Even sadder Leon is he’s probably happy. In his twisted world he thinks he’s doing something good and everyone else is just out to get poor Peter Nash. Only in Nash’s world is a comment that I made about the late Barry Halper somehow out of line and worthy of reporting as some sort of big news.

In the past McDaniel has taken his defense of Halper even further stating, “Did Halper have stuff that was questionable, sadly, no doubt. I also think many of us would have had bad items had we built and acquired a collection of that size. In fact, Halper would have been and was a big target for the unsavory of the world to work their trade.”

It’s a laughable thing to watch unless your one of the many collectors left with questionable merchandise from guy who pleads the fifth at every turn.

I honestly didn't know Mr. Nash was a lawyer and capable of rendering intelligent opinions on legal causes of action such as slander. However, since he is then I am sure that he is also aware of the tort of defamation. Having such information one would think that Mr. Nash might want to be careful making public statements that directly accuse people of committing a tort.

Then again what do I know....

He says at one point that Rob Lifson was forging a Ruth signature and selling it?

That is a very serious accusation! Does he even have proof?

To the resident Counsel ... is that not character assassination? Is that not a HUGE deal?

That would potentially be defamation.

I think he said Mr. Lifson sold a forged Ruth auto, not that he created it.
He also said Mr. Lifson is a convicted felon.

Impossible! Peter I demand to know how Rob could sign such a Ruth signature what with my head always up his ass and all? :)

Prime Minister
 

I think the man FKA Prime Minister Pete Nice should send me $7.99. That is what I blew on Derelicts of Dialect back in 1991. Horrible album.

Oh what the hell I’ll bite…. :)

David do you think there is wake-up call needed for the hobby on Leon, Dan B, Adam W, Barry S, Jay M and myself?

http://photos.imageevent.com/piojohn...titled-1_4.jpg

No John, my wake up call remark had to do with the FBIs recent search of John Rogers home and business, and the why of it..............and yes you do bite.:D Cheers

"In the 1999 Halper sale Lifson catalogued and sold fake uniforms, misrepresented game-used equipment, forged Babe Ruth autographs and even a phony 1846 Knickerbocker baseball he claimed was genuine."

The way he writes leaves things very much open for interpretation.

I guess I should just shut the eff up, but to me, the way he wrote this was very vile and throws out all of these very harsh allegations, but does not offer much in the way of proof.

It just feels this was done in bad taste, at least to me personally.

You asked earlier what's his deal? Derek you figured exactly his deal it in about 10 mins, you’re a lot smarter than most that read his silly site.

I wish it was more fun...bottom line guy owes folks tons of money has mountains of legal problems. He has been accused of selling tons of fake items to some very prominent collectors and may be one of the hobby’s most prolific forgers. When questioned about this past in legal settings he pleads the fifth. Now he spends his days in cyberspace making up fake investigations, claiming to have sources and attacking anyone who brings up his past or says boo against him to draw attention away from his own misery.

What is the result of his deep investigations you ask? Well dig up old photos of me at a NYC dinner with some members. Sort of tally up my REA winnings from 2013 only because I share them here with members….and then make some innuendos about me. I’ve seen more in depth reporting from TMZ.

Nash quotes me as follows with respect to the Rogers's "Chadwick" photo:
"... SABR’s photographic committee chairman..[I'm now co-chairman, and I wasn't co-chairman at the time of the Chadwick thread].. claimed the man did not resemble Chadwick after comparing the nose and ears to other photos.."

I never said that they did not resemble eachother (in fact they kind of did) nor did I say anything about the ears. I did say, "...First of all you are comparing a fuzzy image to another fuzzy image - pretty worthless. BTW - if you compare the nose to a clear Chadwick semi-profile image - it doesn't seem quite right. But again - the tintype is too fuzzy to be sure about anything."

I asked Mr. Rogers to post a better scan (what was posted was only 100 dpi). He declined.

Sloppy reporting. He did get the pencil thing right.

Mark the nice thing about Peter is he doesn’t let a little thing like facts get in the way of a good story.

Whatever. Just spell my name right; it's all free publicity.

