Net54baseball.com Forums
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Popular National Acquisition - Covid (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=349333)

Republicaninmass 08-09-2022 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2250724)
I am fine personally with most smoking bans. If you need to smoke, don't do it around other people.
I get it, its nasty, but it should be up to the owners to decide. What's next, not serving regular soda due to diabetes? They tried!

KMayUSA6060 08-09-2022 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 2250727)
I get it, its nasty, but it should be up to the owners to decide. What's next, not serving regular soda due to diabetes? They tried!
This is such a great counterargument. If public health is so important, why aren't all unhealthy things outlawed?

Republicaninmass 08-09-2022 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMayUSA6060 (Post 2250731)
This is such a great counterargument. If public health is so important, why aren't all unhealthy things outlawed?
No money in the cure!

Peter_Spaeth 08-09-2022 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 2250727)
I get it, its nasty, but it should be up to the owners to decide. What's next, not serving regular soda due to diabetes? They tried!
Slippery slope argument. I don't buy it. The reason for smoking bans is to protect others, not to save people from themselves.

BobbyStrawberry 08-09-2022 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMayUSA6060 (Post 2250725)
That's not on the employer when the federal government implements penalties for companies who don't comply with their restrictions, forcing companies to comply.

If you're not going to have a legitimate discussion, why comment?
Even in such a situation, employees have the choice to go get another job.

Just as you call Fauci an "expert" (rather than an expert) because you don't like what you hear from him, contributions to the discussion which are not to your liking are "illegitimate"?

cgjackson222 08-09-2022 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMayUSA6060 (Post 2250722)
Convenient that every celebrity/figurehead hasn't died from COVID despite being in the at risk population and ignoring their own words a majority of the time.
I am not really sure what you are getting at here. Are you saying no celebrities have died of Covid?

If you are saying that, are you saying that there is some type conspiracy theory sparing celebrities?

KMayUSA6060 08-09-2022 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2250735)
Slippery slope argument. I don't buy it. The reason for smoking bans is to protect others, not to save people from themselves.
I think you've highlighted the basis of anger for the anti-mask/mandate argument. Pretty slippery slope, and hypocritical, no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2250736)
Even in such a situation, employees have the choice to go get another job.

Just as you call Fauci an "expert" (rather than an expert) because you don't like what you hear from him, contributions to the discussion which are not to your liking are "illegitimate"?
So you're in favor of the upheaval of the lives of individuals based on how government sees for?

I call Fauci an "expert" because he botched AIDS, is connected to the Wuhan Lab, and has flip flopped more than a pancake, all the whole collecting the largest taxpayer funded paycheck in our government.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 AM.
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page