Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Will this stock market madness affect cards? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=279823)

Shoeless Moe 03-30-2020 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by japhi (Post 1966307)
Considering he took all the credit for the increases in the dow and SP 500 - which were on a 7 year bull run when he was sworn in - I think he needs to own those indexes now.

I think he also needs to take ownership of the debt he piled on the past 4 years. Close to 1 trillion per year deficits in the best of times - classic case of not saving for a rainy day - and because od that his 2020 debt is going to be epic, 2-4T.

So ya, he owns the economy good or bad. As of today his legacy is the indexes at same levels he was sworn in at, and 3 trillion in new debt. By end of year he is likely looking at worst spike of unemployment since the great depression and 4-6 trillion in new debt.

His legacy IMO is going to be brutal.

Let's revisit in 4-1/2 years when he's no longer President.

gawaintheknight 03-30-2020 06:37 PM

This won't be a popular attitude here, but Hillary would absolutely have been, if not great (I don't know what that would mean in this context), a lot better. She has experience with healthcare policy, she has experience in the Senate, she has experience as Secretary of State, she has experience seeing how a non-dysfunctional White House works. All of that would be helpful, and Trump has none of it. She would not have cut funding for epidemic preparedness or eliminated government agencies that it now turns out are crucial for fighting the epidemic. She would have used the contingency plans the Obama administration created for dealing with epidemics rather than ignoring them and pretending everything was fine for months while the time to act decisively went by. She would have hired competent people and let them do their jobs. She would be actually trying to address the crisis instead of trying to threaten governors she didn't like and tweeting about how high her TV ratings were and trying to bully reporters who asked questions she didn't like. I could go on, but just on those points alone, there's a huge difference.

So, absolutely she would have been a lot better. She was one of the most qualified candidates in the history of the presidency, and she lost to one of the least qualified candidates, and, as they say, elections have consequences.

I'm sure there's a bunch of people here who are now never going to do business with me again, but that's fine.

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1966352)
I not taking any side

but i would think if someone were to criticize Trump, they also are saying that Hillary and/or Biden would be great. If they are not saying that, then its pretty empty to just say how things are bad.

If all of them are bad, really no reason to bad mouth any of them. Whats the point of criticizing with no solution.


Dpeck100 03-30-2020 06:39 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1966385)
Let's revisit in 4-1/2 years when he's no longer President.


I get the feeling you would like this card. One of my favorites.

Republicaninmass 03-30-2020 06:44 PM

Hey Ted, If people still buy from, and look at pwcc auctions, I wouldn't worry too much!


Stuff Trumps All!

gawaintheknight 03-30-2020 06:52 PM

Instead we get this idiocy:

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/mypil...232505593.html

Ted


Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight (Post 1966402)
This won't be a popular attitude here, but Hillary would absolutely have been, if not great (I don't know what that would mean in this context), a lot better. She has experience with healthcare policy, she has experience in the Senate, she has experience as Secretary of State, she has experience seeing how a non-dysfunctional White House works. All of that would be helpful, and Trump has none of it. She would not have cut funding for epidemic preparedness or eliminated government agencies that it now turns out are crucial for fighting the epidemic. She would have used the contingency plans the Obama administration created for dealing with epidemics rather than ignoring them and pretending everything was fine for months while the time to act decisively went by. She would have hired competent people and let them do their jobs. She would be actually trying to address the crisis instead of trying to threaten governors she didn't like and tweeting about how high her TV ratings were and trying to bully reporters who asked questions she didn't like. I could go on, but just on those points alone, there's a huge difference.

So, absolutely she would have been a lot better. She was one of the most qualified candidates in the history of the presidency, and she lost to one of the least qualified candidates, and, as they say, elections have consequences.

I'm sure there's a bunch of people here who are now never going to do business with me again, but that's fine.

Ted


Dpeck100 03-30-2020 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1966409)
Hey Ted, If people still buy from, and look at pwcc auctions, I wouldn't worry too much!


Stuff Trumps All!


If someone wants to follow the most expensive cards on EBAY whether one likes it or not PWCC and Probstein dominate.

There are plenty of high dollar fixed price or flexible price listings but these two run the vast majority of the straight auctions for good cards.

Just as I said when the PWCC issues arose that they weren't going anywhere. I haven't purchased a card from them in quite sometime but I certainly would.

Dpeck100 03-30-2020 06:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If Huffington Post articles are being posted this thread needs another Trump card.

This card has exploded in recent months. I am anxious to see a fresh 10 listed to see what it brings. A PSA 9 just went for $375.

gawaintheknight 03-30-2020 07:08 PM

Not sure why it matters that it's the Huffington Post, but here's the same story from Fox News, if that somehow makes it more believable for people.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/myp...-during-crisis

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dpeck100 (Post 1966420)
If Huffington Post articles are being posted this thread needs another Trump card.

This card has exploded in recent months. I am anxious to see a fresh 10 listed to see what it brings. A PSA 9 just went for $375.


Dpeck100 03-30-2020 07:15 PM

I saw this on Twitter earlier and watched clips. Just can’t fathom looking at a Huffington Post article . I also saw countless liberals on Twitter criticizing Trump for bringing him up and none pointed out how great it was that he was using his factory space for the greater good.

itjclarke 03-30-2020 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1966409)
Hey Ted, If people still buy from, and look at pwcc auctions, I wouldn't worry too much!


Stuff Trumps All!

For sure TED, probably true 99% of the time.

However as a 1/2 “Jap”, who’s American born “Jap” mom, aunt, and grandparents were interned in WWII, and who’s great uncle volunteered for service straight out of the camp and died as part of the 442RCT assault on Monte Cassino... there’s one person in this thread I wouldn’t do business with if you paid me.

Even though they’d lost their home and business as early 30 somethings starting a family, my grandparent’s loyalty to FDR never waned. That word should’ve died decades ago, after countless other Japanese Americans had demonstrated the same and re-assimilated back into society.

Sad to see this type of rhetoric coming back.

seanofjapan 03-30-2020 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itjclarke (Post 1966436)
For sure TED, probably true 99% of the time.

However as a 1/2 “Jap”, who’s American born “Jap” mom, aunt, and grandparents were interned in WWII, and who’s great uncle volunteered for service straight out of the camp and died as part of the 442RCT assault on Monte Cassino... there’s one person in this thread I wouldn’t do business with if you paid me.