"Sources indicate that McDaniel, Bretta, Fraser and others knew full well that the Rogers LOA’s were forgeries, yet chose to post the accusations anyway."

"Sources"??? What sources KNEW that I had prior knowledge of forged LOA's. That's hilarious. :D I think anyone with a semi-functional brain can see that I was surprised that Rogers had anything to do with CC since I actually posted that pretty much word for word and it was even included in Nash's "article". That guy should work for cable news.

photoshop needed
 

This would make a great Goudey or Exhibit 4 in 1 fantasy card.

Note to Mr. Nash. Slander is communicated in spoken form while libel is communicated in written form.

To be fair, his source may have overheard me tell my wife.

Maybe his source is your....no, I won't say it.:D

I want to go on record and say this was all Dan’s idea he called me and put me up to it. He hates Rogers as a kid he had a box of old photographs fall on him and since that day has vowed to take anyone down who is related to old photographs. :)

Then......

Henry.....he is coming for Yee!

You just fell off the birthday list, pal. :D

Peter Nash you are the conman. You conned my wife and I out of $11,000 to pay your rent at the house you used to rent in Saratoga Springs, NY. Your credit was so bad you made a deal with the landlord to pay 6 months’ rent up front.

Besides cheating us out of the $11,000, you gave us a bunch of tainted memorabilia as collateral. After we won the lawsuit you have refused to help us sell the collateral. Is it possible that some of the collateral you gave us is stolen? After all one of the items of collateral you gave us was a book entitled “Boston Baseball Club 1871-1897” that was owned by Tim Murnane’s grandson, Raymond Quinn. But you lied and claimed you owned the book and put a value of $2,500 on it and gave it to us as collateral, that is called FRAUD Peter Nash or in other words stolen property. As you are aware the Judge Ordered the book returned to Raymond Quinn which has been done. It’s my understanding the value you put on the book was high. Did you put that price of $2,500 on the book because it had Tim Murnane’s signature inside the book? I would like to know because I want to tell Raymond Quinn. Here’s a nice article baseball historian John Thorn wrote on sportswriter/baseball player Tim Murnane.

http://ourgame.mlblogs.com/2013/05/0...t-of-the-game/

Peter Nash I see that after you used up the $11,000 you were evicted out of the house, see below.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail

Court: Saratoga Springs City Court
Index Number: LT-002832-07/SS
Case Name: MARKS, LINDA COSEO, f/k/a LINDA COSEO
vs.
NASH, PETER
NASH, ROXANNE
Case Type: Landlord and Tenant
Classification: Non-Payment
Filing Date: 11/09/2007
Disposition Date: 11/21/2007
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name: Honorable Douglas C. Mills

Attorney/Firm(s) For Petitioner - LINDA COSEO MARKS:
DEAN M COON ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney
188 CHURCH STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS, New York 12866
518-584-6300


Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - ROXANNE NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - PETER NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

Pillow talk? My this is getting salty.

Disclosure: I am probably one of the few people on this site who has been mentioned on H.O.S. in a positive way.

Mîçhæ£ ßöw£ß¥

You mean like this. :)

http://photos.imageevent.com/piojohn...of%20blame.jpg

Don't you think folks should know your full name, given your disclosure?

btw, John, nice Goudey!! Looks to be artificially aged too..

Now you just need names and teams LOL.

Looks like a reprint.....need a back scan please....

I get your point. Peter Nash gets sued by so many people. Check this out, here's a lawsuit from Lelands Auctions suing Peter Nash. What was this lawsuit about Josh Evans? Does this lawsuit have any reason why Peter Nash never writes anything about you? I guess Peter you didn't know John Rogers back then so you couldn't get money from him to fund your lawsuit. You could have asked one of Bekim Laiqi's cousins to borrow money from or maybe you were to deep into them by then. You know Pete how you used to tell me how you had to pay the vig.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail


Court: New York County Civil Court
Index Number: CV-008757-99/NY
Case Name: HOUSE, LELAND'S AUCTION vs. NASH, PETER
Case Type: Civil
Classification:
Filing Date: 03/22/1999
Disposition Date: 06/12/2000
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name:


