Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1952 Bowman Stan Musial PSA 10 on eBay :o (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=253426)

swarmee 06-08-2019 10:16 AM

Good thing they are so trusted as the market leader that they have an infinite grade guarantee policy they self-insure, at the card's current market value.

japhi 06-08-2019 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 111gecko (Post 1886701)
This is awful. No refund from Brent; just having him send the card back to him and he sends it to PSA.
PSA has 2 choices: 1) admit they missed the altered card and are stuck with a $ issue, or 2) say they can’t find any alterations and send it back to Brent as good.
Brent is basically out of it?..

No way PSA is going to just start writing cheques. As the seller, and a partner of PSA, he has at least some responsibility to make sure cards in his auctions are good.

It’s clear to me that he knows that Moser is buying from him, restoring and selling through him. I don’t see PSA just bending over and writing big cheques. Would love to be a fly on the wall, I suspect Brent is stuck with refunds on the Moser cards, and he will have to work with Moser on recovery.

If you are within reasonable chargeback times that is where I would start, with my CC company. At minimum it forces him to fight the CB, and lots of card issuers will extend timelines in cases of fraud. I have to bet PWCC is getting slammed with chargebacks now.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 10:25 AM

I believe he goes after any size fish. I am a small fish and he has bought 6 cards from me between 12/2006 and 11/2018. I don't know what he did with those cards but from what I've been reading the past few weeks, I can imagine.

I have kept records of every card that I've sold in 15 years, so I did a search on eBay for the most recent card that he bought from me and have noticed that his userid was changed on 6/4. Originally, it was whitman111 but it now appears to be ricky-leo.

BTW, the name of the purchaser of my card was Gary Moser. I believe that we are talking about the same guy. If not, then ignore what I said.

swarmee 06-08-2019 10:27 AM

Exactly the same guy. You should read more threads. Especially the hundred page ones over on Blowout. If you have "before" pictures of the cards you sold him, please post them on this board.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886705)
I believe he goes after any size fish. I am a small fish and he has bought 6 cards from me between 12/2006 and 11/2018. I don't know what he did with those cards but from what I've been reading the past few weeks, I can imagine.

I have kept records of every card that I've sold in 15 years, so I did a search on eBay for the most recent card that he bought from me and have noticed that his userid was changed on 6/4. Originally, it was whitman111 but it now appears to be ricky-leo.

BTW, the name of the purchaser of my card was Gary Moser. I believe that we are talking about the same guy. If not, then ignore what I said.

We need PSA to provide certs for his submissions. And those of others who do similar things to cards. Dream on.

bobbyw8469 06-08-2019 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886705)
I believe he goes after any size fish. I am a small fish and he has bought 6 cards from me between 12/2006 and 11/2018. I don't know what he did with those cards but from what I've been reading the past few weeks, I can imagine.

I have kept records of every card that I've sold in 15 years, so I did a search on eBay for the most recent card that he bought from me and have noticed that his userid was changed on 6/4. Originally, it was whitman111 but it now appears to be ricky-leo.

BTW, the name of the purchaser of my card was Gary Moser. I believe that we are talking about the same guy. If not, then ignore what I said.

Howard, can you teach me how to check to see if he bought from me? Did you do some sort of Paypal search?

MULLINS5 06-08-2019 10:29 AM

I would NOT send that card back to Brent. It's evidence that could be destroyed.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1886706)
Exactly the same guy. You should read more threads. Especially the hundred page ones over on Blowout. If you have "before" pictures of the cards you sold him, please post them on this board.

I think I read most of the posts over the past few weeks. I have become addicted to this story.

Here is a link to the last card that he purchased from me.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/13285295926...m=132852959261

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1886708)
Howard, can you teach me how to check to see if he bought from me? Did you do some sort of Paypal search?

Robert,

I use Sixbit software to list my items. It will keep a history of all of your transactions. I usually delete them every 6 months. I searched thru my transactions since, it has the buyers name, address, email address, user name etc. I searched for Moser and found the most recent item.