Even though they’d lost their home and business as early 30 somethings starting a family, my grandparent’s loyalty to FDR never waned. That word should’ve died decades ago, after countless other Japanese Americans had demonstrated the same and re-assimilated back into society.

Sad to see this type of rhetoric coming back.

My wife is Japanese and both my kids are half Japanese (and citizens of Japan) so I 100% share your view.

Jdoggs 03-30-2020 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhs5120 (Post 1966025)
Yeah, same point. If a mistake I made kills thousands of Americans, you bet there would be hell to pay at the higher levels.

And you would be held responsible too and fired. End of discussion.

Mark17 03-31-2020 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoggs (Post 1966493)
And you would be held responsible too and fired. End of discussion.

Then Lincoln should've fired US Grant. For that matter, Lincoln shouldn't have been re-elected in 1864 (meaning, McClellan wins and the South maintains slavery.)

Costly mistakes were made in WW2. Should FDR have been voted out. or should Eisenhower have been fired? Should Obama and Hillary been tossed from office over their Benghazi bungling?

You can't judge e person's decisions based on what perfect would've been. This pandemic is a new thing, and like it or not, there is a learning curve for everyone.

gawaintheknight 03-31-2020 05:52 AM

It may be new, but lots of people - qualified, talented, educated, smart people - knew that something like it was inevitable and prepared reports and plans for what to do. There were government agencies in place to handle it, until Trump got rid of them. Trump ignored all of the people who knew what was going on, and said it wasn't a big deal, and then turned things over to Mike Pence whose previous experience with disease outbreaks was causing one when he was governor of Indiana.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/...na/4890988002/

Here's an analogy: suppose you got elected mayor of a town, and the town has a river running through it. The river has never flooded because of the system of dikes and levees in the area. So you decide to cut the budget for maintaining the flood control system, because, hey, the river's never flooded, and then you fire the guy who runs the agency that's in charge of responding to floods, because, hey, the river's never flooded. All the disaster preparedness people tell you that's a bad idea, but you ignore them because they're part of the deep state and you know the river never floods and no one knows more about weather than you do.

Over time, the flood control system deteriorates because there's no funding and no one in charge. Then, later, the weather people tell you that it's going to rain heavily upstream of your town in a few days and the river's going to flood, and you should read the report the last mayor had prepared about what to do if there's a flood. You ignore them, and tell the townspeople that it's only a few drops of rain, nothing to worry about. The rain starts to fall, and the river's rising, and you say to the townspeople, oh, it's risen before, it's going to go down again, there's nothing to worry about, and by the way the stock market is starting to look really good to you. Meanwhile the flood control system is failing because you cut the funding for repairs, and the water's still rising. And all the experts are telling you to evacuate the town, or at least try to repair the flood control system, or put up sandbags on the river, and the weather people are telling you more rain's coming....and you do nothing. Finally the flood happens, and everything's under six feet of water, and lots of people drown, and you say "Gosh, this has never happened before, no one could have known this would happen." You also say "No, I don't take responsibility at all," when someone asks you if you take responsibility for what happened. (That's a direct quote from Trump, by the way).

The proper response of the townspeople should be to kick you out of office and run you out of town on a rail after tarring and feathering you.

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 1966506)
Then Lincoln should've fired US Grant. For that matter, Lincoln shouldn't have been re-elected in 1864 (meaning, McClellan wins and the South maintains slavery.)

Costly mistakes were made in WW2. Should FDR have been voted out. or should Eisenhower have been fired? Should Obama and Hillary been tossed from office over their Benghazi bungling?

You can't judge e person's decisions based on what perfect would've been. This pandemic is a new thing, and like it or not, there is a learning curve for everyone.


jhs5120 03-31-2020 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoggs (Post 1966493)
And you would be held responsible too and fired. End of discussion.

You're missing the point..

Of course people at all levels will be held responsible and there will be blame passed to them, but at the end of the day, the guy at the top is in charge and takes responsibility for his actions (or inactions) that allowed this to happen.

Did everyone see this coming? No. Was this completely unavoidable? No. There are questions that people rightfully have that our leaders will need to answer to understand why this happened and how to prevent it from happening again. Donald Trump said that I will be able to go to a packed church on Easter, now he says I need to stay inside for another month. He was obviously wrong, he messed up. What happened? Did he not listen to his advisors? Has he been hiring the wrong people? Has he been working off of bad information? Was he just trying to be optimistic? This is a small example of the hundreds (if not thousands) of mistakes he has made over the past couple months regarding this pandemic. He needs to take responsibility for them and explain why he keeps getting it wrong.

1952boyntoncollector 03-31-2020 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhs5120 (Post 1966536)
You're missing the point..

Of course people at all levels will be held responsible and there will be blame passed to them, but at the end of the day, the guy at the top is in charge and takes responsibility for his actions (or inactions) that allowed this to happen.

Did everyone see this coming? No. Was this completely unavoidable? No. There are questions that people rightfully have that our leaders will need to answer to understand why this happened and how to prevent it from happening again. Donald Trump said that I will be able to go to a packed church on Easter, now he says I need to stay inside for another month. He was obviously wrong, he messed up. What happened? Did he not listen to his advisors? Has he been hiring the wrong people? Has he been working off of bad information? Was he just trying to be optimistic? This is a small example of the hundreds (if not thousands) of mistakes he has made over the past couple months regarding this pandemic. He needs to take responsibility for them and explain why he keeps getting it wrong.


I think without being political there are some things that everyone gets wrong. I am sure there are fields of science or other area where there is a clear leader of the field. If that leader makes a decision that later looks wrong but every other leader in the field agreed with their decision at the time, i think you got cut some slack. Also if 50 say one thing and 50 say another. You are only going to be 50 percent right and how can you blame someone if it turns out wrong when the decision was based on 50/50 leader of the field intel.

Not saying applies in any specific case, but it appears some people think that if someone was wrong they should get fired etc.....decisions are not made in a vacuum..

carlsonjok 03-31-2020 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1966597)

Not saying applies in any specific case, but it appears some people think that if someone was wrong they should get fired etc.....decisions are not made in a vacuum..