Attorney/Firm(s) For Plaintiff - LELAND'S AUCTION HOUSE:
HERRICK & FEINSTEIN Attorney Type: Firm
2 PARK AVENUE
New York, New York 10016
2125921400


Attorney/Firm(s) For Defendant - PETER NASH:

Leon,

Not a problem at all. I am not a fan of Nash and the guilt by skewed innuendo. Nor do I fall for the "If I act the muckraker then perhaps everyone will forget that I am a big pile of muck myself" act either. I just felt that if I commented in this thread that I should at least put that out there. It was the Babe Ruth's will recovery post. I was the one back in 1998 that first discovered probate documents were being stolen from courthouses and assisted the FBI.

Mîçhæ£ ßöw£ß¥

Truthfully there’s a real card Peter Nash tried to con me to invest in for $250,000. It’s so crazy and over the top you will never forget it and I think we can all agree that Peter Nash needs to seriously get professional help. It’s very sad that Nash actually thought I believed in his conman scheme. Here’s the true story:

January of 2007, Pete and I where at the Fireplace Restaurant on route 17 in Paramus, NJ. After we ate Pete tried to pitch to me an investment that would make me millions. Pete wanted me to invest in the 1912 Red Sox first pitched baseball that he had purchased for approximately $140,000 in auction from Sotheby’s. Sometime thereafter buying the 1912 baseball Nash needing money consigned the 1912 baseball to Robert Edward Auctions and borrowed a large sum of money from Robert Edward Auctions against it. Nash wanted me to give him $250,000 for 49% ownership in the 1912 baseball and most of the money would be used to get the 1912 baseball back from Robert Edward auctions. He would then have the baseball cut up and take the string from inside the baseball and have the string cut into 2 inch lengths. Nash knew the full length of the string inside the baseball and how many 2 inch pieces could be made. Then Nash would have a professional company take the 2 inch pieces of string and put them onto a baseball card. After that he would make a deal with the Red Sox and Memorabilia shops to sell this 1912 Red Sox first pitch baseball cards for $20 each. Nash had this crazy conman proposal all figured out showing a gross profit of $28 million and a net profit of $23 million. At the time I was friends with him so I didn’t want to laugh at the idea and tell him how crazy the idea was so I told him my wife, Lisa probably won’t go for it. So then Pete went for the second pitch to get money from me. He asked me to invest in a bunch of Joe Jackson bricks that he acquired from Shoeless Joe Jackson’s house, I’ll leave that story for another time.

Peter Nash instead of writing a bunch of crap on your website and wasting your time. Why don’t you do something constructive and do a nice write up on all the collateral we have of your so we can sell it and apply it to the Judgment we have against you. As you are aware we have a Court Order to sell this collateral in a commercially reasonable manner. As you are aware we have moved our judgment to NY State and filed it in Saratoga County where you live. Remember any money we spend on legal fees going after your assets, we will make a motion to the court for you to pay those legal fees. The interest on the Judgment is over $100 per day. So why don’t you help yourself and pay down on the Judgment by helping us sell your collateral we have been Court Ordered to sell. Our attorney told us we have many options, asset depositions, wage garnishment, bank accounts, personal property, including attaching your website and selling it to the highest bidder. I hope you will help yourself and send me that write up on your collateral.

What's the starting bid Robert? :)

John Rogers Home and Business Searched by the FBI
 

Dolla dolla bill y'all

http://i.imgur.com/jJahS5D.jpg

Selling $28mil of old baseball string would be quite a feat. I'd love to hear the Joe Jackson bricks story.

Funniest thing that's not even Peter Nash, that is a look alike...I know LOL, but true.

Let's see....28 million bucks divided by 20 Bucks for each card=1,400,000. cards.

2 inches of string per card= 2,800,000 inches of string.

There are 63,360 inches in a mile or enough for 31,680 cards....but we need 1,400,000 cards

So one would need over44 miles of string to make 1,400,000 cards at 20 bucks a pop to get 28 megabucks.