I have a database which I developed years ago which keeps track of every single transaction that I have ever done on eBay. It includes item numbers and eMail addresses along with what was paid for that item. Since I now had Moser's eMail address, I looked up all the transactions that Moser bought from me and found 6.

swarmee 06-08-2019 10:42 AM

Don't see any Lipon cards here, yet.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1289859

Thanks for providing it.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1886713)
Don't see any Lipon cards here, yet.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1289859

Thanks for providing it.

Doesn't mean that there isn't any. Maybe he kept it for his own collection or perhaps he botched the alteration.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886721)
Doesn't mean that there isn't any. Maybe he kept it for his own collection or perhaps he botched the alteration.

That list is very very very partial. Anyone who thinks that list is somehow complete should take the time to understand what it is, and isn't.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886724)
That list is very very very partial. Anyone who thinks that list is somehow complete should take the time to understand what it is, and isn't.

I agree with you. Every time I check the board, a new item has been discovered. Just the tip of the iceberg.

I went to look at Moser's feedback just to see what he's been up to. But, of course his feedback is private so you cannot see what he is currently doing. It's almost as though eBay is alright with all of this. They make it so easy for Buyers to cover their tracks.

I am confident that our fellow members here and over at BO will piece this all together.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886727)
I agree with you. Every time I check the board, a new item has been discovered. Just the tip of the iceberg.

I went to look at Moser's feedback just to see what he's been up to. But, of course his feedback is private so you cannot see what he is currently doing. It's almost as though eBay is alright with all of this. They make it so easy for Buyers to cover their tracks.

I am confident that our fellow members here and over at BO will piece this all together.

On BO they archived it as of fairly recently.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886727)
I agree with you. Every time I check the board, a new item has been discovered. Just the tip of the iceberg.

I went to look at Moser's feedback just to see what he's been up to. But, of course his feedback is private so you cannot see what he is currently doing. It's almost as though eBay is alright with all of this. They make it so easy for Buyers to cover their tracks.

I am confident that our fellow members here and over at BO will piece this all together.

The frustrating part to me is PSA knows every card he and his fellow card doctors have submitted since day 1, but leave us to try to unravel this mess.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886729)
The frustrating part to me is PSA knows every card he and his fellow card doctors have submitted since day 1, but leave us to try to unravel this mess.

And the crime continues as we all sit here waiting to see what happens.

Aquarian Sports Cards 06-08-2019 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886643)
It's like PEDs, the masking technology is ahead of the detection effort.

fyp

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886732)
And the crime continues as we all sit here waiting to see what happens.

Changing his ID and taking his feedback private are not the actions of a man who intends to stop. I would imagine he has cards to sell in the pipeline but it won't be hard to find someone else to take them, particularly if he didn't buy them from Brent pre-alteration. Let's not forget many of these cards he bought raw, and are untraceable unless PSA divulges certs.

Anish 06-08-2019 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UFFDAH (Post 1766736)
For the record I was the winning bidder. I am not stupid nor naïve. I graduated from college Cum Laude and own/run a multi-million $ company that sells into major retailers across the USA. I collected as a kid in the early 80's and my mom would take me to cards shows when Larry Fritsch had all the goodies. I am a meat and potatoes kind of guy that knows how to outfox and trap coyotes and I enjoy matching wits and killing big Whitetail Bucks who have a superior sense of sight and smell.

I bought the card because I simply love the fact that it is a HOF Musial and a fantastic image of him and that it is an extraordinary 66 year old example that made it through all the pitfalls from antiquated manufacturing/distribution and dodged the bullets of kid handling, bike spokes, tape, thumb tacks, and the list goes on to become a PSA 10.

I'm not a flipper, set builder, registry collector, or a Flip Chaser.

My collection consists of mostly Rookies but also some special non-Rookies plus vintage unopened. Baseball, Football, Basketball and Hockey. And a few non-sports. I respect all cards from PSA 1 to PSA 10 and respect all collectors.