When someone is more focused on how the stock market is reacting and directly contradicts actual disease experts, there is a case to be made that decisions are being made in a vacuum.

ullmandds 03-31-2020 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight (Post 1966519)
It may be new, but lots of people - qualified, talented, educated, smart people - knew that something like it was inevitable and prepared reports and plans for what to do. There were government agencies in place to handle it, until Trump got rid of them. Trump ignored all of the people who knew what was going on, and said it wasn't a big deal, and then turned things over to Mike Pence whose previous experience with disease outbreaks was causing one when he was governor of Indiana.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/...na/4890988002/

Here's an analogy: suppose you got elected mayor of a town, and the town has a river running through it. The river has never flooded because of the system of dikes and levees in the area. So you decide to cut the budget for maintaining the flood control system, because, hey, the river's never flooded, and then you fire the guy who runs the agency that's in charge of responding to floods, because, hey, the river's never flooded. All the disaster preparedness people tell you that's a bad idea, but you ignore them because they're part of the deep state and you know the river never floods and no one knows more about weather than you do.

Over time, the flood control system deteriorates because there's no funding and no one in charge. Then, later, the weather people tell you that it's going to rain heavily upstream of your town in a few days and the river's going to flood, and you should read the report the last mayor had prepared about what to do if there's a flood. You ignore them, and tell the townspeople that it's only a few drops of rain, nothing to worry about. The rain starts to fall, and the river's rising, and you say to the townspeople, oh, it's risen before, it's going to go down again, there's nothing to worry about, and by the way the stock market is starting to look really good to you. Meanwhile the flood control system is failing because you cut the funding for repairs, and the water's still rising. And all the experts are telling you to evacuate the town, or at least try to repair the flood control system, or put up sandbags on the river, and the weather people are telling you more rain's coming....and you do nothing. Finally the flood happens, and everything's under six feet of water, and lots of people drown, and you say "Gosh, this has never happened before, no one could have known this would happen." You also say "No, I don't take responsibility at all," when someone asks you if you take responsibility for what happened. (That's a direct quote from Trump, by the way).

The proper response of the townspeople should be to kick you out of office and run you out of town on a rail after tarring and feathering you.

Ted

nice analogy.

gawaintheknight 03-31-2020 05:39 PM

Thanks! I should have added a part about how the towns upstream were flooding one by one, and the mayors there were warning the people downstream about what was coming, but I thought of it too late.

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1966697)
nice analogy.


Keith H. Thompson 03-31-2020 06:20 PM

The Johnstown Flood
 
Although not mentioned by name, the "flood incident" is uncannily close to the actual Johnstown PA Flood. And perhaps intended to do so. The initial dam, thought by at least one engineer to be unsafe, but "oh, its held for years" by others with a financial interest in the lake which was created for recreational purposes.

When the rains did come (said to be of biblical proportions) residents and mayors did try to send warnings downstream to Johnstown, but they were ignored or not believed. And this even after the dam had been undermined and collapsed and there were eye witnesses.

Very important and wealthy people from Pittsburg (Carnegie, Melon) owned summer residences lakeside. The Flood was front page news on the New York Times for over a month. Afterwards there were lawsuits and some legal action, but in the end no one important or any facility took any blame or punishment.

gawaintheknight 04-01-2020 11:37 AM

I was not aware of this as I was developing the analogy, but thank you for sharing it. I hope that this time some people will be held responsible.

1952boyntoncollector 04-01-2020 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlsonjok (Post 1966650)
When someone is more focused on how the stock market is reacting and directly contradicts actual disease experts, there is a case to be made that decisions are being made in a vacuum.

Not sure thats apples to apples, he mentions loss of life is important too just as he states what happened in the market.....theres no narrative there unless someone wants to force a narrative

as to contradicting actual disease experts, what exactly does contradict mean, actions are different than words. The experts say varying things and to be flexible..i dont think they said do exactly this or else..

Also it has been said if you are the leader the buck stops with you. So if you listen 100% to what leading experts say and they are wrong, then you will get fired for being wrong (hiring the wrong guys etc) Its already been established on this thread that if you are wrong you are fired..

I not for or against the guy, but throwing around generalities whether its pro democrat or pro republican doesnt do any good imo..

Republicaninmass 04-01-2020 12:54 PM

Well a card came up last night listed by PWCC I've had on my want list forever. Needless to say, I didnt bid! It wasnt do to the market madness, but my own morals. Doubt he is missing my revenue, but this is one person that wont be shilling up, or selling a doctored card to.

Cliff Bowman 04-01-2020 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight (Post 1966402)
Hillary would absolutely have been, if not great (I don't know what that would mean in this context), a lot better. She has experience with healthcare policy, she has experience in the Senate, she has experience as Secretary of State, she has experience seeing how a non-dysfunctional White House works. All of that would be helpful, and Trump has none of it. She would not have cut funding for epidemic preparedness or eliminated government agencies that it now turns out are crucial for fighting the epidemic. She would have used the contingency plans the Obama administration created for dealing with epidemics rather than ignoring them and pretending everything was fine for months while the time to act decisively went by. She would have hired competent people and let them do their jobs. She would be actually trying to address the crisis instead of trying to threaten governors she didn't like and tweeting about how high her TV ratings were and trying to bully reporters who asked questions she didn't like. I could go on, but just on those points alone, there's a huge difference.

So, absolutely she would have been a lot better. She was one of the most qualified candidates in the history of the presidency, and she lost to one of the least qualified candidates, and, as they say, elections have consequences.



Ted

Best advice my stepfather ever gave me, ‘Opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one.’

itjclarke 04-01-2020 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman (Post 1966959)
Best advice my stepfather ever gave me, ‘Opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one.’

No opinions her, just numbers for people to consider when gauging our federal response.

January 20-
- US reports first cases
- S Korea reports first cases

March 12
- US has tested 10,058
- S Korea has tested 234,998

March 17
- US has tested 72 per million residents and new infection curve is rapidly trending upward (now agreed by all, including current administration)
- S Korea has tested 5400 per million residents and new infection curve is declining

Republicaninmass 04-01-2020 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman (Post 1966959)
Best advice my stepfather ever gave me, ‘Opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one.’

And my father added

"And most of them stink"

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 02:38 PM

President Trump donated his salary toward the Virus......meanwhile the Democratic Party just spent $6 Million dollars on Ads against Trump.

