![]() |
Good thing they are so trusted as the market leader that they have an infinite grade guarantee policy they self-insure, at the card's current market value.
|
Quote:
It’s clear to me that he knows that Moser is buying from him, restoring and selling through him. I don’t see PSA just bending over and writing big cheques. Would love to be a fly on the wall, I suspect Brent is stuck with refunds on the Moser cards, and he will have to work with Moser on recovery. If you are within reasonable chargeback times that is where I would start, with my CC company. At minimum it forces him to fight the CB, and lots of card issuers will extend timelines in cases of fraud. I have to bet PWCC is getting slammed with chargebacks now. |
I believe he goes after any size fish. I am a small fish and he has bought 6 cards from me between 12/2006 and 11/2018. I don't know what he did with those cards but from what I've been reading the past few weeks, I can imagine.
I have kept records of every card that I've sold in 15 years, so I did a search on eBay for the most recent card that he bought from me and have noticed that his userid was changed on 6/4. Originally, it was whitman111 but it now appears to be ricky-leo. BTW, the name of the purchaser of my card was Gary Moser. I believe that we are talking about the same guy. If not, then ignore what I said. |
Exactly the same guy. You should read more threads. Especially the hundred page ones over on Blowout. If you have "before" pictures of the cards you sold him, please post them on this board.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would NOT send that card back to Brent. It's evidence that could be destroyed.
|
Quote:
Here is a link to the last card that he purchased from me. https://www.ebay.com/itm/13285295926...m=132852959261 |
Quote:
I use Sixbit software to list my items. It will keep a history of all of your transactions. I usually delete them every 6 months. I searched thru my transactions since, it has the buyers name, address, email address, user name etc. I searched for Moser and found the most recent item. I have a database which I developed years ago which keeps track of every single transaction that I have ever done on eBay. It includes item numbers and eMail addresses along with what was paid for that item. Since I now had Moser's eMail address, I looked up all the transactions that Moser bought from me and found 6. |
Don't see any Lipon cards here, yet.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1289859 Thanks for providing it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I went to look at Moser's feedback just to see what he's been up to. But, of course his feedback is private so you cannot see what he is currently doing. It's almost as though eBay is alright with all of this. They make it so easy for Buyers to cover their tracks. I am confident that our fellow members here and over at BO will piece this all together. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
One thing that I never thought about. If I block a buyer and he then changes his username, will he still be blocked under his new name. Or, is this just a way to slip between the cracks? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BrianP(arker)-beme |
So it's being returned?
Where does it eventually end up? With PWCC? With PSA? With the card doctor? If it simply all gets returned, I believe it will simply either get reslabbed after a crackout still a 10 but with a new cert number. Or gets a slight ding, and gets reslabbed as a 9 again with a new number, and we start all over again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hey guys. Someone told me a dead horse beating was going on. Did I miss it or do I have some time to get a few licks in?
|
I'm sure you have a boat load of fake cards UFFDAH if you have been working with Brent Mastro in this fashion.
I would get an attorney IMMEDIATELY and sue the snot out of that cheater liar scum bag. He is not your friend. He is a smiling grifter. Very sorry for your loss, but it's probably just the beginning for you. :(:(:( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The time frame is just so quick in this one. I'm betting these are PWCCs cards, not consignments. Oh well records will show it all out in the open
|
Back to the Musial, this is why I am really suspicious of PSA's involvement. It seems to me incredibly unlikely that someone would take a PSA 9 of a vintage superstar and doctor it in "hopes" of a 10, thereby risking discovery of the alteration by the TPG and a tanking in value. And who knows if you get the 10 even if you're not caught, that grade being so subjective. IMO, the only way you take that chance is if you are cock-sure you are going to beat the grader or if you somehow know that you will.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sounds just like options trading when your winning. |
Logic
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I wonder what the mechanics could be, to see a card like this shepherded through the system end to end. That part still seems implausible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have thrown 3k at a trade that had two days until the option expired. A ticking time bomb. He clearly had asymmetric risk here. It appears more that he has confidence in his work and isn't concerned about getting rendered with the AUTH grade or it staying there. |
Quote:
|
I'm going with the nobody risks a 9 to try and get a 10. I don't think there is a single collector/submitter who can even tell you what the difference is. To me the only way you get a 10 is if the grader feels like giving it a 10. I smell something fishy too.