Are there 44 miles of string in a hardball?

My research says there are 363 feet of string in a baseball, and 744 feet of yarn. I dunno maybe my math is off. Anyone?

On which items? The website or the collateral. The website I guess I can start it at $1.00 and see where the bidders take it. I’m sure there's a few companies or people out there that would want to bid on the website.

If Nash doesn’t give provenance or a write up on the collateral maybe I’ll sell all the collateral items in an “AS IS” auction. I can start the bidding at $1.00 and see where it goes. My problem is I hope some of the collateral I have wasn’t stolen from old lady Katherine Dooley in MA. Her attorney Jeff Roberts told me last year they considered going after Nash. He asked me, where is the Hugh Duffy bat. I told him John Rogers bought it in an “AS IS” auction along with a lot of other stuff that came from the Dooley collection, including the signed Babe Ruth mitt that came from McGreevy’s bar. Jeff Roberts, Esq. told me that Nash was allowed to take some stuff from Katherine Dooley’s house and get it appraised but they were never told what those items were. Nash never came back with an appraisal. The law firm did give me a bill of sale of 54 items Peter Nash did buy for $25,000 from Katherine Dooley plus 2 scrap books from sportswriter John Drohan, that Nash paid $1,000 for. But the bill of sale does not include the Hugh Duffy bat nor other McGreevy items like the King Kelly bat, Cap Anson Bat and the signed Babe Ruth mitt and so on. They did give me an inventory list which had the Hugh Duffy listed but the bat was not on the bill of sale. Maybe this is why Peter Nash pleaded the fifth dozens of times. The bill of sale did include the 1898 Hugh Duffy trophy but why didn’t Nash show Robert Edward auctions the bill of sale of the Hugh Duffy trophy. Instead that trophy was part of the “AS IS” sale. One of the law firm’s attorney’s was 50% executor of Kathrine Dooley’s estate. The law firm has a fiduciary responsibility to tell all the heirs what happen with the memorabilia. I wonder if the FBI was searching for the Dooley items at John Rogers properties. She died in June of 2009 so I guess the statute of limitations are good. By the way Legendary Auctions sold the 1898 Hugh Duffy trophy for $36,000. the Hugh Duffy bat and King Kelly bat are now in The National Pastime Museum. legendary Auctions sold the Cap Anson bat in August of 2012 for $53,775.

Peter Nash you should know that just a few months ago that Katherine Dooley’s law firm was deposed. The lawyer said a lot of interesting thing about you such as you returning a baseball that was missing and giving it to the attorney at Katherine Dooley’s funeral.

Seizing the website is an interesting idea. I would definitely look into wage garnishment and possibly going after any ownership interest in his music.

Robert - have you considered Nash possibly not being able to give provenance on some items unless he confessed to fraudulently making them himself? Such as taking something like an old ribbon, attaching it to an old bat, and making something completely (new) out of something old? Kind of like 1 +1 = 3?

Or it could be stolen. One interesting thing would he having your lawyer research the statute of limitations, if you knew the state the items came from. If the clock has run out then there is no 5th amendment privilege.

Lifson already went after the music Royalties and got nothing because the IRS got there first. The surprising thing is Nash’s Royalties are extremely very small less than $1,000 a year. I don’t know how Peter Nash makes money. Maybe he’s on John Rogers payroll? I don’t think he makes any money with the website because I don’t see any advertising. Maybe John Rogers pays Nash to run the website. I heard that John Rogers may have funded the Hauls of Shame website but I don’t know if that’s true. Rogers should speak for himself and not have Nash do his bidding for him on his website.

I meant seizing the actual ownership interest in the music and not just the royalties. However it is possible that he does not own any of it.

If I were owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and was getting stiffed/led on by someone who owned a website that reported on fraud and payment didn't look like it was coming any time soon, I would find out who the hosting service of the website was and see if I could start my own web site.

I would call it "(name of the person) owes me money". I would give the background story and the legal case number and then put two running counters on; one for how many dyas I had been owed money and the second for how much money I was owed.