Had they spent that $6 million to aid in the Virus fight, using that toward masks or supplies for hospitals, they get mine and a lot more people's respect, and votes.

Blowing that much on Ads in a time of crisis, just mind-blowing.

itjclarke 04-01-2020 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1966974)
And my father added

"And most of them stink"

Haha, and so did my dad, and Sgt O’Neill from Platoon, and every football coach I (or probably everyone else) ever had.

bnorth 04-01-2020 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1966974)
And my father added

"And most of them stink"

I have always heard "and they all smell different".

Republicaninmass 04-01-2020 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman (Post 1966959)
Best advice my stepfather ever gave me, ‘Opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one.’

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 1966979)
I have always heard "and they all smell different".

So you've heard, but experience dictates otherwise?

jhs5120 04-01-2020 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1966976)
President Trump donated his salary toward the Virus......meanwhile the Democratic Party just spent $6 Million dollars on Ads against Trump.

Had they spent that $6 million to aid in the Virus fight, using that toward masks or supplies for hospitals, they get mine and a lot more people's respect, and votes.

Blowing that much on Ads in a time of crisis, just mind-blowing.

This is why politics is dumb...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mp/ncna1174041

Paul S 04-01-2020 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1966976)
President Trump donated his salary toward the Virus......meanwhile the Democratic Party just spent $6 Million dollars on Ads against Trump.

Had they spent that $6 million to aid in the Virus fight, using that toward masks or supplies for hospitals, they get mine and a lot more people's respect, and votes.

Blowing that much on Ads in a time of crisis, just mind-blowing.

They can't. That is donated money and specifically earmaked toward the democratic campaign. Big trouble if they use it for anything else.

Paul S 04-01-2020 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1966981)
So you've heard, but experience dictates otherwise?

I always heard,"Tell that a$$hole to shut up!"

itjclarke 04-01-2020 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul S (Post 1966985)
They can't. That is donated money and specifically earmaked toward the democratic campaign. Big trouble if they use it for anything else.

Though at least prominant one man has been known to use charitable donations to their own foundation to cover personal obligations, legal debt, etc, and not get into too much trouble.

gawaintheknight 04-01-2020 03:10 PM

Yeah, about that salary donation thing....

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/2116447...hs-coronavirus

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1966976)
President Trump donated his salary toward the Virus......meanwhile the Democratic Party just spent $6 Million dollars on Ads against Trump.

Had they spent that $6 million to aid in the Virus fight, using that toward masks or supplies for hospitals, they get mine and a lot more people's respect, and votes.

Blowing that much on Ads in a time of crisis, just mind-blowing.


packs 04-01-2020 03:27 PM

delete

Republicaninmass 04-01-2020 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul S (Post 1966987)
I always heard,"Tell that a$$hole to shut up!"

Of someone passes gas


"Did you hear what that ahole said behind you"

itjclarke 04-01-2020 03:54 PM

Adding-

Would you make dismissive comments like “it’s just like the flu, people die from the flu”, and insinuate that it will just blow over when the weather warms up, while scientists and health officials were still fully trying to assess these things.

Falsely inform the public that we’re weeks/months away from a cure, while expert Anthony Fauci is saying it will be at least a year or more before one is developed and fully approved for use.

Make funny jokes like “I can’t touch my face, I miss my face(haha)”, and focus oddly on performance of the stock market- “it looks great”, “they told me I set a record today” while other places like N Korea were taking very serious steps to broadly test, then broadly track all those tested, especially those testing positive w/ a tracking app?

irv 04-01-2020 04:23 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight (Post 1966991)
Yeah, about that salary donation thing....

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/4/2116447...hs-coronavirus

Ted

It blows me away what people will believe anymore. So many fake news outlets out there nowadays, one can only view them as Info-tainment and nothing more.

Main stream media (MSM) is the same way, all out to influence and brainwash your mind.

CNN, MSNB, NY Times, the list goes on and on. All out to get Trump like a bunch of petulant children who are still struggling with the fact the Dems lost the last election.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhs5120 (Post 1966984)

Then both sides are a bunch idiots. Amazing.


And I don't want to hear they can't use that money for anything else. That's BS.


You use that money toward the crisis and someone is gonna complain?

irv 04-01-2020 04:50 PM

CBS News admits 'mistake' after airing footage of overcrowded Italian hospital in report about NYC

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-ne...ually-in-italy

https://www.wcbm.com/2020/04/01/cbs-...ort-about-nyc/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ian-hospital-/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/cbs-n...port-about-nyc

Glad to see they admitted it, but you can bet your ass they were called out on it first by many.

Info-tainment, people, because fear/hate sells and it helps their ratings. :(

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 04:58 PM

Jake Tapper (CNN) interviewed Governor Gavin Newsom (Democrat) today and he tried to get him to say negative things about Trump, and goes so how would you evaluate the President's job so far. Newsom, even shocked me a bit, goes he's done a great job and goes on praising him. The look on Tapper's face, he never saw that coming. And oddly enough I can't find it or I'd post the link. CNN is probably shredding it in the back room right now.

itjclarke 04-01-2020 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967018)
CBS News admits 'mistake' after airing footage of overcrowded Italian hospital in report about NYC

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-ne...ually-in-italy

https://www.wcbm.com/2020/04/01/cbs-...ort-about-nyc/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ian-hospital-/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/cbs-n...port-about-nyc

Glad to see they admitted it, but you can bet your ass they were called out on it first by many.

Info-tainment, people, because fear/hate sells and it helps their ratings. :(

This is your take away right now? There’s been far worse passed off as “news”, and I give them at least some credit for owning it, unlike several other media outlets when confronted with falsehoods.

Meanwhile 391 people died in a day in NYC or Corvona related illnesss (FACT). My sister was on a conference call last week with other surgeons/doctors, and they’re prepping for models which have that potentially growing to 4-5K/day very soon. This was not media selling a story, these were medical professionals, experts using best available data. Ideally well minded/intentioned people working very hard, and/or simply behaving as instructed will help prevent that from happening there or anywhere else.

