 'your mother' joke. Guess thats why you are so expensive. Such original insults. I am not sure what yo mean about aggressively discussing lawsuits against PSA

I have been discussing the opposite. Have I not stated a number of times that I guess everyone is satisfied/refunded that NO lawsuits have been filed.

It seems you are the one that is stating that the hobby has been rocked and just because there are no lawsuits its a HUGE issue and worthy of litigation or other major fix. I also asked the questions about whether past sales at auctions shows how bad the hobby has been rocked as you stated which you didnt answer. I dont think recent auction sales reflect that. Thats a position that would be contra to discussing lawsuits. It sounds like from what you are saying that you are encouraging aggressively discussing lawsuits
(see how that sounds)

Peter C lives!

Jake, I'm expensive due to supply and demand. For the same reason you barely exist in the legal world.

These issues are very obvious to everyone on the board but you. Again, everyone is not satisfied or happy just because no lawsuits are filed. If everyone is satisfied and happy, why is there a present criminal investigation occurring? No harm, no foul, right? Why is there a statute of limitations on lawsuits? Why not just make the limitation period 3 months? Because that's all anyone needs to determine if they are satisfied and happy on a legal dispute, right?

The ramifications of the card alteration scandal will not be fully appreciated for a while as again everyone knows this but you. When enough 'before' pictures are outed and start causing most high grade cards to no longer be able to be sold, do you think that is a non-issue? And they can't be cracked out and resubmitted because the cards will just be outed again. If PSA is required to start replacing numerically cards from the registry and turning them into As, do you think this doesn't affect the hobby?

Do you think this is over just because one dullard says so?

And I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by calling you an idiot.

Peter_Spaeth 10-11-2019 10:08 AM

In my opinion the majority of altered cards are never going to be outed because they were purchased raw. Whether enough are going to be outed anyhow that destroy confidence in TPG high grade slabs altogether, we'll see.

Rhotchkiss 10-11-2019 10:57 AM

Was Mastro still operating biz as usual while under investigation, and if so, how long did that go on until Mastro closed up?

benjulmag 10-11-2019 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1922793)
Whether enough are going to be outed anyhow that destroy confidence in TPG high grade slabs altogether, we'll see.

This to me is the 64 thousand dollar question. And it is very unclear to me that anything short of a new TPG that uses as part of its business model the outing of high grade slabbed cards in order to attract market share, confidence in the PSA slab will ever be impacted enough to provide the needed financial incentive to induce the type of litigation that could threaten PSA.

JeremyW 10-11-2019 03:48 PM

Anyone who is thinking about investing in high grade PSA cards needs to look at Peter's post (#274). From $60 to $4,000. should make people question what is going on.

MULLINS5 10-12-2019 02:43 PM

$60,000 value gain on an altered PSA 8 Bobby Hull rookie just surfaced on Blowout.

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MULLINS5 (Post 1923099)
$60,000 value gain on an altered PSA 8 Bobby Hull rookie just surfaced on Blowout.

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...postcount=1778

A mere 60K gain.

ullmandds 10-12-2019 02:55 PM

Wow!!!

Johnny630 10-12-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1923101)
Wow!!!

How Can Newport Beach Miss the Snow recoloring on this Hull? Can someone please explain this??

I know longer buy they are this bad at detecting alterations....

1952boyntoncollector 10-12-2019 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1922765)
Jake, I'm expensive due to supply and demand. For the same reason you barely exist in the legal world.

These issues are very obvious to everyone on the board but you. Again, everyone is not satisfied or happy just because no lawsuits are filed. If everyone is satisfied and happy, why is there a present criminal investigation occurring? No harm, no foul, right? Why is there a statute of limitations on lawsuits? Why not just make the limitation period 3 months? Because that's all anyone needs to determine if they are satisfied and happy on a legal dispute, right?

Some states have 1 year or 2 statue of limitations by the way. Yeah can argue federal and other ways to pursue a case but why let your statute SOL blow if this issue is rocking the hobby.