This is my very first and only Musial and have been patiently waiting for a special one for a number of years since I got back into collecting. I may not own another Musial.

I may or may not sell my valuable collection some day. Hopefully some of the extra special one's like the Musial will be passed down.

All in all I really like and appreciate the card not only because it is Musial but because of all its attributes and yes for sure because it is a PSA 10.

Do I wish I could have got it for less?? Heck yeah, but I'd be kicking myself today if I put a top bid in of $15K.

I guess being smarter than a coyote or deer doesn’t make you smart enough to detect a scam

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards (Post 1886734)
fyp

Not so sure some of this can be detected with the usual methods.

Mark17 06-08-2019 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1766617)
i don't care how much and how you earned your hard earned money ...spending 28K on a card like that is just plain stupid! And I'll say it again and again and again!

Once upon a time, someone bought a Wagner for around that figure, and someone said the same thing.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anish (Post 1886738)
I guess being smarter than a coyote or deer doesn’t make you smart enough to detect a scam

I am sure he feels chagrined without people piling on too much. Yes no question he was too trusting of Brent, but Brent seduced a lot of people.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 1886741)
Once upon a time, someone bought a Wagner for around that figure, and someone said the same thing.

And they were right, look where Bill (he paid 25, right?) ended up.

Buythatcard 06-08-2019 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886737)
Changing his ID and taking his feedback private are not the actions of a man who intends to stop. I would imagine he has cards to sell in the pipeline but it won't be hard to find someone else to take them, particularly if he didn't buy them from Brent pre-alteration. Let's not forget many of these cards he bought raw, and are untraceable unless PSA divulges certs.

I don't even want to think about how many raw cards were involved. He bought 6 cards from me. 3 raw and 3 graded. He won't be buying anymore from me. I blocked him under his previous user name and his current user name.
One thing that I never thought about. If I block a buyer and he then changes his username, will he still be blocked under his new name. Or, is this just a way to slip between the cracks?

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886745)
I don't even want to think about how many raw cards were involved. He bought 6 cards from me. 3 raw and 3 graded. He won't be buying anymore from me. I blocked him under his previous user name and his current user name.
One thing that I never thought about. If I block a buyer and he then changes his username, will he still be blocked under his new name. Or, is this just a way to slip between the cracks?

He can just create a brand new ID in any case. I have a couple myself, not for anything sinister of course.

Mark17 06-08-2019 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886744)
And they were right, look where Bill (he paid 25, right?) ended up.

Bill's mistake is that he didn't buy the Jumbo Wagner.

chalupacollects 06-08-2019 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886678)
He said, I think, that he also discussed how high to bid with Brent. Ugh.

My own cynical prior comment:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe it's just me, but if I'm looking for an opinion on what to pay for a card, I am likely to ask someone other than the seller.
__________________
Stuff trumps all in this fraud and ostrich hobby.

Hopefully he saved the emails or texts....

brianp-beme 06-08-2019 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UFFDAH (Post 1766830)
My confidence lies in PSA and PWCC who have earned my and many other collectors trust. I review most of my PWCC card targets including the Musial with Brent before I pull the trigger with a bid and have the utmost trust in his opinion. My best bump of a PWCC purchase is a 58' Jim Brown from an 8 to an 8.5 so my confidence and trust is VERY HIGH.

Peter - sellers like Brent, Steve Hart and some others are straight shooters. They build successful businesses because they are trustworthy. No different than my company taking care of our customers/consumers because we stand behind our product, you have to for repeat long term business. Brent does not hesitate to tell me to pass on one of his auction cards if he feels I should be patient and wait for a little stronger example knowing my goals and tastes. Sometimes my itchy trigger does not want to listen to him but I almost always do.

Man, talk about putting your trust in the wrong folks. Hopefully it all works out for the buyer, and for us too...this whole situation is disgusting.

BrianP(arker)-beme

steve B 06-08-2019 12:06 PM

So it's being returned?