That way, when people Googled the name of that person they would see my site. Also, if there were ways to see what other sites that hosting service had, then people would see the fraud reporting site and my site reporting what the fraud reporter owed me.

It might not get my money back but I am pretty sure I would feel better about the situation,

David

You are correct, I just want Nash to tell me which stuff is real. For instance I have a King Kelly framed photo. Nash told me this framed photo was displayed at Mike “King” Kelly’s funeral in 1894 in Boston. How does Nash know this? I had the photo checked out by 2 photo experts and told me the photo is real and told me it’s a first print meaning it’s off the original negative. But the card stock is not a normal Hastings mount, but Hastings is written on the back. Did Nash have an unmounted paper print of Mike Kelly and create this framed photo? Only Peter Nash know and so far he’s not talking. But he has a lot to say on his Hauls of Shame website. Why can’t he talk about his own stuff?

I do know that Nash once bought a damaged Imperial Cabinet photo of King Kelly for $500 on eBay. Paid someone to have it repaired and then sold it for $46,400.

Lifson tried that too. He talked to a company that bought music rights. Nash’s music rights are not worth much. Being that the IRS has a lien on it the money of the sale would go to the IRS. Maybe Peter Nash is collecting Welfare, Food Stamps and rent subsidy. I will find out soon enough through the courts.

That’s a good idea. I was thinking about writing a book and calling it “Ex- Rapper Peter Nash, Bernie Madoff of Baseball Memorabilia”.

Peter Nash, I noticed that you talk about writing a book about Barry Halper. Why did you buy so much stuff from the Halper’s auction in 1999 if you though he was so terrible? I remember you telling me you met Barry Halper and sold him stuff. You used our credit card to buy thousands of dollars’ worth of items in the auction. You told us that some of the items were being sold at bargain prices. I hope you didn’t cheat us out of the money you made from reselling the stuff, you were supposed to split the profits with us. You used up all my ink in my printer a few times staying up all night printing items from the Barry Halper’s auction. You need to get a life and forget about baseball memorabilia, it’s ruined your life.

Sunny,
Could you post photos of these item. Would like to see what they look like.

Scan_Pic0001.jpg (68.5 KB)

Peter Nash where exactly are these bricks? In your deposition you said there in South Carolina but where exactly, you need to give details.

Was the idea to dismantle the museum?? It is brick.

http://www.panoramio.com/photo/12213246

I have a better idea. Encapsulate the entire house with a plastic holder and assign it a grade.

...and then have it redone 3-4 times in hopes of a bump.

Increase your odds of bumping by giving it to Dmitri Young.

Or pristine_paper

....or Pankywitz, or whatever that guys name is. Then have problemstine sell :it!:D

The way Nash had it figured out he would take the string apart and use the thread of the string to make the cards. I guess I should have explained it better. Besides trying to con me out of my money I sometime think maybe in his delusional mind he may have believed in his crazy scheme. But of course using somebody elses money. Peter Nash is so delusional he thought the documentary movie he made “Rooters The Birth of Red Sox Nation” would make him a net profit of $600,000. In reality he lost money making the movie.

Pete you need to get a real job. I remember Bekim Laiqi telling me you’re not the same person he use to know. Angela Thomas told my wife and me that you owe Bekim Laiqi and his cousin $300,000. Did you pay them back? I heard you pawned off the collateral they had to a pawn shop. Do you have any memorabilia left? Or did you give everything to Bekim’s cousins when they paid you that unannounced visit.