The ramifications of the card alteration scandal will not be fully appreciated for a while as again everyone knows this but you. When enough 'before' pictures are outed and start causing most high grade cards to no longer be able to be sold, do you think that is a non-issue? And they can't be cracked out and resubmitted because the cards will just be outed again. If PSA is required to start replacing numerically cards from the registry and turning them into As, do you think this doesn't affect the hobby?

Do you think this is over just because one dullard says so?

And I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by calling you an idiot.


right so now you saying the statute of limitations didnt expire so its still early for lawsuits. What about 3 months before the statute of limitations or a year. I dont know about you but most lawyers dont wait until right before the statute of limitations to file anything as there is added risk such blowing an issue and thus blowing the statute or class action occurs earlier and there is no opt out along with hundreds of other problems in waiting to the last minute etc

The fact you are mentioning statute of limitations being an issue as to why no lawsuits have been filed does prove that you do think lawsuits would be filed since this current scandal is a huge issue but only because enough time has not passed no lawsuits have been filed. If lawsuits or not didnt mean anything why bother to bring up the statute of limitations.

So its not absurd I am bringing up the fact that no lawsuits have been filed. 2 years from now, if still no lawsuits are filed, would you then agree that its far from rocking the hobby in that it would appear most people are happy/refunded with the outcome..

Its ok you said i am an idiot....you spent time to write that and there is much supply and demand for your services so your time in so expensive that you still took what little free time you have to call me names and make a your mama joke. i am honored. Peter C lives..

samosa4u 10-12-2019 03:34 PM

Holy effing sh*t!
 
Somebody trimmed AND recolored an $18,000 USD card? :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

You have to have a REALLY large set of balls to do that - larger than Tony Montana's.

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 1923112)
Somebody trimmed AND recolored an $18,000 USD card? :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

You have to have a REALLY large set of balls to do that - larger than Tony Montana's.

It's all relative. If you have millions, it's not much to risk particularly if you think there's a decent chance you'll succeed. People bet a hell of a lot more than that every day.

MULLINS5 10-12-2019 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923113)
It's all relative. If you have millions, it's not much to risk particularly if you think there's a decent chance you'll succeed. People bet a hell of a lot more than that every day.

I agree with you, but I'm starting to feel like they know ahead of time what the grade will be before going through the trouble.

Johnny630 10-12-2019 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MULLINS5 (Post 1923118)
I agree with you, but I'm starting to feel like they know ahead of time what the grade will be before going through the trouble.

Bingo

calvindog 10-12-2019 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1923107)
right so now you saying the statute of limitations didnt expire so its still early for lawsuits. What about 3 months before the statute of limitations or a year. I dont know about you but most lawyers dont wait until right before the statute of limitations to file anything as there is added risk such blowing an issue and thus blowing the statute or class action occurs earlier and there is no opt out along with hundreds of other problems in waiting to the last minute etc

The fact you are mentioning statute of limitations being an issue as to why no lawsuits have been filed does prove that you do think lawsuits would be filed since this current scandal is a huge issue but only because enough time has not passed no lawsuits have been filed. If lawsuits or not didnt mean anything why bother to bring up the statute of limitations.

So its not absurd I am bringing up the fact that no lawsuits have been filed. 2 years from now, if still no lawsuits are filed, would you then agree that its far from rocking the hobby in that it would appear most people are happy/refunded with the outcome..

Its ok you said i am an idiot....you spent time to write that and there is much supply and demand for your services so your time in so expensive that you still took what little free time you have to call me names and make a your mama joke. i am honored. Peter C lives..

I'm saying that the lawsuit issue is meaningless. That the lack of them does not mean people are happy. My point by noting that statutes of limits exist is to explain that not everyone who can sue MUST sue immediately as you are suggesting. How you, allegedly a lawyer who may have one client, cannot see this is stunning. I scored a $4.35 million settlement on a claim recently with a single letter. No lawsuit. Does that mean my client was thrilled because she didn't file a lawsuit? Do you not understand how this works? Ask Mastro's co-conspirators who paid my clients six figures if they felt a lawsuit was necessary to get them to pay back money they stole.

And if you don't mind me calling you an idiot, then I will again. You're an idiot. And yeah, I always have time for pointing this out, although, again, that no one from here hires a crack civil litigator like yourself surely makes clear I'm not alone in my opinion.