Where does it eventually end up?
With PWCC?
With PSA?
With the card doctor?

If it simply all gets returned, I believe it will simply either get reslabbed after a crackout still a 10 but with a new cert number. Or gets a slight ding, and gets reslabbed as a 9 again with a new number, and we start all over again.

bobbyw8469 06-08-2019 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 1886757)
So it's being returned?

Where does it eventually end up?
With PWCC?
With PSA?
With the card doctor?

If it simply all gets returned, I believe it will simply either get reslabbed after a crackout still a 10 but with a new cert number. Or gets a slight ding, and gets reslabbed as a 9 again with a new number, and we start all over again.

The whole level of fraud and deception bestowed upon us by a few players is sickening.

calvindog 06-08-2019 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 (Post 1886759)
The whole level of fraud and deception bestowed upon us by a few players is sickening.

It’s not just a few players. It’s hundreds of crooks in this hobby, some big, some not so big, big there’s fraud in every corner of it.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1886768)
It’s not just a few players. It’s hundreds of crooks in this hobby, some big, some not so big, big there’s fraud in every corner of it.

Noah's Ark time.

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1764501)
Just checked my lowly 7 and yeah there is a bit of a rough cut on the right side.

Brent Mastro can get that up to a 8 or 9 for you. Give him a call.

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1886768)
It’s not just a few players. It’s hundreds of crooks in this hobby, some big, some not so big, big there’s fraud in every corner of it.

But the biggest Fraudster of them all is Brent Mastro...The Ring leader.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fuddjcal (Post 1886771)
Brent Mastro can get that up to a 8 or 9 for you. Give him a call.

I haven't spoken with the lad since two or three years ago when he assured me Gary had pretty much retired. I think I'll leave it at that, thank you.

T205 GB 06-08-2019 12:50 PM

Hey guys. Someone told me a dead horse beating was going on. Did I miss it or do I have some time to get a few licks in?

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 12:52 PM

I'm sure you have a boat load of fake cards UFFDAH if you have been working with Brent Mastro in this fashion.

I would get an attorney IMMEDIATELY and sue the snot out of that cheater liar scum bag. He is not your friend. He is a smiling grifter. Very sorry for your loss, but it's probably just the beginning for you. :(:(:(

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886773)
I haven't spoken with the lad since two or three years ago when he assured me Gary had pretty much retired. I think I'll leave it at that, thank you.

LOL:D:D:D He was just getting started then...Started on his 15th year of trimming 4,000 cards a year for old Brenty Mastro.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fuddjcal (Post 1886777)
LOL:D:D:D He was just getting started then...Started on his 15th year of trimming 4,000 cards a year for old Brenty Mastro.

I can forgive people a lot of things, and do. Lying flat out to me, not so much.

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buythatcard (Post 1886710)
I think I read most of the posts over the past few weeks. I have become addicted to this story.

Here is a link to the last card that he purchased from me.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/13285295926...m=132852959261

I can see why he bought it. He will dress that pig into a 8 and make a quick 1 or 2K and Brent Mastro the dingleberry will send it to psa and sell it for him...Like he has been doing 4000 cards a year every year. Nice work if you can get it.

Fuddjcal 06-08-2019 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T205 GB (Post 1886774)
Hey guys. Someone told me a dead horse beating was going on. Did I miss it or do I have some time to get a few licks in?

get it going...Brent Mastro deserves a good horse whipping. it's the very least we can do to show Brent Mastro our appreciation for all the good he has done.

