Quote:
|
I don't know the OP, though he seems like a good guy and I sincerely hope he gets the restitution he's looking for. That said, it's impossible to convince me that he and his ilk aren't the source of this entire problem. Of course not knowingly, but the happy willingness to spend $22k more on a 10 than a 9 is ultimately what is being taken advantage here. It wouldn't be entirely fair to put this squarely on the guys with deep pockets, as no one deserves to get ripped off, regardless of their financial standing. However, they do have a seat at the table which, like or not, is what money buys you in this country. I just wish enough of them would be willing to take their money off the table to make a difference.
|
Actually, there’s a good chance it bumped to a 10, and was photoshopped for resale and not altered.
Hasn’t anyone ever received a card that wasn’t quite the same as the scan? Even from PWCC? Of course, doesn’t mean it’s trimmed/altered Before I grab my pitchfork and torch I’d like to hear from the owner to see if the marks are there. |
Quote:
|
If it was an in the holder bump the cert would be the same. Out of the holder re grade for a bump is definitely possible.
|
I he's returning it, that's good enough.
|
Quote:
|
Regarding the '52 Musial:
Here's a picture of the card from Heritage Auctions (it is from their April 2009 Signature Auction, where it sold for $1,673): https://dyn1.heritagestatic.com/lf?s...oduct.chain%5D Now, here's the image of the card, apparently from September 2017: https://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/9/...30283230_o.jpg Finally, here's the image of the card as a PSA 10: https://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/9/...30283221_o.jpg So, if it was worked on before PSA graded it a 9, this work was done before April 2009, as that is when it was auctioned as a PSA 9 by Heritage. Steve |
Quote:
|
I just noticed something:
If you look at the scan of the PSA 9 from 10 years ago (Heritage), the white spot on Stan's left sleeve is NOT there. This matches with the PSA 10 scan. So, on the scan from 2017 of the reholdered PSA 9, the visible white spot must simply be a speck of dust either on the slab, or on the scanner. It would be interesting to know if the black dot in the left upper front border of the card is actually there on the PSA 10. Some scanners, depending on the setting, are known to automatically take out extraneous dots, due to their auto-correct functions. Steve |
Edit - didn't realize what happened here.
|
Quote:
http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=27012 |
Quote:
|
Add Inventory Results
Edit Recently Added Items You submitted 1 item. Cert Number 08168192 is already registered by another member. If it is two different cards, PSA really needs to contact the owner, if they haven't already, to see if it's still owned. I'm still holding out hope!! |
|
Quote:
|
What I mean
Quote:
|
PSA needs some heat on their A $$. They are either willfully and blissfully ignorant in their grading to let so many big time, big dollar cards that are fraudulent hop-skip-jump through the grading process -or- they , or more specifically a couple of rogue graders, are complicit in this whole mess.
I'll sign that comment and add contact info if need be as I will stand behind my comment and feelings on the matter and don't give a Sh*t. $25k of fraud on the Musial, that was already a great card!!. That's outrageous and every collector who loves this hobby should be completely furious with this. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: David Riley (843) 631-7436 home (843) 499-4859 tmobile 2072 N Main Street suite D summerville , sc 29486 |
VERY well said!
|
Quote:
Imagine if you spent a few thousand, or tens of thousands on one of the cards listed on these threads and it turns out nothing was done to the card. How difficult do you think it will be to sell it down the road? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ya, nothing to see here, prob just a misunderstanding. |
I thought he sent it back just recently, he bought it last year.
|
I want to know more about the restoration business Brent had/has. Is it a current business or something he ran in the past? All starting to make sense now.
|
Quote:
I am not an attorney, and I am not pretending to be one, but isn't that fraud? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with Barry on another point. The difference between a '9' and '10' is largely subjective, except maybe as to centering. Like Barry, I have never understood the enormous difference in values at the high end. |
Brent actually owned/owns a separate business restoring antiques.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don’t get the blind forgiveness either... other than they are already so monetarily invested in PSA slabs. Time for a new competent TPG to step forward. Or better yet, less emphasis on TPGs, period.
|
Quote:
|
For the record, I am the OP of THIS thread and was simply pointing out what I thought was amazing card. :p I see people referencing the "OP" but I believe /hope they are referring to a different thread.
|
I think I need to clarify that my comments weren't meant to excuse PSA's failure to identify alterations, but rather that I did not see evidence of fraudulent activity. The company should, of course, be held accountable to meet whatever guarantees it has made with regard to its services.
