![]() |
|
Quote:
http://luckeycards.com/pwunc1915x4c.jpg |
Quote:
|
Leon is absolutely correct. There are tons of cards rarer than the Wagner (including, I would guess, my Plow's Candy below), but few or none that have the Wagner T206 combination of
1) top 10 Hall-of-Famer 2)hugely popular card series (T206) 3)scarcity 4) interesting back story (the whole tobacco thing, whether true or not). Not to mention famous owners, such as Gretzky. http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...pictureid=4723 |
Leon is absolutely correct. There are tons of cards rarer than the Wagner (including, I would guess, my Plow's Candy below), but few or none that have the Wagner T206 combination of
1) top 10 Hall-of-Famer 2)hugely popular card series (T206) 3)scarcity 4) interesting back story (the whole tobacco thing, whether true or not). Not to mention famous owners, such as Gretzky. .................................................. .......................................... Well put. # 1, 2 & 4 = Desirability. There have been many cards posted in this thread that are WAY scarcer than the T206 Wagner, BUT almost all lack the overall desirability. Supply/Demand. |
Two sub-lists I would like to see:
1. T206 cards (back variations included, but no scraps) that are more rare than Wagner. 2. HOF cards (fronts only - back variations NOT considered) that are more rare than Wagner. |
It's also worth noting that while many cards are indeed rarer than the Wagner, for many of those cards the rarity is coming from the ad on the back, as opposed to it being a wholly unique front image.
|
Quote:
Rare = total number of a particular card Scarce = Total number of a card, considering also the demand for that card. Lots of cards are much more rare than Wagner (especially if you throw in front/back variations). But none are close in terms of scarcity, except perhaps the Baltimore News Ruth. |
But regardless of how we define "rare" this was still a fun thread. :)
|
I am guessing that the Wagner has the highest percentage of graded specimens in existence. I will also guess that even for the rarer vintage cards out there the graded percentage goes way down.
This is a really off the wall guess but I would say that way fewer than 10 percent of most say T206s are graded. I know of three local collections including mine where no cards are graded. So basing rarity on graded populations is probably not very accurate? I agree with MVSNYC assessment of the Wagner and its' position in the hobby. |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
No 1917-20 Felix Mendelshohn cards posted......
|
1 Attachment(s)
A scarce set is the 1910 Orange Borders.
I believe mine is the only one in a PSA holder and there are a few in SGC holders. |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Leon;1362635]The value of the T206 Wags has very little to do with rarity (population) as it has more to do with scarcity (people wanting one). I venture to guess I have literally hundreds, maybe a thousand, cards more rare than Wags...but none remotely as valuable..
LL - I sorta get what you are saying, but why do people want one? When did people start wanting one? Who drove this card to the peak of the hobby and when did it register ? (What year?) I think Brent nailed it : "... When something gets ensconced in the hobby psyche..." So when did the Wags take off and become important? 1950's ? Why did that happen? As far as Top 10 HOFer, T206 set, etc. --- That would easily apply to Cobb. So why not Cobb ? Which Cobb with a T206 back would fit in that 60-80 examples known range? I believe the Baltimore Ruth will eventually become the Pinnacle card in the hobby. It's sorta already happening the last few sales... It's getting there. Cobb w/ Cobb back is too rare perhaps. I would rather own it over the Wags, but that is just me. Good discussion, guys - Here's another one that is more rare than T-Wags : |
Waddell
|
[QUOTE=DixieBaseball;1362991]
Quote:
That said, I agree that a Cobb w/Cobb back is cooler than the Wagner at this point. |
[QUOTE=pbspelly;1363086]
Quote:
Barely any, if any, other baseball cards do that. |
Wow, great Ruth and Cobb m101-6's!
|
Quote:
|
As someone else pointed out, the rare Cobb T206 cards have to do with a rare back. Whereas the rare Wagner T206 is (I believe) the only T206 with Wagner on the front. So the Wagner is desirable even for folks who are not into rare backs.