Hey Pete, why haven’t you told the story about the Joe Jackson bricks on your website Hauls of Shame? What, why would you be embarrassed, the Joe Jackson house had some real merit. Oh, come on Peter just because you were embarrassed by the joke Richard Davis, from “Flip This House” played on you. Playing that joke on you with the Shoeless Joe Jackson shoes would have made great TV. You could have use the TV show to promote the bricks and made some quick money. You should have let it go, but instead for about one year you went back and forth like a fool editing the film. They got tired of your silliness and cut you out altogether and aired the show without you. I told you to leave it alone. The joke they pulled on you would have made great TV and it would have given you great provenance to promote the Joe Jackson house bricks you own. How foolish to blow an opportunity to make some real money when you needed the money badly. Just think, if you had allowed the TV show to air their way your whole life would be much different. Your pride and arrogance and stupidity have led you down the road of destruction. Where are those bricks now Peter Nash? Rob Lifson has a Court Order to attach and seize any property, personal of real, which belongs to you and the Order specifically names the “building material/bricks from Joe Jackson’s home” among many other items, including the 1880’s Radbourn Providence Silver Trophy Baseball. But you said in your deposition that John Rogers has your Radbourn Sliver Trophy Baseball because you’re working it into a business deal. So does that means John Rogers lied in his affidavit saying all of his loans to you were unsecured? Peter what happen to that signed Joe Jackson baseball that Legendary Auctions had of yours. I was told John Rogers bought it for $15,000 and as you are aware any proceeds of that ball was supposed to be sent to Rob Lifson, minus any commissions owed to Legendary Auctions. You and Rogers have a lot of explaining to do. You better tell Rogers to send that Radbourn Silver Baseball and the money for the Joe Jackson baseball to Lifson because you certainly don’t need any more legal problems. But Pete don't be delusional the bricks are not worth what you think they are, although you could have made some money with them. I certainly hope that place in South Carolina still has the bricks because you certainly need to pay down on your debt.

So Richard Davis owned the house and Pete acquired the scrap from the flip this house renovation? Then he pitches you on the email scheme with that scrap for 250k?

After I’m done working I’ll post the details. Richard Davis told me dealing with Peter Nash was a nightmare. He told me Nash is the type of guy that after you shake his hand you have to make sure some of your fingers aren’t missing.

Hey Pete please let me know what collateral I have of yours is real. What’s up with this 1912 Boston Red Sox framed team photo that you put $1,000 value on? It looks like a magazine photo that you put in an old frame. What say you? Peter where is my 1912 World Series Player Diamond Stickpin and the 1868 Albumen photo of the Brooklyn Atlantics that you stole from me and gave to Al Angelo for collateral? I have a Court Order for you to return them and I want them back immediately. Please tell Al Angelo to give them to me. I assume your aware that your prior attorney returned the 5 other items you stole from me that you gave to Al Angelo as collateral. If Mr. Angelo doesn't return the items to me I guess I'll have to file criminal charges. The last time I spoke with Al Angelo he hung up the phone on me.

Peter Nash told me he bought the Joe Jackson house for $105,000 from Dan Rawls (just the house not the real property) and right after Nash closed on the house he flipped the house to Richard Davis for a price of $130,000 and Davis moved the house and donated it to be used as the Joe Jackson museum. Nash’s deal with Richard Davis was that he got to keep a certain amount of bricks, the garage in the back yard and some other parts of the house. Nash told me he didn’t have the money to close on the house and Dan Rawls wanted to sell the house directly to Richard Davis, Nash threatened a lawsuit. I was told by Bekim Laiqi that his cousin lent $100,000 to Nash to close on the Joe Jackson house. Bekim told me his cousin took the profit and Peter was left with the Joe Jackson material/bricks.

Richard Davis pull a prank on Peter Nash and Peter fell for it all the way. Davis told Peter that there’s a rumor that Joe Jackson buried his shoes under the house for good luck when he had the house built. So Davis got an old pair of shoes and buried them under the house. When the construction crew lifted the house Nash found the shoes and went wild thinking he won the million dollar lottery. Eventually Davis told Nash it was a prank and Nash felt like a fool and was pissed off. Below is a couple of emails Richard Davis sent me.