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 04:40 PM

Not up to the standards of the old Point Counterpoint on 60 Minutes.

More like the parody on SNL, with Dan Aykroyd famously saying to Jane Curtin, Jane, you ignorant slut!!

calvindog 10-12-2019 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923128)
Not up to the standards of the old Point Counterpoint on 60 Minutes.

More like the parody on SNL, with Dan Aykroyd famously saying to Jane Curtin, Jane, you ignorant slut!!

"2 years from now, if still no lawsuits are filed, would you then agree that its far from rocking the hobby in that it would appear most people are happy/refunded with the outcome.."

Tough to have a cogent argument with someone whose only point is that nearly everyone in the hobby is actually thrilled that PSA is putting thousands of trimmed cards into holders simply because no single victim has individually sued a public company for the price of their worthless card. That's his only point. Peter, let me know how many people who lost between $500 and $10,000 due to PSA incompetence would be willing to pay a lawyer to sue PSA, knowing they can't join up in a class?

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1923130)
"2 years from now, if still no lawsuits are filed, would you then agree that its far from rocking the hobby in that it would appear most people are happy/refunded with the outcome.."

Tough to have a cogent argument with someone whose only point is that nearly everyone in the hobby is actually thrilled that PSA is putting thousands of trimmed cards into holders simply because no single victim has individually sued a public company for the price of their worthless card. That's his only point. Peter, let me know how many people who lost between $500 and $10,000 due to PSA incompetence would be willing to pay a lawyer to sue PSA, knowing they can't join up in a class?

No point prolonging the argument then, if you don't feed it, it dies.

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 04:54 PM

It's also a weird situation because in this market, a lot of people could just mitigate their damage by selling off the cards they have doubts about, or even the ones that have been specifically outed. Easier than paying a lawyer to sue for you in Orange County.

calvindog 10-12-2019 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923132)
It's also a weird situation because in this market, a lot of people could just mitigate their damage by selling off the cards they have doubts about, or even the ones that have been specifically outed. Easier than paying a lawyer to sue for you in Orange County.

Hard to sell a card in a graded holder which has been outed as having been altered, no?

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1923134)
Hard to sell a card in a graded holder which has been outed as having been altered, no?

99 percent of buyers wouldn't check.

ullmandds 10-12-2019 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923135)
99 percent of buyers wouldn't check.

At this point i tend to agree!

Peter_Spaeth 10-12-2019 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1923136)
At this point i tend to agree!

What are they going to do, scroll through 3 million pages on Blowout? Go to PSA's website and cross-check their list -- oops -- never mind that one.

ullmandds 10-12-2019 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923137)
What are they going to do, scroll through 3 million pages on Blowout? Go to PSA's website and cross-check their list -- oops -- never mind that one.

Definitely not!

Aquarian Sports Cards 10-12-2019 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 1923112)
Somebody trimmed AND recolored an $18,000 USD card? :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

You have to have a REALLY large set of balls to do that - larger than Tony Montana's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923113)
It's all relative. If you have millions, it's not much to risk particularly if you think there's a decent chance you'll succeed. People bet a hell of a lot more than that every day.

Or if you have an in at PSA...

HRBAKER 10-12-2019 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards (Post 1923141)
Or if you have an in at PSA...

.....or you just have to be confident in their inability to do their job.

Johnny630 10-12-2019 06:44 PM

This is the worst/Most Obviously Re Colored Card Exposed as of yet.....was this graded at one of those invitationals where the high volume submitters get to sit and discuss with graders??
Did they even look at his jersey or chin of this butchered Hull Rookie
I’m not buying PSA is this bad at grading cards.......
Such a Shame

MULLINS5 10-12-2019 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny630 (Post 1923161)
This is the worst/Most Obviously Re Colored Card Exposed as of yet.....was this graded at one of those invitationals where the high volume submitters get to sit and discuss with graders??
Did they even look at his jersey or chin of this butchered Hull Rookie
Such a Shame

There was a 52 Mantle that was worse than the Hull. Think it was the one that bumped from 1 to 1.5 ?

