Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Problem with Legendary Lot . . . Opinions? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=179702)

jhs5120 12-10-2013 08:41 AM

Now that I have finished reading..

I agree with Leon, they are only guilty of small scans.

If I am buying a group of cards that are in PSA/SGC 1 (I used to buy bulk t206 cards in low grade back in the day). I generally expect every single card to be mangled and I bid accordingly.

By SGC's grading criteria, a "1" designation is in "poor" condition. You received cards that were in poor condition. You shouldn't have expected anything better.

On a side note, if this happened to me and it legitimately upset me I would have asked for a $50 refund, not $260. $260 seems like you are trying to pull a fast one on them. The cards aren't worth $260 less because they are a low end 1 instead of a high end 1. They are worth virtually the same.

Why did you expect they would offer you the buyers AND sellers premium back?

vargha 12-10-2013 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Klein (Post 1214429)
David:

That is a perfect chance to post those scans and let us see the visual evidence.

Rich

The scanner doesn't work on the new computer. I need to move it over to another computer and get this done. Sorry for being a flake about this.

vargha 12-10-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhs5120 (Post 1215622)
Now that I have finished reading..

I agree with Leon, they are only guilty of small scans.

If I am buying a group of cards that are in PSA/SGC 1 (I used to buy bulk t206 cards in low grade back in the day). I generally expect every single card to be mangled and I bid accordingly.

By SGC's grading criteria, a "1" designation is in "poor" condition. You received cards that were in poor condition. You shouldn't have expected anything better.

On a side note, if this happened to me and it legitimately upset me I would have asked for a $50 refund, not $260. $260 seems like you are trying to pull a fast one on them. The cards aren't worth $260 less because they are a low end 1 instead of a high end 1. They are worth virtually the same.

Why did you expect they would offer you the buyers AND sellers premium back?

I didn't "expect" anything, which is good, because I received nothing. I asked for them to take the lot back, but I would have at least grudgingly "settled" for them refunding my buyer's premium.

And your assertion that "They are worth virtually the same" is just silliness. I have two people on this board who made offers on the Alexanders. Should I anonymously contact them back and see if they agree with you?

Rich Klein 01-31-2015 09:05 PM

What was the conclusion to this exciting thread?
 
Inquiring Minds Wants to Know

I was reminded of this thread by the Dean's Card thread

tiger8mush 02-01-2015 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Klein (Post 1374418)
What was the conclusion to this exciting thread?

we're still waiting for scans, due by noon :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 AM.