From: "Richard C. Davis"
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 6:36 pm
Subject: Re: Joe Jackson House
To: "lkochfraser@optonline.net"

> I can probably find a copy somewhere in the office, what is your
> address? Don't know the Cox guys other than that move, I paid
> them personally to do that move, your Dumb Ass Pete seemed to
> think TV networks paid for everything, my show was real and that
> was real money that he cost me for not signing the release. I
> ought to just post the prank footage on youtube:) but I learned
> to not let the viewing public associate with people like him
> with my company or show, therefore I made sure even his shadow
> didn't make the episode.
>
> RCD

From: "Richard C. Davis"
Date: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:38 pm
Subject: Re: Joe Jackson House
To: "lkochfraser@optonline.net"

> Robert,
>
> Yes, he was a pain in the Ass and got in our way every day and
> ultimately never would sign a release so we had to cut footage
> around him so he never was on the show. …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xsd3OqKRslo

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2442326

anyone to buy a "brick"...any brick in the first place needs his head examined. what a complete idiot. I like the stories the Pete tells, but with-out a doubt Sunny, I like reading your your stories just a little more. Never stop dogging Brick Boy...I can see it now, storing bricks at his house that are probably from his backyard planter LOLOL, if he has a backyard anymore? If he does, I hope you take it. Good luck chasing your money Sunny!

There are quite a few "brick" collectors.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LONG-RECTANG...item33894fa29b
Someone had the brilliant idea to market Olympia bricks (the old Red Wing playground), after the place was demolished. They made some good money. Just saying collectible bricks can be cool. Heck I even had a brick from "hadrians wall" I picked up in England in76....sold for $500.00 jes sayin:)

Better a brick than a slab.

The Hadrian's wall brick sounds very cool.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting that Mr. Nash posts an "Editor's Note" explaining that he has been involved in lawsuits with Fraser, Lifson and REA but fails to point out that those parties have huge civil judgments against him, judgments that, I presume, are based on his fraud and therefore cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. No ax to grind there.

You are correct The Fraser’s Judgment and Lifson’s Judgment against Nash are grounded in fraud so therefore the Judgments cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Fraser’s Judgment collect 8.5% interest and Lifson’s 10%. Peter Nash has a minority interest in the McGreevy’s bar in Boston and Lifson collects all of Nash’s money from the bar which amounts to approximately $50,000 per year. It’s too bad that Nash doesn’t own more of the bar. I was told by Bekim Laiqi that Nash owed one of Bekim’s cousin’s approximately $50,000 back in 2008 so Nash sold 10% of his interest in the bar for $75,000 to pay off this debt. John Iannuzzi an FBI Agent told me it’s not wise to borrow money from the Albanians. John Iannuzzi is an FBI agent that called me a few times asking me questions about Peter Nash. This same FBI agent told me Nash is trying to save himself with this Hauls of Shame website. As an interesting note FBI agent Iannuzzi told me Peter Nash hung up the phone on him.

"John Iannuzzi an FBI Agent told me it’s not wise to borrow money from the Albanians."
Doesn't sound too politically correct for a federal agent. Downright inappropriate.:) jes sayin

Yikes...

Background.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/i-...icle-1.1126889

I probably would not quote an FBI agent on a forum, as a courtesy to the agent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quoting an agent is probably ok but I definitely wouldn't list his name.

That's what I meant. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That may be true but that’s what he said. But he didn’t mean it in a bad way. This same FBI agent wasn’t happy with Nash putting his name on his website so Nash was told to take it down. I was told by Bekim Laiqi that he and his cousins has a huge amount of memorabilia as collateral that Peter Nash gave them against money Nash borrowed from them. I was later told by somebody close to the Nash’s, Angela Thomas that Peter owed them $300,000. Let’s put it this way Bekim is a nice guy but I wouldn’t want to owe him money. As Bekim told me they don’t do lawsuits they take care of it in their own way. In early 2010 Bekim called me and asked me if I had Peter Nash’s address, I told him I do and gave it to him. They paid Nash an unannounced visit and I was told Peter Nash ended up pawning all the memorabilia to some pawnshop dealer in NY State. This pawnshop dealer is Kevin Gottlieb and has a location in Albany called Albany gold buyers 1321 Central Ave, Albany, NY and another location in Utica, NY call AAA Cash Corner. I visited Kevin Gottlieb and he’s some character. He wanted to sell me a Hugh Duffy scrap book and some frame thing relating to the 1909 Pittsburgh Pirate having a celebration at the Waldorf Astoria that had many signatures on it. When I ask to see the rest of Nash’s stuff he told me I had to put $100,000 in escrow to prove that I’m a serious buyer, so I left. Below is some information on Kevin Gottlieb. My gut feeling was Nash was trying to get the stuff back but couldn’t.

http://www.wktv.com/news/local/New-l...133699853.html

http://wibx950.com/utica-man-arreste...erlock-device/

http://www.dhr.ny.gov/sites/default/...ash_corner.PDF

Wow, what a tangled and mangled web that has been woven.