You might risk a 5 to get a 6, or a 6 to get an 8, because each of those cards has a flaw that can be improved. But a 9 is flawless. If you had a 9 and a magic wand to change it, what would you even attempt to do to make it better? |
Quote:
|
1390 of these things have been graded, and until this one, zero achieved a 10. I can see risking $3k for a possible $25k - I understand the concept - but the odds would have to be a little better to make it a good play. Here we're talking about trying to achieve a grade that had never been given for this card in the history of PSA.
I generally agree, it looks like what appears to have happened, happened. But I base that on not being able to see how any grading manipulation could have taken this card through the process, not on the smartness of the play. |
It seems like there are more white specs in the after pic on his sleeve right by his wrist.
Anyone else see that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's one explanation Peter, but I'm not buying it here. At most you’ve explained the submitter’s motivation, but it doesn’t eliminate or even reduce the likelihood of the TPG involvement, which is why I stay suspicious.
PSA knows, or with an eye-blink's worth of investigation can learn that there are no graded tens of this 67 year old card depicting one of the most popular players collected. Now it comes to the grader in the course of his mundane, look at hundreds of cards for for a few seconds each day, and he says, hey neat, we got ourselves a 10. Strange that we only hand out that highest grade to about a 10th of one percent of the cards submitted from that set, but wow, somehow this card just pops. No need for extra scrutiny just because this is one of the keys to the set, and I live in a bubble so I have no idea what my grade might mean to the owner financially, so let's just slap a 10 on this bad boy. Now of course it could be that several graders and even an upper mgmt type look at cards this valuable before they get slabbed, if only because of potential liability in the event of a mistake. In that case, they are not necessarily a knowing participant in fraud, just grossly incompetent. But I believe it is folly to dismiss their potential involvement just because you’ve concluded the submitter has money or cards to burn and would of course take the risk of eating a few thousand here and there. |
I leave it to you to prove your conspiracy theory, Todd. I'll stick with common sense. If he had an inside grader, as I just said, he wouldn't even have to alter cards he could just do reviews and crackouts of legit cards.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Colored print dot on front left border white.
Colored some of the red line on shoulder red to fill gaps. Colored the whitish spot on the sleeve blue to match. Colored the gap in the bottom right of the A on back in black to hide. As well as, the PSA 9 might have also been altered prior to because it doesn't have either left or right edge with a rough cut, which would seem to indicate it was trimmed or sheet cut. |
Quote:
|
The personal insults and piling on the guy who spent close to 30k on what appears to be an altered card should have no place on this site.
The lack of understanding on why someone would gamble to turn a 3k card into a 25 to 30k card if he knows how to do so is hard for me to believe. Have you guys never placed a bet before? He only has to make it work 1 time in 8 for this to pay off. Is it certain the card was recolored? It's hard for me to tell from the scans but perhaps the spots in question were simply removed. |
That turns a 3K card into a 25K card? Absolutely f**king nuts!
|
The marks that were supposedly removed are actually common attributes of the ’52 Bowman Musial.
Has anybody ever thought that it may have actually bumped to a “10” and was photoshopped when auctioned? The buyer was on here so maybe he can shed some more light on this. Hopefully this is the case and there are far less trimmed/altered cards then thought and is just a “camera trick”. sorry for the poor images http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=27005 http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=27004 |
Quote:
|
If it bumped cert would be the same, no?
|
Quote:
|
That's right. Hopefully it was cracked out and not altered.
I'm just trying to be a little hopeful in this mess. |
Quote:
A lot of assumptions are being made in these threads from a before and after picture that in some of these cases may not even be the same card. |
Quote:
Edited - I just read all the posts after the quote. I do believe the Doctor could make a business risk-reward proposition on $3k - the ups are worth the downs. The problem is there were NO/ZERO 10’s previously. Risking $3k to get an 8x multiple return makes sense. But not when the historical odds of achieving that goal is nil. I guess there always could be a first, but shouldn’t that have alerted psa? All these 52 Musials graded and never a 10 and then one just comes out of nowhere? |
Quote:
|
Mess up. See edited post above - it’s not the dollars, but the odds.
Regardless, it’s a shame what this a@@hole has done to amazing pieces of American history. I hope something very bad happens to Gary Moser. Ryan Hotchkiss (and Gary, I will gladly meet you in person if you take exception to my post) |
Quote:
|
Actually, at a 9, it probably still goes higher after the touchups. He's made a lot of profit on cards that stayed the same technical grade if you check the thread on Blowout, just by improving the centering or eye appeal.
|
Quote:
Ok Peter, I am convinced. It’s not PSA on this one; at least they were not knowingly involved. |
When you're making money this easy, $3k ain't nothing to roll the dice on. My money is on PSA NOT being a knowing party to the fraud.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM. |