![]() |
Quote:
|
Sweet baby Jesus.
|
Quote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...d18c4b41_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...9148ab43_z.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Congrat. I feel the same way. Vintage has been undervalued for so so long. We just starting to pick up a little and ppl are already claiming we're in a big bubble.
|
Quote:
My bid came in 4th place :confused::rolleyes: https://www.ebay.com/itm/1951-Bowman...torefresh=true |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seller is lucky these cards sell themselves in this feeding frenzy. |
So I’ve been selling a few of my 1950s Topps rookies to take some chips off the table. Might never get some of these back if prices continue to rise. The number of people who have reached out to me post sale on some of these cards shows me that there is still room for growth.
Anyway, can anyone explain the background of the 1951 Bowman Mays? Is that a sheet trying to hide the background, which appears to be a Midwestern barn? Seriously, what the heck is it? A green barn? Here’s the one I sold: https://photos.imageevent.com/derekg...51%20Mays1.jpg |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Here's the photo used for the card (not my photo). The background is a canvas backstop (see grommet), the barn or equipment shed serves a few purposes. It establishes depth perspective for the viewer, balances a hard vertical edge against the soft flowing canvas edge to keep your eye from exiting to the right, the dark roof-line is important to the image also as it forces your eye back to the subject matter. The shed also ties in the green of the underside of his cap with the color of the siding, the gold canvas is also tied in to the small dirt patch at the base of the shed. You can see five layers of depth. The name, the batter, the canvas, the shed, and the sky. Arguably there are 3 more subtle layers, the grommet, the patch of dirt at the base of the shed, and the peak of the roof. The blue sky is left open so the viewers eye can exit the painting. The artist also removed the shoulder patch and painted the shoulder the brightest white to guide your eyes from that spot up to Willies eyes, down his right shoulder to his hands, then up the bat to the top, then across the painting and out the blue sky patch. Interesting to note, his left shoulder sits squarely in what is known as the golden mean or golden ratio which is used in architecture and painting. IMHO, one of the most beautiful cards ever made. |
If the knuckleheads who decide who gets a plaque in Cooperstown ever get a freakin' clue, Minnie Minoso rookies will go up. But the whole rookie thing has never made much since to me.
|
Quote:
|
The Foxx RCs are good deals even now. Foxx finished his 20-year career with 534 home runs, 1,922 runs batted in, 1,751 runs scored, 2,646 hits, 458 doubles, 125 triples, 1,452 bases on balls and a .325 batting average. His 12 consecutive seasons with 30 or more home runs was a major league record until it was broken by Barry (cheater) Bonds in 2004. At the end of his career, his 534 home runs placed him second only to Ruth on the all-time list, and first among right-handed hitters. He retained these positions until Willie Mays passed Foxx for second place in 1966.
In the post-war era I think many of the regionals other than Mantle are underpriced right now. The 1954 Johnson's Aaron has already been mentioned. Pre-rookies other than DiMaggio are often relatively cheap. Look at the many Zeenuts HOFers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now let's talk Topps. 52 Mantle, great design. 52 Mays? Horrible. If you've ever seen the photo that card was based on it's a design nightmare. Dark subject on a dark background and no flow. 53 Mantle? Even better design than 52. Mays? He looks like my 13 year old son on little league picture day. Shameful. Topps for the most part had no idea what they were doing when it came to the nuance of black skin from 1952 thru 1956. They got Aaron right for the most part but if you look at their Mays and Clemente cards they printed their skin color way too dark. Missed opportunity in my opinion. |
Quote:
I’m blown away by your thorough response. I don’t know why I hadn’t noticed the background before. I always loved the look of the card, but didn’t know why. I guess the artist did his job!!! And Mays did his!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Interesting that you mentioned Paul Richards. I’ve found that his 1950s JD McCarthy postcard doesn’t conform to the typical look of other JD McCarthy postcards. Most notably, it’s the only horizontal one I’ve seen for an individual player. All other single-player postcards are oriented vertically. I wonder if there is something further that could be explored here with respect to this particular player... maybe he wanted to “be different”.
|
Quote:
https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...bsize/RUSH.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d9f4eb0f2d.jpg
Yogi has to be in the conversation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1947 Berras
2 Attachment(s)
These guys too... wish I had nicer examples.
|
From the other thread on the pre-1980 side, I agree with the thought on Jackie's true rookie card. The significance of Robinson's career can't be overstated and I think the same would be true for the first card every issued of him from a set devoted to him.
The 75th anniversary is just around the corner too. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...631be36e_w.jpg |
I still think all Hornsby cards are undervalued.
|
Some of those that people are naming are not really that cheap anymore. Bob Gibson and Frank Robinson USED to be extremely affordable. Not anymore. I think you have to look OUTSIDE of baseball now. Elway and Marino seem cheap. Some of those guys.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 AM. |