One of the many things I sued Peter Nash for was that he made a fraudulent sales receipt saying he bought the 1912 Boston Red Sox World Series Trophy, when in fact the Fraser's bought it. Then Nash used this phony receipt to borrow money from people and one of those people was Bekim's cousin. Below is an email I sent to Bekim and copied to John Rogers, FBI, etc..

Subject: Regarding your phone call about Peter Nash

Date: 11/30/10 04:54:42 PM

From: lkochfraser@optonline.net

To: "Laiqi, Bekim" <blaiqi@aol.com>
Cc: "Thomas, Angela" <angela@pranamarketing.com>, "Kozyra, Barry" <barrykozyra@kozyrahartz.com>, INFO@ROGERSARCHIVE.COM, "Iannuzzi, John M." <John.Iannuzzi@ic.fbi.gov>

Hi Bekim,

After receiving your phone call today I thought it would be best to communicate to you in writing. You told me Peter Nash read you some emails that I sent John Rogers a memorabilia dealer from North Little Rock, Arkansas that has agreed to give Peter Nash some money to defend the lawsuit that my wife, Lisa and I have filed against Peter Nash, Roxanne Nash and Nash’s previous attorney Wolfgang Heimerl.

In our conversation you made it clear that you do not want your name mentioned in the lawsuit or involved in the lawsuit. The facts are you are involved in the lawsuit; paragraph 97 refers to you and your cousin. About three weeks ago you called me telling me Peter Nash was very upset that I mentioned you and your cousin in the lawsuit. I told you I referred to you and your cousin as creditors in paragraph 97.

Earlier this year you are the one that called Angela Thomas and got her to give you my unlisted telephone number and when you called me you told me Peter Nash owed you and your cousin money and wanted to know where Peter Nash lived because Peter refused to give you his address. It didn’t surprise me that Peter owed you money he told me that you and your cousins had lent him money many time before. I remember the time when Peter paid back a loan for $35,000 in cash at your kitchen table at your parents’ house in Bedford, NY. I sat there and watch you and Peter Nash count it.

It was very shocking when you told me that your cousin believed that he owned the 1912 WS Trophy because Peter Nash had not paid him back and that your cousin had some type of legal document signed by Peter Nash and notarized proving your cousin had ownership. You told me your cousin considered suing my wife and me for the 1912 trophy. Then on another occasion you wanted us to sell it and split the proceeds with your cousin. You also told me Peter Nash was very upset that you were talking to me and you actually said Peter was “mortified”. I spent a lot of time emailing you many documents to prove that the Frasers own the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection and that the Frasers were always the owners of the Trophy and Peter Nash never had ownership in the 1912 WS Trophy/Bruce Garland Collection. The shocking thing Peter Nash did was sign a FRAUDULENT SALE AGREEMENT FOR $55,000. And then tells people that he is the owner and borrowed money against it.

After I sent you the proof that the Frasers own the 1912 WS trophy/Bruce Garland Collection you said your cousin doesn’t want to sue Peter Nash for the money but will take care of it in his own way. Obviously your cousin was scammed by Peter Nash big time but so was I. Now Peter Nash is borrowing money from some wealth memorabilia dealer in Arkansas. Maybe Peter is selling this guy the Brooklyn Bridge.

Peter Nash is a LIAR and has hurt me and my family and I will not hold back on anything. I’m sorry that you’re involved but blame that on Peter Nash. We are all victims of Peter Nash.

Regards,

Robert Fraser

That's intense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think a film about all of this would be very interesting!!

Only if it ends with Peter Nash in prison.

I think this could be part of a larger 30 for 30 about fraud in the memorabilia industry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk