![]() |
Popped my grading company cherry today.
Been collecting since a kid in the late 80s like most folks here, but never have made a submission to a grading company. Been following along on these SGC threads, and figured I'd give them a shot. Had several prewar & 50s cards in my collection where I want to see if they are altered vs "1-1.5-2" range, and a few other that could go anywhere from a 3-4-5-6. I'm hoping good thoughts. Very impressed with the SCG on-line platform. Entering the cards, service requests & payment were very straightforward. I am surprised they do not have a place to enter your USPS / FedEx tracking number - that worries me a little bit. My curiosity has been killing me for where these cards stand. For my first run, I settled on eight cards. _________________________________________ PS - If anyone is curious they are: 1) 1950 Bowman Jackie Robinson - bought from a large ungraded lot, strong eye appeal, strong corners & centering. Could be A-1-1.5-2. Great eye appeal but a hard corner crease + small stain. Very curious. 2) 1933 Goudey Paul Waner - I won two years ago in an auction as an ungraded single card. Fantastic eye appeal. Straight borders, great centering, sharp corners, the card measures. If it is not altered, it should score in the 4-5-6 range. The card "pops". 3) 1956 Topps Ted Williams - another card bought from a large ungraded auction lot that looks a legit EX w/ near perfect centering. 4) 1951 Bowman (football) Sammy Baugh - The card appears to be in 7-7.5-8 range. It's fantastic. Corners that can cut glass, but the card measures correctly. and four different T206s: 5) A beater Speaker that looks like it was in the infantry during WWI & WWII - I just want to confirm it is authentic. 6) An OMSL Ryan. Another gem I won in an large ungraded auction lot. 7) & 8) Two scarce back T206s, again could be anywhere from 1.5 to 4. My first grading submission, and I must admit that I'm pretty excited. Trying to keep my expectations grounded. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What does this tell us about the strangle hold that PSA actually has on the market that people will wait a year or more to get their cards back in PSA holders as opposed to going with a competitor?
And I highly doubt they are not pumping out submissions for all of the auction houses and their top submitters. Sure for those folks it is business as usual. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There are two different SGC 10s now, right? That is, two different grades that are both identified as a 10 on the label.
|
Quote:
Nat may not have to buy SGC. Other than Mike, SGC may end up with no customers if this trend continues. |
When I got back into the hobby, which was nearly 20 years ago now, BGS 9.5s consistently sold for a premium over PSA 10s. So, y'know, things can change.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yes......crazy as that sounds!
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Yes: SGC 10 Gem SGC 10 Pristine Gold Label You have to have a keen eye and training to tell a Gem from a Pristine! lol That is a bit too much I'd say! |
Some cool cards.....
1 Attachment(s)
Just got these back today! The Payton RC is amazing!
Mike Attachment 477017 PS Sent snail mail on 8/4/21......got them back in mail today! |
Quote:
|
Sgc hasnt a dam clue.
They recently graded 15 1952 topps "canadian gray backs" (their description from their drop down menu) with a note "we only label red and black backs" and for me to "send a scan" of the Frank house yellow tiger to determine if it qualifies for the variation label. They never even looked at my submission paperwork, just took the fees and graded them as commons. |
Quote:
There are still way better than dealing with PSA and the laundry list of problems there. |
Quote:
Also, Tom was in the shipping or review department, not sure which. He would always catch small things like this, or call if there was a dispute over a variation. Weird times! You'd think they'd be trying to capitalize on market share instead of losing it. I'd send then some doggie doo from my sneaker before I send another card to then. In essence, I now have 15 misgraded "commons", at risk to damage by cracked out Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
I will update. Right now they are refusing to grade any as gray backs.
" The submission is enroute to you. When you receive it can you send me an image of the Frank House card and I'll see if it's a "yellow tiger" card? My verification team makes the decision on what the label should look say. They let me know that we don't indicate gray back on the label." Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
20 days
Quote:
Really nice to have cards graded fairly, economically, and on a timeline that they tell you will happen! Usually they are even quicker but I think they have been getting swamped lately! Mike |
Quote:
|
They sure have
Quote:
Their twitter is here And their website is here Their slabs are very similar to Beckett. It's nice to see our neighbors up north get some grading choices. I know a lot have issues with sending stuff to the states to be graded. More power to them! |
Shipped 19 T206s to Boca Raton, they got em on the 11th of Aug, and I got em back yesterday, Sept 4. SGC all day long baby!!