Forrest through the trees.

itjclarke 04-01-2020 05:11 PM

Newsom gave a live address to the state to tell us about the statewide lockdown, and complimented the Pres for the recent support. This was seen by millions and reported on. Stop trying to make shit up (“CNN shredding”) to fan the flames, further polarize.

Speaking of flames, the governor even held his composure after Trump had just accused him of “poor forrest management”, and then with all present twice called the town or Paradise, the town of “Pleasure”. That said, he didn’t have to speak up, an exhausted firefighter corrected him on camera. Roughly 90% of that “town” of about 25-30K’s structures had just been completely destroyed.

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itjclarke (Post 1967024)
Newsom gave a live address to the state to tell us about the statewide lockdown, and complimented the Pres for the recent support. This was seen by millions and reported on. Stop trying to make shit up (“CNN shredding”) to fan the flames, further polarize.

Speaking of flames, the governor even held his composure after Trump had just accused him of “poor forrest management”, and then with all present twice called the town or Paradise, the town of “Pleasure”. That said, he didn’t have to speak up, an exhausted firefighter corrected him on camera. Roughly 90% of that “town” of about 25-30K’s structures had just been completely destroyed.



oh good, please post it, I can't find it.

itjclarke 04-01-2020 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1967029)
oh good, please post it, I can't find it.

It shouldn’t be hard for you to find the governor’s live address on line, I’ll let you do the investigative leg work.

... Or don’t, and you can just happily keep working to drive the wedge between people. More divisiveness is exactly what we need right now.. as well as your great public health advice from prior posts. People dying are just in “overtime”, right?

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 06:26 PM

Overtime or Extra Innings.

I like to relate everything to sports.

carlsonjok 04-01-2020 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1966943)
Not sure thats apples to apples, he mentions loss of life is important too just as he states what happened in the market.....theres no narrative there unless someone wants to force a narrative

That is a nice bit of equivocation. He didn't ever mention the loss of life until it was blatantly obvious that the loss of life will be substantial. There is plenty of ink out there regarding the President's early (non)reactions to the virus. But, here are two of my favorites:

February 24
: The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA. We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me! (Note on 2/24, the DJIA closed at 27,938. Today closed at 20,910.)

February 26:And again, when you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.

Quote:

as to contradicting actual disease experts, what exactly does contradict mean, actions are different than words. The experts say varying things and to be flexible..i dont think they said do exactly this or else..
I am referring specifically to his pushing of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as some kind of miracle cure, when there is absolutely no evidence it works. Hydroxychloroquine is an anti-malarial and azithromycin is an antibiotic. Neither are anti-virals. Now, it is entirely possible that they may work. After all, rogaine started out as a blood pressure medicine. However, there has been no clinical trials and the two most publicized studies of their use have such huge procedural flaws that it is impossible to draw any scientifically sound conclusions from them. And I've heard no responsible doctor or relevant scientist say otherwise.

Quote:

Also it has been said if you are the leader the buck stops with you. So if you listen 100% to what leading experts say and they are wrong, then you will get fired for being wrong (hiring the wrong guys etc) Its already been established on this thread that if you are wrong you are fired..
Come on now. Are you really trying to suggest that Trump was listening to experts all along? I've seen plenty of experts talk about this (I have a friend and a brother-in-law who are both virologists) and all of them were sounding the alarm. Heck, even the political class was sounding the alarm. On February 4, Chris Murphy, a senator from Connecticut said the following: "Just left the Administration briefing on Coronavirus. Bottom line: they aren't taking this seriously enough. Notably, no request for ANY emergency funding, which is a big mistake. Local health systems need supplies, training, screening staff etc. And they need it now."
Quote:

I not for or against the guy, but throwing around generalities whether its pro democrat or pro republican doesnt do any good imo..
You'll have to point out for me where I made any comment about anyone political affiliation. Noting gross incompetence isn't political.

mq711 04-01-2020 07:26 PM

I start a post about Carl Hubbell and it gets “watercoolered” in a day and this political crap is allowed to continue, what gives?

irv 04-01-2020 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itjclarke (Post 1967021)
This is your take away right now? There’s been far worse passed off as “news”, and I give them at least some credit for owning it, unlike several other media outlets when confronted with falsehoods.

Meanwhile 391 people died in a day in NYC or Corvona related illnesss (FACT). My sister was on a conference call last week with other surgeons/doctors, and they’re prepping for models which have that potentially growing to 4-5K/day very soon. This was not media selling a story, these were medical professionals, experts using best available data. Ideally well minded/intentioned people working very hard, and/or simply behaving as instructed will help prevent that from happening there or anywhere else.

Forrest through the trees.

No, the message I was trying to convey was don't always believe what you are told, even if it is from MSM, and to always keep an open mind and do some research yourself before you draw conclusions.

Just like ABC showed footage from a NJ gun range and tried to pass it off as a war zone from Syria, there are many others out there, the majority left leaning, that do this constantly without consequence.

Were you aware of the story CNN fabricated about Nick Sandman all because he was wearing a red MAGA hat?

He just won a large settlement from them and is going after others who also portrayed him in a negative/false light.

This kid and his family had death threats against them and were told and called all sorts of things.
Did you hear anything from CNN about losing this case and having to pay out millions to him? I highly doubt it but we should have.
Here's the real story. I assume you are familiar with the fake one they made to make Trump and all his supporters look like evil bastards?

I despise CNN and MSNBC and a few others up here as well. Their blatant lies and manipulation bothers me when I see people get gut hooked into believing them thinking they are getting the truth and the whole story. :mad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSkp...JgaLDKxkjP3oAw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrQBqBY7fm4

Touch'EmAll 04-01-2020 07:38 PM

Anyone notice - Saw interesting blip: Mark Cuban won't say if he'll run for President, but notes the "door is wide open." He is young, he is energetic, he is a top businessman, he is a go-getter. Appears he has long range vision for what's honestly best for America. He isn't stuck in the political Democrat vs. Republican thing. Trump, Biden, I just kinda roll my eyes. I would vote for Mark Cuban in a heartbeat.

Now back to original post - Stock market affect cards. Today the DOW got crushed, and probably be even worse by Friday. Weekly unemployment figures come out I think tomorrow - will be really bad. Anyway, I have a few cards up on ebay (1959 Aaron PSA 8, 1965 Aaron PSA 7 & 1970 Ryan PSA 8) that close in couple days and the views/bids/watchers seem quite strong, really curious how they end up, fingers crossed. Will let you know how they do. Anyone else have cards closing last few days or in the next week?