Republicaninmass 06-08-2019 01:14 PM

The time frame is just so quick in this one. I'm betting these are PWCCs cards, not consignments. Oh well records will show it all out in the open

nolemmings 06-08-2019 01:18 PM

Back to the Musial, this is why I am really suspicious of PSA's involvement. It seems to me incredibly unlikely that someone would take a PSA 9 of a vintage superstar and doctor it in "hopes" of a 10, thereby risking discovery of the alteration by the TPG and a tanking in value. And who knows if you get the 10 even if you're not caught, that grade being so subjective. IMO, the only way you take that chance is if you are cock-sure you are going to beat the grader or if you somehow know that you will.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nolemmings (Post 1886786)
Back to the Musial, this is why I am really suspicious of PSA's involvement. It seems to me incredibly unlikely that someone would take a PSA 9 of a vintage superstar and doctor it in "hopes" of a 10, thereby risking discovery of the alteration by the TPG and a tanking in value. And who knows if you get the 10 even if you're not caught, that grade being so subjective. IMO, the only way you take that chance is if you are cock-sure you are going to beat the grader or if you somehow know that you will.

Risk reward. When you are making that much money you can take risks here and there for huge upside. If it goes south, a few K down the drain, so what.

Dpeck100 06-08-2019 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886788)
Risk reward. When you are making that much money you can take risks here and there for huge upside. If it goes south, a few K down the drain, so what.


Sounds just like options trading when your winning.

Bram99 06-08-2019 01:37 PM

Logic
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nolemmings (Post 1886786)
Back to the Musial, this is why I am really suspicious of PSA's involvement. It seems to me incredibly unlikely that someone would take a PSA 9 of a vintage superstar and doctor it in "hopes" of a 10, thereby risking discovery of the alteration by the TPG and a tanking in value. And who knows if you get the 10 even if you're not caught, that grade being so subjective. IMO, the only way you take that chance is if you are cock-sure you are going to beat the grader or if you somehow know that you will.

I refuse to believe that someone would take the chance to have the card cracked out, found to be altered, and turn from a "9" to "authentic" with the corresponding loss in more than 90% of it's value. The poster is dead accurate here. This is the best sign I have seen yet that this was not just Moser/PWCC but that there had to be a third actor of some kind.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bram99 (Post 1886790)
I refuse to believe that someone would take the chance to have the card cracked out, found to be altered, and turn from a "9" to "authentic" with the corresponding loss in more than 90% of it's value. The poster is dead accurate here. This is the best sign I have seen yet that this was not just Moser/PWCC but that there had to be a third actor of some kind.

It's a 3K card or whatever it is. It's meaningless to a guy making the kind of money he makes from altering cards. Huge upside, trivial downside. I think you're way off the mark here implicating PSA. This isn't a collector to whom the card means something. It's a piece of paper to him. It's a risk reward calculation to him plain and simple. Nothing else to see here.

Mark17 06-08-2019 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bram99 (Post 1886790)
I refuse to believe that someone would take the chance to have the card cracked out, found to be altered, and turn from a "9" to "authentic" with the corresponding loss in more than 90% of it's value. The poster is dead accurate here. This is the best sign I have seen yet that this was not just Moser/PWCC but that there had to be a third actor of some kind.

Yes. Coupled with the comment someone else made, that politics might be involved with getting 10s. Way too much downside to try this in a "normal" way....

But I wonder what the mechanics could be, to see a card like this shepherded through the system end to end. That part still seems implausible.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 1886796)
Yes. Coupled with the comment someone else made, that politics might be involved with getting 10s. Way too much downside to try this in a "normal" way....

But I wonder what the mechanics could be, to see a card like this shepherded through the system end to end. That part still seems implausible.

Downside only exists relative to upside. You guys are not seeing how this man operates. He risked 3K. He made 25K. 3K is a trivial risk to him. Context.

Dpeck100 06-08-2019 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886797)
Downside only exists relative to upside. You guys are not seeing how this man operates.

You are correct Peter.

I have thrown 3k at a trade that had two days until the option expired. A ticking time bomb. He clearly had asymmetric risk here. It appears more that he has confidence in his work and isn't concerned about getting rendered with the AUTH grade or it staying there.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dpeck100 (Post 1886798)
You are correct Peter.

I have thrown 3k at a trade that had two days until the option expired. A ticking time bomb. He clearly had asymmetric risk here. It appears more that he has confidence in his work and isn't concerned about getting rendered with the AUTH grade or it staying there.