Johnny630 10-12-2019 06:50 PM

I guess at this Point What Difference Does it Make?

WhenItWasAHobby 10-15-2019 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923100)


What a disgrace. I'm not familiar with 1958 Topps Hockey cards, but I do know that many of the later '60's Topps Baseball cards had a dot matrix print pattern that would make it easy to detect recoloring under magnification. Putting $18,000 at risk to modify a card reveals a lot about PSA's gross lack of competence and the card doctor's brazen confidence (likely based on years of experience and lucrative returns on investment) to attempt to get a grade bump like this.

perezfan 10-15-2019 02:09 PM

Agree...

Gross incompetence by PSA. A simple magnifying glass would reveal the very significant recoloring of that card. Within the thread on BO, they blew up that section, and it was beyond obvious that red ink was added to the jersey. Major tampering, and a true disgrace. Hope the buyer gets word of this.

Peter_Spaeth 10-15-2019 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 1923797)
Agree...

Gross incompetence by PSA. A simple magnifying glass would reveal the very significant recoloring of that card. Within the thread on BO, they blew up that section, and it was beyond obvious that red ink was added to the jersey. Major tampering, and a true disgrace. Hope the buyer gets word of this.

"As far as the other question that you had in regards to this investigation of the auction here in our industry, I can answer it very short and sweet. We don't believe that there is anything of a material nature for our company to be concerned with."

"So I think this whole trimming issue that we spent a lot of time talking about today is really something that we don't consider material to our business."

Joseph J. Orlando

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/edite...083408142.html

brad31 10-15-2019 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923803)
"As far as the other question that you had in regards to this investigation of the auction here in our industry, I can answer it very short and sweet. We don't believe that there is anything of a material nature for our company to be concerned with."

"So I think this whole trimming issue that we spent a lot of time talking about today is really something that we don't consider material to our business."

Joseph J. Orlando

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/edite...083408142.html

Wow if I read that transcript correctly it sounds to me like that they either do not accept submissions from PWCC or PWCC has stopped submitting cards on behalf of themselves or their consigners.

WhenItWasAHobby 10-15-2019 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923803)
"As far as the other question that you had in regards to this investigation of the auction here in our industry, I can answer it very short and sweet. We don't believe that there is anything of a material nature for our company to be concerned with."

"So I think this whole trimming issue that we spent a lot of time talking about today is really something that we don't consider material to our business."

Joseph J. Orlando

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/edite...083408142.html

Unbelievable! :eek:

WhenItWasAHobby 10-15-2019 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 1923797)
Agree...

Gross incompetence by PSA. A simple magnifying glass would reveal the very significant recoloring of that card. Within the thread on BO, they blew up that section, and it was beyond obvious that red ink was added to the jersey. Major tampering, and a true disgrace. Hope the buyer gets word of this.


Who knows? It may not matter to the buyer. Maybe the buyer is another card doctor hoping to alter it to a 9 or 10.

Peter_Spaeth 10-15-2019 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby (Post 1923820)
Unbelievable! :eek:

Except that it's exactly what you would expect and could have predicted, no?

perezfan 10-15-2019 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby (Post 1923825)
Who knows? It may not matter to the buyer. Maybe the buyer is another card doctor hoping to alter it to a 9 or 10.

Well, I guess you have a point. I almost forgot that these guys actually have to buy the cards before they alter, slab and consign them. If a Doctor has the balls to plop down $78K on that card in hopes of getting a 9 or 10, he's got a lot more intestinal fortitude than me! :o

Beastmode 10-15-2019 05:49 PM

I'm shocked collectors still think these trimmers were submitting altered cards to PSA without knowing the outcome. Please, our collecting community cannot be that dumb. 99% certainty these trimmers knew exactly the grade they were going to get, and PSA is knee deep in this crap.

If a trimmer is spending thousands of dollars to duplicate a factory cut to 1/64 of an inch, and years perfecting his skills, he's going to have an inside track to getting that bump.