Dpeck100 04-01-2020 07:56 PM

There were 25 PSA graded 1982 Wrestling All Stars Series A that sold overnight at strong prices.

I get it people should supposedly not be spending but so far they are.

The market knows this Friday there is going to be 3 million plus apply for unemployment benefits.

100backstroke I sold three of four lots listed Sunday at strong prices and one of the buyers requested another card through EBAY and I sold that card too that I had not planned on at a great price.

I remain convinced people want the cards.

1952boyntoncollector 04-01-2020 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 100backstroke (Post 1967072)
Anyone notice - Saw interesting blip: Mark Cuban won't say if he'll run for President, but notes the "door is wide open." He is young, he is energetic, he is a top businessman, he is a go-getter. Appears he has long range vision for what's honestly best for America. He isn't stuck in the political Democrat vs. Republican thing. Trump, Biden, I just kinda roll my eyes. I would vote for Mark Cuban in a heartbeat.

Now back to original post - Stock market affect cards. Today the DOW got crushed, and probably be even worse by Friday. Weekly unemployment figures come out I think tomorrow - will be really bad. Anyway, I have a few cards up on ebay (1959 Aaron PSA 8, 1965 Aaron PSA 7 & 1970 Ryan PSA 8) that close in couple days and the views/bids/watchers seem quite strong, really curious how they end up, fingers crossed. Will let you know how they do. Anyone else have cards closing last few days or in the next week?

if everyone knows the market will get crushed why not buy a short in a dow index fund....if so easy....

1952boyntoncollector 04-01-2020 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itjclarke (Post 1966970)
No opinions her, just numbers for people to consider when gauging our federal response.

January 20-
- US reports first cases
- S Korea reports first cases

March 12
- US has tested 10,058
- S Korea has tested 234,998

March 17
- US has tested 72 per million residents and new infection curve is rapidly trending upward (now agreed by all, including current administration)
- S Korea has tested 5400 per million residents and new infection curve is declining

lets see if we can trade a first round pick to south korea for their leader.....maybe they will throw in a 5th rounder...

1952boyntoncollector 04-01-2020 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlsonjok (Post 1967065)
That is a nice bit of equivocation. He didn't ever mention the loss of life until it was blatantly obvious that the loss of life will be substantial. There is plenty of ink out there regarding the President's early (non)reactions to the virus. But, here are two of my favorites:
February 26:And again, when you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.


I am referring specifically to his pushing of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as some kind of miracle cure, when there is absolutely no evidence it works. Hydroxychloroquine is an anti-malarial and azithromycin is an antibiotic. Neither are anti-virals. Now, it is entirely possible that they may work. After all, rogaine started out as a blood pressure medicine. However, there has been no clinical trials and the two most publicized studies of their use have such huge procedural flaws that it is impossible to draw any scientifically sound conclusions from them. And I've heard no responsible doctor or relevant scientist say otherwise.


Come on now. Are you really trying to suggest that Trump was listening to experts all along? I've seen plenty of experts talk about this (I have a friend and a brother-in-law who are both virologists) and all of them were sounding the alarm. Heck, even the political class was sounding the alarm. On February 4, Chris Murphy, a senator from Connecticut said the following: "Just left the Administration briefing on Coronavirus. Bottom line: they aren't taking this seriously enough. Notably, no request for ANY emergency funding, which is a big mistake. Local health systems need supplies, training, screening staff etc. And they need it now."

You'll have to point out for me where I made any comment about anyone political affiliation. Noting gross incompetence isn't political.


Again you are trying to fit a narrative. The pushing of the new drugs were 'what do you have to lose drugs' and by the time he was pushing that he was also talking about loss of human life being a main thing to avoid. So you cant pick and choose a timeline on one issue without correcting the other. Also talk is different then actions. The Easter thing about some parts of the country being open was a thought, perhaps that was against experts advice, but it doesnt look there will be any action on that.

Saying there is gross incompetence is actually political when there a large group that would disagree. Can say there are problems and mistakes but when throwing around all or nothing descriptions, it looks political. Just like saying hes doing the best job ever. That would be political to me as well as a large group would disagree to that .

CharleyBrown 04-01-2020 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967018)
CBS News admits 'mistake' after airing footage of overcrowded Italian hospital in report about NYC

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-ne...ually-in-italy

https://www.wcbm.com/2020/04/01/cbs-...ort-about-nyc/

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ian-hospital-/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/cbs-n...port-about-nyc

Glad to see they admitted it, but you can bet your ass they were called out on it first by many.

Info-tainment, people, because fear/hate sells and it helps their ratings. :(

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-times/ -- MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/ -- MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating) - and far right leaning

WCBM is a far right radio wing of Fox News

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/ - MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating) - and far right leaning

How are you going to call out a VOX link for being infotainment because it has a LEFT bias and then post 4 links to websites with a RIGHT bias, each of which have lower factual ratings than VOX?

irv 04-01-2020 08:15 PM

Continual Trump bashing even during these times. Who said this pandemic had no political agenda? The Dems are using anything and everything they can to paint Trump in a bad light. Shameful, absolutely shameful. :mad:

https://twitter.com/TrumpStudents/st...32736%3Fs%3D09

irv 04-01-2020 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharleyBrown (Post 1967083)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-times/ -- MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/ -- MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating) - and far right leaning

WCBM is a far right radio wing of Fox News

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/ - MIXED (below VOX's Mostly Factual Rating) - and far right leaning

How are you going to call out a VOX link for being infotainment because it has a LEFT bias and then post 4 links to websites with a RIGHT bias, each of which have lower factual ratings than VOX?

No, just showing many other news outlets are also covering this story so it is highly unlikely it is made up B.S.

Although the Washington Times has a very strong right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias.


FOX: however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.


Vox: Overall, we rate Vox Left Biased due to wording and story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to two failed fact checks, with only one offering a correction.

I'll trust/believe the 2 above Vox first but like I also said or alluded to earlier, I am pretty much fed up with anything MSM has to say anymore.

Shoeless Moe 04-01-2020 11:42 PM

Has anyone tried Provasic on the Virus?
 
This is gonna be Fauci and Trump in another week......



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOMMXUc7p0U

itjclarke 04-02-2020 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1967080)
lets see if we can trade a first round pick to south korea for their leader.....maybe they will throw in a 5th rounder...

Or we can just try and learn lessons from them. However this requires humility, a full acceptance others may know better or be smarter, and there are some who do not seem willing to do this.

itjclarke 04-02-2020 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967084)
Continual Trump bashing even during these times. Who said this pandemic had no political agenda? The Dems are using anything and everything they can to paint Trump in a bad light. Shameful, absolutely shameful. :mad:

Your comments about "Dems" politicizing this issue are contrary to what I, and I believe several others here have been saying which is not partisan. This is a serious global situation. Simply LISTEN to medical EXPERTS! Learn from past outbreaks. Learn from the countries who are doing it better than we are!!

Also see the example of Democratic Governor Newsom, who whether Jake Tapper could believe it or not, was complimentary to Trump on more than one occasion, while making quick tough decisions in advance of federal guidance to try and slow the spread of this virus in his state. Newsom is far from perfect, going back to his time as mayor in SF, however he's clearly making a deliberate attempt to avoid unnecessary partisan bickering right now.

It would be nice of others would take a similar tact as this does need to transcend partisan politics. It does not seem like you absorb this however when you go right back to "the Dems are attacking Trump narrative", which is painfully circular.

You also bash liberal media. Anyone on the left could then easily counter with Fox's and Hannity's terribly negative coverage of the Stoneman Douglass teenage activists, or Info Wars' attacks on the Sandy Hook families. But what good does any of that do right now? It just further pisses people off during a time we need some unity.

What I observe is that you and some others seem to use the offensive, as a best defensive tactic for what has been an underwhelming executive response thus far. I imagine the inner monologue-- "Oh crap, our guy contradicted himself again, '15 won't be zero by next week', this won’t just ‘dissipate in April when it warms up’, it is not ‘just like the flu’.... errrrr 'it’s a war!’.... yes, we'll call it a war now!!!… and also attack the dems!! And the media!!"

BTW- I do not watch CNN or MSNBC talking heads, I do not watch Fox. I mostly avoid Facebook, totally avoid Twitter, and question things that are forwarded from those sites. I try my best to ID potential slant in a story written or televised, and then ideally extract the most basic facts. It's not possible to fully avoid bias in reporting, especially if they are simply providing bad info, but it's also not too difficult to pick up on their selective wording, deliberate vocal tones, and to try to look beyond. It is also far too cynical (and lazy) to simply believe all those in media/press (MSNBC, CNN or Fox) are slime balls, only concerned with ratings. I think there are many honest and dedicated reporters and producers out there. We just need to work harder to find them, filter out the other noise.

carlsonjok 04-02-2020 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1967081)
Again you are trying to fit a narrative. The pushing of the new drugs were 'what do you have to lose drugs' and by the time he was pushing that he was also talking about loss of human life being a main thing to avoid. So you cant pick and choose a timeline on one issue without correcting the other.

You know, it is possible to hold several thoughts in sequence and, get this, even at the same time. Everything in my previous post, save the mention of gross incompetence, is a verifiable fact. I even provided links for you to see for yourself. If stating what is objectively true is pushing a narrative, then the word fact has no meaning. Though, I have to say this is the first time I've met a nihilist out in the wild.

Quote:

Also talk is different then actions. The Easter thing about some parts of the country being open was a thought, perhaps that was against experts advice, but it doesnt look there will be any action on that.

Saying there is gross incompetence is actually political when there a large group that would disagree.
When you are the President of the United States, words matter. Here is an article talking about the responses of the various states to the outbreak. It is a good jumping off point for determining when the various states put in measures to slow the spread of the disease and the severity of those measures.

To *now* make this political, you may want to look at the states that were slower to respond and have put in the less stringent measures. You'll find something interesting about their party affiliation. Words matter.

Quote:

Can say there are problems and mistakes but when throwing around all or nothing descriptions, it looks political.
As far as your assertion that mistakes were made, that is true. Huge, deadly mistakes were made that went directly against the advise of public health experts. And, yes, experts can be wrong. But, in this case, they were right, and the difference of experiences between the US and South Korea that someone posted about earlier is instructive. John Hopkins maintains an up to date coronavirus website that allows you do drill down into the data. It's interesting to compare and contrast the charts in the lower right hand side for the US and South Korea. It shows what would have been possible if someone here had listened to the experts from the git-go. Korea has experienced 3.3 deaths for every million residents so far and the spread of the disease is slowing. The US has experienced 15.6 deaths per million and the spread of the disease is accelerating. This is all verifiable fact. Expertise matters.

AustinMike 04-02-2020 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967084)
Continual Trump bashing even during these times. Who said this pandemic had no political agenda? The Dems are using anything and everything they can to paint Trump in a bad light. Shameful, absolutely shameful. :mad:

Yes, using the man's OWN words and actions/inactions is absolutely shameful./snark off

I don't know whether it is comforting or disconcerting to know that there are "Loonies" in Canada as well as in the US. ;)

1952boyntoncollector 04-02-2020 06:32 AM

p to date coronavirus website that allows you do drill down into the data. It's interesting to compare and contrast the charts in the lower right hand side for the US and South Korea. It shows what would have been possible if someone here had listened to the experts from the git-go. Korea has experienced 3.3 deaths for every million residents so far and the spread of the disease is slowing. The US has experienced 15.6 deaths per million and the spread of the disease is accelerating. This is all verifiable fact. Expertise matters.[/QUOTE]

So lets say s. korea does the best but USA is 2nd best of all countries in the world in regards to the objective numbers, does that make it gross incompetence? The buffalo bills went to 4 super bowls and lost them all but they were far from the worst team in those years..

gawaintheknight 04-02-2020 06:36 AM

Obviously I'm not going to change your mind, but take a story like this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...a4e_story.html

Trump is ripping off the taxpayers by overcharging the Secret Service for hotel rooms at his properties. That money goes into his pocket.

Now, is your position that this information is false? It's based on official government documents, so if it's false, either the Secret Service is lying or the Post is forging documents. Do you have any reason to believe that's true?

