Great news, Leon!

Thank you! :)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/391757219078...AIT&rmvSB=true

She has sold this same card multiple times. I really wish ebay would ban her. I recall in the late 90's, early 00's sellers would get banned. Ebay needs to update their polices.

Well, it sure doesn't seem like Battlefield has changed her ways any.
These are mostly from within the last month, and looking at some 52 Topps cards she currently has on E-Bay, which look exceptional, one can only conclude, again, that she is hasn't changed one bit.
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...e&interval=365

I was set up at a show yesterday. A guy comes up to me and tells me he is bidding on a nrmt or better 55 Clemente on ebay. I asked him if the seller was Battlefield? He said "what?" He looked and it was her/him/them. I told him of our stories. He didn't know who the seller was nor what their feedback was AND he was bidding on $1500+ card, raw. That is when I saw their new listing and they aren't covering their butts the way they were recently in other ads. That said, they had about 135 Negs in the last year but not that many the last few months (still way too many but less than before). Back to reporting her/he/them for their misdeeds.

Yep. In one of the many negative feedbacks was a 51 Bowman Mantle., slabbed/graded. I was watching it a bit before it sold and wondered if I'd ever see any feedback about it? It was a $10,000+ dollar card, and although the purchaser doesn't get into details about the card, my gut told me it wasn't the last time I'd see or hear about it.
Also, that Mantle is not the only graded/slabbed card in her negative feedback. Seems she can't even be honest about those, and with most people thinking pics of slabbed/graded cards are likely unaltered/photoshopped, she has taken it to a whole new level!

I've only bought low dollar centered 57s which were actually rather nice. I've never dared to buy high dollar cards from battlefield. I've bought from the two "phenomenal" sellers..."really_bad_cards", and that was enough.

So looking at the expanded pic closely of the '51 mantle I noticed the lower right corner looks photoshopped. The corner is a bit discolored and may actually be dinged badly.

I've been tempted with some of her 52's but since most look phenomenal, I have steered clear knowing they likely aren't what they appear to be.
Some of the prices, if they were in the exact condition as shown and described, would be pretty good deals, imo, but knowing her/them and what they are doing to the hobby, and people in general, I just can't do it.

Since they have as many negatives and neutrals as they do AND seem to give quick refunds, it really does say something, and it's not good. I would just say you are rolling the dice and they are stacked against you if you buy raw cards from them. Personally I have better things to do with my time but I don't blame some people for trying it. As I told the guy at the show though, is it really worth the headache and expense? That Clemente would have been graded if it would, imo. But there is always a chance a grader could have a bad and give a numerical grade out when they shouldn't. It's just not a game I am going to play though. Good luck to those that do. You still have lots of chances :).
http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?item=...ld0516&_sop=16

Just searching for some 52 Topps cards and of course I came across ole Battlefield again.
I hate to revisit this thread and bring it up to the top, but I thought with new members joining all the time, it might not be a bad idea if they see it?

Not much, and most likely not anything has changed with her. Seems like the same old same old, business as usual with her.
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...e&interval=365

As long as the make SOME money doing their scam, they could care less....

i like when battlefield defends itself on negative feedback on some of the negative feedback that is.

How do they become a top rated seller with 125 negative feedbacks over the past months?

I have 0 negative feedbacks but my PO does not scan enough of my items. Because of that I can't even become a top rated seller.

Go figure.

I have the same problem. It's obvious they don't actually meet the top rated standards, they do however meet the double standard...

When there seems to be no good answer the answer is usually $$.