Until Joe Orlando is quoted under penalty of perjury during a deposition, I'll assume anything coming from his mouth is meant for the collectors club kool-aid drinkers.

bnorth 10-15-2019 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beastmode (Post 1923851)
I'm shocked collectors still think these trimmers were submitting altered cards to PSA without knowing the outcome. Please, our collecting community cannot be that dumb. 99% certainty these trimmers knew exactly the grade they were going to get, and PSA is knee deep in this crap.

If a trimmer is spending thousands of dollars to duplicate a factory cut to 1/64 of an inch, and years perfecting his skills, he's going to have an inside track to getting that bump.

Until Joe Orlando is quoted under penalty of perjury during a deposition, I'll assume anything coming from his mouth is meant for the collectors club kool-aid drinkers.

I have had that opinion for a very long time.

WhenItWasAHobby 10-16-2019 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1923833)
Except that it's exactly what you would expect and could have predicted, no?

I was thinking in terms of a response from a CEO of a publicly traded company dismissing an issue as immaterial when in my opinion it is clearly germane to their business where the potential liability to their company is significant.

On the other hand you bring up a great point: this is just another example of lame rhetoric by Orlando used to smooth over, deflect and dismiss just another PSA scandal and naturally his response doesn't surprise me in the least. He gave me the scorched earth treatment when I publicly exposed examples of doctored PSA cards ten years ago, by banning me, deleting registry sets, etc and never publicly addressed the issue. I wasn't alone; there were other disgruntled collectors who endured the same fate. One has to wonder what kind of retribution he imposed on the stock analysts who brought up the questions regarding trimmed cards in the recent quarterly results meeting?

I'm reminded when Ken Lay the CEO of Enron assured employees and stockholders all is well with Enron and promoted a bright future and cajoled the said parties to buy even more Enron stock when in fact the company was quietly floundering into a state of disaster. Lay was later convicted of multiple crimes including making false statements. Whether that applies to this situation, I'll leave that to the legal experts.

samosa4u 10-16-2019 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby (Post 1923966)

He gave me the scorched earth treatment when I publicly exposed examples of doctored PSA cards ten years ago, by banning me, deleting registry sets, etc and never publicly addressed the issue. I wasn't alone; there were other disgruntled collectors who endured the same fate.

I think I remember you from almost twenty years ago on the CU Forums. Was your avatar a panther? Do you remember the image wars? We used to find pictures of ugly people and then we would Photoshop them collecting cards, and post them on the forum with funny headers (I saw xxx last night looking at his cards on the toilet - now we know why his cards keep getting the ST qualifier). I was only a teenager back then and I'm pretty sure I annoyed the hell outta' everybody. :D

I remember when PSA graded the first O-Pee-Chee Wayne Gretzky RC a 10 GEM MINT. Being Canadian, I have seen a trillion of these cards before and I just felt that it wasn't a perfect-looking card. I remember pointing out an error, or two, and then I got the boot. :eek:

WhenItWasAHobby 10-16-2019 11:34 AM

Yes, I did have a panther avatar in the early days. I didn't have Photoshop software, so the customized cards phenomenon doesn't stand out for me. It was a great time in the early days - buying raw cards at shows and selected shops and getting them graded and seeing their value jump significantly if they got a high grade. Then by 2003 or so, the nice cards dried up and things started to surface that PSA wasn't all that it was cracked up to be.

Johnny630 10-16-2019 07:31 PM

Great Job BODA

This whitey ford 61 AS is a disgrace.....

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showth...315750&page=75

PSA’s OPINION IS WORTHLESS

Peter_Spaeth 10-16-2019 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny630 (Post 1924113)
Great Job BODA

This whitey ford 61 AS is a disgrace.....

https://www.blowoutforums.com/showth...315750&page=75

PSA’s OPINION IS WORTHLESS

It appears to be in one of Nat Turner's sets. Nat as some know has a very substantial collection, it would be interesting to know his reaction assuming he finds out.

https://www.psacard.com/articles/art...ard-collection

Johnny630 10-16-2019 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1924119)
It appears to be in one of Nat Turner's sets. Nat as some know has a very substantial collection, it would be interesting to know his reaction assuming he finds out.

Hope the gentleman finds out..........

Johnny630 10-16-2019 07:48 PM

Here comes my inner Chuck.....