Side Note: Shipped 10 T206s to PSA last year, still waiting………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….. |
Damn....
Quote:
I love the time comparison.....it's like getting your cards back lets say yesterday or maybe in a couple years. Wild times indeed. TBH no matter what you posted I was gonna respond since my fave number is 444 and well, look how many posts you have! :) :cool: Peace, Mike |
I've been pretty impressed with SGC this year. All of my standard orders have been completed within 2 weeks, and most were within one week. All of my grades have been both fair and predictable/reliable, unlike with PSA where recent grades have been a complete roll of the dice depending on which grader you get on which day. PSA turnarounds are fast now as well, but they cost $200+ per card, so that's not exactly impressive. Also, SGC slabs are starting to close the crazy gap in sales prices between them and PSA, which really widened over the past year or two, especially with modern and in other sports.
I'm also happy to report that I haven't received a single slab with sharp corners poking out on the black insert in a long time. They appear to have fixed this QC issue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Thread was called which one was nicer https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=306452 |
12 gray backs. All mislabeled
1 yellow tiger house mislabeled All were described appropriately via SGCs drop down menu Graded fast...but no excuse People really graded VG commons at $25 a card? https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...f5a881fe95.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...68fc432551.jpg Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Do you have some examples of these backs next to the typical red backs and black backs that you can post? Same card side-by-side, one gray, one not? Last time I had an issue with a couple of SGC graded cards, I reached out to customer service and they were on it right away. I literally received a phone call that evening from an executive and the following morning I had a FedEx overnight label in my inbox. I shipped the cards out from CA to FL that day, and literally had them back in hand with new holders 42 hours later. Granted, they were high-ish end cards, but the customer service I received was outstanding. Hopefully yours will be as well. |
The back scan has a cream back at the end. I guarantee they are gray backs. Sgc also labeled them as "Canadian" in the past.
"My verification team has informed me that we only recognize Red and Black backs on the label. Not Gray backs. " Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Ted that sucks!
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
IMHO The grading companies are in a world of hurt right now. And they have reached a point where people are just shoveling money at them. So it isn't a financial problem. It is a customer service and quality control issue. They simply don't have enough competent workers to keep up with demand.
|
"My verification team has informed me that we only recognize Red and Black backs on the label. Not Gray backs. "
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk[/QUOTE] From a quick ebay search this seems to be accurate. They have 0 gray back SGC cards for sale and the only 2 that have sold recently were not labeled gray backs. My 2 thoughts (not that they mean much) 1) Anyone who is expert enough to want and pay premiums for the gray back probably aren't going to need the label to verify that it is actually a gray back. 2) If the SGC drop down and your order/invoice showed "gray back" as a label distinction then they owe you a partial refund at the very least, since you paid to have them labeled under that pretense. Out of curiosity who have you been corresponding with at SGC? I've had nothing but good experience with their customer service in the past, including recently. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
My 2 thoughts (not that they mean much) 1) Anyone who is expert enough to want and pay premiums for the gray back probably aren't going to need the label to verify that it is actually a gray back. 2) If the SGC drop down and your order/invoice showed "gray back" as a label distinction then they owe you a partial refund at the very least, since you paid to have them labeled under that pretense. Out of curiosity who have you been corresponding with at SGC? I've had nothing but good experience with their customer service in the past, including recently. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk[/QUOTE] Your 2 centsbare appreciated ! It's some kid in customer service, Brent. Yes I chose either "gray back" or "canadian" from their drop down menu with a note asking of they could label either all as gray back or all as canadian. The real shame was I sent the Frank house yellow tiger...gray back to them for proper labeling. It's as rare as a 52 Mantle in PSA 8 and they blew it! |
I have half a dozen 1954 Topps Canadians I was going to send in to get holdered. Now I wonder if I should do that. As you said, there is an option for those in the SGC drop-down and they have graded and labeled them as such before.