He made 25K from a 3K purchase which he could afford easily to blow up. Even with a relatively low chance of success it's an obvious gamble to take. He has 20 years of experience and knows his chances. Nothing to see.

barrysloate 06-08-2019 01:58 PM

I'm going with the nobody risks a 9 to try and get a 10. I don't think there is a single collector/submitter who can even tell you what the difference is. To me the only way you get a 10 is if the grader feels like giving it a 10. I smell something fishy too.

You might risk a 5 to get a 6, or a 6 to get an 8, because each of those cards has a flaw that can be improved. But a 9 is flawless. If you had a 9 and a magic wand to change it, what would you even attempt to do to make it better?

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate (Post 1886802)
I'm going with the nobody risks a 9 to try and get a 10. I don't think there is a single collector/submitter who can even tell you what the difference is. To me the only way you get a 10 is if the grader feels like giving it a 10. I smell something fishy too.

You might risk a 5 to get a 6, or a 6 to get an 8, because each of those cards has a flaw that can be improved. But a 9 is flawless. If you had a 9 and a magic wand to change it, what would you even attempt to do to make it better?

Look what he DID do in this case, why speculate? There are before and after pics on BO. I give up, Dave and I seem to be the only ones posting who understand this in context.

Mark17 06-08-2019 02:06 PM

1390 of these things have been graded, and until this one, zero achieved a 10. I can see risking $3k for a possible $25k - I understand the concept - but the odds would have to be a little better to make it a good play. Here we're talking about trying to achieve a grade that had never been given for this card in the history of PSA.

I generally agree, it looks like what appears to have happened, happened. But I base that on not being able to see how any grading manipulation could have taken this card through the process, not on the smartness of the play.

Dpeck100 06-08-2019 02:06 PM

It seems like there are more white specs in the after pic on his sleeve right by his wrist.

Anyone else see that?

CuriousGeorge 06-08-2019 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886803)
Look what he DID do in this case, why speculate? There are before and after pics on BO. I give up, Dave and I seem to be the only ones posting who understand this in context.

Peter, without question you are correct. Any loss is meaningless in this context and I’m sure he has lost plenty. He has such made up on many more.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 1886806)
1390 of these things have been graded, and until this one, zero achieved a 10. I can see risking $3k for a possible $25k - I understand the concept - but the odds would have to be a little better to make it a good play. Here we're talking about trying to achieve a grade that had never been given for this card in the history of PSA.

I generally agree, it looks like what appears to have happened, happened. But I base that on not being able to see how any grading manipulation could have taken this card through the process, not on the smartness of the play.

If he had an inside grader at PSA, he could make an incredible fortune just doing reviews, he wouldn't have to alter cards at all. He obviously has a tremendous eye, and he is an expert at 52 Bowmans by reputation, he probably saw one he thought might finally be the one and went with the opportunity.

nolemmings 06-08-2019 02:08 PM

That's one explanation Peter, but I'm not buying it here. At most you’ve explained the submitter’s motivation, but it doesn’t eliminate or even reduce the likelihood of the TPG involvement, which is why I stay suspicious.

PSA knows, or with an eye-blink's worth of investigation can learn that there are no graded tens of this 67 year old card depicting one of the most popular players collected. Now it comes to the grader in the course of his mundane, look at hundreds of cards for for a few seconds each day, and he says, hey neat, we got ourselves a 10. Strange that we only hand out that highest grade to about a 10th of one percent of the cards submitted from that set, but wow, somehow this card just pops. No need for extra scrutiny just because this is one of the keys to the set, and I live in a bubble so I have no idea what my grade might mean to the owner financially, so let's just slap a 10 on this bad boy.