PSA has completely wrongfully put tens of thousands, it not hundreds of thousands of cards in holders that are altered.... facilitating the public to be potentially defrauded over and over again.....their Number 1 In the industry egotistical mentality is all Bull To The S Garbage Wake Up People !!!!!

1952boyntoncollector 10-17-2019 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1923127)
I'm saying that the lawsuit issue is meaningless. That the lack of them does not mean people are happy. My point by noting that statutes of limits exist is to explain that not everyone who can sue MUST sue immediately as you are suggesting. How you, allegedly a lawyer who may have one client, cannot see this is stunning. I scored a $4.35 million settlement on a claim recently with a single letter. No lawsuit. Does that mean my client was thrilled because she didn't file a lawsuit? Do you not understand how this works? Ask Mastro's co-conspirators who paid my clients six figures if they felt a lawsuit was necessary to get them to pay back money they stole.

And if you don't mind me calling you an idiot, then I will again. You're an idiot. And yeah, I always have time for pointing this out, although, again, that no one from here hires a crack civil litigator like yourself surely makes clear I'm not alone in my opinion.

Thanks for calling me an idiot again Peter C. So now its school yard who is bigger than the other. Bullys dont care how people are treated in the world. Another school yard tactic So again you proved my point, the fact that only time is cited by you as a reason why lawsuits have not been filed shows that lawsuits are indeed an important factor. You are just saying its too soon.

My view is enough time has passed that people seem to be happy with the outcome or great lawyers like you write one terrific letter so no lawsuit is needed. I think we can all name instances in which a lawsuit did more than a letter .

I dont think filing a lawsuit now would be immediate as well. How long as it been? It appears 'victims' are happy how things are proceeding where they are happy or not worth filing a lawsuit at this point. There are problems in the world in which lawsuits are filed and there problems where none are, thus far this falls in the later category

1952boyntoncollector 10-17-2019 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1923130)
"2 years from now, if still no lawsuits are filed, would you then agree that its far from rocking the hobby in that it would appear most people are happy/refunded with the outcome.."

Tough to have a cogent argument with someone whose only point is that nearly everyone in the hobby is actually thrilled that PSA is putting thousands of trimmed cards into holders simply because no single victim has individually sued a public company for the price of their worthless card. That's his only point. Peter, let me know how many people who lost between $500 and $10,000 due to PSA incompetence would be willing to pay a lawyer to sue PSA, knowing they can't join up in a class?

so nobody lost more than $10,000 due to PSA's incompetence which seems to be the magic number for no lawsuit. . PSA is the only one thats incompetent too i guess as interesting enough, you didnt mention any other entity that could possibly be responsible, just PSA.

Insurance companies are public companies and they get sued, not sure why you mention PSA is a public company like thats a deterrent, they probably have insurance as well. I guess nobody sues public companies.

Peter_Spaeth 10-17-2019 09:57 AM

Please let this end.

calvindog 10-17-2019 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1924216)
Please let this end.

He's too stupid to let it end.

samosa4u 10-17-2019 12:09 PM

Why don't you two just fight it out on the streets of NY, and afterwards, when both of you are exhausted, then just go for a beer?

1952boyntoncollector 10-18-2019 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1924225)
He's too stupid to let it end.

Ditto

1952boyntoncollector 10-18-2019 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 1924251)
Why don't you two just fight it out on the streets of NY, and afterwards, when both of you are exhausted, then just go for a beer?

yeah he can pay for it given all of the money he makes. Maybe i will pay for the tip when we get the bill but hopefully he wont have alligator arms.

calvindog 10-18-2019 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1924434)
yeah he can pay for it given all of the money he makes. Maybe i will pay for the tip when we get the bill but hopefully he wont have alligator arms.

Work harder. Don’t be an idiot all the time. Maybe then you’ll be successful in our field. Don’t be bitter about being a loser, it’s your fault, not mine.

1952boyntoncollector 10-18-2019 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1924445)
Work harder. Don’t be an idiot all the time. Maybe then you’ll be successful in our field. Don’t be bitter about being a loser, it’s your fault, not mine.

Sounds like alligator arms..

perezfan 10-18-2019 11:44 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0MK7qz13bU


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.