|
Gray backs
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not sure what they are doing over there Thankfully their heads are so far up their ass they can see t206 backs from their throat. " Yellow Tiger is not a variation we acknowledge on the label. The card is correctly labeled" I've disputed the entire credit card charge. $540 wasted. Now that they are holdered and NOT labeled properly, I'm at risk breaking them out |
Dealign with SGC lately has been bizarre, especially with regard to obscure issues. For a time after their move to the new pricing schedule, they sent back quite a few vintage Japanese baseball, Cuban league baseball, and soccer as issues they didn't grade. More recently, they've graded more of the obscure cards I've submitted (including some they rejected just a few months ago).
That said, I've found the grading pretty fair. There seems to be some compaction at the lower end of the scale, where cards I would have expected in the past to grade 2-3 are grade 1.1.5, but then again a few cards I was less confident about graded higher. So who knows? Anyway, their turnaround time certainly can't be beat! |
As far as grading I've noticed they went from not caring about centering, to quite strict on overall grade due to centering. Pretty weird, but it's their future.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Can I see the Frank House Ted?
|
1952 topps Frank house Yellow Tiger gray back. Me thinks SGC would have had a nice card here for advertising had they labeled it appropriately. Likely as Rare as a psa 9 mantle, definately rarer than a wagner! Sadly not as valuable .... though the last one did five figures in a private sale.
They screwed the pooch. They wont miss my revenue. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...c44bbbad36.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...e661784f53.jpg Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Turnaround times at SGC are increasing. They're up to 16 business days now. More and more people are making the move over to SGC. I hope that trend continues. They're so much better than PSA in every aspect other than resale prices, in my opinion. But they're closing the gap with modern cards.
|
Quote:
PS - I think Ted would disagree with you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
PSA just dropped their express service fees back to $150, so that's something. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
As a buyer, I’m totally fine with the gap right now.
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Also, what if you're looking to get this graded for your PC? Maybe you don't want to shell out $300 to have it graded? And what if you're looking to hold it for 5+ years? If SGC continues to gain market share, then the price gap between them and PSA will continue to narrow. 5 years down the line, the differences might not be as drastic. Resale prices matter, but it's not always an apples to apples comparison. I can't tell you how many truly perfect cards I've had over the years in PSA 9 holders. Sure, most 9s have some minor flaw, but there is no shortage of gem mint cards in PSA 9 holders. I've cracked out a lot of them and crossed them over to BGS or SGC and they were given the gem mint grades they deserved and ended up selling for significantly more than they would have in their PSA slab. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks Scott.
I've filed a dispute on my CC as their dropdown has the choices for variations, but they will not honor their own system. I would not have sent them in if I had known this. Now I risk damage cracking them out, or face questions listing them as gray backs in their holder. Lose/lose and out 600$ |
has anyone had a recent SGC submission?
what is their current timing from receipt of cards to the grading stage? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I sent 7 cards that were received 9/9. They just updated to ‘post grade processing’ today, 10/14.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My last order with SGC was received on 9/2, graded on 10/4, and shipped back to me on 10/5.
|
I sent 10 T206s to SGC last week. My only choices of service were 45-60 days for $30 each or $2500 for 3 business days turnaround ( I assume that's for all 10 cards ) ?
|
Quote:
|
SGC received my three cards on September 9th and they were graded on October 13th. They are shipping them back today. Since I live only 30 minutes away I should receive them tomorrow.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The registry is the reason for the price differential. PSA has a great registry; SGC doesn’t.
|
has anyone received an order back from SGC in the last week? If so, what was the date SGC received the order? I am trying to get the most updated timing as I am still waiting.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Apparently grades are posting now for the $30 sub level that were received on 9/24. |
I’m waiting on a sub received on 10/4/21.
Added: In Receive status currently. And I will update any changes as I see them with dates. |
Quote:
Let us know when yours goes post grading please, I’ll be excited as my order was received 10/5, thx & Cheers Colton |
Thank you for all of these responses.
If they are posting grades now for 9/24 received orders, then my 9/30 should post in the next few days.... they must getting a ton of submissions, because these turnaround times are beyond 30days... that is longer than what it was in late Sept. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM. |