Or is it your position that they shouldn't report a story like this at all? If not, why not? It's easy to pick out a couple of things that the media has gotten wrong, but then to suggest that everything else they report on is also wrong, or lies, doesn't make any sense. It's like saying "Well, they say that guy is a great surgeon, but one or two of his patients die every year."

So I guess I don't understand what you mean by "fake news" other than "they report stories that make Trump look bad."

Oh, and also, the last election was in 2018 and the Democrats won that one.

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967010)
It blows me away what people will believe anymore. So many fake news outlets out there nowadays, one can only view them as Info-tainment and nothing more.

Main stream media (MSM) is the same way, all out to influence and brainwash your mind.

CNN, MSNB, NY Times, the list goes on and on. All out to get Trump like a bunch of petulant children who are still struggling with the fact the Dems lost the last election.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.


carlsonjok 04-02-2020 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1967142)

So lets say s. korea does the best but USA is 2nd best of all countries in the world in regards to the objective numbers, does that make it gross incompetence?

A 5x difference in death rates between #1 and #2 would certainly lend credence to the words of a great philosopher that "If you're not first, your last." But, if you want to make the case that the American response is the second best, have at it. I'd be interested in seeing that.

Quote:

The buffalo bills went to 4 super bowls and lost them all but they were far from the worst team in those years..
Ouch. You really know how to hit a guy where it hurts. I was a Bills fan for years and those 4 straight losses hurt. Badly.

AustinMike 04-02-2020 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967084)
Continual Trump bashing even during these times. Who said this pandemic had no political agenda? The Dems are using anything and everything they can to paint Trump in a bad light. Shameful, absolutely shameful. :mad:

I just saw this, and it is truly shameful.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/antho...101124851.html

Republicaninmass 04-02-2020 07:35 AM

Guess the half the board will be getting infractions!


"Acting weird " but be worse than political arguements

irv 04-02-2020 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinMike (Post 1967140)
Yes, using the man's OWN words and actions/inactions is absolutely shameful./snark off

I don't know whether it is comforting or disconcerting to know that there are "Loonies" in Canada as well as in the US. ;)

Lets blame Trump for his actions/in-actions. :rolleyes:

Oops!

https://www.instagram.com/tv/B-dGINug9bh/?

utm_source=ig_embedhttps://www.instagram.com/tv/B-dGINu...ource=ig_embed

guy3050 04-02-2020 09:23 AM

No Politics in this post, Wishing all my American Neighbors to be safe!!!!

Corporal Lance Boil 04-02-2020 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guy3050 (Post 1967182)
No Politics in this post, Wishing all my American Neighbors to be safe!!!!

And wishing my not-so-far away Canadian neighbor to North good health and safety!

1952boyntoncollector 04-02-2020 10:52 AM

The stock market may help cards in that if you buy CLCT now at 15 dollars and change...you can net a nice profit later on....

MULLINS5 04-02-2020 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gawaintheknight (Post 1966402)
This won't be a popular attitude here, but Hillary would absolutely have been, if not great (I don't know what that would mean in this context), a lot better.

You are 100% correct. Hillary would have handled this pandemic a lot better than Trump has because Republicans would have supported her as President, whereas democrats will not support Trump.

CharleyBrown 04-02-2020 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967167)
Lets blame Trump for his actions/in-actions. :rolleyes:

Oops!

https://www.instagram.com/tv/B-dGINug9bh/?

utm_source=ig_embedhttps://www.instagram.com/tv/B-dGINu...ource=ig_embed

Are you seriously posting an instagram tv link from a Russian-based account profile? Why? Do you not question the junk you see on social media?

irv 04-02-2020 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharleyBrown (Post 1967206)
Are you seriously posting an instagram tv link from a Russian-based account profile? Why? Do you not question the junk you see on social media?

Are you saying the people/voices in that vid are fake? Russian based. LMAO. Nice try though. :D

carlsonjok 04-02-2020 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MULLINS5 (Post 1967199)
You are 100% correct. Hillary would have handled this pandemic a lot better than Trump has because Republicans would have supported her as President, whereas democrats will not support Trump.

That assertion is, to put it as diplomatically as I can, ahistorical. Compare and contrast the voting history on the 2009 Great Recession stimulus with that of the contemporary COVID-19 stimulus.

Someone already did.

CharleyBrown 04-02-2020 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1967211)
Are you saying the people/voices in that vid are fake? Russian based. LMAO. Nice try though. :D

No, but the video used very short clips of each person to manipulate the message instead of weighing the context of what was being said. A modicum of critical thought would have one question the clips and see what the actual message of each person was. It doesn't matter if it's clips from Trump, Biden, McConnell, Schumer or whoever else... those instagram accounts use those clips like that because they cause an emotional reaction. They are used to manipulate, which is why I questioned you using a post from a Russian Instagram account while dismissing a verified media publication like Vox.

Cliff Bowman 04-02-2020 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharleyBrown (Post 1967221)
No, but the video used very short clips of each person to manipulate the message instead of weighing the context of what was being said. A modicum of critical thought would have one question the clips and see what the actual message of each person was. It doesn't matter if it's clips from Trump, Biden, McConnell, Schumer or whoever else... those instagram accounts use those clips like that because they cause an emotional reaction. They are used to manipulate, which is why I questioned you using a post from a Russian Instagram account while dismissing a verified media publication like Vox.

This is a golden opportunity for you to show at least one of those sound clips was taken out of context by showing the longer clip and facts showing that it is misleading. I’ll wait patiently.

gawaintheknight 04-02-2020 12:19 PM

Nice try, but I'm old enough to remember the Obama administration and that's not how it went at all. I'm also old enough to remember the 2016 election when Republicans were talking about impeaching her the day after she was sworn in.

Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by MULLINS5 (Post 1967199)
You are 100% correct. Hillary would have handled this pandemic a lot better than Trump has because Republicans would have supported her as President, whereas democrats will not support Trump.


drcy 04-02-2020 12:29 PM

Putting aside moral debate, for the economy's sake itself you have to fix the coronas problem before the economy will rebound. If people are dying and scared to go to work and go the store, co-workers are getting the disease, the medical system is overloaded with patients, the economy will be damaged and sick even if everyone is allowed to go to work and mingle in society.

Thus, I think the "Let everyone go back to work and social life to save the economy" is an incorrect economic argument anyway.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.