That said, I agree that a Cobb w/Cobb back is cooler than the Wagner at this point.[/QUOTE] ... but the Wagner T206 is not rare at all with sweet cap back and not rare with it's front either... There are about a hundred of them out there... They are simply wanted for their celebrity value. They have been over marketed along with the Mantle to be the "it" cards of our hobby for 50 years. I think that the Wags "was" a good investment, but I don't believe it has much more appreciation ahead over the coming decades. (I could be wrong of course...) I still think the the T-Wags is a nice looking portrait though and a nice collectible. Agreed with Leon's point on the Wags & Mantle rook... as someone pointed out early... they have been ensconced in the psyche of the public as the "it" cards to own. |
3 Attachment(s)
I'm "IN"...as far as I know, these are the only 2 Greiner's Bread cards on PSA or SGC Pop Report...
|
Scarce , rare , tough , difficult , infrequent , etc. etc.
http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/204295...936TYPETWO.JPG
.....Type Two Wide Pens , 1936 Goudey Premiums , R-314 ....when it takes eight years to find , let alone upgrade , a particular item ... we need our own page of adjectives in here . |
http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/t...hagenfront.jpg
I sold this one with all of my golf cards, but this is the only one graded, and one of the toughest golf cards there is. 1925 Empreza Walter Hagen |
1 Attachment(s)
My favorite Zeenut:
|
2 Attachment(s)
here are some...not hard to find pre ww-I cards "rarer" than wags!
|
Quote:
|
Hey Leon - Nice Card! I knew there was at least one more out there... We talked about these YEARS AGO - I missed out on a Near Set because the Seller and I couldn't agree on a price as "Greiner's" weren't listed in any of the Price Guides...Tharp's - Yes, Yeungling's - of course, but NOT Greiner's. I've NEVER managed to catch up with that seller and have no idea where the cards ended up. He was an old Coin Dealer. Coulda, woulda, shoulda...I'm sure that we were only "a few dollars" apart but Food Issues weren't appreciated much in the mid-1980s. But Modern Rookie cards - NOW WE'RE TALKIN"!!!!! :D
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Type issues...
2 Attachment(s)
As I look through all these cards it occurred to me that almost every pre-war issue has cards that probably are more scarce/rare than the T206 Wagner. Look at all the different types represented in this thread. I don't recall seeing a Fatima, so I will add this card in here (Perhaps I glossed over one in this thread..) as I am quite sure there aren't 75 or more of these floating around...
|
E106 Wagner
1 Attachment(s)
I'm not certain this card is more rare than the T206, but PSA population report shows 14 graded in this pose, while SGC shows 31 total between the "batting" and "throwing" poses...this being the highest graded example of either pose by either company.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Every single one of these Millers is rarer than t206 wagner...1/3 more rare than doyle, nat'l.
|
Hi Pete. What is the difference between the two American Caramel cards?
Is it just the lack of red color in the background? Or is there something more? |
This Wagner is more rare than the t206 Wagner
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...e39855ed6d.jpg http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...639807274f.jpg |
Sean...yep...Sunset and no sunset variations.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
1913 Blank Bank Pinkerton EX-NM
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
4 Attachment(s)
This thread was referenced in another today, and I figured why not revive it. Especially since I have acquired more to display here!
|
every card I own is more rare than a t-206 Wagner...
|
ed
Nice ones Ed.....you beat me on that Oldring.......Jerry
|
Quote:
|
5 Attachment(s)
Lots of great stuff in this thread!
I like my collection of 112-year-old one-of-ones: (I actually have two others: Jimmy Burke & Jack Taylor - without scans) Attachment 233786 Attachment 233787 Attachment 233788 Attachment 233789 Attachment 233790 |
Real cool, Raymond. Real cool. :cool:
|
E106 Wagner
1 Attachment(s)
Pretty sure this qualifies. May be close
|
Very impressive, Raymond. You should go for a complete set! ;) :D
And that's a great looking Wagner there, Dan. I'll take VG 3s like that all day. |
5 Attachment(s)
a few more
Andy |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM. |