![]() |
Quote:
You don't call Lowe's to complain and get your money back? Sure you do, and you know it. |
Quote:
|
No of course not. But both my scenario and the OPs occurred because of improper packing. If the packaging is so inadequate that it risks damage from routine opening procedure...it's on the seller
|
This thread makes my head hurt.
|
Quote:
|
$800+
$800+, shipped with no protection. If I spend that much money on a card and I receive it even in an envelope I'm going to assume that the seller did the right thing and protected it. The last thing I'm going to think is, "I better be careful opening this, it might not be protected". To me that should be a safe assumption, without question. The fact that some are putting this on the buyer is insane to me. We operate in a system of assumptions when we purchase on ebay. Sellers assume buyers are going to pay, buyers assume that sellers are going to ship the item with care. If at any point the item gets damaged, from the moment it's put in the envelope, to the moment it's securely out of the envelope, the condition of the card falls on the seller. If you rip an envelope open and damage the card, because it wasn't properly cared for when shipped, then the blame falls squarely on the seller. This isn't a matter of personal responsibility, not to me. This is a matter of reasonable expectations as a buyer on ebay. You pay for something, you expect it to be shipped with care. The end result of the seller accidentally ripping the card is immaterial. It never would have been ripped if the seller had shipped the item with care. All other arguments about coffee and the like are just association fallacies to me as they don't have anything to do with the OPs situation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I answered your question, please answer mine: Let's say the card (shipped the same way it was) would have been damaged during shipping by a postal machine. Is it the post office's fault, or does the seller assume liability since it wasn't packaged properly? |
Quote:
Once the buyer has it in his possession, responsibility transfers to him. If he rips it or drops it in the toilet, that's his doing. Look, this is pointless as we simply do not agree on the basic concepts involved. This will be my last post on this thread (I can hear the applause from across the country...) :) |
Quote:
I gotcha. If the card is ripped by a postal machine because of the seller's poor packaging, it's the seller's fault, but if the card is ripped by the buyer because of the seller's poor packaging, it the buyer's fault. What is the common denominator in either scenario? The seller's poor packaging. |
Quote:
Given the facts we've been presented with (including no pictures or descriptions, etc.), I think it's pretty clear that there are degrees of fault on each side of the table. If I were the buyer, I'd complain to the seller about the shipping, but I'd probably eat the cost. If I were the seller, and a buyer came to me with this complaint, I would offer to refund most or all of the sale price. Even though I don't find the seller 100% at fault, I find it inexcusable to not work to rectify the problem for the buyer. |
Sorry, I had an 11:59 tee time
Did I miss anything?:D
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 235048 |
:)
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dave, that's the best post of this thread! There are good members on both sides of this issue. Pete, show the card man! |
Quote:
Card packaged properly = no damage Card not packaged properly = leaving it open to potential damage This is the seller's responsibility and he failed. He eats the cost. |
Quote:
Apologies to Jeff L, Larry7, AL-R and all the other attorneys on the board. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 PM. |