Now of course it could be that several graders and even an upper mgmt type look at cards this valuable before they get slabbed, if only because of potential liability in the event of a mistake. In that case, they are not necessarily a knowing participant in fraud, just grossly incompetent. But I believe it is folly to dismiss their potential involvement just because you’ve concluded the submitter has money or cards to burn and would of course take the risk of eating a few thousand here and there.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 02:12 PM

I leave it to you to prove your conspiracy theory, Todd. I'll stick with common sense. If he had an inside grader, as I just said, he wouldn't even have to alter cards he could just do reviews and crackouts of legit cards.

ullmandds 06-08-2019 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 1886741)
Once upon a time, someone bought a Wagner for around that figure, and someone said the same thing.

not looking so good for the purchaser of this musial if I do say so.

CuriousGeorge 06-08-2019 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886810)
If he had an inside grader at PSA, he could make an incredible fortune just doing reviews, he wouldn't have to alter cards at all. He obviously has a tremendous eye, and he is an expert at 52 Bowmans by reputation, he probably saw one he thought might finally be the one and went with the opportunity.

Peter, would you mind writing this question down so when he’s under oath we don’t forget to ask him?

barrysloate 06-08-2019 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886803)
Look what he DID do in this case, why speculate? There are before and after pics on BO. I give up, Dave and I seem to be the only ones posting who understand this in context.

I just looked at the pictures on BO again, and the before and after look identical. Can anybody discern what was done to the 9 to improve it? My eyes aren't perfect, but they look the same to me.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrysloate (Post 1886817)
I just looked at the pictures on BO again, and the before and after look identical. Can anybody discern what was done to the 9 to improve it? My eyes aren't perfect, but they look the same to me.

Yes, they analyzed the recoloring over there.

swarmee 06-08-2019 02:26 PM

Colored print dot on front left border white.
Colored some of the red line on shoulder red to fill gaps.
Colored the whitish spot on the sleeve blue to match.
Colored the gap in the bottom right of the A on back in black to hide.

As well as, the PSA 9 might have also been altered prior to because it doesn't have either left or right edge with a rough cut, which would seem to indicate it was trimmed or sheet cut.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1886820)
Colored print dot on front left border white.
Colored some of the red line on shoulder red to fill gaps.
Colored the whitish spot on the sleeve blue to match.
Colored the gap in the bottom right of the A on back in black to hide.

As well as, the PSA 9 might have also been altered prior to because it doesn't have either left or right edge with a rough cut, which would seem to indicate it was trimmed or sheet cut.

If it was trimmed or sheet cut, he wouldn't have cracked it. He's too damn knowledgeable.

pokerplyr80 06-08-2019 02:35 PM

The personal insults and piling on the guy who spent close to 30k on what appears to be an altered card should have no place on this site.

The lack of understanding on why someone would gamble to turn a 3k card into a 25 to 30k card if he knows how to do so is hard for me to believe. Have you guys never placed a bet before? He only has to make it work 1 time in 8 for this to pay off.

Is it certain the card was recolored? It's hard for me to tell from the scans but perhaps the spots in question were simply removed.

barrysloate 06-08-2019 02:35 PM

That turns a 3K card into a 25K card? Absolutely f**king nuts!

PiratesWS1979 06-08-2019 02:42 PM

The marks that were supposedly removed are actually common attributes of the ’52 Bowman Musial.
Has anybody ever thought that it may have actually bumped to a “10” and was photoshopped when auctioned?

The buyer was on here so maybe he can shed some more light on this.

Hopefully this is the case and there are far less trimmed/altered cards then thought and is just a “camera trick”.

sorry for the poor images

http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=27005
http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=27004

Bored5000 06-08-2019 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1886826)
The personal insults and piling on the guy who spent close to 30k on what appears to be an altered card should have no place on this site.

The lack of understanding on why someone would gamble to turn a 3k card into a 25 to 30k card if he knows how to do so is hard for me to believe. Have you guys never placed a bet before? He only has to make it work 1 time in 8 for this to pay off.

Is it certain the card was recolored? It's hard for me to tell from the scans but perhaps the spots in question were simply removed.