|
The edge had a questionable trim in the 9 holder to begin with
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one is taking on PSA unless they were to get shut down. In order to use another grader for the majority of your collection you want their grades to be the most coveted. It is too great of feat to get the market to switch. New grading companies certainly would be welcomed because competition forces companies to get better but the landscape is very well defined. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't play in the really expensive segment of the market but I am someone who has submitted a lot of cards that are in my own collection and so the game doesn't stop just because of a bad call. I have tried to track down cards in a specific grade for years and you need people to get totally turned off from graded cards to have things change significantly. What else do many of us have to do? We like to collect cards and so grading creates challenges that are really tough and make trying to keep searching worth while. You can still rip packs for the price range of cards I collect and so hunting in many cases is still possible. Grading is the final step in the process for me. I got to catch the fish first and then go to the weigh station. If it doesn't get the grade I want I generally keep it and just keep trying. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So many times I said I am going to keep this one sealed and cave pretty quickly. When it goes your way it is ridiculously fun. I ripped a 1985 Topps WWF rack box and it was amazing. I bought a few packs as a kid but any money I could get my hands on was going to 85 Topps baseball instead looking for a Dwight Gooden so it was incredible to get to tear through a box. I self subbed a Hogan Yellow 10 and a Roddy Piper too. This keeps people like me addicted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I was going to start building high graded PSA vintage (1910/1911, PSA 8+ 1951 Parkies, etc) sets this year but nope, can't do it with all that's going on. No way. I'm doing these raw and in binders instead and that's coming from a loyal PSA customer of 15 years.
I am invested emotionally in a PSA/DNA set (signed79.com) and will finish getting that upgraded and slabbed, but no more PSA projects for now. |
Quote:
I love collecting but I have made no bones about the fact that when I send in cards for grading I want to increase their value. The potential margins are shocking in cards. Find me a stock you can magically make worth six times what you paid. Obviously that can't be done and so this kind of massive escalation in price that takes place in every segment gets money chasing cards. Tom Brady has proven to be a total blue chip investment. His cards are like Amazon shares and when they came public there was little fanfare but have done nothing but go up over time. Incredible. |
This won’t shake anyone major player out of the registry. I think this incident just points out that PSA needs to add graders and improve inspection methods. I have no doubt that they will do this and they will come out of this a stronger company with improved grading procedures.
|
This is what i believe as well
Quote:
|
He only has to make it work 1 time in 8 for this to pay off.
"Pot odds..." |
Some rose-colored glasses up in here. The core reason for PSA and BGS' existance is keeping their customers safe from fraud. lol 'This is fine' comes to mind. As if these companies will police themselves.
|
You get a flu shot every year to minimize your chance of getting the flu. You don't smoke (hopefully) to minimize your chance of getting heart and respiratory disease. You wear a seat belt to minimize your chance of getting killed in an auto accident. Nothing completely eliminates bad outcomes; you can, however, reduce the probability of them happening. Grading cards substantially reduces the chance of getting doctored cards; it does not eliminate it. Procedures will improve over time to reduce the probability of getting a doctored card still further. However, like in the prior examples, the probability will never go to zero. If you can live with that great. If not, you will never be happy.
|
Jay perhaps but they've been doing this for 28 years now. What's your basis for thinking things are improving? For me these revelations are confirming my wildest fears.
|
What is really being overlooked here, imo, is how good is the work that is being done? Nobody has answered this question no matter how many times I have asked it. It is pretty easy, in most cases, from what I have seen to tell the alterations from before and after pics. But what about cards that have never been previously holdered or cards that have never been sold online to have an electronic footprint? Is the work so good that it can't be reasonably detected by the advanced collector or by TPG's? I'm not interested in another response that "Oh the TPG's are the professionals and should be able to....". Yeah, I get that, but would this work be undetectable by 99.9% of people without before and after pics??
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Peter- First, I think grading has gotten marginally more accurate over time. I also think that because of the current situation, really a wake up call, PSA, if they are smart, will try to upgrade their procedures. I know if I was running the company that is what I would be doing. It's a public company. If management doesn't do this the board ought to step in and find management who will.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nail Squarely Hit! Steve |
The recoloring seems pretty evident, even to the naked eye in the scans. Maybe because it was pointed out?
|
That's entirely possible. If you know where to look, you'll be able to see it every time.
I'd really like to get one of these cards in hand to see how good the alterations are and if I can tell. I will say that if the time allowed for inspection is under 1-2 minutes, the work doesn't have to be all that good. Given a bit more time, and even pretty good alterations should be detectable without much technology. And given a very good amount of time and some specific info on that particular issue, there should be almost no undetectable alterations. |
Quote:
|
Not sure if anyone read this ..
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/14/y...fraud.amp.html Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
How was this resolved? It looked like you might have gotten hit with other Mosered cards, right? Did they inform you of all the cards you bought from all the possible known scammers when you contacted them?
Thanks! |
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM. |