I am also surprised at how many people are disbelieving that Moser would alter a "9" in an attempt to try for a "10." Three grand is a small amount to risk, considering how much Moser has already been shown to have profited from his alterations.

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 02:48 PM

If it bumped cert would be the same, no?

Dpeck100 06-08-2019 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886830)
If it bumped cert would be the same, no?

Yes

PiratesWS1979 06-08-2019 02:56 PM

That's right. Hopefully it was cracked out and not altered.

I'm just trying to be a little hopeful in this mess.

pokerplyr80 06-08-2019 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886830)
If it bumped cert would be the same, no?

Not if cracked out and resubmitted. I would be too risk adverse to try that myself but for someone with a higher net worth I could see it happening.

A lot of assumptions are being made in these threads from a before and after picture that in some of these cases may not even be the same card.

Rhotchkiss 06-08-2019 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nolemmings (Post 1886786)
Back to the Musial, this is why I am really suspicious of PSA's involvement. It seems to me incredibly unlikely that someone would take a PSA 9 of a vintage superstar and doctor it in "hopes" of a 10, thereby risking discovery of the alteration by the TPG and a tanking in value. And who knows if you get the 10 even if you're not caught, that grade being so subjective. IMO, the only way you take that chance is if you are cock-sure you are going to beat the grader or if you somehow know that you will.

+1. Who the hell has balls big enough to take a 9 of a fairly big time card/player and alter it hoping for a 10. Even if he knew for sure that you could successfully make all the alterations without detection, what makes him think he wood get a 10 when there none previous. HUGE balls or the fix was in from the getgo. This one seems to indicate the latter

Edited - I just read all the posts after the quote. I do believe the Doctor could make a business risk-reward proposition on $3k - the ups are worth the downs. The problem is there were NO/ZERO 10’s previously. Risking $3k to get an 8x multiple return makes sense. But not when the historical odds of achieving that goal is nil. I guess there always could be a first, but shouldn’t that have alerted psa? All these 52 Musials graded and never a 10 and then one just comes out of nowhere?

Peter_Spaeth 06-08-2019 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 1886842)
+1. Who the hell has balls big enough to take a 9 of a fairly big time card/player and alter it hoping for a 10. Even if he knew for sure that you could successfully make all the alterations without detection, what makes him think he wood get a 10 when there none previous. HUGE balls or the fix was in from the getgo. This one seems to indicate the latter

It takes no balls at all for someone with hundreds of thousands of dollars in cards and probably millions in the bank to take a gamble on a 3K card, with a huge upside. You can't see that?

Rhotchkiss 06-08-2019 03:42 PM

Mess up. See edited post above - it’s not the dollars, but the odds.

Regardless, it’s a shame what this a@@hole has done to amazing pieces of American history. I hope something very bad happens to Gary Moser.

Ryan Hotchkiss (and Gary, I will gladly meet you in person if you take exception to my post)

Bicem 06-08-2019 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1886844)
It takes no balls at all for someone with hundreds of thousands of dollars in cards and probably millions in the bank to take a gamble on a 3K card, with a huge upside. You can't see that?

Exactly, plus if it comes back a 9 he's lost nothing.

swarmee 06-08-2019 04:02 PM

Actually, at a 9, it probably still goes higher after the touchups. He's made a lot of profit on cards that stayed the same technical grade if you check the thread on Blowout, just by improving the centering or eye appeal.

Rhotchkiss 06-08-2019 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bicem (Post 1886850)
Exactly, plus if it comes back a 9 he's lost nothing.

True!! It did not occur to me it could come back something other than a 10 or altered (but I am not that smart to begin with!). And I guess if it comes back altered, or a 8 or 9, he cracks a resubmits, over and over until he gets the 10 or gives up. Perhaps that is what happened.

Ok Peter, I am convinced. It’s not PSA on this one; at least they were not knowingly involved.

MULLINS5 06-08-2019 04:34 PM

When you're making money this easy, $3k ain't nothing to roll the dice on. My money is on PSA NOT being a knowing party to the fraud.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.